Book a demo

Quadruped Robot Machine Vision Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Quadruped Robot Machine Vision Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/quadruped-robot-machine-vision-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Robotics & Automation
Quadruped Robot Machine Vision Patents: Filing Trends and Who Holds the Ground
  • Filing peaked early and hasn't returned. 2017 logged 14 filings against just 2 by the midpoint year of 2022, and the most recent year sits at 2 — a pattern of a burst of foundational filing followed by a long plateau, not sustained growth.
  • Mechanical structure still outweighs vision. B62D (motor vehicles & steering) and B25J (manipulators & robots) each appear in the large majority of the 72 families, while G06V (image/video recognition) appears in only 5 — the vision layer is thin relative to the legged-locomotion hardware it rides on.
  • Boston Dynamics anchors the citation graph. Its screw-actuator and gait-behaviour patents are the two most-cited records in the set, and its negative-obstacle detection patent (2022) is the newest highly-cited entry — but its own recent-year filing has dropped to zero, a -100% YoY signal worth tracking.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
72
Published Records
86%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-44%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (9 records) with 2024 (5) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 72 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks 72 patent families at the intersection of legged-robot mechanics and the vision or perception systems that let them navigate uneven ground. The search combines terms for quadruped, quadrupedal and legged robots with claim or description language around terrain perception, 3D vision, obstacle detection and visual odometry, filtered to IPC classes covering image recognition (G06V20), robot leg drive mechanisms (B62D57/032) and image analysis (G06T7). The result is a narrow, mechanically-grounded slice of robotics IP rather than a broad computer-vision corpus.

Filing offices skew heavily toward the United States, with India, Europe and China each contributing a smaller but meaningful share. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent year in any trend line is understated and should be read as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017–2026
  1. 1BOSTON DYNAMICS INC54
  2. 2BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV3
  3. 3SHAPIRO AMIR3
  4. 4DR CHANDAR RATHOD1
  5. 5KEVAL RAJNIKANT RATHOD (STUDENT OF BIRLA VISHVAKARMA MAHAVIDYALAYA ENGG COLLEGE)1
  6. 6KAIDJOHAR YUSUFIBHAI KHARODAWALA (STUDENT OF BIRLA VISHVAKARMA MAHAVIDYALAYA ENGG COLLEGE)1
  7. 7Guangdong Yantong Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.1
  8. 8Yijian Xiangshan Laundry (Zhongshan) Co., Ltd.1
  9. 9DR E JAYAKIRAN REDDY1
  10. 10VIDYA JYOTHI INST OF TECH1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Quadruped Robot Machine Vision covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology mix

Two views of the same 72 families: how filing activity has moved over time, and which technical subclasses carry the claim weight.

A 2017 peak, then a plateau

Filings hit 14 in 2017, the peak year on record, then dropped toward single digits by the 2022 midpoint and have stayed low through the most recent (partial) year. This reads less like a cooling field and more like an early cluster of foundational filings that has not been followed by a second wave.

A 2017 peak, then a plateau04811151420172018201920202021202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Structure dominates, vision is a thin layer

B62D and B25J between them cover the large majority of families — these are the leg, steering and manipulator mechanics. G05D (non-electric control), F16H (gearing) and G01L (force/pressure sensing) form a secondary cluster of locomotion-support classes. G06V, the dedicated image-recognition class, appears in only 5 of 72 families, suggesting most vision work here is claimed as a supporting feature of a mechanical system rather than as a vision invention in its own right.

Structure dominates, vision is a thin layerB62D · Motor vehicles & steering7198.6%B25J · Manipulators & robots6286.1%G05D · Control of non-electric variab…912.5%F16H · Gearing & transmissions811.1%G01L · Force & pressure measurement811.1%G06V · Image/video recognition56.9%F15B · Fluid-pressure actuators & sys…45.6%B60R · Vehicles, parts & accessories22.8%Other1520.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 72 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Quadruped Robot Machine Vision covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Quadruped Robot Machine Vision with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about quadruped robot machine vision and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The most-cited records in this set

Representative filing
US20220390952A12022-12-08

US20220390952A1 — Detecting negative obstacles

BOSTON DYNAMICS, INC.

A computer-implemented method for a legged robot that identifies a candidate support surface lower than the robot's current surface, checks whether that surface has an area of missing terrain data large enough to matter for a leg touchdown, and if so classifies that area as a no-step region — flagging holes, drops and negative obstacles the robot should avoid stepping into.Filed by Boston Dynamics, published 2022-12-08.

US20220390952A1 — patent drawing 1US20220390952A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-citation patent families
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20180172121A1Screw Actuator for a Legged Robot62
2US10017218B1Achieving a target gait behavior in a legged robot38
3WO2008084480A2A quadruped legged robot driven by linear actuators36
4US9878751B1Three-piston ankle mechanism of a legged robot and associated control system31
5US20220390952A1Detecting negative obstacles22
6US20180162469A1Whole Body Manipulation on a Legged Robot Using Dynamic Balance17
7US10253855B2Screw actuator for a legged robot16
8US12054208B2Achieving a target gait behavior in a legged robot15
9US10144465B1Achieving a target gait behavior in a legged robot10
10US10988192B1Three-piston ankle mechanism of a legged robot and associated control system7

Citation counts are drawn from the searched corpus and favour older filings; treat them as a signal of influence on later filers, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Quadruped Robot Machine Vision covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Four read-throughs of the filing trend, technology mix and citation graph, aimed at where to place claims rather than where the crowd already is.

Filing momentum
14 → 2
peak (2017) to latest year

The early cluster hasn't repeated

A 2017 peak followed by a decline to 2 filings by 2022 and roughly the same through the latest year points to a field that had one active filing window, likely tied to a handful of players establishing core leg-mechanism claims, rather than continuous incremental filing.

Read the trend as a floor given ~18-month publication lag.
Technology depth
5 of 72
families touching G06V

Vision claims are thin relative to mechanics

Dedicated image/video recognition claims (G06V) appear in a small minority of families against the near-universal presence of B62D and B25J. Most perception functionality in this set is likely claimed as a feature within a locomotion or control patent rather than as a standalone vision method.

Occupied claim space in B62D/B25J does not mean vision claim space is occupied.
Citation concentration
62 citations
top-cited record (US20180172121A1)

A small set of early patents anchor the field

The most-cited records — a screw actuator, a gait-behaviour patent and a linear-actuator quadruped design — are mechanical rather than vision patents, and the newest highly-cited entry, the 2022 negative-obstacle filing, is the clearest vision-adjacent standout.

Older records accumulate citations by default; weight recency accordingly.
Collaboration
4 pairs
co-assignee relationships found

Co-filing is rare and mostly academic

Only 4 co-assignee pairs appear across 72 families, the strongest being a university-inventor pairing. Corporate co-filing between separate companies is essentially absent, suggesting this space is being built through in-house R&D rather than joint ventures.

Academic pairings suggest early-stage or exploratory work, not commercialization partnerships.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to quadruped robot machine vision, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Quadruped Robot Machine Vision covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is active, and who has slowed down

Recent-year momentum is muted across almost every named assignee in this set, which is more informative than the overall ranking on its own.

Momentum leader
-100% YoY
Boston Dynamics

Foundational filer, now quiet on record

Boston Dynamics holds two of the most-cited mechanical patents in the set plus the standout 2022 negative-obstacle vision filing, but shows zero filings in the latest year — a sharp drop from prior activity that may reflect a shift to trade-secret practice or a lull between filing cycles.

Watch for a resumption given the strength of its existing citation position.
Academic pairing
3 co-filings
Ben-Gurion University + Shapiro Amir

The strongest collaboration in the dataset

The Ben-Gurion University and inventor Shapiro Amir pairing is the densest co-assignee relationship found, though it too shows zero filings in the latest year, consistent with a completed research cycle rather than ongoing output.

Useful for licensing outreach rather than competitive blocking.
Single recent filer
1 filing
Guangdong Junye Technology Institute (LP), latest year

The only assignee with positive recent-year activity

Against a backdrop of zero recent-year filings from Boston Dynamics, Google, Ben-Gurion University and others, this is the one name in the momentum data still actively filing in the most recent year — worth monitoring even without a large existing portfolio.

A single filing is a signal to watch, not yet a trend.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a freedom-to-operate check
Branches where filing density is low relative to the mechanical core of this dataset.
negative-obstacle terrain classificationvisual odometry fusion with leg force sensing3D vision for dynamic gait re-planningmonocular depth on legged platformsobstacle detection under occlusion
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Guangdong Junye Technology Institute (Limited Partnership)1
Boston Dynamics, Inc.0-100%
Google LLC0
Ben-Gurion University0
SHAPIRO AMIR0
Hangzhou Ezviz Software Co., Ltd.0
Guangdong Yantong Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.0
Wu Yuanqing0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Quadruped Robot Machine Vision covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The filing trend and technology mix point to specific next steps depending on whether you're clearing a design or scouting a licensing target.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on vision claims specifically

Because G06V claim density is low against the mechanical core, a targeted search on terrain-classification and obstacle-detection claim language is more useful here than a broad landscape re-run.

Explore claim scope in Eureka

Track whether Boston Dynamics resumes filing

Its zero-filing latest year against a strong citation position is the single most watchable signal in this dataset; a resumption would likely reset the competitive picture.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka

Investigate the academic-inventor pairing for licensing

The Ben-Gurion University and Shapiro Amir collaboration is the strongest co-assignee link found and may represent an accessible licensing or acquisition target given no recent competing activity.

Review co-assignee networks in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Quadruped Robot Machine Vision covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Quadruped Robot Machine Vision covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Quadruped Robot Machine Vision in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole quadruped robot machine vision corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.