Quadruped Robot Machine Vision Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
- Filing peaked early and hasn't returned. 2017 logged 14 filings against just 2 by the midpoint year of 2022, and the most recent year sits at 2 — a pattern of a burst of foundational filing followed by a long plateau, not sustained growth.
- Mechanical structure still outweighs vision. B62D (motor vehicles & steering) and B25J (manipulators & robots) each appear in the large majority of the 72 families, while G06V (image/video recognition) appears in only 5 — the vision layer is thin relative to the legged-locomotion hardware it rides on.
- Boston Dynamics anchors the citation graph. Its screw-actuator and gait-behaviour patents are the two most-cited records in the set, and its negative-obstacle detection patent (2022) is the newest highly-cited entry — but its own recent-year filing has dropped to zero, a -100% YoY signal worth tracking.
Filing growth compares 2021 (9 records) with 2024 (5) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 72 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This dataset tracks 72 patent families at the intersection of legged-robot mechanics and the vision or perception systems that let them navigate uneven ground. The search combines terms for quadruped, quadrupedal and legged robots with claim or description language around terrain perception, 3D vision, obstacle detection and visual odometry, filtered to IPC classes covering image recognition (G06V20), robot leg drive mechanisms (B62D57/032) and image analysis (G06T7). The result is a narrow, mechanically-grounded slice of robotics IP rather than a broad computer-vision corpus.
Filing offices skew heavily toward the United States, with India, Europe and China each contributing a smaller but meaningful share. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent year in any trend line is understated and should be read as a floor, not a ceiling.
Filing trend and technology mix
Two views of the same 72 families: how filing activity has moved over time, and which technical subclasses carry the claim weight.
A 2017 peak, then a plateau
Filings hit 14 in 2017, the peak year on record, then dropped toward single digits by the 2022 midpoint and have stayed low through the most recent (partial) year. This reads less like a cooling field and more like an early cluster of foundational filings that has not been followed by a second wave.
Structure dominates, vision is a thin layer
B62D and B25J between them cover the large majority of families — these are the leg, steering and manipulator mechanics. G05D (non-electric control), F16H (gearing) and G01L (force/pressure sensing) form a secondary cluster of locomotion-support classes. G06V, the dedicated image-recognition class, appears in only 5 of 72 families, suggesting most vision work here is claimed as a supporting feature of a mechanical system rather than as a vision invention in its own right.
Shares are the percentage of the 72 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Quadruped Robot Machine Vision with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about quadruped robot machine vision and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited records in this set
US20220390952A1 — Detecting negative obstacles
A computer-implemented method for a legged robot that identifies a candidate support surface lower than the robot's current surface, checks whether that surface has an area of missing terrain data large enough to matter for a leg touchdown, and if so classifies that area as a no-step region — flagging holes, drops and negative obstacles the robot should avoid stepping into.Filed by Boston Dynamics, published 2022-12-08.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20180172121A1 | Screw Actuator for a Legged Robot | 62 |
| 2 | US10017218B1 | Achieving a target gait behavior in a legged robot | 38 |
| 3 | WO2008084480A2 | A quadruped legged robot driven by linear actuators | 36 |
| 4 | US9878751B1 | Three-piston ankle mechanism of a legged robot and associated control system | 31 |
| 5 | US20220390952A1 | Detecting negative obstacles | 22 |
| 6 | US20180162469A1 | Whole Body Manipulation on a Legged Robot Using Dynamic Balance | 17 |
| 7 | US10253855B2 | Screw actuator for a legged robot | 16 |
| 8 | US12054208B2 | Achieving a target gait behavior in a legged robot | 15 |
| 9 | US10144465B1 | Achieving a target gait behavior in a legged robot | 10 |
| 10 | US10988192B1 | Three-piston ankle mechanism of a legged robot and associated control system | 7 |
Citation counts are drawn from the searched corpus and favour older filings; treat them as a signal of influence on later filers, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Four read-throughs of the filing trend, technology mix and citation graph, aimed at where to place claims rather than where the crowd already is.
The early cluster hasn't repeated
A 2017 peak followed by a decline to 2 filings by 2022 and roughly the same through the latest year points to a field that had one active filing window, likely tied to a handful of players establishing core leg-mechanism claims, rather than continuous incremental filing.
Vision claims are thin relative to mechanics
Dedicated image/video recognition claims (G06V) appear in a small minority of families against the near-universal presence of B62D and B25J. Most perception functionality in this set is likely claimed as a feature within a locomotion or control patent rather than as a standalone vision method.
A small set of early patents anchor the field
The most-cited records — a screw actuator, a gait-behaviour patent and a linear-actuator quadruped design — are mechanical rather than vision patents, and the newest highly-cited entry, the 2022 negative-obstacle filing, is the clearest vision-adjacent standout.
Co-filing is rare and mostly academic
Only 4 co-assignee pairs appear across 72 families, the strongest being a university-inventor pairing. Corporate co-filing between separate companies is essentially absent, suggesting this space is being built through in-house R&D rather than joint ventures.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to quadruped robot machine vision, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is active, and who has slowed down
Recent-year momentum is muted across almost every named assignee in this set, which is more informative than the overall ranking on its own.
Foundational filer, now quiet on record
Boston Dynamics holds two of the most-cited mechanical patents in the set plus the standout 2022 negative-obstacle vision filing, but shows zero filings in the latest year — a sharp drop from prior activity that may reflect a shift to trade-secret practice or a lull between filing cycles.
The strongest collaboration in the dataset
The Ben-Gurion University and inventor Shapiro Amir pairing is the densest co-assignee relationship found, though it too shows zero filings in the latest year, consistent with a completed research cycle rather than ongoing output.
The only assignee with positive recent-year activity
Against a backdrop of zero recent-year filings from Boston Dynamics, Google, Ben-Gurion University and others, this is the one name in the momentum data still actively filing in the most recent year — worth monitoring even without a large existing portfolio.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Guangdong Junye Technology Institute (Limited Partnership) | 1 | — |
| Boston Dynamics, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| Google LLC | 0 | — |
| Ben-Gurion University | 0 | — |
| SHAPIRO AMIR | 0 | — |
| Hangzhou Ezviz Software Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Guangdong Yantong Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Wu Yuanqing | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The filing trend and technology mix point to specific next steps depending on whether you're clearing a design or scouting a licensing target.
Run a freedom-to-operate check on vision claims specifically
Because G06V claim density is low against the mechanical core, a targeted search on terrain-classification and obstacle-detection claim language is more useful here than a broad landscape re-run.
Explore claim scope in EurekaTrack whether Boston Dynamics resumes filing
Its zero-filing latest year against a strong citation position is the single most watchable signal in this dataset; a resumption would likely reset the competitive picture.
Set up assignee monitoring in EurekaInvestigate the academic-inventor pairing for licensing
The Ben-Gurion University and Shapiro Amir collaboration is the strongest co-assignee link found and may represent an accessible licensing or acquisition target given no recent competing activity.
Review co-assignee networks in EurekaCommon questions about this landscape
This dataset identifies 72 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine legged-robot terminology with terrain perception, 3D vision, obstacle detection or visual odometry claim language, filtered to specific IPC classes for image recognition and leg-drive mechanisms. That is a narrow, purpose-built slice rather than a count of all robotics or all computer-vision patents, so broader searches using different keyword combinations will return larger numbers. The 72-family count should be read as the intersection of legged locomotion and vision-specific claiming, not the total activity in either field alone.
Filing peaked at 14 in 2017 and has declined since, sitting at 2 by the 2022 midpoint and remaining low through the most recent year. This is a flat-to-declining trend rather than a growth curve, though the most recent year is always undercounted because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months. The pattern looks like an early cluster of foundational filings around 2017 that has not been followed by a comparable second wave, rather than a field that peaked and is actively winding down.
By citation count within this corpus, the leading records are mechanical patents on leg actuation and gait control, including a screw-actuator patent and a gait-behaviour patent, both cited well above other records in the set. Boston Dynamics also holds the newest highly-cited entry, a 2022 filing on detecting negative obstacles, which is the clearest vision-specific standout among the top-cited group. Citation counts favour older patents by nature of how citation accumulates over time, so these should be read as historically influential rather than necessarily the strongest current claims.
US20220390952A1, filed by Boston Dynamics and published in December 2022, claims a method for a legged robot to detect a candidate support surface below its current surface, check whether that lower surface has a gap in terrain data large enough to matter for a footstep, and if so mark that area as a no-step region. In practice this covers a specific technique for flagging holes, drops and similar negative obstacles so the robot avoids placing a foot there. Anyone building terrain-classification logic for legged robots should review this claim closely, since it is narrowly drawn around missing-data detection rather than obstacle detection generally.
The clearest gap is in dedicated vision claiming: G06V, the image-recognition IPC class, appears in only 5 of the 72 families, while the mechanical classes B62D and B25J appear in nearly all of them. That suggests vision functionality in this field is mostly claimed as a supporting feature within a locomotion patent rather than as a standalone method, leaving room for claims that isolate the vision or perception technique itself — for example fusing visual odometry with leg force sensing, or handling occlusion during obstacle detection — independent of a specific mechanical leg design.
Research Quadruped Robot Machine Vision in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole quadruped robot machine vision corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.