Book a demo

Quaternary Ammonium Compounds Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026

Quaternary Ammonium Compounds Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/quaternary-ammonium-compounds-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Fine Chemicals · Patent Landscape
Quaternary Ammonium Compound Patents: Who Leads and Where Filing Is Flat
  • 43.5% of all 733 records sit with just five assignees, and the top ten account for 61.0% — this field is concentrated, not fragmented.
  • Filing has gone flat since 2021 the peak year at 45 filings, with 2022's 23 marking a clear midpoint decline rather than continued growth.
  • 80.4% of records touch C11D detergents and cleaning compositions dominate the technology mix, while textile treatment and cosmetics use sit far behind at roughly 10-11% each.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
733
Published Records
44%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-67%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (45 records) with 2024 (15) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 733 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

Quaternary ammonium compounds sit at the intersection of surfactant chemistry, biocidal formulation and fabric care, which is why this dataset pulls from C07C211 quaternization chemistry, C11D1 detergent formulation and A01N33 biocidal application in a single search. The 733 records in scope span 2015 through the current filing year, with the most recent year necessarily undercounted because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months.

Reading this landscape means separating chemistry claims (quaternization routes, amine feedstocks) from application claims (fabric softening, biocidal efficacy, biodegradability). The two claim types are governed by different IPC classes and, as the composition data below shows, they are claimed at very different rates.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1PROCTER & GAMBLE CO125
  2. 2COLGATE PALMOLIVE CO69
  3. 3RHODIA OPERATIONS SAS62
  4. 4UNITED LAB INT LLC32
  5. 5SPECIALTY OPERATIONS FRANCE31
  6. 6STEPAN COMPANY31
  7. 7UNILEVER IP HLDG BV25
  8. 8THE CLOROX CO24
  9. 9UNILEVER GLOBAL IP LTD24
  10. 10SCHEIBEL JEFFREY JOHN24
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Quaternary Ammonium Compounds covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 733 records: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings ran at 35 in 2017, climbed to a peak of 45 in 2021, then declined to 23 by the 2022 midpoint. The downward trend since the peak, combined with the expected undercount in the final year or two, suggests this is a maturing rather than an expanding filing area.

Filing trend, 2017-2026013253850352017201820192020452021202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

C11D (detergents and cleaning compositions) touches 80.4% of the 733 records, making it the dominant application context by a wide margin. A01N biocides follow at 25.5%, with A61K medicinal preparations, C07C core chemistry, A61Q cosmetics, A01P pesticide activity, D06M textile treatment and C09K materials applications each in the 9-14% range. Because records can carry multiple IPC codes, these shares sum to well over 100% of the record total — that overlap itself is informative, showing how often quat chemistry claims are bundled with a specific end-use application.

Technology composition by IPC subclassC11D · Detergents & cleaning composit…58980.4%A01N · Biocides / agrochemicals18725.5%A61K · Medicinal preparations10013.6%C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds8711.9%A61Q · Cosmetics use8111.1%A01P · Pesticide activity7710.5%D06M · Textile chemical treatment7610.4%C09K · Materials for misc. applicatio…658.9%Other34046.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 733 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Quaternary Ammonium Compounds covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Quaternary Ammonium Compounds with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about quaternary ammonium compounds and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Prior Art

Key patents and the citation backbone

Representative Filing
US20130116163A12013-05-09

Use of a quaternary ammonium compound as a hydrotrope

NOURYON CHEMICALS INTERNATIONAL B.V.

US20130116163A1 claims an alkyl di(lower alkyl)mono(polyoxyethylene) quaternary ammonium compound used as a hydrotrope in aqueous nonionic surfactant solutions, with the surfactant preferably a C8-C18-alcohol alkoxylate. The formula specifies R as C6-C22 alkyl and R1/R2 as independently C1-C4 alkyl, with a defined ethyleneoxy chain length, filed by Nouryon Chemicals International B.V.Filed 2013-05-09 — predates this dataset's 2015 window start but sits in the citation lineage of records inside it.

US20130116163A1 — patent drawing 1US20130116163A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US4260529ADetergent composition consisting essentially of biodegradable nonionic surfactant and cationic surfactant con…1,099
2US4239660ADetergent composition comprising a hydrolyzable cationic surfactant and specific alkalinity source1,047
3WO1998035006A1Liquid cleaning composition809
4US4239659ADetergent compositions containing nonionic and cationic surfactants, the cationic surfactant having a long al…674
5US4259217ALaundry detergent compositions having enhanced greasy and oily soil removal performance538
6WO2010066632A1Laundry article having cleaning and conditioning properties216
7WO2010066631A1Laundry article having cleaning and conditioning properties211
8US20050137114A1Novel foamer composition and methods for making and using same194
9US4846992ABuilt thickened stable non-aqueous cleaning composition and method of use, and package therefor154
10US5543067AWaterless self-emulsiviable biodegradable chemical softening composition useful in fibrous cellulosic materia…141

Citation counts favour older documents simply because they have had more time to be cited within this corpus — treat them as a signal of influence on the field's claim structure, not as a measure of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Quaternary Ammonium Compounds covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Analysis

What the concentration and composition data mean

The numbers point to a field where a small group of formulators has occupied the core detergent and biocidal claim space, while the underlying quaternization chemistry itself is less densely claimed.

Concentration
43.5% / top 5
share of 733 records

Five assignees hold nearly half the field

The leader alone accounts for 125 records, and the gap to fifth place (31) is steep. That drop-off matters for freedom-to-operate work: the top of this ranking is where formulation claims are thickest, and it is also where continuation filings are most likely to keep extending coverage.

Top 5 combined = 319 of 733 records
Momentum
45 → 23
peak (2021) to midpoint (2022)

Filing has cooled since 2021

Volume rose from 35 in 2017 to a peak of 45 in 2021, then fell to 23 by 2022. Combined with near-zero recent-year activity from several of the largest historical filers, this looks like a field where the dominant players have already staked their core claims rather than one still being actively built out.

Most named leaders show 0 filings in the latest year
Composition
80.4% C11D
share of 733 records

Detergent application dominates the claim mix

Four out of five records touch detergent and cleaning composition classifications, while core acyclic/carbocyclic chemistry (C07C) appears in just 11.9%. That imbalance suggests more formulation-layer claims than feedstock or synthesis-route claims across this corpus.

C07C core chemistry: 87 of 733 records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to quaternary ammonium compounds, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Quaternary Ammonium Compounds covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Competitive Landscape

Who is filing, and where they cluster

The ranked leaders in this dataset are dominated by household and personal-care formulators rather than specialty chemical producers, which shapes where the densest claim thickets sit.

Leader
125 records
leading assignee

A single formulator holds the largest single share

The top-ranked assignee's 125 records are well ahead of the field, and its filings cluster tightly with named co-inventors, pointing to a small internal team driving a large share of the portfolio.

Co-assignee pairs run as high as 24 shared filings
Tail structure
61.0% / top 10
share of 733 records

A long tail sits below a concentrated top ten

Once past the top ten (447 of 733 records), the ranked list of 100 companies thins quickly, with many single or low-count filers. That tail is where opportunistic or defensive filings are more likely, rather than sustained R&D programmes.

100 companies counted in the ranking overall
Momentum
0-1 filings
latest year, named leaders

Recent-year activity has nearly stopped among top filers

Several of the largest historical assignees show zero filings in the most recent year, and one tracked assignee shows a -100% year-on-year change. This is consistent with the broader flat-to-declining trend rather than an anomaly specific to any one company.

Latest-year counts range from 0 to 1 among tracked leaders
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
Sub-areas where record counts are comparatively thin relative to the core detergent cluster.
Biodegradable quat feedstock routesLow-alkyl quaternization for cosmetics useTextile-specific quat softener chemistryPesticide-activity quat formulationsMaterials-grade quat surfactants (C09K)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
The Clorox Company1
Procter & Gamble Co.0
Rhodia Operations SAS0
Colgate-Palmolive Company0
UNITED LAB INT LLC0-100%
Stepan Company0
Unilever IP Holdings B.V.0-100%
Unilever PLC0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Quaternary Ammonium Compounds covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific follow-up questions rather than a single conclusion — the value is in narrowing from field-level trends to claim-level detail.

Check freedom-to-operate against the top five

With 43.5% of records held by five assignees, any new detergent or fabric-softener formulation should be screened against that concentrated set before broader searching.

Run a claim-level search in Eureka

Track the flat filing trend by sub-application

The field-wide decline since 2021 may not be even across A01N biocidal, A61Q cosmetics and D06M textile applications — breaking the trend out by IPC subclass can reveal where activity is still live.

Explore trend by IPC in Eureka

Watch the co-assignee clusters

The strongest co-assignee pairs run as high as 24 shared filings, indicating specific internal teams worth tracking for continuation activity.

Map assignee networks in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Quaternary Ammonium Compounds covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Quaternary Ammonium Compounds covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Quaternary Ammonium Compounds in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole quaternary ammonium compounds corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.