Book a demo

QD Display Manufacturing Patent Snapshot 2026

QD Display Manufacturing Patent Snapshot 2026
Evidence Snapshot
QD Display Manufacturing Patent Snapshot in 2026

QD display manufacturing is a concentrated field dominated by Chinese display manufacturers, with TCL Technology Group holding the largest share among the top hundred filers. Annual filing volume has eased from its 2019 peak, and the field now shows characteristics of a maturing, consolidating stage rather than one of rapid expansion.

24
Patent families in scope
63%
Top visible applicants share
-54%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

TCL Technology leads a China-concentrated field with a modest global corpus

TCL Technology Group Corporation holds 7 patent families, the largest position among all ranked applicants, followed by BOE Technology Group and Shenzhen. China Star Optoelectronics (CSOT), each with 3 patent families. The top five filers collectively account for 63% of the combined total across the ranked applicants visible in this query, signaling a high-concentration visible assignee structure.

A clear tier gap separates TCL Technology from the second tier. BOE Technology, CSOT, and Beijing BOE Tech Dev form a mid-tier cluster, while academic institutions — including Hongik University and Henan University — occupy the lower tier with single-family positions. Samsung Display and Samsung Electronics each hold one patent family, indicating limited but strategic presence.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1TCL Technology Group Corporation7
2BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd.3
3Shenzhen China Star Optoelectronics Semiconductor Display Technology Co., Ltd. (CSOT)3
4Beijing BOE Technology Development Co., Ltd.2
5Hongik University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation2
6Henan University1
7Fuzhou University1
8Samsung Display Co., Ltd.1
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
9Nanjing University1
10Beijing Institute of Technology1
11Wuhan China Star Optoelectronics Semiconductor Display Technology Co., Ltd.1
1210644137 Canada Inc.1
13Yonsei University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation1
14Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.1
15HKC Corporation Ltd.1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

TCL Technology’s lead reflects a broad material-science and device-architecture emphasis, while the BOE ecosystem (BOE Technology Group and Beijing BOE Tech Dev) operates across overlapping organic semiconductor sub-classes. Entrants with printing-process or photolithographic approaches remain sparse, leaving room for differentiation in process technology.

Filing counts for 20242026 are subject to publication lag and likely understate actual recent activity; readers should treat the apparent recent-year figures as floors rather than definitive totals. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Filing volume peaked in 2019 and 2021; organic-semiconductor classes dominate the technology mix

The annual filing trend reveals an irregular but broadly active period from 2019 through 2024, while the technology composition is heavily weighted toward organic-semiconductor and quantum-dot materials classes.

Annual filing trend

Activity peaked at 5 patent families in both 2019 and 2021, with intervening dips in 2018, 2020, and 2022. The 2023 figure of zero and the partial counts for 2024–2026 reflect publication lag and should not be read as a sustained drop; actual recent-year output is likely higher than the recorded values.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 5 in 2019.22017020185201932020520213202202023320242202512026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H10K (organic semiconductors, OLED structures) is the visible branch with 20 records, consistent with QD-on-OLED and QLED architectures. C09K (materials for miscellaneous applications, covering quantum dot formulations) and H01L (semiconductor devices) form the second tier. B82Y (nanotechnology applications) and G03F (photolithography and photomechanics) are present but sparse, indicating that nanoparticle characterisation and patterning process innovation are less contested.

Technology compositionH10K · Organic semiconductors (OLED etc.) leads with 20; C09K · Materials for misc. applications 9.H10K · Organic semicondu…20C09K · Materials for mis…9H01L · Semiconductor dev…8B82Y · Nanotechnology ap…5G03F · Photolithography …3G09F · Displaying, adver…2B41J · Typewriters & pri…1C01G · Compounds of othe…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US11785823B2Published 2023-10-10

Quantum dot display panel and manufacturing method…

Wuhan China Star Optoelectronics Semiconductor Display Technology CO., LTD.

A quantum dot display panel and a manufacturing method thereof are provided. The quantum dot display panel includes an array substrate; a luminescent layer disposed on the array substrate; an encapsulation layer disposed on the luminescent layer; and a color filter layer disposed on the encapsulation layer. The color filter layer includes a plurality of… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Quantum dot display panel and manufacturing method… — patent drawingQuantum dot display panel and manufacturing method… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1II-VI BASED NON-Cd QUANTUM DOTS, MANUFACTURING MET…22
2Display device and preparation method therefor3
3Integrated optoelectronic devices for lighting and…2
4Alloy nanomaterial, preparation method therefor, a…2
5Quantum dot display panel and manufacturing method…1
6QLED and manufacturing method thereof1

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · TCL Technology Group Corporation

TCL Technology Group Corporation

TCL Technology Group holds 7 patent families, the largest position in the corpus. Its technology emphasis spans C09K materials (quantum dot formulations), H10K50, and H10K71 organic semiconductor device structures — a broad base covering both the light-emitting material and the display architecture. Its applicant momentum is flagged as a new entrant in the most recent filing window, suggesting the bulk of its portfolio was built in an earlier active period and recent additions are limited.

patent families: 7
Challenger · Shenzhen China Star Optoelectronics (CSOT)

Shenzhen China Star Optoelectronics (CSOT)

CSOT holds 3 patent families, tied with BOE Technology Group for second rank. Its technical focus is concentrated in H10K59 and H10K50 organic semiconductor display sub-classes, with limited breadth into materials chemistry — a narrower but coherent device-level strategy. CSOT is also flagged as a new entrant in the most recent filing window with 2 recent-period families, indicating that its activity is more recent relative to the dataset window than TCL Technology’s.

patent families: 3
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd.Hongik University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own QD display Patent Snapshot?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.