Radar Level Measurement Patents: Who Leads, Trends 2026
Radar Level Measurement Patents: Who Holds the Core Claims
51.2% concentration. The top five ranked assignees hold 522 of the 1,020 records in scope, so the guided-wave and antenna claims that matter sit with a small group of instrumentation makers. Annual filings rose to a peak of 104 in 2017. Tracked from 2021 (39) to 2024 (the most recent year treatable as complete), filings fell 77% to 9. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in and should not be read as a continued decline.
- 1ROSEMOUNT TANK RADAR202
- 2HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC145
- 3ROSEMOUNT INC78
- 4VEGA GRIESHABER GMBH & CO50
- 5ENDRESS & HAUSER GMBH & CO KG47
See the full radar level measurement analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Questions practitioners ask about this field
Who holds the most radar level measurement patents?
Filing is concentrated at the top: the leading assignee alone accounts for 202 of the 1,020 records in scope, and the top five ranked assignees together hold 51.2% of all records. The top ten extend that to 65.0%. Below that group sits a long tail of smaller filers, so freedom-to-operate work should focus first on the handful of companies holding the bulk of the portfolio rather than trying to clear every name in the ranking.
Why did radar level measurement filings decline after 2017?
Filings peaked at 104 in 2017 and fell to 9 by 2024, a drop the dataset states as -77% between 2021 and 2024. This looks like a maturing claim space rather than a shrinking market: guided-wave launcher and antenna geometry were heavily claimed early, narrowing the room for new hardware claims. Note that 2025 and 2026 figures in any such dataset are always understated because publication lags filing by about 18 months, so the most recent two years should not be read as confirming a further slowdown.
What is the difference between guided-wave radar and free-space radar patent claims?
Guided-wave radar claims, which sit inside the G01F/G01S combination covering the bulk of the corpus, center on a probe or launcher that guides the microwave pulse down a physical conductor into the process fluid. Free-space radar claims instead center on antenna design, most visibly the horn-antenna geometry behind one of the most-cited records in the set (US8890759B2, 222 citations). The two routes carry different fouling and dielectric-sensitivity trade-offs, which is why antenna claims (H01Q) and material-analysis claims (G01N) cluster differently around each.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Radar Level Measurement covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.