Book a demo

Produced Water Treatment Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026

Produced Water Treatment Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/produced-water-treatment-and-reinjection-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Produced Water Treatment
Produced Water Treatment and Reinjection Patents: Who Files, What They Claim
  • Concentrated but not locked up. the top 5 assignees hold 26.4% of all 519 records in scope, and the top 10 hold 39.3% — a leader plus a long tail, not a monopoly.
  • Filing has cooled since 2024. activity peaked at 48 records that year and the 2022 midpoint (41) already sat above the 2017 start (19), so the field grew and then flattened.
  • Separation dominates the claim map. 80.7% of records sit in water/wastewater treatment (C02F) and 25.6% in separation processes (B01D), leaving drilling-adjacent and materials classes comparatively thin.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
519
Published Records
26%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+23%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
CN
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

Produced water — the water lifted alongside oil and gas — carries dispersed oil, solids, dissolved salts and bacteria that must be removed before the water can be discharged or reinjected. This landscape tracks 519 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that claim treatment methods, separation apparatus, or reinjection systems addressing that stream. The scope spans compact separation hardware, chemical and biological treatment steps, and the wellbore-side handling that determines whether reinjection stays economical as injectivity declines over time.

Reading the data as patent families rather than raw filings matters here because several of the leading assignees are large national oil companies that file continuations and parallel jurisdictions aggressively; families strip that duplication out and show where genuinely distinct inventive claims sit.

Filing activity and technology mix, 2015–2026
  1. 1CHINA PETROLEUM & CHEMICAL CORP36
  2. 2PETROCHINA CO LTD31
  3. 3CHINA NAT PETROLEUM CORP27
  4. 4HYDROZONIX LLC23
  5. 5CHANGQING ENGINEERING DESIGN CO LTD20
  6. 6SENUO TECH CO LTD18
  7. 7SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO16
  8. 8BL TECHNOLOGY INC12
  9. 9XINJIANG PETROLEUM ENG DESIGN CO LTD12
  10. 10CHIYODA CORP9
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Produced Water Treatment and Reinjection covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 519-record dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

Filings rose then flattened

Records climbed from 19 in 2017 to a peak of 48 in 2024, with the 2022 midpoint at 41 already above the 2017 starting point. The most recent year (2026) shows only 4 records, but publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so recent-year counts always understate real activity — treat 2026 as incomplete rather than as a genuine drop.

Filings rose then flattened013253850192017201820192020202120222023482024202542026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Separation and treatment lead by a wide margin

C02F (water and wastewater treatment) appears in 80.7% of the 519 records and B01D (separation processes) in 25.6%, confirming that most claims sit on the treatment and separation steps rather than upstream well hardware. E21B (earth and rock drilling) at 10.8% marks the wellbore-side minority, while B01J, C10G, B01F, C09K and B04C each sit under 3% — thinner ground where fewer claims compete for the same space.

Separation and treatment lead by a wide marginC02F · Water & wastewater treatment41980.7%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…13325.6%E21B · Earth & rock drilling (wells)5610.8%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …132.5%C10G · Hydrocarbon oils & refining112.1%B01F · Mixing & stirring81.5%C09K · Materials for misc. applicatio…81.5%B04C · Cyclone separators61.2%Other12323.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 519 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Produced Water Treatment and Reinjection covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Produced Water Treatment and Reinjection with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about produced water treatment and reinjection and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited prior art in this space

Representative Filing
CA2917959A12017-04-30

CA2917959A1 — Settling oil removal tank, system and method for produced water treatment

XINJIANG PETROLEUM ENGINEERING CO., LTD.

A settling oil removal tank with a central tubular column, water distribution chamber, oil collecting groove and bottom sludge discharge device. The central column seals at its lower end, connects to a water outlet pipe at the top, and feeds a set of water collecting pipelines with inlets along their length, with the water distribution chamber connected to route flow through the tank body.Filed by a Xinjiang oilfield engineering entity in 2017; representative of the tank-and-internals design claims common among Chinese national-oil-company filers in this dataset.

View full filing
Highest-citation records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20080156709A1Produced water treatment method and apparatus102
2US20110089013A1Apparatus of produced water treatment, system and method of using the apparatus, and method of water reuse by…75
3US5350527AOily water separation and water reclamation system75
4US4139463AMethod of and means for oily water separation60
5US20100264068A1Method of produced water treatment, method of water reuse, and systems for these methods56
6US20120037568A1Controlled method of minimizing radioactive sludge generation in post stimulation flowback and/or produced wa…45
7US20140151296A1Produced water treatment to remove organic compounds36
8WO2013129159A1随伴水の処理方法及び処理装置25
9CN106621484A沉降除油罐、采出水处理系统及处理方法24
10JP2005288373AOily water separation system24

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations — read them as a signal of influence on later filers, not as a measure of current commercial importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Produced Water Treatment and Reinjection covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data means for filing and freedom-to-operate

Three findings that shape where a new filing is likely to clear and where it will run into dense prior art.

Concentration
26.4% / 39.3%
top 5 / top 10 share of 519 records

A leader plus a long tail, not a single gatekeeper

The leading assignee holds 36 records against a fifth-place figure of 20 and a tenth-place figure of 9 — a steep drop-off rather than a plateau. That shape means freedom-to-operate work has to clear one dominant filer's claims specifically, but beyond the top 10 the field opens into single- and double-digit filers where negotiated licensing or design-around is more realistic.

Based on the 100-company ranked list, 519 records.
Momentum
48 in 2024, 41 at 2022 midpoint
peak year vs. field midpoint

Growth has flattened, not accelerated

The field grew from 19 records in 2017 to a peak of 48 in 2024, but the flat comparison between the 2022 midpoint and the peak shows the growth curve levelling rather than compounding. Several of the largest assignees show 0 filings in the latest tracked year, consistent with a maturing rather than an expanding filing wave.

Filing trend, 2017-2026 (2026 partial).
Claim density
80.7% C02F, 25.6% B01D
share of 519 records

Treatment and separation are the crowded ground

Four in five records touch water/wastewater treatment claims and a quarter touch separation-process claims, so incremental improvements to standard treatment trains face the densest prior art. Classes tied to catalysis, mixing, and cyclone separation each sit under 3% of records, marking comparatively open claim space around those mechanisms.

IPC subclass distribution, 519 records.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to produced water treatment and reinjection, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Produced Water Treatment and Reinjection covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

Filing activity clusters around national oil companies and their engineering subsidiaries, with co-assignee pairs showing internal group-level collaboration rather than cross-company partnerships.

Scale filer
36 records
leader's record count

The leading assignee files well ahead of the field

The top-ranked assignee's 36 records sit nearly double the fifth-place figure of 20, reflecting a large integrated filer with treatment claims spanning multiple subsidiaries and business units rather than a single R&D group.

Assignee ranking, 519 records.
Group filing
6 shared records
strongest co-assignee pairs

Collaboration is mostly intra-group

The strongest co-assignee pairs link a parent oil company to its own oilfield branch or research institute, each pairing appearing on 6 shared records. This points to internal technology transfer between exploration divisions and engineering design arms rather than cross-company joint filings.

10 co-assignee pairs identified across the dataset.
Momentum stall
0 in latest year
for several leading assignees

Several top filers show no recent-year activity

Multiple assignees at or near the top of the ranking, including the leading filer, show zero records in the most recent tracked year. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this understates true recent activity, but the pattern still marks a pause worth watching against the field's overall 2024 peak.

Recent-year momentum by assignee.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a first-mover filing
Sub-areas where IPC share sits well below the C02F/B01D core, suggesting claim space is comparatively open.
Bacteria control biocide dosingCompact separation skid designInjectivity decline mitigationCyclone-based deoiling (B04C)Catalytic oxidation pretreatmentReinjection economics modelling
Rank all filers by momentum →
Filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp (Sinopec)0-100%
PetroChina Co., Ltd.0
HYDROZONIX LLC0
Changqing Engineering Design Co., Ltd.0
Senuo Technology Co., Ltd.0
China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC)0
Saudi Arabian Oil Co. (Saudi Aramco)0-100%
General Electric Company0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Produced Water Treatment and Reinjection covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this next

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, licensing, or identifying open claim space.

Map freedom-to-operate against the top 10

With 39.3% of all 519 records held by the top 10 assignees, a working FTO review should start there before scanning the long tail of single- and double-digit filers.

Explore assignee claims in Eureka

Watch the 2024 peak against 2026's partial count

Filing activity peaked at 48 records in 2024; whether 2026 confirms a real slowdown or simply reflects publication lag will not be clear for another 12-18 months.

Track filing trends in Eureka

Test claim scope in the under-3% classes

Cyclone separation, mixing, and catalytic classes each sit under 3% of records, making them worth a closer novelty search before committing to the crowded C02F/B01D core.

Run a novelty search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Produced Water Treatment and Reinjection covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on produced water treatment patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Produced Water Treatment and Reinjection covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Produced Water Treatment and Reinjection in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole produced water treatment and reinjection corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.