MAP Packaging Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
A data-driven review of Modified Atmosphere Package patents covering 457 records from 2015-2026, including assignee concentration, IPC composition, filing trends and the claims that block new entrants.
Filing growth = 2021 (7 records) → 2024 (0); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 457 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.
What the Modified Atmosphere Package Patent Record Shows
Modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) sits at the intersection of packaging engineering and food preservation: altering the gas composition inside a sealed pack to extend shelf life without chemical preservatives. The 457 records in scope span 2015 through the 2026 cut-off and cluster heavily around container and packaging structure claims, with a secondary concentration in food preservation and active-packaging indicator methods. Family-level counting is used throughout so that continuation filings and multi-jurisdiction copies of the same invention are not double-counted.
Filing concentrated among a small number of established packaging and chemicals suppliers, with the leader alone accounting for 80 records — far ahead of the field. The receiving-office spread, led by the United States, Europe and WIPO PCT filings, points to a technology still filed for global commercial protection even as the annual filing count has fallen from its 2018 peak.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing Trends and Technology Composition
The following figures are drawn directly from the 457 records in scope, using patent families as the counting unit and IPC subclass as the technology dimension.
A sharp retreat from the 2018 peak
Annual filings ran from 5 records in 2017 up to a peak of 26 in 2018, then declined; the 2021-to-2024 window alone shows a -100% change. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete and should not be read as confirming a continued decline.
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.
Packaging structure dominates the classification mix
B65D (containers & packaging) appears on 60.0% of the 457 records, well ahead of A23B (food preservation, 41.6%) and A23L (foods & non-alcoholic beverages, 31.9%). B65B (packaging & wrapping, 24.5%) and B32B (layered products & laminates, 10.1%) form a second tier, while G01N (material analysis & testing, 6.1%), A21D (baking; doughs, 2.2%) and C08J (polymer processing, 2.0%) are thin enough to suggest under-filed adjacent branches.
Shares are the percentage of the 457 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Protective & Active Packaging: Modified Atmosphere Package Patent Landscape with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about protective & active packaging: modified atmosphere package patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaRepresentative Filing and Most-Cited Prior Art
Method and apparatus for inserting an oxygen scavenger into a modified atmosphere package (US20020020151A1, Pactiv)
A unique method and apparatus for inserting an oxygen scavenger into a modified atmosphere package for extending the shelf life of food, especially raw meats. A scavenger feeding means feeds a chain of interconnected oxygen scavengers. A separating means separates the oxygen scavenger located at an exposed end of the chain from the rest. An adhesive application means applies adhesive to the separated scavenger, and a conveyor means conveys it to a position adjacent to a film layer used to form an outer pack.Abstract shown as filed; apparatus and process claims are analysed separately in the chat panel below.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6050412A | Method and apparatus for packaging and shipping horticultural products including cut flowers | 167 |
| 2 | US6085930A | Controlled atmosphere package | 154 |
| 3 | US20100307116A1 | Multiple-Atmosphere, Nested Food Container | 147 |
| 4 | US20060246242A1 | Packaging articles, films and methods that promote or preserve the desirable color of meat | 136 |
| 5 | US4515266A | Modified atmosphere package and process | 121 |
| 6 | US5811142A | Modified atmosphere package for cut of raw meat | 92 |
| 7 | US6447826B1 | Packaging for meat and foodstuff | 91 |
| 8 | US6054153A | Modified atmosphere package with accelerated reduction of oxygen level in meat compartment | 76 |
| 9 | US8573392B2 | Modified atmosphere packaging for ultrasound transducer cartridge | 70 |
| 10 | US20070014953A1 | Webs with synergists that promote or preserve the desirable color of meat | 68 |
Citation counts are drawn from within this searched corpus and favour older, foundational filings; treat them as a signal of influence rather than current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the Numbers Mean for Filing Strategy
Three patterns stand out once the ranking, trend and classification data are read together.
A narrow leadership group, then a long tail
The leader alone holds 80 records, and the top five combined account for 43.5% of all 457 records in scope. Below tenth place the field opens into single- and few-filing entrants, which is where freedom-to-operate work typically finds room to move.
Annual filing has fallen from its 2018 high
Filings peaked at 26 records in 2018 and the 2021-to-2024 window — the last span that can be treated as complete given publication lag — shows a -100% change. This does not mean the underlying technology is exhausted; it means the claim space that was actively being staked has narrowed.
Structure claims outnumber material or sensing claims
Container and packaging-structure claims (B65D) appear on 60.0% of records, versus 6.1% for material analysis and testing (G01N) and 2.0% for polymer processing (C08J). The gap suggests sensing and material-science angles on MAP are comparatively under-claimed relative to structural packaging design.
Collaboration is limited and concentrated
Only ten co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and the strongest pair recurs far more often than the others, pointing to a small number of durable corporate-affiliate filing relationships rather than broad industry collaboration.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to protective & active packaging: modified atmosphere package patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Dow Global Technologies LLC | Rohm and Haas Company | 24 |
| AgroFresh Inc. | Dow Global Technologies LLC | 5 |
| AgroFresh Inc. | MIR NAZIR | 5 |
| AgroFresh Inc. | MCGEE ROBERT L | 5 |
| AgroFresh Inc. | MCCASKEY EVAN | 5 |
| AgroFresh Inc. | EDAGI FERNANDO K | 5 |
| Dow Global Technologies LLC | MIR NAZIR | 3 |
| Dow Global Technologies LLC | MCGEE ROBERT L | 3 |
Most co-assignee activity traces back to a small number of corporate-affiliate pairings rather than cross-company partnerships, consistent with a field where large suppliers file largely on their own account.
Taking This Analysis Further
The ranking, trend and classification data answer where filing has happened. The next questions are what specific claims mean for a given product design and where a new filing could actually land.
Map a specific product against the claim landscape
Run a candidate packaging design or scavenger mechanism against the most-cited records and the leader's filing footprint to see where it sits relative to existing claims.
Explore in Patsnap EurekaTrack the thinning tail of filers
The gap between the top ten and the rest of the ranked leaders is where new entrants have historically found room; monitoring that tail flags emerging competitors before they scale.
Explore in Patsnap EurekaWatch the under-claimed IPC branches
G01N-classed material analysis and testing and C08J-classed polymer processing sit well below the packaging-structure classes in filing density, and are worth monitoring for early activity.
Explore in Patsnap EurekaCommon Questions on Modified Atmosphere Package Patents
The assignee ranking covers 100 companies counted by patent family, and it is heavily front-loaded: the leader alone holds 80 of the 457 records in scope, and the top five combined account for 43.5% of all records. Below the top ten, which together hold 62.6%, the field spreads into a long tail of companies with only one or a few filings each. This shape means a freedom-to-operate review should focus first on the leading handful of assignees rather than treating the field as evenly distributed.
Annual filings rose to a peak of 26 records in 2018 and have declined since, with the 2021-to-2024 span — the most recent period that can be treated as complete — showing a -100% change. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the 2025 and 2026 counts in the dataset are still incomplete and should not be read as proof the decline continues. Overall the trend points to a technology whose core claim space was staked out earlier in the period covered.
Container and packaging-structure claims classified under B65D appear on 60.0% of the 457 records, making it the dominant classification. Food preservation methods (A23B, 41.6%) and food and beverage applications (A23L, 31.9%) form the next tier, with packaging and wrapping processes (B65B, 24.5%) also well represented. Material analysis and testing (G01N) and polymer processing (C08J) each cover only a small share, suggesting the sensing and materials side of the field is comparatively open.
US20020020151A1, assigned to Pactiv, claims a method and apparatus for inserting an oxygen scavenger into a modified atmosphere package, including the scavenger feeding, separating, adhesive-application and conveyor mechanisms used to attach a scavenger to an outer film layer. It is a mechanism-and-process patent, not a broad claim over oxygen scavengers or MAP generally, so it is most relevant to anyone designing an automated in-line scavenger-insertion system rather than to MAP packaging or scavenger chemistry as a whole. A design that inserts scavengers by a materially different mechanical route, or that pre-integrates the scavenger into the film rather than attaching it in-line, sits outside its specific claim scope.
The classification data shows structural packaging claims (B65D) far outweighing material analysis and testing (G01N, 6.1%) and polymer processing (C08J, 2.0%), which points to sensing, indicator and advanced-material angles as comparatively under-claimed relative to packaging structure itself. The long tail below the top ten assignees, who hold 62.6% of the 457 records between them, also indicates room for new entrants outside the leading group. Co-filing is limited to ten identified pairs, so there is little evidence of crowded joint-venture activity blocking a solo filer from entering these adjacent branches.
Research Protective & Active Packaging: Modified Atmosphere Package Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole protective & active packaging: modified atmosphere package patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.