Book a demo

Precision Fermentation Oxygen Transfer Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026

Precision Fermentation Oxygen Transfer Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/precision-fermentation-oxygen-transfer-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Precision Fermentation
Precision Fermentation Oxygen Transfer: Patents Behind Mass-Transfer Engineering
  • 33.5% concentration. The top 5 assignees hold 301 of 898 records in scope — a field with a clear leader and a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants.
  • Filing growth is real, not flat. Complete-year filings rose from 29 in 2021 to 39 in 2024, a 34% increase over that three-year span.
  • Bioreactor hardware dominates the claims. 72.9% of records sit in C12M (bioreactors & enzyme apparatus), well ahead of the 58.7% in C12P fermentation process claims.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
898
Published Records
34%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+34%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (29 records) with 2024 (39) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 898 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

Precision fermentation oxygen transfer sits at the intersection of bioreactor hardware and microbial process engineering: claims here cover how gas is delivered to a culture, how bubble size and agitation speed set the volumetric mass transfer coefficient (kLa), and how dissolved oxygen is measured and controlled at scale. The search set combines fermentation-process terms with oxygen-transfer terms across C12M, C12P and C12N classifications, capturing both the reactor hardware and the strain or process claims built around it.

898 records are in scope, spanning 2015 through the partial 2026 year. Because publication trails filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years of the trend will keep filling in and should not be read as a slowdown.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1LANZATECH INC98
  2. 2LANZATECH NZ INC83
  3. 3LANZATECH NEW ZEALAND LTD50
  4. 4CALYSTA INC46
  5. 5KIVERDI INC24
  6. 6JUPENG BIO HK LTD21
  7. 7MARTEK BIOSCIENCES CORP21
  8. 8JANSSEN VACCINES & PREVENTION BV19
  9. 9CORBION BIOTECH INC15
  10. 10OPX BIOTECHNOLOGIES INC14
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Precision Fermentation Oxygen Transfer covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 898-record set: how filing activity has moved year over year, and how those records split across IPC subclasses. A record can carry more than one class, so the composition shares add up to more than 100%.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings ran from 57 in 2017 to a peak of 62 in 2019, then continued through complete-year growth of 29 (2021) to 39 (2024), a 34% rise over that span. 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete due to publication lag and understate true filing activity.

Filing trend, 2017–2026020406080572017201862201920202021202220232024202592026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

C12M bioreactor and apparatus claims lead at 72.9% of the 898 records, ahead of C12P fermentation and enzymatic synthesis claims at 58.7% and C12N microorganism/genetic engineering claims at 39.9%. Smaller but active branches include A23L foods (7.6%), C07K peptides (7.2%), B01D separation (6.8%), C12R microorganism indexing (6.5%) and A61K medicinal preparations (6.3%).

Technology composition by IPC subclassC12M · Bioreactors & enzyme apparatus65572.9%C12P · Fermentation & enzymatic synth…52758.7%C12N · Microorganisms & genetic engin…35839.9%A23L · Foods & non-alcoholic beverages687.6%C07K · Peptides & proteins657.2%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…616.8%C12R · Microorganisms (index)586.5%A61K · Medicinal preparations576.3%Other51757.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 898 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Precision Fermentation Oxygen Transfer covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Precision Fermentation Oxygen Transfer with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about precision fermentation oxygen transfer and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative and most-cited filings

Representative Filing
US11884909B22024-01-30

US11884909B2 — Cluster airlift bioreactor (Ark Biotech, 2024-01-30)

ARK BIOTECH INC.

The bioreactor uses multiple spargers arranged across a plurality of vertical circulation loops, each loop having its own sparging and return regions and its own individual mass transfer coefficient. A controller coordinates the spargers so that the cumulative mass transfer coefficient across all loops stays within a target band, effectively distributing oxygen delivery across independently tunable circulation zones rather than relying on a single mixing volume.Filed by Ark Biotech; issued January 2024.

US11884909B2 — patent drawing 1US11884909B2 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6194191B1An improved method for the production and purification of adenoviral vectors417
2WO2008151149A2Production of oil in microorganisms392
3WO1998022588A2An improved method for the production and purification of adenoviral vectors262
4US20090004715A1Glycerol Feedstock Utilization for Oil-Based Fuel Manufacturing201
5US20060286205A1Biomass hydrolysate and uses and production thereof180
6US20100330633A1Integrated System and Process for Bioproduct Production176
7US20080050770A1Method for the production and purification of adenoviral vectors166
8US6726907B1Purified adenoviral compositions122
9US20150133636A1Purification of Biological Molecules97
10US7939710B1Trophic conversion of obligate phototrophic algae through metabolic engineering94

Citation counts reward older filings that have had more time to accumulate references — read them as a signal of influence within this searched corpus, not as a ranking of current technical relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Precision Fermentation Oxygen Transfer covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data means for filing strategy

Three patterns stand out once the records are broken down by concentration, claim type and citation depth.

Concentration
33.5% / 898
top 5 share of all records

A leader plus a long tail

The leading assignee alone accounts for 98 records, and the top 5 combined hold 301 of 898 records in scope. Beyond tenth place (14 records), filing activity fragments quickly into single- and few-filing entrants, typical of a field still being staked out rather than one locked up by a handful of incumbents.

Assignee ranking, 100 companies
Hardware vs. process
72.9% vs 58.7%
C12M vs C12P share

Reactor design leads process claims

Bioreactor and apparatus claims (C12M) outpace fermentation and enzymatic synthesis claims (C12P) by a wide margin, suggesting oxygen-transfer innovation is currently concentrated more in physical reactor geometry, sparging and control than in the biological process itself.

IPC composition, 898 records
Growth signal
29 → 39
2021 to 2024 filings

Momentum is building, not fading

Complete-year filings grew 34% from 2021 to 2024. Because 2025 and 2026 are still filling in under normal publication lag, the apparent dip in the most recent years is an artefact of timing, not a real contraction in activity.

Complete-year filing trend
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to precision fermentation oxygen transfer, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Precision Fermentation Oxygen Transfer covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gate sits

The ranked leaders cluster around synthetic-biology fermentation platforms and gas-fermentation bioreactor design, with adjacent activity from algae/oil-producing microorganism developers and biologics manufacturers using fermentation-derived recombinant production.

Leader
98 records
top-ranked assignee

Gas-fermentation platforms set the pace

The leading assignee's filing volume is built around gas-to-product fermentation and associated bioreactor control, reflected in its recurring co-assignee links with allied research entities.

Assignee ranking, records basis
Runner-up cluster
24 records
fifth-place assignee

A mid-tier of specialised filers

Between the leader and the fragmented tail sits a mid-tier of assignees working single-cell protein, algal oil and recombinant biologics production, each filing steadily but well below the leader's volume.

Top 5 combined, 301 of 898
Collaboration
10 pairs
co-assignee pairs identified

Collaboration is limited and mostly internal

Co-assignee pairs are few and mostly link a company to its own subsidiary or a long-standing university research partner rather than cross-company joint filings, indicating oxygen-transfer IP here is largely built in-house.

Co-assignee pairs, strongest 5 records
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth screening
Sub-areas that show up in the composition data but sit well below the leading classes, suggesting room for a clean first claim.
Real-time kLa sensing/feedback controlMicro-bubble sparger geometryMulti-loop airlift coordinationDissolved-oxygen control for shear-sensitive strainsSeparation-integrated bioreactor design
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
LanzaTech NZ Inc0
LanzaTech Inc0-100%
Calysta Inc0
Kiverdi Inc0-100%
Introgen Therapeutics Inc0
Martek Biosciences Corp0
LANZATECH NZ INC0
Solazyme Inc0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Precision Fermentation Oxygen Transfer covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio benchmarking, or scouting for white space.

Screen the under-claimed branches

Real-time mass-transfer sensing and multi-loop reactor coordination show lighter filing density than core sparger and bioreactor claims — worth a closer freedom-to-operate check before committing to a claim strategy there.

Explore white space in Eureka

Track the leader's continuation activity

With 98 records and clear co-assignee links to affiliated entities, the leading filer's continuation and divisional pattern is worth monitoring for signs of where its claim scope is still expanding.

Monitor assignee activity in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Precision Fermentation Oxygen Transfer covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Precision Fermentation Oxygen Transfer covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Precision Fermentation Oxygen Transfer in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole precision fermentation oxygen transfer corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.