Book a demo

QD / Nano Emitters Patent Snapshot 2026

QD / Nano Emitters Patent Snapshot 2026
Evidence Snapshot
QD / Nano Emitters Patent Snapshot in 2026

The QD / Nano Emitters space is highly concentrated, with 3M Innovative Properties Co commanding the dominant share of patent activity and Europe (EPO) serving as the primary filing jurisdiction. The field reached a multi-year expansion peak in 2023 and recent-window growth remains positive, though annual volume has eased from that peak.

7
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
Europe (EPO)
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··5 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

3M dominates a tightly held QD / Nano Emitters field

3M Innovative Properties Co holds the top position with 13 patent records, placing it decisively ahead of every other filer in this corpus. Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials ranks second with 2 patent records, and four other applicants each hold 1 patent record.

The top five filers account for 95% of the combined total across the ranked applicants visible in this query — an extremely high concentration ratio that leaves little room for challengers to mount a near-term position without either licensing or targeted technical differentiation.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
13M Innovative Properties Co13
2KOREA INST OF MACHINERY & MATERIALS2
3Zhejiang Brilliant Optoelectronic Technology Co Ltd1
4Korea Institute of Industrial Technology1
5Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO)1
6Sri Eshwar College of Engineering1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

3M’s emphasis spans nanotechnology applications (B82Y), semiconductor devices (H01L), and optical elements and systems (G02B), suggesting a broad platform rather than a single-application focus. Smaller entrants tend to occupy narrower sub-spaces such as OLED organic semiconductors or crystal growth materials.

The most recent 18–24 months of filings are likely under-counted due to standard patent publication lag, so apparent inactivity in 20242026 should not be read as a slowdown. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

A 2023 activity spike and a nanotechnology-dominant IPC mix

The filing trend reveals an irregular but net-positive multi-year trajectory, with a clear 2023 spike, while the IPC composition is anchored by nanotechnology and semiconductor device classifications.

Annual filing trend

Annual filings were sporadic from 2017 through 2022, then jumped to 3 patent records in 2023 — the peak year. Figures for 2024 onwards reflect publication lag and should not be interpreted as a real cessation of activity. The recent three-year window sits 50% above the prior three-year window, confirming multi-year expansion despite the post-2023 easing.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 3 in 2023.22017020181201912020020210202232023020240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B82Y (Nanotechnology applications) and H01L (Semiconductor devices) together account for the largest share of IPC records, confirming that quantum-dot and nano-emitter work is primarily framed as a nanotechnology and semiconductor problem. G02B (Optical elements and systems) and H05B (Electric heating and lighting circuits) form a secondary tier, while H10K (Organic semiconductors/OLED), C09K, C30B, F21V, and H10H each represent sparse coverage.

Technology compositionB82Y · Nanotechnology applications leads with 16; H01L · Semiconductor devices 15.B82Y · Nanotechnology ap…16H01L · Semiconductor dev…15G02B · Optical elements …9H05B · Electric heating …8H10K · Organic semicondu…4C09K · Materials for mis…1C30B · Crystal growth1F21V · Lighting device c…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US10566391B2Published 2020-02-18

OLED display with improved color uniformity

3M Innovative Properties Company

Organic light emitting diode (OLED) displays having an emissive OLED layer and a nanostructured interface configured to reduce variability of color with view angle are described. An optical stack having first and second layers with differing refractive indices includes the nanostructured interface between the first and second layers. The second layer is… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

OLED display with improved color uniformity — patent drawingOLED display with improved color uniformity — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1OLED display with improved color uniformity7
2Display device with random NANO pattern and manufa…6
3Display device with random NANO pattern and manufa…5
4Organic light-emitting device with nano-structured…4
5Optical stack for improved color uniformity in OLE…2
6Emissive article with light extraction film2

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · 3M Innovative Properties Co

3M Innovative Properties Co

3M holds 13 patent records — more than six times the next-ranked filer. Its technology focus spans B82Y (Nanotechnology applications), H01L (Semiconductor devices), and G02B (Optical elements and systems), indicating a platform-level approach to nano-emitter integration for display and lighting applications. No momentum data is available for 3M in the recent-window comparison, consistent with its status as the established incumbent rather than a new entrant.

13 patent records
Challenger · Korea Institute of Industrial Technology

Korea Institute of Industrial Technology

Korea Institute of Industrial Technology holds 1 patent record and is flagged as a new entrant in the recent filing window, with its activity concentrated in B82Y (Nanotechnology applications) and C09K (Materials for miscellaneous applications). Its entry alongside Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials signals coordinated Korean public-sector interest in nano-emitter materials, particularly luminescent materials under C09K.

1 patent record · new entrant
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Zhejiang Brilliant Optoelectronic Technology Co LtdNederlandse Org voor Toegepast Natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek (TNO)+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.