https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/radioligand-and-radioconjugate-therapy-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Radioligand & Radioconjugate Therapy
Radioligand and radioconjugate therapy patents: filing momentum, leading assignees and open claim space
  • Filings grew 89% from 2021 to 2024 (96 to 181 records), the clearest complete-year signal in the dataset before publication lag understates 2025-2026.
  • The top 5 assignees hold 28.7% of all 1,924 records while the top 10 hold 41.2% — concentrated at the head, with a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants behind them.
  • A61K dominates at 87.2% of records but G01N (material analysis, 16.8%) and C07B (organic chemistry methods, 5.9%) mark thinner, more contestable claim territory.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,924
Published Records
29%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+89%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (96 records) with 2024 (181) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,924 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Radioligand and radioconjugate therapy sits at the intersection of targeting biology and radiochemistry: a bio-molecule — often an antibody, peptide or small molecule — carries a chelator that holds a therapeutic or diagnostic radioisotope in place long enough to reach, bind and irradiate a target tissue. The patent evidence here spans 1,924 records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026, captured where claims reference radioligand therapy, radioimmunoconjugates or chelator conjugation together with a practical constraint — isotope availability, chelate stability, radiolysis protection, specific activity, renal retention or dosimetry calculation. That pairing is deliberate: it separates general conjugate chemistry from the harder engineering problems that determine whether a radioconjugate actually works in a patient.

The dataset is best read as two overlapping layers. One is the biology layer — targeting constructs, antibody and peptide scaffolds, the anti-CD20 lineage that anchors the most-cited prior art. The other is the physics-and-chemistry layer — chelator stability under radiolysis, isotope supply chains, and the dosimetry calculations that regulators expect before a candidate advances. Filing volume concentrates in the first layer; some of the more defensible near-term claim space sits in the second.

Filing volume and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1JANSSEN BIOTECH INC146
  2. 2SCIENCONS AS109
  3. 3REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS INC108
  4. 4NORDIC NANOVECTOR AS101
  5. 5GENENTECH INC88
  6. 6CENT FOR PROBE DEV & COMMERCIALIZATION52
  7. 7JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY49
  8. 8FUSION PHARMA INC48
  9. 9ABDERA THERAPEUTICS INC47
  10. 10MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENT45
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Radioligand and Radioconjugate Therapy covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,924 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.

Filing activity, 2017-2026

Filings rose from 79 in 2017 to a peak of 201 in 2018, then continued at elevated levels; the 2021-to-2024 span shows the clearest sustained growth in the dataset, up 89% (96 to 181 records). 2025 and 2026 figures (18 in 2026) are undercounts — publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so recent-year totals will keep rising as records publish.

Filing activity, 2017-202606312518825079201720120182019202020212022202320242025182026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

A61K (medicinal preparations) appears on 87.2% of the 1,924 records, confirming that most filings anchor on a drug composition claim regardless of the radiochemistry involved. A61P (therapeutic activity, 49.5%) and C07K (peptides and proteins, 40.5%) follow. Smaller subclasses — G01N at 16.8%, C07D at 8.4%, C12N at 8.2%, C07B at 5.9% and C12P at 4.8% — mark narrower, more specialised claim territory where density is lower. Records commonly carry more than one class, so these shares sum to well over 100%.

Technology composition by IPC subclassA61K · Medicinal preparations1,67887.2%A61P · Therapeutic activity of compou…95249.5%C07K · Peptides & proteins77940.5%G01N · Material analysis & testing32316.8%C07D · Heterocyclic compounds1628.4%C12N · Microorganisms & genetic engin…1588.2%C07B · General organic chemistry meth…1145.9%C12P · Fermentation & enzymatic synth…924.8%Other45123.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,924 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Radioligand and Radioconjugate Therapy covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Radioligand and Radioconjugate Therapy with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about radioligand and radioconjugate therapy and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Representative and most-cited filings

Representative filing
US20170112951A12017-04-27

One-Step Labeling of Antibodies to High Specific Activity with Actinium-225 (US20170112951A1)

SCHEINBERG, DAVID A.

A one-step method chelates actinium-225 to a bio-molecule construct — an antibody or monoclonal antibody — through a bifunctional ligand in a 3-arm configuration, performed at physiological temperature (about 37°C). The filing covers methods for increasing radiochemical yield and for producing high specific activity actinium-225 complexes, plus the complexes and pharmaceutical compositions themselves.Filed by Scheinberg, David A., published 2017-04-27.

US20170112951A1 — patent drawing 1US20170112951A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5595721ARadioimmunotherapy of lymphoma using anti-CD20883
2US6090365ARadioimmunotherapy of lymphoma using anti-CD20 antibodies329
3US6015542ARadioimmunotherapy of lymphoma using anti-CD20 antibodies308
4US20080050310A1Antibodies and immunoconjugates and uses therefor304
5US5843398ARadioimmunotherapy of lymphoma using anti-CD20 antibodies289
6US6287537B1Radioimmunotherapy of lymphoma using anti-CD20 antibodies233
7WO2003034903A2PSMA antibodies and protein multimers222
8WO1990013300A1ENDOTHELIAL CELL-LEUKOCYTE ADHESION MOLECULES (ELAMs) AND MOLECULES INVOLVED IN LEUKOCYTE ADHESION (MILAs)216
9US20020102208A1Radiolabeling kit and binding assay213
10US6309636B1Recombinant peptides derived from the Mc3 anti-BA46 antibody, methods of use thereof, and methods of humanizi…176

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations inside the searched corpus — read them as a signal of influence on the field's foundational claims, not as a ranking of current technical importance. The anti-CD20 radioimmunotherapy lineage anchors the most-cited group here.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Radioligand and Radioconjugate Therapy covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns in the data that matter more than the raw counts.

Concentration
28.7% / 41.2%
share of all 1,924 records held by top 5 / top 10 assignees

Ownership is concentrated but not locked up

The top 5 assignees hold 28.7% of all records and the top 10 hold 41.2% — a real concentration at the head, but well under half the field even among the ten most active filers. The remaining majority sits with entities holding only a handful of families each, which means freedom-to-operate work cannot stop at checking the leaders.

Based on the full 100-company ranking returned for this dataset.
Momentum
+89%
growth 2021 to 2024 (96 to 181 records)

Growth is real, not a filing-lag artefact

The 2021-to-2024 window is the last stretch of complete-year data, and it shows a genuine 89% increase in filings. 2025 and 2026 numbers look lower only because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months — they should not be read as a slowdown.

2018 remains the single peak year on record at 201 filings.
Composition
16.8%
of records classed under G01N, material analysis and testing

Dosimetry and analytical claims are thinner ground

A61K's 87.2% share shows most filings default to a composition claim. Subclasses tied to measurement and process — G01N, C07B, C12P — sit well below 20% each, which is where analytical and manufacturing-process claims face less crowded prior art than the core composition space.

Shares are of all 1,924 records; a record can carry multiple IPC classes.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to radioligand and radioconjugate therapy, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Radioligand and Radioconjugate Therapy covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the field is still open

The ranked leaders span large pharmaceutical companies, specialist radioligand developers, and academic and research institutions — a mix that reflects how much of this technology still moves between bench and clinic through licensing and collaboration rather than in-house development alone.

Leader
146
records, most in the ranking

A single leader ahead of a tight next tier

The top-ranked assignee holds 146 records, well ahead of fifth place at 88 and tenth place at 45 — a steep drop-off that suggests real first-mover advantage in the core claim territory rather than a crowded photo finish at the top.

Ranking covers 100 assignees, counted by patent family.
Academic & research
10 pairs
co-assignee pairs identified

University-industry pairing is a visible pattern

Co-assignee pairs recur between academic medical centres and commercial developers, and between a specialist radioligand firm and a large pharmaceutical partner — evidence that early chelator and isotope-handling IP often originates in academic labs before commercial co-filing.

Strongest pairs recur across multiple joint filings.
Recent momentum
Mixed
YoY direction across leading assignees in the latest year

Momentum is uneven even among active filers

Some leading assignees show year-over-year gains in the latest year while others show declines or flat activity — normal in a field this early, and a reminder that a single leader's current-year count says little about which programme will still be filing in three years.

Latest-year counts are still filling in due to publication lag.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas where filing density is comparatively thin relative to the core composition claims.
radiolysis-protective excipient formulationsrenal retention reduction constructsspecific-activity yield optimisation methodsdosimetry calculation software/methodsisotope supply-chain and generator claims
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Janssen Biotech Inc2-50%
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc2+100%
Novartis AG (Switzerland)2+100%
Johns Hopkins University10%
Sciencons AS0—
Nordic Nanovector AS0—
Genentech Inc0—
Fusion Pharma Inc0—
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Radioligand and Radioconjugate Therapy covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Using this landscape

The data points to where claim space is crowded and where it is not — the next step is testing a specific claim or target against it.

Check freedom-to-operate before drafting

With 87.2% of records touching A61K, a new composition claim needs a tight search against that subclass specifically, not just the field as a whole.

Explore this landscape in Eureka

Watch the thinner subclasses

G01N, C07B and C12P each sit under 20% of records — a reasonable place to look for defensible process or analytical claims ahead of competitors.

Run a deeper query in Eureka

Track leading assignees' current filings

Recent-year momentum is mixed even among top filers; monitoring their newest publications flags shifts before they show up in aggregate rankings.

Set up assignee tracking in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Radioligand and Radioconjugate Therapy covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Radioligand and Radioconjugate Therapy covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Radioligand and Radioconjugate Therapy in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole radioligand and radioconjugate therapy corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve

Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.