Book a demo

Process Temperature Sensors Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Process Temperature Sensors Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/process-temperature-sensors-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Industrial Sensors
Process Temperature Sensors Patents: Filing Trends and Where the Field Is Still Open
  • Filing has cooled from its 2019 peak. 251 records that year against 23 so far in the most recent (partial) year, with the last complete three-year span down 42% from 2021 to 2024.
  • No single filer dominates. The leader holds 117 records and the top 5 combined account for just 16.5% of all 2,868 records in scope — this is a long-tail field, not a concentrated one.
  • Temperature measurement overlaps heavily with diagnosis and surgery. G01K (23.0%) and A61B (19.7%) are the two largest classes, pointing to a strong crossover between industrial RTD/thermocouple design and body-worn sensing.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
2,868
Published Records
17%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-42%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (179 records) with 2024 (104) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 2,868 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this dataset covers

This landscape covers 2,868 published patent records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine industrial temperature-sensing hardware terms — resistance temperature detectors, thermocouple assemblies, sheath materials, thermowell design — with performance and reliability concepts such as response time, insulation resistance, drift under high temperature, and in-situ calibration. The scope is deliberately narrow to the intersection of sensor construction and process-grade performance claims, rather than temperature sensing in general.

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any trend understates real activity. The 2024 figures are the last that can be read as a complete filing year; 2025 and 2026 will continue to fill in as records publish.

Filing activity by year, 2017–2026
  1. 1WATLOW ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING CO117
  2. 2FRACTYL HEALTH INC103
  3. 3BIOLINQ INC93
  4. 4CIRCUIT THERAPEUTICS INC81
  5. 5EATON CUMMINS AUTOMATED TRANSMISSION TECHNOLOGIES LLC80
  6. 6ENDRESS & HAUSER GMBH & CO KG67
  7. 7ROSEMOUNT INC62
  8. 8ABBOTT DIABETES CARE INC60
  9. 9BAXTER HEALTHCARE SA54
  10. 10BAXTER INT INC54
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Process Temperature Sensors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 2,868-record dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

A 2019 peak, then a step down

Filings ran from 172 in 2017 to a peak of 251 in 2019, then declined; the last complete three-year comparison shows 179 records in 2021 falling to 104 in 2024, a 42% drop. Readers should not extend that decline into 2025-2026 — those years are still publishing.

A 2019 peak, then a step down075150225300172201720182512019202020212022202320242025232026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Sensor hardware meets medical devices

G01K (temperature measurement) leads at 23.0% of records, closely trailed by A61B (diagnosis and surgery) at 19.7% and A61M (devices for body fluids) at 9.0%. G01N (material analysis and testing) and H05B (electric heating circuits) each sit in the 5-12% band, showing that process-grade thermal sensing claims frequently sit alongside medical and material-testing filings rather than in isolation.

Sensor hardware meets medical devicesG01K · Temperature measurement66123.0%A61B · Diagnosis & surgery56519.7%G01N · Material analysis & testing34712.1%A61M · Devices for body fluids2579.0%H05B · Electric heating & lighting ci…1705.9%G06F · Electric digital data processi…1515.3%G01F · Flow, level & volume measuring1154.0%A61N · Electrotherapy & radiation the…1073.7%Other2,64792.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 2,868 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Process Temperature Sensors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Process Temperature Sensors with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about process temperature sensors and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records in this dataset

Representative Early Filing
US3759083A1973-09-18

US3759083A — Sensing element response time measuring system

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE UNITED STATES ATOMIC

A resistance temperature detector, configured as one arm of a bridge circuit, is heated by a current separate from the bridge exciting current to a temperature above its environment. The time required for the RTD to cool through a predetermined temperature range once the heating current is removed is measured to determine the sensor's response time.Filed 1973 by an agency of the US government — establishes response-time measurement via self-heating and cooling as a foundational technique still referenced in the field.

US3759083A — patent drawing 1US3759083A — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US7187960B2Apparatus and method for measuring biologic parameters1,331
2US6798341B1Network based multiple sensor and control device with temperature sensing and control627
3US20050043907A1Network based multiple sensor and control device with temperature sensing and control543
4US20090105605A1Apparatus and method for measuring biologic parameters530
5US20070258506A1Temperature sensors and methods of manufacture thereof526
6US4749416AImmersion pyrometer with protective structure for sidewall use518
7US4217463AFast responsive, high pressure thermocouple504
8US5158128AThermocouple for a continuous casting machine500
9US6296711B1Film processing system499
10US20060275933A1Thermally conductive ceramic tipped contact thermocouple493

Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Process Temperature Sensors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data means for filing strategy

Three patterns stand out once concentration, timing and class overlap are read together.

Concentration
16.5%
of 2,868 records held by top 5 assignees

Leadership is real but not dominant

The leading assignee holds 117 records and the top 5 combined reach 474, or 16.5% of all 2,868 records in scope. Tenth place holds 54. That gap between the leader and the rest suggests a field where an established base of prior art exists but no single company can block a well-drafted claim across the whole space.

Ranking covers 100 companies, the full set the data endpoint returns.
Timing
-42%
2021 to 2024 filing change

Activity has stepped down from its 2019 peak

Filings peaked at 251 in 2019 and the last complete comparison, 2021 to 2024, shows a 42% decline (179 to 104). Because publication lags filing by about 18 months, the 2025-2026 figures will rise as they fill in — the honest reading is a cooling field, not a stalled one.

2024 is the most recent year treated as complete.
Composition
23.0% / 19.7%
G01K vs A61B share of records

Industrial and medical sensing claims overlap

G01K (temperature measurement) and A61B (diagnosis and surgery) are the two largest classes in the dataset, with A61M and A61N also present in the 3-9% range. That overlap reflects shared RTD and thermocouple hardware between process instrumentation and wearable or implantable diagnostic sensors.

Class shares sum to more than 100% because records carry multiple IPC codes.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to process temperature sensors, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Co-assignee activity
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Baxter International IncBaxter Healthcare SA76
Baxter International IncCHILDERS ROBERT13
Baxter Healthcare SACHILDERS ROBERT13
Baxter International IncHOPPING PETER8
Baxter Healthcare SAHOPPING PETER8
Abbott Diabetes Care IncHAYTER GARY6
Watlow Electric Manufacturing CoSTEINHAUSER LOUIS P2
Watlow Electric Manufacturing CoPTASIENSKI KEVIN2

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in this dataset, and the strongest pairing is concentrated between two related corporate entities plus a named inventor — collaboration filing is rare in this space compared with single-assignee filing.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Process Temperature Sensors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where momentum has gone

The ranked leaders span industrial instrumentation makers and medical device companies, reflecting the G01K/A61B overlap seen in the technology composition. Recent-year momentum, however, is flat or negative across the assignees tracked here.

Leader
117
records

The top-ranked assignee sets the pace but does not dominate

At 117 records, the leading assignee sits well ahead of fifth place (80) and tenth place (54), but even combined the top 5 account for only 16.5% of all 2,868 records — leaving substantial room for challengers.

Ranking includes 100 companies total.
Momentum
0 in latest year
for several tracked assignees

Recent-year filing has slowed across the board

Several of the assignees tracked for year-over-year momentum show zero filings in the latest year, and one shows a 67% year-over-year decline. This should be read alongside the 18-month publication lag rather than as firms exiting the space outright.

Momentum reflects publication timing as much as filing decisions.
Collaboration
10 pairs
co-assignee relationships

Filing is mostly solo, not joint

Only 10 co-assignee pairs exist across the dataset, and the strongest is concentrated within one corporate family plus a named inventor. New entrants looking for partnership precedent will find little to draw on here.

Co-filing is the exception rather than the norm in this field.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth watching
Branches where filing density is comparatively thin relative to the core RTD and thermocouple claims.
In-situ calibration drift correctionThermowell vibration/fatigue designSheath material for corrosive process fluidsMulti-point sensing arrays with digital outputWireless/wearable RTD hybrid designs
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Biolinq Inc2-67%
Watlow Electric Manufacturing Co0-100%
Fractyl Health Inc0-100%
Circuit Therapeutics Inc0
Baxter International Inc0
Baxter Healthcare SA0
Eaton Cummins Automated Transmission Technologies LLC0-100%
Endress+Hauser GmbH & Co KG0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Process Temperature Sensors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a field with a step-down in filing activity, a long tail of assignees, and cross-domain overlap with medical devices. The next step depends on what decision is in front of you.

Map the white space before filing

Under-claimed branches such as in-situ calibration correction and corrosive-fluid sheath materials sit next to dense core claims on RTD and thermocouple assemblies. A freedom-to-operate check against the ranked leaders' portfolios is the first move before drafting.

Explore white space in Eureka

Watch the medical/industrial crossover

The overlap between G01K and A61B classes suggests sensor hardware originally built for process instrumentation is migrating into diagnostic and body-worn devices. Tracking assignees active in both classes gives an early read on where that crossover is heading.

Track crossover filers in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Process Temperature Sensors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about process temperature sensor patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Process Temperature Sensors covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Process Temperature Sensors in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole process temperature sensors corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.