Book a demo

Radio Access Network Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026

Radio Access Network Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/radio-access-networks-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Radio Access Networks
Radio Access Network Patents: Who Leads and Where Filing Is Heading
  • 52.2% concentration. The five leading assignees account for 190,344 of the 364,514 records in scope — over half the field sits with a handful of filers.
  • Filing cooled after 2022. The peak year was 2022 at 2,151 filings; from 2021 to 2024, the last complete year, filings fell 31%, from 2,011 to 1,391.
  • Momentum is broadly negative at the top. Every leading assignee tracked shows a double-digit percentage decline in the latest year versus the prior one, some down more than 85%.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
364.5K
Published Records
52%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-31%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (2,011 records) with 2024 (1,391) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 364,514 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the Radio Access Networks patent record shows

Radio Access Networks (RAN) patenting spans the physical and control-plane work that lets a mobile device connect to a network: radio channel management, beamforming control, wireless signal processing, frequency band allocation, packet routing at the edge, and the network functions that coordinate all of it. The dataset behind this page covers 364,514 published records filed or published between 2015 and the August 2026 cut-off, drawn from a search string that pairs RAN terminology with the specific technical mechanisms — radio channel, beamforming control, wireless signal, frequency band, packet routing, network function — that separate a RAN filing from adjacent wireless work.

Filing activity in this dataset is heavily weighted toward a small number of large telecom equipment and handset vendors, with a long tail of smaller and single-filing entrants behind them. The trend line rose through the early 2020s, peaked in 2022, and has since declined through the last complete filing year; because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the very newest years in the chart will fill in further and should not yet be read as a falling trend.

Filing volume by year, 2017–2026
  1. 1QUALCOMM INC56,171
  2. 2TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)47,176
  3. 3HUAWEI TECH CO LTD31,856
  4. 4SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD29,931
  5. 5LG ELECTRONICS INC25,210
  6. 6NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES OY12,732
  7. 7NTT DOCOMO INC9,814
  8. 8APPLE INC9,070
  9. 9INTERDIGITAL PATENT HOLDINGS INC6,531
  10. 10AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P6,368
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Radio Access Networks Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 364,514-record dataset: filing volume by year, and how records distribute across IPC subclasses. Because a single record can carry multiple IPC codes, the class shares below sum to more than the record total and should be read against the full 364,514 record base, not against each other.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings ran from 1,176 in 2017 to a peak of 2,151 in 2022, then declined to 1,391 by 2024, a 31% drop across that three-year span. 2025 and 2026 figures (132 in the partial final year) are still incomplete due to publication lag and will rise as later filings publish.

Filing trend, 2017-202606251,2501,8752,5001,176201720182019202020212,15120222023202420251322026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

H04W (wireless communication networks) dominates at 4.5% of the 364,514 records, more than double the next subclass, H04L (digital information transmission) at 2.1%. Everything below H04B (0.8%) — multiplex communication, switching, telephonic communication, and AI-based computing — sits at 0.1-0.2% of records, indicating those mechanisms are usually claimed as secondary elements inside a RAN filing rather than as its primary subject.

Technology composition by IPC subclassH04W · Wireless communication networks16,5134.5%H04L · Digital information transmissi…7,6032.1%H04B · Transmission (general)2,8030.8%G06F · Electric digital data processi…8270.2%H04J · Multiplex communication5350.1%H04Q · Switching & selecting4560.1%H04M · Telephonic communication4340.1%G06N · Computing based on AI models4210.1%Other1,6230.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 364,514 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Radio Access Networks Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Radio Access Networks Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about radio access networks patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative and most-cited filings

Representative Filing
US20100093340A12010-04-15

Method and system for enabling connection of a mobile communication terminal to a radio communication network

TELECOM ITALIA S.P.A.

The claim covers a mobile terminal receiving information about available radio access networks in a geographic area, determining its current location within that area, and using both inputs to select and connect to one of the available radio access networks covering that location.Filed by Telecom Italia S.p.A., published 2010-04-15 as US20100093340A1.

US20100093340A1 — patent drawing 1US20100093340A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20130132854A1Service Plan Design, User Interfaces, Application Programming Interfaces, and Device Management1,214
2US20190364492A1Methods and devices for radio communications876
3US6374112B1Flexible radio access and resource allocation in a universal mobile telephone system759
4US20200259896A1Industrial Automation with 5G and Beyond746
5US5933421AMethod for frequency division duplex communications746
6US20070206531A1Random access procedure with enhanced coverage623
7US20070097939A1Automatic configuration of PICO radio base station584
8US20170303259A1Communication method and apparatus using network slicing571
9US20140086177A1End-to-end architecture, API framework, discovery, and access in a virtualized network552
10US20070049314A1Push-to-talk group call system using CDMA 1x-EVDO cellular network486

Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and skew toward older filings, which have simply had more time to accumulate citations — treat this as a signal of prior influence, not of current filing priority.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Radio Access Networks Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the concentration and trend numbers mean for filing strategy

The data points to a field where claim space at the core is already dense, momentum has cooled from a 2022 high, and citation influence still sits with older filings.

Concentration
52.2%
of 364,514 records held by top 5

The core is occupied by a handful of filers

Five assignees hold 190,344 of the 364,514 records in scope, and the top ten extend that to 64.4%. New entrants filing on core RAN mechanisms — beamforming control, channel allocation — are filing into dense prior art held by a small group.

Source: assignee ranking, 100 companies
Trend
-31%
filings, 2021 to 2024

Filing volume has pulled back from its 2022 peak

Filings peaked at 2,151 in 2022 and fell to 1,391 by 2024, the last complete year. That is a real pullback rather than an artefact of publication lag, since 2024 is fully counted; 2025-26 figures will still rise but sit chronologically after this decline.

Source: filing trend, 2017-2026
Momentum
-65% to -90%
YoY change among leading assignees

Even the largest filers are pulling back in the latest year

Every leading assignee tracked in the latest-year momentum data shows a sharp year-on-year decline, from roughly -65% to -90%. This is consistent with the broader trend pullback rather than a single company retreating from the field.

Source: recent-year momentum by assignee
Citation influence
1,214 citations
on the most-cited record

Influence still sits with older filings

The most-cited record in this dataset is a decade-old filing on service plan design and device management, cited 1,214 times. Citation counts inside any searched corpus favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations, not because newer work is less significant.

Source: most-cited records table
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to radio access networks patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Radio Access Networks Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the core claim space

The ranked leaders in this dataset are large telecom equipment vendors, handset makers and chipset suppliers rather than a diffuse field of small filers. Concentration at the top is real, but recent-year momentum has slowed for all of them.

Leader
56,171
records

The top-ranked assignee holds a scale advantage

The leading assignee's record count sits well above fifth place (25,210) and tenth place (6,368), meaning the gap between first and the rest of the field is itself a strategic fact: a challenger competing head-on at the core is competing against a filer with double the volume of the next four combined.

Source: assignee ranking
Mid-field
25,210
fifth-place records

A dense but reachable second tier

Fifth place still holds 25,210 records, and the top five together cover 52.2% of all 364,514 records in scope. This tier represents established handset and infrastructure vendors defending broad claim positions rather than a single dominant filer.

Source: assignee ranking
Long tail
6,368
tenth-place records

Volume drops sharply outside the top ten

Tenth place holds 6,368 records against a leader with 56,171 — an order-of-magnitude gap. Below the ranked leaders sits a long tail of smaller filers, which is where more narrowly-scoped, defensible filings are more likely to find open space.

Source: assignee ranking, 100 companies
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These sit below the dominant IPC subclasses (H04W, H04L) in filing density based on this dataset's composition figures, suggesting narrower but less contested claim space.
Multiplex communication scheduling (H04J)Switching & selecting control (H04Q)AI-based network function optimisation (G06N)Telephonic-RAN interoperability (H04M)Edge packet routing for RAN handover
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum among leading assignees
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Sweden)11-87%
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.11-65%
Nokia Technologies Oy11-85%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (Korea)10-77%
AT&T Intellectual Property I, L.P.10-71%
Qualcomm Incorporated7-90%
LG Electronics Inc.4+100%
Verizon Patent and Licensing Inc.3-70%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Radio Access Networks Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this next

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, competitive tracking, or identifying open claim space.

Check freedom-to-operate against the concentrated core

With 52.2% of records held by five assignees, any filing touching core beamforming, channel allocation or frequency band claims should be checked against that group's granted claims before drafting.

Run a freedom-to-operate check

Track momentum, not just volume

Every leading assignee shows a steep year-on-year pullback in the latest tracked year. Watching whether that reverses as 2025-26 filings publish will tell you whether the 2022 peak was cyclical or structural.

Set up assignee monitoring

Scope claims in the under-claimed subclasses

H04J, H04Q, H04M and G06N each sit at 0.1-0.2% of records, well below H04W and H04L. Narrower claims in these areas face less prior art density.

Explore white space with Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Radio Access Networks Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on Radio Access Networks patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Radio Access Networks Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Radio Access Networks Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole radio access networks patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.