Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Radioactive waste conditioning turns loose or liquid radioactive material into a stable solid form for storage and eventual disposal. The dominant routes captured in this search are vitrification — melting waste into a borosilicate glass matrix — and cementation, along with the supporting problems of waste loading, glass durability, secondary waste generation and the package acceptance criteria that a conditioned waste form must meet before a repository will take it. Remote handling and long-term leaching performance recur across the corpus because both determine whether a conditioning process is deployable at a live facility rather than only in a lab.
The 76 records in scope span receiving offices led by the United States, with meaningful activity at the EPO and under the PCT route, and smaller filings in India, Canada and the UK. That spread points to a field where protection is sought mainly in jurisdictions with active nuclear waste programmes rather than broad global filing.
Two views of the same 76 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.
Filing rose to a peak of 5 records in 2022. Earlier and later years sit lower, and the final years in the window are undercounted simply because publication has not caught up with filing yet — treat the last one to two years as provisional, not as a real slowdown.
G21F (radiation protection and shielding) appears in 65.8% of the 76 records, C03C (glass and enamel compositions) in 55.3%, and B09B (solid waste disposal) in 40.8%. C03B glass manufacture and shaping follows at 36.8%. Smaller shares in F27B furnaces, G01N testing and B01D separation mark where fewer filers have staked claims, and each record can carry more than one class, so these figures add up to more than the record total by design.
Shares are the percentage of the 76 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about radioactive waste conditioning and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA method and system for increasing the waste loading of vitrified nuclear waste includes a plasma mass filter and a heating apparatus. The plasma mass filter collects radioactive particles from a multi-species plasma; the particles are then placed with a frit in crucibles and induction heated to fuse the radioactive elements with the frit, forming a melted mixture that cools into vitrified waste with relatively high waste loading.Filed by Archimedes Operating, LLC; published 2004-04-22.

| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5643350A | Waste vitrification melter | 85 |
| 2 | US5947887A | Extruder glass-melter process for vitrification of nuclear and other toxic wastes | 59 |
| 3 | US5637127A | Plasma vitrification of waste materials | 59 |
| 4 | US5846278A | Method of determining glass durability | 22 |
| 5 | US6329563B1 | Vitrification of ion exchange resins | 18 |
| 6 | US7019189B1 | Process and composition for the immobilization of radioactive and hazardous wastes in borosilicate glass | 15 |
| 7 | WO2009039059A1 | Mitigation of secondary phase formation during waste vitrification | 10 |
| 8 | US20080020918A1 | Process and composition for the immobilization of high alkaline radioactive and hazardous wastes in silicate-… | 10 |
| 9 | US7550645B2 | Process and composition for the immobilization of radioactive and hazardous wastes in borosilicate glass | 10 |
| 10 | US20060189471A1 | Process and composition for the immobilization of radioactive and hazardous wastes in borosilicate glass | 10 |
Citation counts reward older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations inside this searched corpus — read them as a signal of influence on later filers, not as a ranking of current technical relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns worth acting on before drafting or clearing a new application in this space.
The leading assignee holds 25 records in the ranking; by fifth place that figure is down to 4, and by tenth place just 2. That gap suggests one organisation has built a defensible position around its core vitrification process while the remaining 26 ranked assignees are each protecting narrower, more specific improvements.
Two-thirds of records touch radiation protection and shielding claims, and more than half touch glass or enamel composition claims. A new filing that sits squarely in both is entering the densest part of the landscape and should expect close prior-art scrutiny.
Filing counts move year to year rather than trending cleanly upward, with the peak so far in 2022. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the last one or two years in the window will look artificially quiet and should not be read as a real drop-off.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to radioactive waste conditioning, with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranking covers 27 assignees; most are single-digit filers sitting behind one dominant leader, with a small cluster of co-filing relationships among individually named inventors and one organisation.
One assignee accounts for 25 of the records captured in this search, far ahead of any other name in the ranking. That scale points to sustained, process-level investment in vitrification rather than a one-off filing.
Fifth place in the ranking holds only 4 records, and tenth place just 2. Below the leader, protection is fragmented across many smaller filers rather than held by two or three clear challengers.
Ten co-assignee pairs appear in the data, with the strongest links repeating between the same handful of named parties at counts of 4 each. That is a narrow network, not a broad industry consortium.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Geomatrix Solutions Inc | 0 | — |
| P&T Global Solutions LLC | 0 | — |
| VEOLIA NUCLEAR SOLUTIONS INC | 0 | -100% |
| Stir-Melter Inc | 0 | — |
| University of Manitoba | 0 | — |
| Westinghouse Savannah River | 0 | — |
| GRIBETZ ARTHUR | 0 | — |
| CHEKHMIR ANATOLY | 0 | — |
Use the dataset to decide where a new filing has room, and what prior art it needs to clear first.
With one assignee holding 25 of the 76 records, any new vitrification process claim should be checked against that portfolio first, not just against the most-cited historical patents.
Run a freedom-to-operate check in EurekaF27B furnace design, G01N durability testing and B01D separation carry the smallest shares of the 76 records, which is where a narrower, well-drafted claim is more likely to clear without colliding with dense prior art.
Explore white space in EurekaVitrification claims typically cover melting radioactive waste into a glass matrix, often specifying waste loading levels, frit composition, or melter design such as plasma or induction heating. Cementation claims instead cover mixing waste with cement-based binders to form a stable solid, and tend to focus on mix ratios and long-term leaching resistance. Both routes appear in this dataset because the search string covers both terms directly, and a single filing can claim aspects of either or both processes.
The assignee ranking for this dataset covers 27 companies, with one clear leader holding 25 of the 76 records in scope. Filing activity then drops sharply, with fifth place at only 4 records and tenth place at 2, meaning most named assignees hold just one or a handful of families each. This is a concentrated field at the top with a long tail of smaller filers rather than several evenly matched competitors.
Glass durability determines whether a vitrified waste form will meet the long-term leaching limits set by package acceptance criteria before a repository accepts it, so it is a recurring claim element rather than a side topic. C03C, the glass and enamel composition class, covers 55.3% of the 76 records in this dataset, reflecting how closely composition and durability are tied together in actual filings. A process that achieves high waste loading but fails durability testing is not commercially deployable, which is why both appear together in claim language.
The filing trend in this dataset peaked in 2022 at 5 records, without a clean upward or downward trajectory across the other years. Because patent publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent one to two years in any such trend will always look artificially low simply because those applications have not published yet. A genuine growth or decline rate is not something this evidence set can support until more recent years complete their publication cycle.
Based on IPC class shares across the 76 records, F27B furnace and kiln design, G01N material testing, and B01D separation processes carry the smallest shares, at 11.8%, 3.9% and 2.6% respectively. That does not mean these areas are unimportant, but that fewer filers have staked specific claims there compared to the dense G21F shielding and C03C glass composition classes. A new filing aimed at furnace design for vitrification or in-line durability testing methods is more likely to find open claim space than one aimed squarely at core glass composition.
Go past this page: query the whole radioactive waste conditioning corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.
Help us improve
Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.
This page