Book a demo

Quantum Photonic Circuit Patent Landscape 2026

Quantum Photonic Circuit Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

Quantum Photonic Circuit Patent Landscape in 2026

The quantum photonic circuit field is in a confirmed growth stage, with the recent three-year window running 48% above the prior period, though annual volume has eased from its 2023 peak. Academic institutions dominate the ranking, with Abu Dhabi University holding the top position, and optical control and modulation accounting for the largest share of technical coverage.

200
Patent families in scope
25%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+48%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Academic institutions lead a moderately concentrated field

Abu Dhabi University heads. The top five filers together account for 25% of the combined total across the hundred largest filers, signaling moderate concentration rather than monopolistic control.

The tier gap between the leader and the second-ranked filer is meaningful — 19 versus 11 patent families — but the next several applicants are tightly clustered between 7 and 10, suggesting a competitive mid-tier where position can shift quickly. No single entity commands an overwhelming share, which leaves the competitive structure genuinely open.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Abu Dhabi University19
2PsiQuantum Corp11
3The Boeing Company10
4Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University10
5Nanyang Technological University7
6Advanced Micro Foundry Pte Ltd7
7THE HONG KONG UNIV OF SCI & TECH7
8Quantum Tech UG GmbH7
9National Research Council of Canada6
10PRESIDENT & FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE5
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Commissariat a l’Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives (CEA)5
12Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique5
13The Government of the United States of America4
14Stevens Institute of Technology4
15The Governing Council of the University of Toronto4
16Massachusetts Institute of Technology4
17George Washington University4
18Corning Incorporated4
19Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC)3
20University of Rochester3
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The presence of a Gulf university at the top of the ranking, alongside U. S. defense contractors, Singaporean foundries, and multiple North American research universities, indicates that quantum photonic circuit IP development is globally distributed and driven at least as much by publicly funded research as by commercial engineering.

Filing data for 2024 and 2025 are subject to publication lag and will undercount actual activity; the apparent slowdown in those years should not be read as a real deceleration. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Multi-year growth intact despite an eased annual peak; optical control dominates the technology mix

Two lenses reveal the field’s trajectory: an annual filing trend that peaked in 2023 and a technology composition dominated by optical control, modulation, and optical elements. Together they show where momentum has been and which technical branches attract the densest IP attention.

Annual filing trend

Filings climbed from 6 families in 2017 to a peak of 36 in 2023, then eased to 26 in 2024 and 20 in 2025. The apparent softening in 2024–2025 reflects publication lag rather than real deceleration; the recent three-year window remains 48% above the prior three-year window on a multi-year basis. 2026 shows only 2 families, consistent with near-complete undercount at time of analysis.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 36 in 2023.6201711201819201918202028202134202236202326202420202522026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

G02F (optical control and modulation) and G02B (optical elements and systems) are the two dominant branches, reflecting the core photonic integration challenge. H01S (lasers and stimulated emission), H01L (semiconductor devices), and G06N (computing based on AI models) form a meaningful second tier, showing that quantum photonic circuit IP increasingly intersects with classical semiconductor process and AI-driven computation. Nanotechnology applications under B82Y and general transmission under H04B round out the active space.

Technology compositionG02F · Optical control & modulation leads with 114; G02B · Optical elements & systems 107.G02F · Optical control &…114G02B · Optical elements …107H01S · Lasers & stimulat…30H01L · Semiconductor dev…27G06N · Computing based o…26B82Y · Nanotechnology ap…22H04B · Transmission (gen…18G01N · Material analysis…12↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
WO2022076990A1Published 2022-04-14

Optical waveguide structure with partially overlap…

The Boeing Company

An optical waveguide structure (100) comprises a first coupler and a second coupler that, in combination, direct a first-wavelength light (132, 512) to travel through a nonlinear-optical waveguide, the two couplers and an extension waveguide but not a secondary waveguide, a first resonator loop is defined for which the first-wavelength light (132, 512) is… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Optical waveguide structure with partially overlap… — patent drawingOptical waveguide structure with partially overlap… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Optical measuring device73
2Training of photonic neural networks through in si…34
3Quantum Optical Neural Networks30
4Verbesserter Lichtwellenleiter mit einem selbstjus…22
5ODMR-Spektrumanalysator auf Basis von NV-reichem D…21
6Systems And Methods For Suspended Polymer Photonic…19
7Transparent conducting oxide (TCO) based integrate…18
8Systems and Methods for Activation Functions for P…17

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of growth-stage momentum, moderate concentration, cross-sector collaboration, and U. S.-dominant jurisdiction coverage shapes where incremental investment is likely to yield differentiated positioning.

Growth

Growth stage with eased annual pace from the 2023 peak

The field carries a Growth lifecycle designation: the recent three-year filing window is 48% above the prior three-year window. Annual volume peaked in 2023 at 36 families and has eased since, partly due to publication lag in the most recent years. New entrants still appear in the momentum data across multiple applicants, confirming the field has not yet consolidated into a mature, slow-moving state.

Growth · 2023 peak
Concentration

Moderate concentration with a competitive mid-tier

The top five filers account for 25% of the combined total across the hundred largest filers, indicating no single actor has locked in the field. Abu Dhabi University’s 19-family lead is notable but not insurmountable — a cluster of seven applicants sits between 7 and 10 families. An R&D team building a focused portfolio in a specific sub-branch could realistically enter the top tier within two to three years of sustained filing.

Top-5 share: 25%
Collaboration

Early-stage cross-sector co-filing with limited volume

The most active co-filing pairs identified are Quantum Tech UG GmbH with Elmos Semiconductor AG, and the National Research Council of Canada with The Royal Institute for the Advancement of Learning (McGill University). Each pair has one recorded co-filing. The low collaboration count suggests that the ecosystem has not yet matured into deep multi-party consortia, which also means that forming strategic alliances now could establish durable positioning ahead of consolidation.

2 active co-filing pairs
Geography

U.S. filing office dominant; PCT and EPO provide international coverage

The United States is the leading jurisdiction by a wide margin, followed by WIPO PCT and Europe via the EPO. Germany, India, and Canada each hold smaller but non-trivial shares. China shows limited filing activity relative to its scale in adjacent photonics fields, which may reflect a genuine gap or emerging domestic pathways not yet captured in this corpus. Singapore’s presence aligns with Advanced Micro Foundry’s manufacturing focus.

U.S. lead; 12 jurisdictions
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Quantum Tech UG GmbHElmos Semiconductor AG1
National Research Council of CanadaTHE ROYAL INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCEMENT OF LEARNING MC…1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights are derived from applicant ranking, lifecycle, collaboration, and jurisdiction evidence.Explore insights →
Leaders

Abu Dhabi University leads on volume; PsiQuantum Corp anchors the commercial tier

The top of the ranking is split between publicly funded universities and a pure-play quantum startup, with a defense prime and foundry platform completing the top five. Technology emphasis diverges sharply across these players.

Leader · Abu Dhabi University

Abu Dhabi University

Abu Dhabi University holds 19 patent families, the largest position in the corpus. Its momentum classification is new entrant for this tracking window, with 12 families filed in the recent period. Technology focus is concentrated in optical control and modulation (G02F 1), with a secondary cluster in non-metallic elements and inorganic compounds (C01B 32) — suggesting graphene or carbon-based photonic material work — and nanotechnology applications (B82Y 20). This materials-oriented angle differentiates it from the device integration focus of commercial peers.

families: 19
Challenger · PsiQuantum Corp

PsiQuantum Corp

PsiQuantum Corp holds 11 patent families and is the highest-ranked pure commercial quantum computing company in the corpus. Its momentum is classified as new entrant in the recent window, with 9 families filed recently — indicating rapid ramp-up from a small prior base. Technology emphasis spans optical control and modulation (G02F 1), general transmission (H04B 10), and quantum computing models (G06N 10), reflecting a systems-level integration strategy that ties photonic hardware to quantum algorithm execution.

families: 11
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access the complete ranked list of all applicants, their technology profiles, and filing momentum across the full corpus.
The Boeing CompanyAdvanced Micro Foundry Pte Ltd+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Abu Dhabi University12▲ new entrant
PsiQuantum Corp9▲ new entrant
The Boeing Company4▲ new entrant
The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology3▲ new entrant
Quantum Tech UG GmbH6▲ new entrant
Advanced Micro Foundry Pte Ltd7▲ new entrant
National Research Council of Canada1▲ new entrant
Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique2▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player profiles combine applicant ranking, technology focus, and filing momentum data.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the photonic core

Several IPC branches appear at lower share levels relative to the dominant optical control and elements classes. These are observations of relative sparsity; technical plausibility and entry path are assessed individually below.

H01S · Lasers & stimulated emission

With 30 records, this branch sits well below the G02F and G02B dominance, despite lasers being a fundamental light source in any quantum photonic system. The sparse dedicated coverage may reflect that laser IP is often filed separately in device-level portfolios rather than integrated into photonic circuit families — creating a potential wedge for applicants who can claim tightly integrated on-chip laser sources. Entry path would leverage existing semiconductor laser process IP combined with photonic integration know-how.

Search this in Eureka →

G06N · Computing based on AI models

Twenty-six records appear under computing and AI models, with Stanford’s portfolio notably combining G02F optical control with G06N neural network computation. The most-cited works include training of photonic neural networks and quantum optical neural network architectures, confirming technical overlap. However, the count remains low relative to the overall corpus, suggesting most applicants have not yet filed on the algorithmic and training-method layer of photonic quantum computing — an adjacent space with plausible near-term commercial value.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
Access branch-level gap analysis across all IPC classes in the quantum photonic circuit corpus.
B82Y · Nanotechnology applicationsH04B · Transmission (general)+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch sparsity is measured relative to the dominant IPC classes in the corpus and does not constitute a validated commercial opportunity assessment.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ by technology route across optical and computing branches

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerG02F 1 · Optical control & modulationG02B 6 · Optical elements & systemsH01S 5 · Lasers & stimulated emissionB82Y 20 · Nanotechnology applicationsH04B 10 · Transmission (general)
Abu Dhabi UniversityStrong · 19AbsentAbsentEmerging · 3Absent
PsiQuantum CorpStrong · 9Moderate · 4AbsentAbsentStrong · 6
Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior UniversityStrong · 8AbsentAbsentAbsentModerate · 3
The Boeing CompanyStrong · 10AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
The Governing Council of the University of TorontoStrong · 4Strong · 4AbsentAbsentAbsent
Institut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueAbsentStrong · 5Moderate · 2AbsentEmerging · 1
Stevens Institute of TechnologyStrong · 4AbsentAbsentStrong · 3Absent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Map your own quantum photonic circuit IP landscape

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.