Protective Packaging Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
- Filing peaked in 2023 at 11 records then pulled back, after climbing from just 4 filings in 2017 — a mature claim space rather than one still accelerating.
- Containers and polymer processing dominate B65D (93 records) and C08J (57 records) hold most of the claim density; additive and process subclasses sit far thinner.
- Several leading assignees show zero recent filings suggesting established foam-chemistry positions are being held, not extended — an opening for structural approaches like molded pulp.
What this landscape covers
This landscape draws on 153 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026, covering protective packaging, cushioning materials and shock-absorbing packaging as claimed under drop test, compression set, expanded foam, molded pulp and transport vibration search terms within B65D81, C08J9 and B65D5. It spans both the physical container/packaging claims and the underlying polymer chemistry that gives cushioning materials their shock-absorbing properties.
Filing activity climbed unevenly from 2017 through a 2023 peak of 11 records, and the receiving-office split shows the United States, Japan and Europe as the three jurisdictions carrying most of the filing volume, with WIPO PCT, Australia and Canada trailing well behind.
Filing trends and technology composition
Filings in this dataset run from 2015 through the 2026 partial year, with publication lag meaning the most recent one or two years will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be.
A peak in 2023, then a pullback
Annual filings rose from 4 in 2017 to a peak of 11 in 2023, passing through 3 at the 2022 midpoint. The count has not returned to peak since, and 2026 shows 0 so far — consistent with a partial year rather than a stopped technology.
Containers and polymer processing dominate
B65D (containers & packaging) leads with 93 records, followed by C08J (polymer processing & solutions) at 57. Layered products, plastics shaping and polymer additive subclasses each sit well below that, showing where claim density thins out.
Shares are the percentage of the 153 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Protective and Cushioning Packaging with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about protective and cushioning packaging and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaRepresentative and most-cited filings
Molded pulp cushioning material (US20240278971A1)
A molded pulp cushioning material designed to fit an accommodation object with defined outer surfaces, using first and second walls carrying protruding support portions arranged in specific directional patterns, with a set spacing between adjacent protrusions to secure the object during transport.Filed by Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc., published 2024-08-22 — illustrates the structural, geometry-based claiming style now common in molded pulp cushioning.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5755082A | Manufacturing equipment for cushioning material | 85 |
| 2 | US4773534A | Printed circuit board transporter | 50 |
| 3 | US20020052425A1 | Polyurethane foam, process for producing the same, and foam forming composition | 43 |
| 4 | CN1251596A | 聚氨酯泡沫体及其制法和泡沫体形成用组合物 | 40 |
| 5 | WO1998044016A1 | Polyurethane foam, process for producing the same, and foam forming composition | 29 |
| 6 | US20070138047A1 | Tray for protective packaging | 28 |
| 7 | EP1382435A1 | Molded product for cushioning material, and production process and recovery thereof | 28 |
| 8 | US5993953A | Laminated paper for cushioning material | 28 |
| 9 | EP0217516A2 | Expandable polyvinyl (idene) aromatic particles, process for preparing them and molded articles produced ther… | 28 |
| 10 | US20150033669A1 | Multilayer film with enhanced interlayer adhesion | 26 |
Citation counts favor older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate references within this corpus; treat them as a measure of historical influence, not present-day relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the filing pattern signals
Reading the numbers together — not just individually — points to where the space is settled and where it is still open.
Growth has flattened since the peak
Filings rose from 4 in 2017 to a peak of 11 in 2023, passing through only 3 at the 2022 midpoint. The 2026 count of 0 reflects a partial year and publication lag rather than a sudden stop, but the underlying trend before that was already flat.
Containers and packaging carry most of the claim weight
B65D accounts for 93 of the 153 records, with C08J polymer processing next at 57. The remaining subclasses — B29C, B32B, C08L, C08G, B65B, C08K — each sit well below a fifth of the leading subclass's count.
Older foam and equipment filings anchor the citation graph
US5755082A, a cushioning-material manufacturing equipment filing, holds the highest citation count at 85, with foam-forming composition filings from the early 2000s close behind. High citation counts here reflect age and influence within the corpus, not current relevance.
Collaboration is limited and mostly single-instance
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and just one pair — a chemical group and its affiliate — files together with any regularity. Most collaboration in this space is one-off rather than a sustained joint program.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to protective and cushioning packaging, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the activity has cooled
The assignee base mixes large chemical groups, specialist packaging manufacturers and individual filers, but recent-year momentum data shows several previously active names now filing nothing.
Foam-chemistry positions look held, not extended
Assignees with strong historical foam and polyurethane composition filings — including major chemical groups — show zero filings in the most recent tracked year, consistent with mature, defended positions rather than active expansion.
Container and structural geometry claims lead by volume
The largest single IPC subclass, B65D, covers container and packaging structure claims — the category the representative 2024 molded pulp filing sits within, alongside a long tail of single-filing entrants.
Most filers work alone
Only 10 co-assignee pairs exist across the dataset, and nearly all involve a single shared filing. Joint filing is not a common strategy in this space, which means licensing and cross-filing activity should not be assumed from the data.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| SMITH LTD | 0 | — |
| Sanyo Chemical Industries, Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Dow Chemical Company | 0 | — |
| Liffon Industrial Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| DOW CHEM GR | 0 | — |
| Pregis Innovative Packaging LLC | 0 | — |
| Asahi Kasei Corporation | 0 | — |
| Hitachi Electronics Services Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The filing data points to specific next questions rather than a single conclusion.
Check freedom-to-operate against structural claims
Molded pulp and container-geometry claims under B65D carry the highest record count. Any new structural cushioning design should be checked against this subclass first, not just against the historically cited foam patents.
Run a clearance search in EurekaEvaluate the additive and process white space
C08K and B65B are the thinnest subclasses in this dataset relative to B65D and C08J. A first filing combining a specific additive package with a defined wrapping or vibration-damping process step has comparatively open claim space.
Explore white space in EurekaTrack dormant legacy holders
Several assignees with strong historical filing counts show zero activity in the latest tracked year. Confirming whether those positions are being maintained, licensed out, or allowed to lapse changes the risk calculus for new entrants.
Monitor assignee activity in EurekaCommon questions about this landscape
Filing activity in this dataset is spread across a mix of chemical groups and specialist packaging firms rather than concentrated in one or two dominant holders. Several assignees show meaningful historical filing counts but zero activity in the most recent tracked year, which points to established positions being held rather than actively extended. Reviewing the full assignee ranking alongside recent-year momentum gives a clearer picture than any single company name, since leadership by cumulative count and leadership by current activity are not the same thing here.
Molded pulp cushioning claims, exemplified by the representative 2024 Sony Interactive Entertainment filing, tend to protect structural geometry — wall shapes, protruding support portions, and how they fit around an object. Expanded foam claims, which dominate the oldest and most-cited records in this dataset, tend to protect the chemistry and manufacturing process behind the foam-forming composition itself. Because the two routes claim different things — structure versus formulation — a product can sometimes combine both without infringing either, provided neither the geometry nor the chemistry map directly onto an existing claim.
The dataset shows filings climbing from 4 in 2017 to a peak of 11 in 2023, then falling off, with 2026 showing 0 filings so far. Part of that recent drop is a data artefact: patent publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so 2025 and 2026 will read as sparser than they eventually turn out to be once those filings publish. The genuine signal is that growth was not accelerating going into the peak — the 2022 midpoint of 3 filings suggests the 2023 peak was a single strong year rather than the top of a sustained climb.
The thinnest IPC branches in this dataset are C08K (polymer additives, 11 records) and B65B (packaging and wrapping process, 11 records), both far behind the 93 records under B65D and 57 under C08J. That gap suggests filing that combines a specific additive package with a defined wrapping or transport-vibration process step has not been heavily claimed yet. Recent-year momentum data showing zero activity from several previously active assignees reinforces that some of this space has been vacated rather than fully occupied.
Among receiving offices in this dataset, the United States leads with 40 filings, followed by Japan at 35 and the European Patent Office at 30. WIPO/PCT filings sit lower at 9, with Australia and Canada each in single digits. That distribution suggests the US, Japan and Europe are the primary markets to clear before commercializing a new cushioning design, with PCT filings serving as the route into secondary markets.
Research Protective and Cushioning Packaging in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole protective and cushioning packaging corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.