https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/radioactive-waste-conditioning-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Nuclear Fuel Cycle
Radioactive Waste Conditioning Patents: Vitrification, Cementation and the Filers Behind Them
  • A single leader with 25 records sits well ahead of a long tail of 27 ranked assignees, most holding only a handful of families each.
  • Glass and disposal classes dominate C03C glass compositions and B09B solid waste disposal each cover well over a third of the 76 records in scope, alongside G21F radiation protection at 65.8%.
  • Filing activity peaked in 2022 at five records and the most recent years understate true activity because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
76
Published Records
US
Leading Jurisdiction
27
Active Filers Ranked
2022
Peak Filing Year

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What radioactive waste conditioning patents actually cover

Radioactive waste conditioning turns loose or liquid radioactive material into a stable solid form for storage and eventual disposal. The dominant routes captured in this search are vitrification — melting waste into a borosilicate glass matrix — and cementation, along with the supporting problems of waste loading, glass durability, secondary waste generation and the package acceptance criteria that a conditioned waste form must meet before a repository will take it. Remote handling and long-term leaching performance recur across the corpus because both determine whether a conditioning process is deployable at a live facility rather than only in a lab.

The 76 records in scope span receiving offices led by the United States, with meaningful activity at the EPO and under the PCT route, and smaller filings in India, Canada and the UK. That spread points to a field where protection is sought mainly in jurisdictions with active nuclear waste programmes rather than broad global filing.

Filing activity by year, 2015-2026
  1. 1GEOMATRIX SOLUTIONS INC25
  2. 2P&T GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LLC18
  3. 3VEOLIA NUCLEAR SOLUTIONS INC8
  4. 4STIR-MELTER INC7
  5. 5CHEKHMIR ANATOLY4
  6. 6GRIBETZ ARTHUR4
  7. 7UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA4
  8. 8EXTRUDER VITRIFICATION GROUP3
  9. 9JOHNSON CONTROLS GMBH2
  10. 10WESTINGHOUSE SAVANNAH RIVER2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Radioactive Waste Conditioning covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 76 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

A single peak year, then a shallow tail

Filing rose to a peak of 5 records in 2022. Earlier and later years sit lower, and the final years in the window are undercounted simply because publication has not caught up with filing yet — treat the last one to two years as provisional, not as a real slowdown.

A single peak year, then a shallow tail013450201720182019202020215202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Glass chemistry and radiation shielding carry the claim volume

G21F (radiation protection and shielding) appears in 65.8% of the 76 records, C03C (glass and enamel compositions) in 55.3%, and B09B (solid waste disposal) in 40.8%. C03B glass manufacture and shaping follows at 36.8%. Smaller shares in F27B furnaces, G01N testing and B01D separation mark where fewer filers have staked claims, and each record can carry more than one class, so these figures add up to more than the record total by design.

Glass chemistry and radiation shielding carry the claim volumeG21F · Radiation protection & shieldi…5065.8%C03C · Glass & enamel compositions4255.3%B09B · Solid waste disposal3140.8%C03B · Glass manufacture & shaping2836.8%A62D · Chemical protection & detox1722.4%F27B · Furnaces & kilns911.8%G01N · Material analysis & testing33.9%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…22.6%Other67.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 76 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Radioactive Waste Conditioning covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Radioactive Waste Conditioning with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about radioactive waste conditioning and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited records in this corpus

Representative Filing
US20040077916A12004-04-22

System and method for radioactive waste vitrification (US20040077916A1)

ARCHIMEDES OPERATING, LLC

A method and system for increasing the waste loading of vitrified nuclear waste includes a plasma mass filter and a heating apparatus. The plasma mass filter collects radioactive particles from a multi-species plasma; the particles are then placed with a frit in crucibles and induction heated to fuse the radioactive elements with the frit, forming a melted mixture that cools into vitrified waste with relatively high waste loading.Filed by Archimedes Operating, LLC; published 2004-04-22.

US20040077916A1 — patent drawing 1
View full record
Highest-citation records among the 76 in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5643350AWaste vitrification melter85
2US5947887AExtruder glass-melter process for vitrification of nuclear and other toxic wastes59
3US5637127APlasma vitrification of waste materials59
4US5846278AMethod of determining glass durability22
5US6329563B1Vitrification of ion exchange resins18
6US7019189B1Process and composition for the immobilization of radioactive and hazardous wastes in borosilicate glass15
7WO2009039059A1Mitigation of secondary phase formation during waste vitrification10
8US20080020918A1Process and composition for the immobilization of high alkaline radioactive and hazardous wastes in silicate-…10
9US7550645B2Process and composition for the immobilization of radioactive and hazardous wastes in borosilicate glass10
10US20060189471A1Process and composition for the immobilization of radioactive and hazardous wastes in borosilicate glass10

Citation counts reward older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations inside this searched corpus — read them as a signal of influence on later filers, not as a ranking of current technical relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Radioactive Waste Conditioning covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns worth acting on before drafting or clearing a new application in this space.

Concentration
25 vs 4
leader vs fifth place, in records

One filer, then a steep drop

The leading assignee holds 25 records in the ranking; by fifth place that figure is down to 4, and by tenth place just 2. That gap suggests one organisation has built a defensible position around its core vitrification process while the remaining 26 ranked assignees are each protecting narrower, more specific improvements.

Assignee ranking, 27 companies
Technology mix
65.8% / 55.3%
share of 76 records in G21F / C03C

Shielding and glass chemistry are the crowded ground

Two-thirds of records touch radiation protection and shielding claims, and more than half touch glass or enamel composition claims. A new filing that sits squarely in both is entering the densest part of the landscape and should expect close prior-art scrutiny.

IPC subclass shares, 76 records
Timing
2022 peak, 5 filings
highest single year in the trend

Activity is uneven, not rising steadily

Filing counts move year to year rather than trending cleanly upward, with the peak so far in 2022. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the last one or two years in the window will look artificially quiet and should not be read as a real drop-off.

Filing trend, 2015-2026
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to radioactive waste conditioning, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Radioactive Waste Conditioning covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where they cluster

The ranking covers 27 assignees; most are single-digit filers sitting behind one dominant leader, with a small cluster of co-filing relationships among individually named inventors and one organisation.

Leader
25
records

A dominant single assignee

One assignee accounts for 25 of the records captured in this search, far ahead of any other name in the ranking. That scale points to sustained, process-level investment in vitrification rather than a one-off filing.

Assignee ranking
Mid tier
4
records, fifth place

A thin second tier

Fifth place in the ranking holds only 4 records, and tenth place just 2. Below the leader, protection is fragmented across many smaller filers rather than held by two or three clear challengers.

Assignee ranking
Co-filing
10
co-assignee pairs

A small, tight collaboration network

Ten co-assignee pairs appear in the data, with the strongest links repeating between the same handful of named parties at counts of 4 each. That is a narrow network, not a broad industry consortium.

Co-assignee pairs, this dataset
🔍
Sub-areas with thin claim coverage
Branches that sit inside the search scope but carry comparatively few filings, based on the IPC shares above.
In-line glass durability testingSecondary waste stream minimisationRemote handling for melter maintenanceFurnace and kiln design for vitrificationFiltration-stage waste separation
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Geomatrix Solutions Inc0—
P&T Global Solutions LLC0—
VEOLIA NUCLEAR SOLUTIONS INC0-100%
Stir-Melter Inc0—
University of Manitoba0—
Westinghouse Savannah River0—
GRIBETZ ARTHUR0—
CHEKHMIR ANATOLY0—
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Radioactive Waste Conditioning covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this

Use the dataset to decide where a new filing has room, and what prior art it needs to clear first.

Check freedom to operate around the leader's core claims

With one assignee holding 25 of the 76 records, any new vitrification process claim should be checked against that portfolio first, not just against the most-cited historical patents.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka

Draft into the thinner sub-areas

F27B furnace design, G01N durability testing and B01D separation carry the smallest shares of the 76 records, which is where a narrower, well-drafted claim is more likely to clear without colliding with dense prior art.

Explore white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Radioactive Waste Conditioning covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on radioactive waste conditioning patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Radioactive Waste Conditioning covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Radioactive Waste Conditioning in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole radioactive waste conditioning corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.