Book a demo

Pseudocapacitor Electrode Design Optimization Patent Snapshot

Pseudocapacitor Electrode Design Optimization Patent Snapshot
Evidence Snapshot
Pseudocapacitor Electrode Design Optimization Patent Snapshot in 2026

The patent corpus for pseudocapacitor electrode design optimization is extremely small — 4 patent families in scope — with Cellmo Materials Innovation Inc holding the dominant position. Activity peaked in 2020 and has eased since, signalling a field that is early-stage and lightly contested rather than actively growing.

4
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··4 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

A two-applicant field with near-total concentration

The patent evidence snapshot for pseudocapacitor electrode design optimization is dominated by Cellmo Materials Innovation Inc, which holds 3 of the 4 patent families in scope, placing it first in the applicant ranking. King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals accounts for the remaining family, making this a two-applicant field.

The top five filers collectively account for 100% of the combined total of the ranked applicants visible in this query — in practice here, two applicants — indicating extreme concentration with no meaningful second tier.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Cellmo Materials Innovation Inc3
2King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Cellmo Materials Innovation Inc’s visible position implies that any organization entering this area will need to design around its existing H01G 11 filings or seek licensing; King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals represents the sole academic presence, suggesting limited institutional diversification to date.

The two most recent data points (20252026) are subject to publication lag and likely undercount actual filing activity in that window. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

A 2020 peak, minimal subsequent activity, and a single dominant IPC class

The filing trend reveals a brief pulse of activity around 2020 followed by near-silence, while the technology composition is entirely concentrated in H01G (Capacitors), leaving no observed diversification into adjacent classes.

Annual filing trend

The trend shows isolated filings in 2020 (the peak year) and isolated records in 2025 and 2026; all other years in the window show zero filings. The 2025–2026 data points are subject to publication lag and should be treated as minimum counts rather than final figures.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 2 in 2020.02017020180201922020020210202202023020241202512026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

All 4 families are classified under H01G (Capacitors), with no filings recorded in adjacent IPC classes such as materials chemistry, electrochemistry, or manufacturing process classes. This single-class composition reflects the narrow, application-specific nature of the current corpus.

Technology compositionH01G · Capacitors leads with 4.H01G · Capacitors4↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US12431301B1Published 2025-09-30

Polyaniline-iron (PANI/Fe) based hybrid supercapac…

King Fahd University Of Petroleum And Minerals

A hybrid supercapacitor comprising: an electrolyte; a carbon-based electrode including jute stick activated carbon; and, a pseudocapacitive electrode is described. The pseudocapacitive electrode comprises a first metallic substrate and a composite material disposed on the first metallic substrate. The composite material comprises a matrix of polyaniline… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Polyaniline-iron (PANI/Fe) based hybrid supercapac… — patent drawingPolyaniline-iron (PANI/Fe) based hybrid supercapac… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Metal Foam Capacitors and Supercapacitors1

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Cellmo Materials Innovation Inc

Cellmo Materials Innovation Inc

Cellmo Materials Innovation Inc holds 3 patent families — all classified under H01G 11 (Capacitors) — making it the clear IP leader in this space. Applicant momentum data is not available in the evidence, so trajectory cannot be quantified; however, its position as the visible filer in a near-empty corpus is structurally significant for any new entrant.

families: 3
Challenger · King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals

King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals

King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals holds 1 patent family, also in H01G 11. As the sole academic filer, it represents a potential collaboration or licensing partner for industry players seeking to build on independently developed research. Momentum data is not available in the evidence.

families: 1
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Cellmo Materials Innovation IncKing Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.