Quadruped Robot Control Patents: Who Leads, Where Gaps Are 2026
- Filing peaked in 2023 at 26 families, then eased back — the 2026 count is partial due to the roughly 18-month publication lag, but the shape through 2022-2025 already shows growth flattening rather than accelerating.
- China alone accounts for 28 of the tracked filings versus 18 from the US and 13 from the EPO, putting the balance of claim activity outside the jurisdictions many Western teams monitor by default.
- B62D (motor vehicles & steering) outranks B25J (manipulators & robots) 55 records to 47 — a reminder that quadruped locomotion claims are being filed as vehicle/steering art as often as robotics art, which changes where a freedom-to-operate search needs to look.
Filing growth compares 2021 (4 records) with 2024 (15) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 81 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This dataset tracks 81 patent families filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine quadruped, quadrupedal or legged robot terminology with locomotion, balance, whole-body or model-predictive control claims, classified under B62D57/032, B25J9/16 or G05B13. The scope is deliberately narrow: it is not general robotics, it is the control layer that keeps a four-legged machine upright, walking and load-balanced.
Filing offices split unevenly across China, the United States, Europe, the WIPO/PCT route, India and Hong Kong, which is a useful proxy for where applicants expect to enforce or manufacture. The most-cited records in the set date back to the 1990s, a reminder that foundational anti-slip and attitude-control patents still anchor citation graphs even as filing activity has moved to whole-body dynamic models and impact-aware swing-leg trajectories.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 81 families: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses are carrying the claim density.
Filing trend, 2017-2026
Filings rose from zero in 2017 to a peak of 26 in 2023, with the 2022 midpoint sitting at 5. The climb to peak then partial pullback suggests the field went through a concentrated filing wave rather than sustained, monotonic growth — treat the 2025-2026 dip as partly a publication-lag artefact, not a firm signal of retreat.
IPC subclass distribution
B62D (motor vehicles & steering) and B25J (manipulators & robots) dominate at 55 and 47 records respectively, with G05D (control of non-electric variables) a distant third at 27. The long tail — F16F, G06F, A63H, G06N — shows AI-model and toy-adjacent classifications are present but still marginal in claim volume.
Shares are the percentage of the 81 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Quadruped Robot Control System with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about quadruped robot control system and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaMost-cited and most-recent filings
Planning and control method for legged robot, apparatus, robot, and storage medium
Filed by Tsinghua University, this application covers determining a foot-end reference state per leg from movement state and swing parameters, planning an impact-aware swing-leg trajectory from a foot-end dynamic model and a discrete collision model, and performing impact-aware whole-body control from a whole-body dynamic model paired with that same collision model.Published 2026-04-09 as US20260097488A1 — filed close to the data cut-off, so its examination status and eventual claim scope are still unsettled.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5644204A | Anti-slip control for a legged robot and realisitc simulation of a legged creature | 95 |
| 2 | JP2003326483A | Attitude control device of mobile robot | 37 |
| 3 | US20230087057A1 | Method and apparatus for controlling wheel-legged robot, wheel-legged robot, and device | 32 |
| 4 | CN112975978A | 多足机器人负重平衡方法、装置和多足机器人 | 22 |
| 5 | US20230311320A1 | Mobile manipulation control method and system of quadruped robot with operation arm | 15 |
| 6 | WO2025042802A1 | System and method for landmine detection and avoidance using a legged robotic platform | 13 |
| 7 | CN116237943A | 一种结合地形约束的四足机器人控制方法 | 10 |
| 8 | CN112147890A | 一种基于Acrobot模型的四足机器人对角支撑静平衡控制方法 | 10 |
| 9 | WO2025102514A1 | 足式机器人规划与控制方法、装置、机器人及存储介质 | 9 |
| 10 | CN114047697A | 一种基于深度强化学习的四足机器人平衡倒立摆控制方法 | 9 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside the searched corpus — read them as a measure of influence on later filers, not as a ranking of current commercial relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers say about where this field is headed
Three readings of the trend, geography and citation data that matter for deciding where to file or watch.
A concentrated wave, not steady growth
Filings went from zero in 2017 to a peak of 26 in 2023 before easing. That pattern — a sharp climb followed by a plateau or pullback — is more consistent with a cluster of applicants racing to file around a shared technical approach than with a technology still in early, open-ended growth.
China leads filing volume by a wide margin
China's 28 filings outpace the US at 18 and the EPO at 13, with WIPO/PCT and India trailing further behind. For teams doing freedom-to-operate work, this means Chinese-language prior art and Chinese national filings carry more weight in this field than in many adjacent robotics categories.
Vehicle-steering art outweighs robotics-manipulator art
More records sit under B62D (motor vehicles & steering) than under B25J (manipulators & robots). Locomotion and balance control for legged machines is being claimed as steering/suspension mechanics almost as often as it is claimed as robotic control, which is easy to miss in a search scoped only to B25J.
Foundational anti-slip and attitude-control patents still anchor the graph
The most-cited record in the set is a 1990s anti-slip control patent for legged robots, still cited 95 times; a 2003 attitude-control patent follows at 37. Recent filings on wheel-legged control and load-balancing are catching up in citation count but have had far less time to accumulate them.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to quadruped robot control system, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the activity has cooled
Recent-year momentum across the named assignees in this dataset shows almost no fresh filing in the latest tracked year, which is at least partly a publication-lag effect but is also visible across firms that were active in prior years.
Academic labs remain active where corporates have paused
The Indian Institute of Science shows one filing in the latest tracked year, while several corporate and university assignees — including Tencent and Guangdong University of Technology — show a -100% year-on-year drop to zero. That contrast suggests corporate filing programmes in this niche are pausing or consolidating faster than academic output.
Two of the more active recent filers show a sharp drop-off
Tencent and Guangdong University of Technology both moved from prior-year filing activity to zero in the latest year, a -100% year-on-year change for each. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, some of this is filings not yet public rather than a genuine stop, but it is worth tracking into the next data refresh.
A wider group shows flat rather than declining output
University of Queensland, UBTECH Robotics and Shandong University all report zero filings in the latest year without a stated year-on-year decline, distinguishing them from firms that were actively filing and then stopped. This looks more like normal filing-cycle gaps than retreat from the space.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Indian Institute of Science | 1 | — |
| Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| University of Queensland | 0 | — |
| UBTECH Robotics Corp. | 0 | — |
| Guangdong University of Technology | 0 | -100% |
| Shandong University | 0 | — |
| China Aerospace Science and Industry Intelligent Robot Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Tsinghua University | 0 | -100% |
Where to take this analysis
The trend and player data point to specific next steps depending on whether you are scoping freedom-to-operate or deciding where to file.
Run a dedicated B62D freedom-to-operate check
Because vehicle-steering classification (B62D) carries more records than robotics classification (B25J) in this field, a search scoped only to robot-manipulator classes will miss over half the relevant prior art.
Explore in EurekaWatch the 2025-2026 filings once the lag clears
The apparent pullback after 2023 is partly a publication-lag artefact; revisit the trend once filings from the last 18 months have had time to publish before concluding the field has cooled.
Track filings in EurekaMap China-originated filings against Western counterparts
With 28 of 81 families originating from Chinese filings against 18 from the US and 13 from the EPO, cross-referencing Chinese national filings for family members elsewhere will surface where enforcement risk actually concentrates.
Search assignees in EurekaCommon questions about quadruped robot control patents
The most-cited record in this dataset is a 1990s anti-slip control patent for legged robots (US5644204A), cited 95 times, followed by a 2003 Japanese attitude-control patent cited 37 times. These older filings function as foundational prior art that later applicants build on and cite around, rather than as the current commercial leaders. For present-day filing activity, China accounts for the largest share of receiving-office filings in the dataset at 28, ahead of the United States at 18 and the EPO at 13, so recent claim density is concentrated more in Chinese filings than citation counts alone suggest.
Filing activity rose from zero in 2017 to a peak of 26 families in 2023, then appears to ease off through 2024-2026. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any patent trend will always look artificially low, so the apparent 2025-2026 slowdown should not yet be read as a genuine drop in R&D activity. The clearer signal is that growth has flattened rather than continuing to accelerate after the 2023 peak, which is worth revisiting once later filings finish publishing.
Three IPC subclasses carry almost all of the claim density: B62D (motor vehicles and steering) at 55 records, B25J (manipulators and robots) at 47, and G05D (control of non-electric variables) at 27. B62D outranking B25J is notable because it means locomotion and balance-control claims are frequently filed under vehicle/steering mechanics rather than robotics classification, which a search scoped only to robot-specific IPC codes would miss. G05B (control and regulating systems generally) adds a further 14 records, and smaller counts appear in F16F (springs and dampers), G06F, A63H and G06N.
Whole-body control refers to coordinating a legged robot's full set of joints and limbs as a single dynamic system, rather than controlling each leg independently, typically using a whole-body dynamic model alongside models for foot-end contact and collision. It matters commercially because claims in this area, such as the representative 2026 filing from Tsinghua University, tie specific control steps to specific models (foot-end dynamic model, discrete collision model), which narrows what exactly is protected and what a competing implementation using a different model structure might avoid infringing.
Based on the IPC composition, sub-areas tied to AI-based gait prediction (G06N overlap, only 2 records) and wheel-legged hybrid transition control remain thin relative to the core locomotion and balance-control claim base. Impact-aware swing-leg trajectory planning and foot-end collision modelling appear in recent filings like the 2026 Tsinghua application but are not yet densely claimed across the corpus. Before filing into any of these branches, a targeted search against the B62D and B25J classification split described above is worth running, since claim density in the adjacent vehicle-steering classification can be easy to miss.
Research Quadruped Robot Control System in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole quadruped robot control system corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.