Book a demo

Quantum Sensing & Metrology Patent Landscape 2026

Quantum Sensing & Metrology Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

Quantum Sensing & Metrology Patent Landscape in 2026

The quantum sensing and metrology field spans 2,281 patent families and remains in a growth phase, with the most recent three-year window up 47% versus the prior comparable period, though annual volume eased from its 2023 peak. Google LLC leads by family count, but the top five filers hold only 18% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, signalling a fragmented, multi-stakeholder competitive field.

2,281
Patent families in scope
18%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+47%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Google leads a fragmented field with strong academic presence in the top tier

Google LLC heads the top five filers account for 18% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total — a relatively low concentration figure indicating that no single player commands a dominant share.

The tier gap between the leader (90 patent families) and the twentieth-ranked applicant, University of Ulm (25 patent families), is roughly 3.6×. Several universities and government laboratories sit inside the top fifteen, meaning that academic and public-sector actors are structural participants rather than peripheral contributors.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Google LLC90
2Quantum Tech UG GmbH69
3Massachusetts Institute of Technology65
4Northrop Grumman Systems Corp64
5PRESIDENT & FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE61
6Kyoto University54
7Wells Fargo Bank NA45
8Beihang University35
9University of Strathclyde34
10Regents of the University of California34
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11NPL Management Ltd34
12UNIV OF SCI & TECH OF CHINA32
13Commissariat a l’Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives (CEA)32
14Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)31
15Ricoh Co Ltd30
16Texas Instruments Inc29
17Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC27
18SaxonQ GmbH25
19ColdQuanta Inc25
20University of Ulm25
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Google’s position is anchored in quantum computing infrastructure (G06N), which partially overlaps with sensing applications. Northrop Grumman and Kyoto University concentrate on electric and magnetic measurement (G01R 33), the field’s dominant technical branch, signalling that hardware-focused players most directly contest the core sensing space.

Filing counts for 2024 and 2025 are systematically understated due to patent publication lag of typically 18–24 months; apparent softening in those years should not be read as a genuine slowdown. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Multi-year growth intact, with electric and magnetic measurement as the structural core

Annual filing volume climbed steadily from 2017 through 2023 before easing, consistent with a maturing growth field. The technology mix is broad but clearly anchored in a dominant branch, with AI-assisted computing methods emerging as a significant secondary layer.

Annual filing trend

Filings grew from 81 families in 2017 to a peak of 400 in 2023, a roughly five-fold increase over six years. The 2024 and 2025 figures (331 and 256 respectively) reflect publication lag rather than a genuine reversal; the 2026 count of 33 is an early partial-year tally only.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 400 in 2023.81201712220182082019251202026620213332022400202333120242562025332026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

G01R (electric and magnetic measurement) is the dominant branch, followed at a distance by G06N (AI-based computing methods), G01N (material analysis and testing), and B82Y (nanotechnology applications). The prominence of G06N reflects quantum algorithm development intersecting with sensing hardware; G01N and B82Y signal active work at the interface of quantum sensing and physical chemistry or nanoscale devices.

Technology compositionG01R · Electric & magnetic measurement leads with 1,588; G06N · Computing based on AI models 1,065.G01R · Electric & magnet…1,588G06N · Computing based o…1,065G01N · Material analysis…494B82Y · Nanotechnology ap…199A61B · Diagnosis & surgery142H01L · Semiconductor dev…133G06F · Electric digital …129H04B · Transmission (gen…105↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
AU2023383698A1Published 2025-06-26

Intracellular quantum metrology device, intracellu…

National Institutes For Quantum Science And Technology

The purpose of the present invention is to achieve quantum metrology which makes it possible to measure the state of the inside of a cell and in which disadvantages of quantum metrology using nano-particles are overcome. The intracellular quantum metrology device (1) is provided with a substrate (10) having a nanopillar (11) formed on the surface thereof… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Optically integrated biosensor based on optically …232
2Methods and apparatus for optically detecting magn…188
3Atomic magnetometer and operating method of the same185
4Diode laser-pumped magnetometer172
5High sensitivity solid state magnetometer164
6High sensitivity atomic magnetometer and methods f…152
7Electronic spin based enhancement of magnetometer …134
8Electronic spin based enhancement of magnetometer …132

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment

The field’s growth trajectory, fragmented ownership, rich collaboration network, and US-centric filing geography together define where new entrants have room and where incumbents are entrenched.

Growth

Growth stage, past its 2023 annual peak

The field is classified as Growth: the most recent three-year filing window sits 47% above the prior comparable window, confirming multi-year expansion. Annual volume eased from its 2023 peak of 400 families, and the most recent years are further understated by publication lag. The window for early-mover positioning has not closed, but core magnetic measurement and quantum computing branches are becoming increasingly contested.

Growth stage
Concentration

Low concentration, broad participation

The top five filers hold 18% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total — a low figure for a technology field of this size. Universities, national labs, start-ups, and large corporates all appear in the top twenty, which means no single player can set de facto standards or block broad swaths of the landscape. New entrants with differentiated technical approaches have realistic paths to meaningful positions.

Fragmented
Collaboration

National lab–university and industry–university pairs dominate co-filing

The most active co-filing pair is NPL Management Ltd and the University of Strathclyde with 31 joint patent families, reflecting the UK’s coordinated metrology research infrastructure. Kyoto University and Sumida Corporation (23 families) represent the leading industry–university pairing. Quantum Tech UG GmbH and Elmos Semiconductor AG (21 families) anchor a European hardware collaboration. Harvard University and MIT co-filed 19 families, the strongest US academic pairing. These clusters suggest that partnership with a complementary institution — particularly a national metrology institute or a precision-components manufacturer — accelerates portfolio building.

Ecosystem
Geography

US-dominant filing, with China and Europe active secondary jurisdictions

The United States leads as the primary filing office, followed by China, WIPO (PCT), and Europe (EPO). Germany, Japan, Australia, India, and Canada form a secondary tier. South Korea and the United Kingdom trail. The PCT route is used extensively, indicating applicants seeking broad international coverage. China’s strong position in the secondary tier is reinforced by Beihang University and the University of Science and Technology of China both appearing in the top-twenty applicant ranking.

US-led, global
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
NPL Management LtdUniversity of Strathclyde31
Kyoto UniversitySumida Corporation23
Quantum Tech UG GmbHElmos Semiconductor AG21
President & Fellows of Harvard CollegeMassachusetts Institute of Technology19
Kyoto UniversityNissin Electric Co Ltd9
President & Fellows of Harvard CollegeUniversity of Maryland4
President & Fellows of Harvard CollegeQUERA COMPUTING INC3
Kyoto UniversityHamamatsu Photonics KK3
Quantum Tech UG GmbHDUOTEC GMBH3
Google LLCRegents of the University of California2

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Collaboration counts represent co-filed patent families; jurisdiction counts are at the patent-record level.Explore insights →
Leaders

Google leads in volume; Quantum Tech UG GmbH is the fastest-growing challenger

The leader and primary challenger occupy distinct technical niches — quantum computing infrastructure versus core electromagnetic sensing hardware — making them complementary rather than directly colliding across all branches.

Leader · Google LLC

Google LLC

Google LLC ranks first with 90 patent families. Its portfolio is concentrated in G06N (AI and quantum computing models), reflecting an infrastructure-first strategy that spans quantum algorithm development applicable to sensing tasks. Recent-period momentum is essentially flat at +3% versus the prior window, suggesting the portfolio is consolidating rather than aggressively expanding.

families: 90
Challenger · Quantum Tech UG GmbH

Quantum Tech UG GmbH

Quantum Tech UG GmbH holds 69 patent families and is the fastest-growing major filer in the ranking, with recent-period filings up 63% versus the prior window. Its portfolio centres on G01R 33 (electric and magnetic measurement) and G01N 21 (material analysis), placing it squarely in applied quantum magnetometry and optical sensing — the most hardware-proximate segment of the field. Its close collaboration with Elmos Semiconductor AG (21 joint families) further anchors a chip-level integration pathway.

families: 69
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access momentum scores, technology emphasis, and co-filing maps for all ranked applicants.
Northrop Grumman Systems CorpPresident & Fellows of Harvard College+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Google LLC41▬ +3%
President & Fellows of Harvard College17▼ -6%
Kyoto University24▬ 0%
Quantum Tech UG GmbH26▲ +63%
Massachusetts Institute of Technology15▼ -40%
Wells Fargo Bank NA20▼ -17%
Northrop Grumman Systems Corp5▼ -62%
Beihang University14▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Trajectory data compare each applicant’s most recent three-year filing count against the prior three-year period.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches at the quantum sensing periphery

Several IPC branches appear adjacent to the field’s core but carry relatively low shares of the current corpus, representing areas where the technical intersection with quantum sensing exists but patent activity has not yet densified.

A61B · Diagnosis & surgery

With 142 patent records and a 3% share of classified records among the top branches, quantum-enhanced biomedical sensing — magnetoencephalography, zero-field NMR, and optically pumped magnetometers for cardiac imaging — remains under-represented relative to its technical potential. The most-cited prior art in the corpus includes several magnetometer patents directly applicable to biomagnetic measurement. Entrants with both quantum sensing hardware expertise and regulatory pathway experience in medical devices face lower incumbent density than in the core G01R branch.

Search this in Eureka →

G01C · Distance, navigation & gyroscopes

G01C (distance, navigation, and gyroscopes) carries 86 patent records, a modest footprint given that atom interferometry and quantum gyroscopes are among the most mature quantum sensing modalities beyond magnetometry. Northrop Grumman’s portfolio includes G01C 19 filings, but the branch as a whole is sparsely covered relative to the core magnetic measurement cluster. For defence, aerospace, or autonomous-navigation players with existing inertial sensing programmes, this represents a realistic adjacent entry point with identifiable commercial pull.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See claim-level gap analysis across all IPC branches in the quantum sensing corpus.
B82Y · Nanotechnology applicationsG01V · Geophysics & gravity surveying+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch counts are observations of relative filing sparsity and are not validated commercial opportunity assessments.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ across technology branches

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerG01R 33 · Electric & magnetic measurementG06N 10 · Computing based on AI modelsG01N 24 · Material analysis & testingG01N 21 · Material analysis & testingB82Y 10 · Nanotechnology applications
Google LLCAbsentStrong · 90AbsentAbsentAbsent
Kyoto UniversityStrong · 37AbsentStrong · 33AbsentAbsent
Quantum Tech UG GmbHStrong · 44AbsentAbsentModerate · 16Absent
NPL Management LtdStrong · 32AbsentStrong · 28AbsentAbsent
University of StrathclydeStrong · 32AbsentStrong · 28AbsentAbsent
Wells Fargo Bank NAAbsentStrong · 45AbsentAbsentAbsent
Northrop Grumman Systems CorpStrong · 42AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own quantum sensing landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.