Book a demo

Prussian Blue Analogue Cathode Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026

Prussian Blue Analogue Cathode Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/prussian-blue-analogue-cathode-materials-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Batteries & Energy Storage
Prussian Blue Analogue Cathode Material Patents
  • Filing peaked in 2023 at 27 families, then eased back toward the 2022 level — this is a maturing filing wave, not one still accelerating.
  • China accounts for 87 of the tracked filings, against single digits from the US, Europe, Korea and India combined, so most claim scope sits under Chinese examination practice.
  • Momentum has gone flat at the top, with several previously active assignees showing zero filings in the latest year and one falling -100% YoY.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
114
Published Records
18%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+340%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (5 records) with 2024 (22) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 114 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the filing record shows

Prussian blue analogue (PBA) cathodes — nickel hexacyanoferrate and related hexacyanoferrate chemistries — sit at the intersection of sodium-ion battery development and low-cost, cobalt-free cathode design. The dataset tracks 114 patent families filed between 2015 and the 2026 cut-off, concentrated in claims touching vacancy defects, crystal water content, coprecipitation synthesis, rate capability and structural stability. Filing activity was negligible before 2017, built steadily through the early 2020s, and peaked in 2023 at 27 families before the midpoint-to-latest-year trend turned flat or declining.

Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the apparent slowdown in the most recent year is partly an artefact of the data cut-off rather than a confirmed drop in activity. Even so, the shape of the curve — a sharp climb followed by a plateau — points to a technology area where the core coprecipitation and defect-control claims are now well populated, and where new entrants need to differentiate rather than restate.

Annual filings, 2017-2026
  1. 1NATRON (ASSIGNMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF CREDITORS) LLC5
  2. 2ALTRIS AB4
  3. 3ALVEO ENERGY INC4
  4. 4CONTEMPORARY AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY (HONG KONG) LIMITED4
  5. 5WUYI UNIV4
  6. 6NORTHVOLT AB4
  7. 7WENZHOU NATECH NEW ENERGY TECH CO LTD3
  8. 8Hongxing (Shanxi) New Energy Materials Co., Ltd.3
  9. 9LIAONING STARRY SKY SODIUM BATTERY CO LTD3
  10. 10SOUTHEAST UNIV3
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Prussian Blue Analogue Cathode Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
Data

Filing trend and technology composition

The two views below separate when filings happened from what they actually claim, which matters for a chemistry that spans battery, cyanide-compound and nanotechnology classifications.

Annual filing trend

Filings rose from zero in 2017 to a peak of 27 in 2023, with 2022 sitting at the midpoint of 13 — the growth phase has flattened rather than continued to accelerate into the most recent, still-incomplete year.

Annual filing trend081523300201720182019202020212022272023202427202532026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass distribution

H01M (batteries, cells & fuel cells) dominates at 108 of 114 records, with C01C (cyanides and nitrogen compounds) a distant but substantial second at 67, confirming that most filings are battery-application claims built on hexacyanoferrate chemistry rather than pure inorganic-chemistry claims. Smaller pockets in B82Y (nanotechnology), C01B, C01G, H01G, C02F and C23C mark adjacent framing — particle-scale morphology, capacitor use and coating routes — that sit outside the core battery claim set.

IPC subclass distributionH01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells10894.7%C01C · Ammonia, cyanides & nitrogen c…6758.8%B82Y · Nanotechnology applications1210.5%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…97.9%C01G · Compounds of other metals65.3%H01G · Capacitors43.5%C02F · Water & wastewater treatment32.6%C23C · Coating & surface deposition32.6%Other119.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 114 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Prussian Blue Analogue Cathode Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Prussian Blue Analogue Cathode Materials with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about prussian blue analogue cathode materials and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative and most-cited filings

Representative recent filing
WO2024168546A12024-08-22

WO2024168546A1 — Prussian blue-analogue nanoscale cathode material and preparation method

SHENZHEN INSTITUTES OF ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY

The filing claims a Prussian blue analogue nanoscale cathode material with general formula NaxMy[Fe(CN)6]z, where M is a transition metal and 0<x<2, 0<y<1, 0<z<1, produced as particles with diameter below 60nm for use in sodium-ion batteries. The application states the sub-60nm particle scale improves sodium diffusion rate, sodium storage capacity and rate performance, and describes a preparation method claimed to give high yield suitable for industrial-scale production.Filed by Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, published 2024-08-22.

WO2024168546A1 — patent drawing 1WO2024168546A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20140220392A1Prussian Blue Analogue Anodes for Aqueous Electrolyte Batteries44
2US20140127560A1Stabilization of battery electrodes using prussian blue analogue coatings33
3CN105990567A一种类普鲁士蓝纳米材料的制备方法及其在钠离子电池中的应用24
4US20140127592A1Stabilization of battery electrodes using polymer coatings21
5CN115207316A一种普鲁士蓝类似物正极材料的制备方法及应用17
6CN110767906A一类基于吩嗪负极材料的可充水系离子电池及其制备方法15
7CN112694104A一种普鲁士蓝类似物及其制备方法、负极材料和应用13
8CN114620758A一种氧化铜修饰铁基普鲁士蓝正极材料的制备方法11
9CN110391407A一种核壳结构的动力电池正极材料及其制备方法和用途11
10WO2024168546A1一种类普鲁士蓝纳米正极材料及其制备方法和钠离子电池8

Citation counts accumulate over time and favour older US filings in this corpus; treat them as a measure of historical influence on the field, not of which claims are most relevant to file around today.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Prussian Blue Analogue Cathode Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

Reading the filing pattern

Three patterns in the data matter more than the raw counts: where claims concentrate, how citation weight is distributed, and what the co-filing map says about how this space is organised.

Composition
108 of 114
records classified under H01M

Battery-application claims dominate

Almost every record in this dataset is framed as a battery-application claim rather than a standalone inorganic-chemistry claim, and 67 records also carry a C01C cyanide-compound classification — meaning most filers are claiming the hexacyanoferrate chemistry and its battery use together, not separately.

IPC composition, 114 families
Geography
87 of ~111
filings routed through China

Filing scope concentrates in one office

China's receiving-office count dwarfs WIPO, US, EPO, India and Korea combined, which means the enforceable claim language most filers actually rely on has been shaped and examined under Chinese practice rather than under US or EPO precedent.

Receiving office counts
Momentum
-100% YoY
at a previously active filer

Activity has gone quiet at the top

Several assignees that filed in prior years — including one with a full year-on-year drop — show zero filings in the latest tracked year. Combined with the post-2023 plateau in the trend line, this points to a first filing wave that has largely run its course rather than one still building.

Recent-year assignee momentum
Citations
44 citations
on the top-cited record

Citation weight sits with early US filings

The most-cited records in this corpus are older US applications from the mid-2010s; more recent Chinese filings, including the highly specific sodium-ion cathode claims from 2022 onward, have not yet accumulated comparable citation counts simply because they are younger.

Most-cited records table
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to prussian blue analogue cathode materials, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Prussian Blue Analogue Cathode Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The assignee set includes established battery manufacturers, university labs and specialist sodium-ion startups, with only two documented co-assignee pairs — suggesting most work here is still done in-house rather than through joint filing.

Startups & specialists
2 co-assignee pairs
documented in the dataset

Sodium-ion specialists filing in narrow pairs

Northvolt and Altris appear as a co-assignee pair, alongside a university-institute pairing between Zhengzhou University and a Wuhan marine-propulsion research institute — evidence of a small number of targeted collaborations rather than a broad partnership network.

Co-assignee pairs, n=2
Momentum leaders
1 filing
in the latest year, at two assignees

No assignee is currently scaling filings

The most active assignees in the latest tracked year — a Liaoning sodium-battery specialist and Zhengzhou University — each show only a single filing, and one of those is down 50% year-on-year. No assignee in this dataset is currently increasing its filing rate.

Recent-year momentum
Established filers gone quiet
0 in latest year
at Northvolt, CATL and others

Larger names have paused rather than withdrawn

Northvolt, CATL and Wuyi University all show zero filings in the latest year despite earlier activity. Given the ~18-month publication lag, this may understate work already filed but not yet published rather than confirm a strategic exit.

Recent-year assignee momentum
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These branches show low filing density relative to the core coprecipitation and defect-control claims — worth a freedom-to-operate check rather than an assumption of open space.
vacancy-defect quantification methodscrystal-water content controlcapacitor-format hexacyanoferrate electrodes (H01G overlap)wastewater-derived precursor routes (C02F overlap)surface coating deposition (C23C overlap)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Liaoning Xingkong Sodium Battery Co., Ltd.1-50%
Zhengzhou University1
Aierwei'ou Energy Co., Ltd.0
Northvolt0-100%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd. (CATL)0
Wuyi University0
Hongxing (Shanxi) New Energy Materials Co., Ltd.0
Wenzhou Nashu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Prussian Blue Analogue Cathode Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this

The filing plateau and China-concentrated scope mean the next moves are about precision — checking specific claim language and adjacent branches — rather than a broad landscape re-scan.

Check freedom-to-operate on defect and water-content claims

Vacancy-defect control and crystal-water management are the two technical-detail search terms that pull this dataset together; run a targeted claim-scope check on both before committing to a coprecipitation process design.

Run a claim search in Eureka

Track the assignees that have gone quiet

Several previously active filers show zero activity in the latest year; given publication lag, monitor them for filings that may surface over the next 12-18 months rather than assuming they have exited.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka

Map the capacitor and coating overlaps

Small but real filing counts in H01G and C23C suggest PBA chemistry is being explored outside the core battery-cathode use case; a focused search there may surface less-crowded claim space.

Explore adjacent IPC classes in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Prussian Blue Analogue Cathode Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Prussian Blue Analogue Cathode Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Prussian Blue Analogue Cathode Materials in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole prussian blue analogue cathode materials corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.