Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (96 records) with 2024 (181) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,924 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Radioligand and radioconjugate therapy sits at the intersection of targeting biology and radiochemistry: a bio-molecule — often an antibody, peptide or small molecule — carries a chelator that holds a therapeutic or diagnostic radioisotope in place long enough to reach, bind and irradiate a target tissue. The patent evidence here spans 1,924 records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026, captured where claims reference radioligand therapy, radioimmunoconjugates or chelator conjugation together with a practical constraint — isotope availability, chelate stability, radiolysis protection, specific activity, renal retention or dosimetry calculation. That pairing is deliberate: it separates general conjugate chemistry from the harder engineering problems that determine whether a radioconjugate actually works in a patient.
The dataset is best read as two overlapping layers. One is the biology layer — targeting constructs, antibody and peptide scaffolds, the anti-CD20 lineage that anchors the most-cited prior art. The other is the physics-and-chemistry layer — chelator stability under radiolysis, isotope supply chains, and the dosimetry calculations that regulators expect before a candidate advances. Filing volume concentrates in the first layer; some of the more defensible near-term claim space sits in the second.
Two views of the same 1,924 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.
Filings rose from 79 in 2017 to a peak of 201 in 2018, then continued at elevated levels; the 2021-to-2024 span shows the clearest sustained growth in the dataset, up 89% (96 to 181 records). 2025 and 2026 figures (18 in 2026) are undercounts — publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so recent-year totals will keep rising as records publish.
A61K (medicinal preparations) appears on 87.2% of the 1,924 records, confirming that most filings anchor on a drug composition claim regardless of the radiochemistry involved. A61P (therapeutic activity, 49.5%) and C07K (peptides and proteins, 40.5%) follow. Smaller subclasses — G01N at 16.8%, C07D at 8.4%, C12N at 8.2%, C07B at 5.9% and C12P at 4.8% — mark narrower, more specialised claim territory where density is lower. Records commonly carry more than one class, so these shares sum to well over 100%.
Shares are the percentage of the 1,924 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about radioligand and radioconjugate therapy and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA one-step method chelates actinium-225 to a bio-molecule construct — an antibody or monoclonal antibody — through a bifunctional ligand in a 3-arm configuration, performed at physiological temperature (about 37°C). The filing covers methods for increasing radiochemical yield and for producing high specific activity actinium-225 complexes, plus the complexes and pharmaceutical compositions themselves.Filed by Scheinberg, David A., published 2017-04-27.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5595721A | Radioimmunotherapy of lymphoma using anti-CD20 | 883 |
| 2 | US6090365A | Radioimmunotherapy of lymphoma using anti-CD20 antibodies | 329 |
| 3 | US6015542A | Radioimmunotherapy of lymphoma using anti-CD20 antibodies | 308 |
| 4 | US20080050310A1 | Antibodies and immunoconjugates and uses therefor | 304 |
| 5 | US5843398A | Radioimmunotherapy of lymphoma using anti-CD20 antibodies | 289 |
| 6 | US6287537B1 | Radioimmunotherapy of lymphoma using anti-CD20 antibodies | 233 |
| 7 | WO2003034903A2 | PSMA antibodies and protein multimers | 222 |
| 8 | WO1990013300A1 | ENDOTHELIAL CELL-LEUKOCYTE ADHESION MOLECULES (ELAMs) AND MOLECULES INVOLVED IN LEUKOCYTE ADHESION (MILAs) | 216 |
| 9 | US20020102208A1 | Radiolabeling kit and binding assay | 213 |
| 10 | US6309636B1 | Recombinant peptides derived from the Mc3 anti-BA46 antibody, methods of use thereof, and methods of humanizi… | 176 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations inside the searched corpus — read them as a signal of influence on the field's foundational claims, not as a ranking of current technical importance. The anti-CD20 radioimmunotherapy lineage anchors the most-cited group here.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns in the data that matter more than the raw counts.
The top 5 assignees hold 28.7% of all records and the top 10 hold 41.2% — a real concentration at the head, but well under half the field even among the ten most active filers. The remaining majority sits with entities holding only a handful of families each, which means freedom-to-operate work cannot stop at checking the leaders.
The 2021-to-2024 window is the last stretch of complete-year data, and it shows a genuine 89% increase in filings. 2025 and 2026 numbers look lower only because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months — they should not be read as a slowdown.
A61K's 87.2% share shows most filings default to a composition claim. Subclasses tied to measurement and process — G01N, C07B, C12P — sit well below 20% each, which is where analytical and manufacturing-process claims face less crowded prior art than the core composition space.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to radioligand and radioconjugate therapy, with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranked leaders span large pharmaceutical companies, specialist radioligand developers, and academic and research institutions — a mix that reflects how much of this technology still moves between bench and clinic through licensing and collaboration rather than in-house development alone.
The top-ranked assignee holds 146 records, well ahead of fifth place at 88 and tenth place at 45 — a steep drop-off that suggests real first-mover advantage in the core claim territory rather than a crowded photo finish at the top.
Co-assignee pairs recur between academic medical centres and commercial developers, and between a specialist radioligand firm and a large pharmaceutical partner — evidence that early chelator and isotope-handling IP often originates in academic labs before commercial co-filing.
Some leading assignees show year-over-year gains in the latest year while others show declines or flat activity — normal in a field this early, and a reminder that a single leader's current-year count says little about which programme will still be filing in three years.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Janssen Biotech Inc | 2 | -50% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc | 2 | +100% |
| Novartis AG (Switzerland) | 2 | +100% |
| Johns Hopkins University | 1 | 0% |
| Sciencons AS | 0 | — |
| Nordic Nanovector AS | 0 | — |
| Genentech Inc | 0 | — |
| Fusion Pharma Inc | 0 | — |
The data points to where claim space is crowded and where it is not — the next step is testing a specific claim or target against it.
With 87.2% of records touching A61K, a new composition claim needs a tight search against that subclass specifically, not just the field as a whole.
Explore this landscape in EurekaG01N, C07B and C12P each sit under 20% of records — a reasonable place to look for defensible process or analytical claims ahead of competitors.
Run a deeper query in EurekaRecent-year momentum is mixed even among top filers; monitoring their newest publications flags shifts before they show up in aggregate rankings.
Set up assignee tracking in EurekaThis dataset identifies 1,924 patent families published or filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that reference radioligand therapy, radioimmunoconjugates or chelator conjugation alongside a practical constraint such as isotope availability, chelate stability, specific activity or dosimetry. This is a defined search scope, not a count of every patent touching radiochemistry broadly, so the true universe of related filings is larger. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years in the total will keep rising as more records publish.
The ranked leader in this dataset holds 146 records, with a fairly steep drop to 88 at fifth place and 45 at tenth — indicating a distinct top tier rather than a flat field. The top 5 assignees together account for 28.7% of all 1,924 records, and the top 10 account for 41.2%. Beyond that group the ranking spreads across a long tail of companies and institutions each holding a handful of families, including specialist radioligand developers, large pharmaceutical companies, and academic medical centres.
Yes, based on the last fully complete years of data: filings grew from 96 in 2021 to 181 in 2024, an 89% increase. The single highest filing year on record so far is 2018 at 201. Figures for 2025 and 2026 appear lower only because publication typically lags actual filing by around 18 months, not because activity has slowed — those years should not yet be read as a decline.
A61K, medicinal preparations, appears on 87.2% of the 1,924 records and is by far the most crowded classification, followed by A61P (therapeutic activity, 49.5%) and C07K (peptides and proteins, 40.5%). Less crowded areas include G01N (material analysis and testing, 16.8%), C07D (heterocyclic compounds, 8.4%), C12N (microorganisms and genetic engineering, 8.2%), C07B (organic chemistry methods, 5.9%) and C12P (fermentation and enzymatic synthesis, 4.8%). Because a single record can carry multiple classes, these are shares of all records rather than mutually exclusive slices, and the lower-share classes are where analytical and process claims tend to face less crowded prior art.
US20170112951A1 describes a one-step method for chelating actinium-225 to an antibody or monoclonal antibody construct through a bifunctional ligand in a 3-arm configuration, performed at physiological temperature around 37 degrees Celsius. It claims methods for increasing radiochemical yield and for producing high specific activity actinium-225 complexes, along with the complexes and pharmaceutical compositions themselves. For anyone developing an actinium-225 or similarly alpha-emitting radioconjugate, this filing is relevant prior art specifically around one-step, physiological-temperature chelation methods aimed at high specific activity, and any competing method should be checked against its specific process claims rather than assumed distinct on target biology alone.
Go past this page: query the whole radioligand and radioconjugate therapy corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.
Help us improve
Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.
This page