Book a demo

Protective Packaging Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026

Protective Packaging Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/protective-and-cushioning-packaging-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Packaging Technology
Protective and Cushioning Packaging Patents
  • Filing peaked in 2023 at 11 records then pulled back, after climbing from just 4 filings in 2017 — a mature claim space rather than one still accelerating.
  • Containers and polymer processing dominate B65D (93 records) and C08J (57 records) hold most of the claim density; additive and process subclasses sit far thinner.
  • Several leading assignees show zero recent filings suggesting established foam-chemistry positions are being held, not extended — an opening for structural approaches like molded pulp.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
153
Published Records
30%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-38%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape draws on 153 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026, covering protective packaging, cushioning materials and shock-absorbing packaging as claimed under drop test, compression set, expanded foam, molded pulp and transport vibration search terms within B65D81, C08J9 and B65D5. It spans both the physical container/packaging claims and the underlying polymer chemistry that gives cushioning materials their shock-absorbing properties.

Filing activity climbed unevenly from 2017 through a 2023 peak of 11 records, and the receiving-office split shows the United States, Japan and Europe as the three jurisdictions carrying most of the filing volume, with WIPO PCT, Australia and Canada trailing well behind.

Filing volume and IPC composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1SANYO CHEM IND LTD11
  2. 2DOW CHEM GR10
  3. 3LIFOAM IND9
  4. 4THE DOW CHEM CO9
  5. 5HITACHI ELECTRONICS SERVICES7
  6. 6THE GREAT WESTERN PACKAGING7
  7. 7PREGIS INNOVATIVE PACKAGING INC7
  8. 8ASAHI KASEI KOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA7
  9. 9NIPPON SHOKUBAI CO LTD6
  10. 10SMITH LTD6
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Protective and Cushioning Packaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Filing Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Filings in this dataset run from 2015 through the 2026 partial year, with publication lag meaning the most recent one or two years will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be.

A peak in 2023, then a pullback

Annual filings rose from 4 in 2017 to a peak of 11 in 2023, passing through 3 at the 2022 midpoint. The count has not returned to peak since, and 2026 shows 0 so far — consistent with a partial year rather than a stopped technology.

A peak in 2023, then a pullback03691242017201820192020202120221120232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Containers and polymer processing dominate

B65D (containers & packaging) leads with 93 records, followed by C08J (polymer processing & solutions) at 57. Layered products, plastics shaping and polymer additive subclasses each sit well below that, showing where claim density thins out.

Containers and polymer processing dominateB65D · Containers & packaging9360.8%C08J · Polymer processing & solutions5737.3%C08G · Condensation polymers2617.0%B29C · Shaping of plastics1811.8%B32B · Layered products & laminates1811.8%C08L · Polymer compositions1711.1%B65B · Packaging & wrapping117.2%C08K · Use of additives in polymers117.2%Other6039.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 153 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Protective and Cushioning Packaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Protective and Cushioning Packaging with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about protective and cushioning packaging and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Filings

Representative and most-cited filings

Representative Filing
US20240278971A12024-08-22

Molded pulp cushioning material (US20240278971A1)

SONY INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT INC.

A molded pulp cushioning material designed to fit an accommodation object with defined outer surfaces, using first and second walls carrying protruding support portions arranged in specific directional patterns, with a set spacing between adjacent protrusions to secure the object during transport.Filed by Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc., published 2024-08-22 — illustrates the structural, geometry-based claiming style now common in molded pulp cushioning.

US20240278971A1 — patent drawing 1US20240278971A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5755082AManufacturing equipment for cushioning material85
2US4773534APrinted circuit board transporter50
3US20020052425A1Polyurethane foam, process for producing the same, and foam forming composition43
4CN1251596A聚氨酯泡沫体及其制法和泡沫体形成用组合物40
5WO1998044016A1Polyurethane foam, process for producing the same, and foam forming composition29
6US20070138047A1Tray for protective packaging28
7EP1382435A1Molded product for cushioning material, and production process and recovery thereof28
8US5993953ALaminated paper for cushioning material28
9EP0217516A2Expandable polyvinyl (idene) aromatic particles, process for preparing them and molded articles produced ther…28
10US20150033669A1Multilayer film with enhanced interlayer adhesion26

Citation counts favor older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate references within this corpus; treat them as a measure of historical influence, not present-day relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Protective and Cushioning Packaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signals

What the filing pattern signals

Reading the numbers together — not just individually — points to where the space is settled and where it is still open.

Filing momentum
11 in 2023
peak year

Growth has flattened since the peak

Filings rose from 4 in 2017 to a peak of 11 in 2023, passing through only 3 at the 2022 midpoint. The 2026 count of 0 reflects a partial year and publication lag rather than a sudden stop, but the underlying trend before that was already flat.

153 published records, 2015–2026
Claim concentration
93 records
B65D subclass

Containers and packaging carry most of the claim weight

B65D accounts for 93 of the 153 records, with C08J polymer processing next at 57. The remaining subclasses — B29C, B32B, C08L, C08G, B65B, C08K — each sit well below a fifth of the leading subclass's count.

IPC composition across 8 subclasses
Citation influence
85 citations
top-cited record

Older foam and equipment filings anchor the citation graph

US5755082A, a cushioning-material manufacturing equipment filing, holds the highest citation count at 85, with foam-forming composition filings from the early 2000s close behind. High citation counts here reflect age and influence within the corpus, not current relevance.

Top 5 cited records range from 29 to 85 citations
Collaboration pattern
10 pairs
co-assignee pairs

Collaboration is limited and mostly single-instance

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and just one pair — a chemical group and its affiliate — files together with any regularity. Most collaboration in this space is one-off rather than a sustained joint program.

Strongest pair: 9 shared records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to protective and cushioning packaging, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Protective and Cushioning Packaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Assignees

Who is filing, and where the activity has cooled

The assignee base mixes large chemical groups, specialist packaging manufacturers and individual filers, but recent-year momentum data shows several previously active names now filing nothing.

Legacy chemical holders
0 in latest year
recent momentum

Foam-chemistry positions look held, not extended

Assignees with strong historical foam and polyurethane composition filings — including major chemical groups — show zero filings in the most recent tracked year, consistent with mature, defended positions rather than active expansion.

Recent-year momentum data across leading assignees
Structural claimants
93 records
B65D subclass

Container and structural geometry claims lead by volume

The largest single IPC subclass, B65D, covers container and packaging structure claims — the category the representative 2024 molded pulp filing sits within, alongside a long tail of single-filing entrants.

153 total records, B65D at 93
Thin collaboration network
10 pairs
co-assignee pairs

Most filers work alone

Only 10 co-assignee pairs exist across the dataset, and nearly all involve a single shared filing. Joint filing is not a common strategy in this space, which means licensing and cross-filing activity should not be assumed from the data.

Strongest pair shares 9 records
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These sit in the thinner IPC branches relative to the dominant container and foam-processing subclasses.
additive-modified foam matrices (C08K)transport-vibration wrapping processes (B65B)layered/laminate cushioning structures (B32B)non-foam plastics shaping for cushioning (B29C)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
SMITH LTD0
Sanyo Chemical Industries, Ltd.0
Dow Chemical Company0
Liffon Industrial Co., Ltd.0
DOW CHEM GR0
Pregis Innovative Packaging LLC0
Asahi Kasei Corporation0
Hitachi Electronics Services Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Protective and Cushioning Packaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The filing data points to specific next questions rather than a single conclusion.

Check freedom-to-operate against structural claims

Molded pulp and container-geometry claims under B65D carry the highest record count. Any new structural cushioning design should be checked against this subclass first, not just against the historically cited foam patents.

Run a clearance search in Eureka

Evaluate the additive and process white space

C08K and B65B are the thinnest subclasses in this dataset relative to B65D and C08J. A first filing combining a specific additive package with a defined wrapping or vibration-damping process step has comparatively open claim space.

Explore white space in Eureka

Track dormant legacy holders

Several assignees with strong historical filing counts show zero activity in the latest tracked year. Confirming whether those positions are being maintained, licensed out, or allowed to lapse changes the risk calculus for new entrants.

Monitor assignee activity in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Protective and Cushioning Packaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Protective and Cushioning Packaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Protective and Cushioning Packaging in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole protective and cushioning packaging corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.