Book a demo

PS-PVD Technology Landscape 2026 — PatSnap Eureka

PS-PVD Technology Landscape 2026 — PatSnap Eureka
Explore in Eureka
2026 Patent Landscape

Plasma Spray Physical Vapor Deposition Technology Landscape 2026

PS-PVD bridges conventional PVD and thermal spray by vaporizing oxide ceramics at chamber pressures of 50–500 Pa with plasma gun powers exceeding 50 kW. The process produces columnar, strain-tolerant coatings at deposition rates surpassing EB-PVD, with non-line-of-sight coverage of complex geometries.

50–500 Pa
PS-PVD operating pressure range
Explore in Eureka
>6,000 K
Plasma jet temperature enabling feedstock vaporization
Explore in Eureka
1998–2026
Publication and filing timeline in this dataset
Explore in Eureka
7
Named active assignees in PS-PVD and adjacent VLPPS technologies in this dataset
Explore in Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··9 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka Data
Technology Overview

PS-PVD: Bridging Thermal Spray and Vapor Deposition for Gas Turbine Coatings

PS-PVD operates at chamber pressures of 50–500 Pa — far below the 5,000–8,000 Pa range of conventional low-pressure plasma spray — with plasma gun powers typically exceeding 50 kW. Plasma jets expand to lengths up to 2,000 mm and diameters of 150–200 mm, with temperatures exceeding 6,000 K, enabling full vaporization of yttria-stabilized zirconia and other oxide ceramics.

Within the broader Very Low Pressure Plasma Spray (VLPPS) family, PS-PVD is distinguished by substantially higher plasma power and lower operating pressure than legacy LPPS/VPS processes. Coatings can be deposited from molten droplets, vapor phase, or a mixture, at deposition rates roughly an order of magnitude higher than conventional PVD, as documented in the foundational 2011 VLPPS review.

PS-PVD Patent Assignees by Filing Count (Dataset Snapshot)
PS-PVD Patent Assignees by Filing Count: Rolls-Royce Corporation 4, GE Infrastructure Technology 2, Sulzer Metco AG 2, Sichuan Hangda New Materials 1, Oerlikon Metco AG 1Horizontal bar chart showing filing counts per named PS-PVD assignee in this dataset. Source: PatSnap Eureka retrieved records.Rolls-Royce Corporation4GE Infrastructure Technology2Sulzer Metco AG2Sichuan Hangda New Materials1Oerlikon Metco AG1↗ Click bars to explore

The core application domain is gas turbine thermal barrier coatings, where columnar YSZ structures provide strain tolerance during thermal cycling on turbine blades, vanes, and combustor liners. Environmental barrier coatings on SiC-SiC ceramic matrix composites represent the second major application cluster, with Rolls-Royce Corporation holding a concentrated active patent portfolio covering internal-cavity EBC deposition.

The innovation timeline in this dataset spans 1998 to early 2026, with identifiable clusters from foundational apparatus patents through process science development to recent AI-driven process monitoring. In retrieved records, US and European assignees account for the majority of direct PS-PVD filings, with China entering via a 2022 CN active patent from Sichuan Hangda New Materials, Inc.

PatSnap Eureka Filing counts derived from named assignee records retrieved across targeted PS-PVD and VLPPS patent searches in PatSnap Eureka; this dataset is not a comprehensive industry census.Explore the data ↗
Data Analysis

Filing Trends and Technology Cluster Distribution in PS-PVD

Patent and literature evidence in this dataset spans three distinct phases: a foundational period (1998–2011) establishing process concepts, a development phase (2012–2018) focused on characterization and EBC applications, and a consolidation phase (2019–2026) marked by active commercial filings and AI-driven process management.

PS-PVD Technology Cluster Distribution by Patent/Literature Count (Dataset Snapshot)

In this dataset, the vapor-phase TBC deposition cluster accounts for the largest share of records, followed by EBC/CMC applications and VLPPS reactive variants, reflecting the dominance of gas turbine coating use cases among retrieved records.

PS-PVD Technology Cluster Distribution: TBC Vapor-Phase 7, EBC/CMC PS-PVD 4, VLPPS Reactive Variants 3, Process Modeling and Diagnostics 3, TBC Benchmarking 3Horizontal bar chart showing record counts per technology cluster in this dataset. Source: PatSnap Eureka retrieved records.TBC Vapor-Phase Deposition7EBC / CMC Applications4VLPPS Reactive Variants3Process Modeling & Diagnostics3TBC Benchmarking (PS-PVD vs SPS)3↗ Click bars to explore

PS-PVD Filing Activity by Phase (1998–2026, Dataset Snapshot)

In this dataset, the consolidation phase (2019–2026) contains the highest concentration of active patent filings, reflecting commercial maturation, with the development phase (2012–2018) producing the most characterization literature among retrieved records.

PS-PVD Filing Activity by Phase: Foundational 1998-2011: 4 records; Development 2012-2018: 7 records; Consolidation 2019-2026: 9 recordsVertical bar chart showing record counts per maturity phase in this dataset. Source: PatSnap Eureka retrieved records.1073041998–2011Foundational72012–2018Development92019–2026Consolidation↗ Click bars to explore
PatSnap Eureka Record counts are approximate tallies from targeted PatSnap Eureka searches and do not represent a full census of global PS-PVD patent activity.Explore the data ↗
Application Domains

Key PS-PVD Application Domains: From Turbine Blades to CMC Components

PS-PVD and VLPPS technologies are applied across four principal domains identified in this dataset, spanning gas turbine TBCs, CMC environmental barrier coatings, sputtering target and semiconductor-adjacent uses, and energy system components.

Columnar YSZ · Gas Turbine TBC

Gas Turbine Thermal Barrier Coatings

The dominant application in this dataset, PS-PVD deposits columnar YSZ coatings on turbine blades, vanes, and combustor liners to reduce heat flux into metallic substrates. The 2019 thermal stability study confirmed PS-PVD YSZ coatings retain metastable tetragonal phase after high-temperature exposure, validating commercial readiness. Sichuan Hangda New Materials’ 2022 CN active patent explicitly targets TBC manufacturing with plasma jets up to 2,000 mm at pressures of 5–200 Pa.

Thermal Spray Coating
EBC · SiC-SiC CMC · Internal Cavity

CMC Environmental Barrier Coatings

Rolls-Royce Corporation’s patent family covers EBC deposition on SiC-SiC CMC substrates for next-generation gas turbine hot-section components, using operating pressures of 0.5–10 Torr (67–1,333 Pa) and plasma temperatures exceeding 6,000 K to vaporize metal silicate coating materials. The 2017 EP patent specifies metal silicate coatings with controlled silica content to protect CMC substrates from water vapor recession. The 2020–2021 active EP patents extend this to internal cavities where non-line-of-sight vapor-phase deposition is essential.

Environmental Barrier Coating
High-Density Target · Y₂O₃ Protective Layer

Sputtering Target and Semiconductor Uses

A 2020 US patent by Ji, Helin describes a sputtering target preparation process using plasma spray technology, noting that the method produces high-density, high-purity targets comparable to initial powder purity — relevant to thin-film battery and semiconductor fabrication. A 2022 US patent from Shenyang Fortune Precision Equipment Co., Ltd. employs supersonic plasma spraying to deposit Y₂O₃ protective layers on semiconductor chamber components. These filings indicate plasma spray techniques adjacent to PS-PVD are entering semiconductor manufacturing workflows.

Semiconductor-Adjacent
SOFC · Next-Generation Turbine · Thin Film

Energy Systems and Power Generation

The 2017 energy technology review explicitly frames PS-PVD within efficiency-driven energy applications including solid oxide fuel cells and next-generation turbines, noting the process’s ability to deposit dense, thin coatings of 1–100 µm with controlled microstructure as directly applicable to electrochemical device fabrication. Recent literature from 2021–2022 compares PS-PVD and SPS columnar TBCs for automotive piston head applications and power generation turbines, broadening the addressable market beyond aerospace. Reactive VLPPS at ~150 Pa also enables in-situ titanium-titanium nitride composite coating synthesis for energy system wear applications.

Energy Systems
PatSnap Eureka Explore insights ↗
Key Patent Assignees

Leading Assignees in PS-PVD Technology — Dataset Snapshot

In this dataset, Rolls-Royce Corporation holds the most concentrated active patent portfolio specifically focused on PS-PVD, with 3 active patents in EP/US jurisdictions all directed to CMC/EBC use cases. Sulzer Metco AG and its successor Oerlikon Metco AG collectively represent the primary equipment and process IP lineage across filings spanning 2011 to 2026 in retrieved records.

Top PS-PVD Assignees by Filing Count in Retrieved Records (Dataset Snapshot)

Top PS-PVD Assignees: Rolls-Royce Corporation 4, GE Infrastructure Technology LLC 2, Sulzer Metco AG 2, Sichuan Hangda New Materials Inc 1, Oerlikon Metco AG 1Horizontal bar chart showing top assignees by filing count in this dataset. Source: PatSnap Eureka retrieved records.Rolls-Royce Corporation4GE InfrastructureTechnology LLC2Sulzer Metco AG2Sichuan HangdaNew Materials Inc1Oerlikon Metco AG1↗ Click bars to explore
EBC on CMC · Internal Cavity PS-PVD

Rolls-Royce Corporation

Rolls-Royce Corporation holds the most concentrated active PS-PVD patent portfolio in this dataset, with filings spanning 2017–2021 across EP and US jurisdictions. Key patents cover PS-PVD deposition of metal silicate environmental barrier coatings on SiC-SiC CMC substrates and the extension of vapor-phase deposition to internal cavities of geometrically complex components. Two EP patents filed in 2020 and 2021 remain active, specifically claiming non-line-of-sight internal cavity coating for next-generation gas turbine hot-section parts.

United States
PS-PVD TBC Process IP · Equipment Systems

Sulzer Metco AG

Sulzer Metco AG authored the foundational 2011 paper describing PS-PVD operating at 0.1 kPa and filed a CA patent in 2012 for a thermal barrier coating structure manufacturing method using PS-PVD. The 2012 CA patent (now inactive) established the structural IP baseline for columnar YSZ TBC production via vapor-phase deposition. Sulzer Metco’s successor entity Oerlikon Metco AG filed a 2026 WO application applying deep semi-supervised anomaly detection for plasma gun electrode health monitoring, extending the process IP lineage through AI-driven maintenance.

Switzerland — CH
🔍
Unlock Full Assignee Analysis: GE, Oerlikon Metco, Tocalo, and More
This dataset also includes active filings from GE Infrastructure Technology LLC covering high-power plasma delivery systems, Oerlikon Metco AG’s 2026 AI prognostic WO application, and Tocalo Co., Ltd.’s PCT filing on low-pressure plasma spray process control — each representing a distinct strategic position in the PS-PVD supply chain.
Oerlikon Metco AI filing GE power delivery IP + more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
PatSnap Eureka Assignee data derived from named patent records retrieved in PatSnap Eureka targeted searches; this snapshot does not represent a full global portfolio census.Explore players ↗
Emerging Directions

Four Emerging Trajectories in PS-PVD Technology (2020–2026)

Based on the most recent filings and publications in this dataset, the field is evolving toward non-line-of-sight internal cavity coating, AI-driven process management, Chinese industrial entry, and CFD-validated process scaling — representing distinct strategic opportunities and risk vectors for technology developers.

AI-Driven Electrode Health Monitoring (2026)

Oerlikon Metco AG’s 2026 WO filing applies deep semi-supervised anomaly detection (DeepSAD) and mixture-of-local-experts models to predict remaining service life of plasma gun nozzle-electrodes. This is the most recent filing in this dataset and signals a transition toward data-driven, AI-augmented PS-PVD process management. Equipment buyers and integrators should anticipate software-locked process management becoming standard, with implications for IP ownership of process data.

Non-Line-of-Sight Internal Cavity Coating (2020–2021)

Rolls-Royce Corporation’s active EP and US patents cover PS-PVD deposition within internal cavities of complex CMC components, exploiting vapor-phase transport to reach geometries inaccessible to any line-of-sight process. Two EP patents filed in 2020 and 2021 remain active, making this the most legally protected emerging capability in this dataset. R&D teams developing next-generation CMC engine components must design around these active claims.

🔒
Unlock: Reactive VLPPS IP White Space and TBC Benchmarking Signals
Within this dataset, reactive VLPPS (R-VLPPS) for composite coating synthesis at sub-200 Pa has no identified active patents — only academic literature from 2014 — representing a potential filing opportunity. Recent SPS vs. PS-PVD benchmarking literature also signals automotive piston head TBC as an emerging commercial target.
Reactive VLPPS IP gapAutomotive TBC benchmarking+ more
Unlock full analysis →
PatSnap Eureka Emerging direction signals are derived from patent filings and literature publications retrieved in PatSnap Eureka; they represent dataset-level signals, not comprehensive market forecasts.Explore emerging trends ↗
Process Comparison

PS-PVD vs. EB-PVD: Key Technical and Commercial Dimensions

Click any row to explore further.

DimensionPS-PVDEB-PVD
Operating Pressure50–500 Pa (0.5–5 mbar)Conventional PVD range (lower vacuum)
Plasma / Energy SourceHigh-power plasma gun ≥50 kW (often 80–150 kW)Electron beam energy source
Deposition RateRoughly an order of magnitude higher than conventional PVDBaseline reference rate for columnar TBC
Coating MicrostructureColumnar, strain-tolerant; structurally analogous to EB-PVDColumnar, strain-tolerant
Non-Line-of-Sight CapabilityYes — vapor transport covers internal cavities and complex geometriesNo — line-of-sight process only
FeedstockPowder (1–50 µm particle size); YSZ, metal silicates, oxide ceramicsSolid ingot or powder forms
Plasma Jet DimensionsUp to 2,000 mm length, 150–200 mm diameterN/A — electron beam source
Key Applications (per dataset)TBC on turbine blades/vanes; EBC on SiC-SiC CMC; SOFC; sputtering targetsTBC on turbine blades/vanes (established baseline)
PatSnap Eureka Comparison data derived from PS-PVD patent and literature records retrieved in PatSnap Eureka; EB-PVD values represent relative baseline positions as described in those same sources.Compare in Eureka ↗
Frequently asked questions

Frequently Asked Questions: Plasma Spray Physical Vapor Deposition (PS-PVD)

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka can answer them instantly from patent and research data.Ask Eureka ↗
PatSnap Eureka

Generate Your PS-PVD Patent Landscape Report with PatSnap Eureka

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to generate reports like this one for any technology area.

Data and insights on this page are based on a limited patent and literature dataset and are for reference only. Figures may not represent the complete technology landscape.

Powered by PatSnap Eureka
Link copied to clipboard

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.