Book a demo

Quadruped Robot Control Patents: Who Leads, Where Gaps Are 2026

Quadruped Robot Control Patents: Who Leads, Where Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/quadruped-robot-control-system-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Robotics & Automation
Quadruped Robot Control System Patents: Who Holds the Locomotion Claims
  • Filing peaked in 2023 at 26 families, then eased back — the 2026 count is partial due to the roughly 18-month publication lag, but the shape through 2022-2025 already shows growth flattening rather than accelerating.
  • China alone accounts for 28 of the tracked filings versus 18 from the US and 13 from the EPO, putting the balance of claim activity outside the jurisdictions many Western teams monitor by default.
  • B62D (motor vehicles & steering) outranks B25J (manipulators & robots) 55 records to 47 — a reminder that quadruped locomotion claims are being filed as vehicle/steering art as often as robotics art, which changes where a freedom-to-operate search needs to look.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
81
Published Records
63%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+275%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (4 records) with 2024 (15) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 81 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks 81 patent families filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine quadruped, quadrupedal or legged robot terminology with locomotion, balance, whole-body or model-predictive control claims, classified under B62D57/032, B25J9/16 or G05B13. The scope is deliberately narrow: it is not general robotics, it is the control layer that keeps a four-legged machine upright, walking and load-balanced.

Filing offices split unevenly across China, the United States, Europe, the WIPO/PCT route, India and Hong Kong, which is a useful proxy for where applicants expect to enforce or manufacture. The most-cited records in the set date back to the 1990s, a reminder that foundational anti-slip and attitude-control patents still anchor citation graphs even as filing activity has moved to whole-body dynamic models and impact-aware swing-leg trajectories.

Filing activity by year and by IPC subclass
  1. 1TENCENT TECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN) CO LTD32
  2. 2THE UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND8
  3. 3UBTECH ROBOTICS CORP LTD5
  4. 4GUANGDONG UNIV OF TECH3
  5. 5SHANDONG UNIV3
  6. 6HONDA MOTOR CO LTD2
  7. 7TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY2
  8. 8INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE2
  9. 9China Aerospace Science and Industry Intelligent Robot Co., Ltd.2
  10. 10成都锦发边缘智能科技有限公司1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Quadruped Robot Control System covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 81 families: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses are carrying the claim density.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings rose from zero in 2017 to a peak of 26 in 2023, with the 2022 midpoint sitting at 5. The climb to peak then partial pullback suggests the field went through a concentrated filing wave rather than sustained, monotonic growth — treat the 2025-2026 dip as partly a publication-lag artefact, not a firm signal of retreat.

Filing trend, 2017-20260815233002017201820192020202120222620232024202552026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass distribution

B62D (motor vehicles & steering) and B25J (manipulators & robots) dominate at 55 and 47 records respectively, with G05D (control of non-electric variables) a distant third at 27. The long tail — F16F, G06F, A63H, G06N — shows AI-model and toy-adjacent classifications are present but still marginal in claim volume.

IPC subclass distributionB62D · Motor vehicles & steering5567.9%B25J · Manipulators & robots4758.0%G05D · Control of non-electric variab…2733.3%G05B · Control & regulating systems1417.3%F16F · Springs & vibration dampers67.4%G06F · Electric digital data processi…33.7%A63H · Toys22.5%G06N · Computing based on AI models22.5%Other56.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 81 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Quadruped Robot Control System covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Quadruped Robot Control System with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about quadruped robot control system and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited and most-recent filings

Representative Recent Filing
US20260097488A12026-04-09

Planning and control method for legged robot, apparatus, robot, and storage medium

TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY

Filed by Tsinghua University, this application covers determining a foot-end reference state per leg from movement state and swing parameters, planning an impact-aware swing-leg trajectory from a foot-end dynamic model and a discrete collision model, and performing impact-aware whole-body control from a whole-body dynamic model paired with that same collision model.Published 2026-04-09 as US20260097488A1 — filed close to the data cut-off, so its examination status and eventual claim scope are still unsettled.

US20260097488A1 — patent drawing 1US20260097488A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5644204AAnti-slip control for a legged robot and realisitc simulation of a legged creature95
2JP2003326483AAttitude control device of mobile robot37
3US20230087057A1Method and apparatus for controlling wheel-legged robot, wheel-legged robot, and device32
4CN112975978A多足机器人负重平衡方法、装置和多足机器人22
5US20230311320A1Mobile manipulation control method and system of quadruped robot with operation arm15
6WO2025042802A1System and method for landmine detection and avoidance using a legged robotic platform13
7CN116237943A一种结合地形约束的四足机器人控制方法10
8CN112147890A一种基于Acrobot模型的四足机器人对角支撑静平衡控制方法10
9WO2025102514A1足式机器人规划与控制方法、装置、机器人及存储介质9
10CN114047697A一种基于深度强化学习的四足机器人平衡倒立摆控制方法9

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside the searched corpus — read them as a measure of influence on later filers, not as a ranking of current commercial relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Quadruped Robot Control System covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about where this field is headed

Three readings of the trend, geography and citation data that matter for deciding where to file or watch.

Filing Momentum
26 in 2023
peak year filings

A concentrated wave, not steady growth

Filings went from zero in 2017 to a peak of 26 in 2023 before easing. That pattern — a sharp climb followed by a plateau or pullback — is more consistent with a cluster of applicants racing to file around a shared technical approach than with a technology still in early, open-ended growth.

Peak year 2023 vs. midpoint 2022 = 5
Jurisdiction Split
28 vs 18 vs 13
China vs US vs EPO filings

China leads filing volume by a wide margin

China's 28 filings outpace the US at 18 and the EPO at 13, with WIPO/PCT and India trailing further behind. For teams doing freedom-to-operate work, this means Chinese-language prior art and Chinese national filings carry more weight in this field than in many adjacent robotics categories.

Receiving offices: CN 28, US 18, EPO 13, WIPO 9, IN 6, HK 3
Classification Split
55 vs 47
B62D vs B25J records

Vehicle-steering art outweighs robotics-manipulator art

More records sit under B62D (motor vehicles & steering) than under B25J (manipulators & robots). Locomotion and balance control for legged machines is being claimed as steering/suspension mechanics almost as often as it is claimed as robotic control, which is easy to miss in a search scoped only to B25J.

IPC counts: B62D 55, B25J 47, G05D 27, G05B 14
Citation Anchors
95 citations
top-cited record

Foundational anti-slip and attitude-control patents still anchor the graph

The most-cited record in the set is a 1990s anti-slip control patent for legged robots, still cited 95 times; a 2003 attitude-control patent follows at 37. Recent filings on wheel-legged control and load-balancing are catching up in citation count but have had far less time to accumulate them.

US5644204A (95 cites) and JP2003326483A (37 cites) lead the ranking
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to quadruped robot control system, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Quadruped Robot Control System covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the activity has cooled

Recent-year momentum across the named assignees in this dataset shows almost no fresh filing in the latest tracked year, which is at least partly a publication-lag effect but is also visible across firms that were active in prior years.

Academic Filer
1 in latest year
Indian Institute of Science

Academic labs remain active where corporates have paused

The Indian Institute of Science shows one filing in the latest tracked year, while several corporate and university assignees — including Tencent and Guangdong University of Technology — show a -100% year-on-year drop to zero. That contrast suggests corporate filing programmes in this niche are pausing or consolidating faster than academic output.

IISc: 1 filing in latest year
Corporate Pullback
-100% YoY
Tencent, Guangdong University of Technology

Two of the more active recent filers show a sharp drop-off

Tencent and Guangdong University of Technology both moved from prior-year filing activity to zero in the latest year, a -100% year-on-year change for each. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, some of this is filings not yet public rather than a genuine stop, but it is worth tracking into the next data refresh.

Both assignees: 0 filings latest year, -100% YoY
Flat Activity
0 in latest year
University of Queensland, UBTECH, Shandong University

A wider group shows flat rather than declining output

University of Queensland, UBTECH Robotics and Shandong University all report zero filings in the latest year without a stated year-on-year decline, distinguishing them from firms that were actively filing and then stopped. This looks more like normal filing-cycle gaps than retreat from the space.

Three assignees at 0 filings, no YoY decline flagged
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These branches show thin claim density relative to the core locomotion and balance-control filings — worth a dedicated search before assuming freedom to operate.
Impact-aware swing-leg trajectory planningWheel-legged hybrid transition controlFoot-end dynamic collision modellingLoad-carrying balance under external disturbanceAI-model-based gait prediction (G06N overlap)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Indian Institute of Science1
Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.0-100%
University of Queensland0
UBTECH Robotics Corp.0
Guangdong University of Technology0-100%
Shandong University0
China Aerospace Science and Industry Intelligent Robot Co., Ltd.0
Tsinghua University0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Quadruped Robot Control System covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The trend and player data point to specific next steps depending on whether you are scoping freedom-to-operate or deciding where to file.

Run a dedicated B62D freedom-to-operate check

Because vehicle-steering classification (B62D) carries more records than robotics classification (B25J) in this field, a search scoped only to robot-manipulator classes will miss over half the relevant prior art.

Explore in Eureka

Watch the 2025-2026 filings once the lag clears

The apparent pullback after 2023 is partly a publication-lag artefact; revisit the trend once filings from the last 18 months have had time to publish before concluding the field has cooled.

Track filings in Eureka

Map China-originated filings against Western counterparts

With 28 of 81 families originating from Chinese filings against 18 from the US and 13 from the EPO, cross-referencing Chinese national filings for family members elsewhere will surface where enforcement risk actually concentrates.

Search assignees in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Quadruped Robot Control System covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about quadruped robot control patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Quadruped Robot Control System covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Quadruped Robot Control System in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole quadruped robot control system corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.