Book a demo

Radiopharmaceutical Manufacturing Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Radiopharmaceutical Manufacturing Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/radiopharmaceutical-manufacturing-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Radiopharmaceutical Manufacturing
Radiopharmaceutical Manufacturing Patents: Mapping the Leaders and the Open Ground
  • Filing jumped +450% from 2021 to 2024 (2 to 11 records), the clearest sign yet that dose-dispensing and hot-cell claims are being staked out now, not settled history.
  • One leader sits well clear of a 59-strong field, with a five-record gap down to fifth place and a long tail of single-digit filers below tenth.
  • Medicinal preparations (A61K) touch 57.6% of the 165 records, while radiation protection and shielding (G21F) sits at just 12.1% — hardware claims are comparatively thin.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
165
Published Records
+450%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction
59
Active Filers Ranked

Filing growth compares 2021 (2 records) with 2024 (11) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.

Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this patent set covers

This landscape tracks 165 published records filed against radiopharmaceutical manufacturing infrastructure: shielded hot cells, aseptic dispensing lines, dose dispensing and transport shielding, quality-control release testing, decay correction and the site-licensing steps that sit around them. The search string pairs manufacturing and radiopharmacy terms with the specific operational vocabulary — hot cell, aseptic process, transport shielding — that separates a genuine manufacturing claim from a broader radiopharmaceutical composition filing.

Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 cut-off. Because publication typically lags filing by around eighteen months, the 2025 and 2026 counts in any trend chart are still filling in and should not be read as a slowdown.

Filing activity and technology mix, 2015–2026
  1. 1JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY32
  2. 2GE HEALTHCARE LTD27
  3. 3ORANO MED26
  4. 4RADIOMEDIX INC23
  5. 5SCINOGY PRODUCTS PTY LTD23
  6. 6MAYO FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION & RESEARCH14
  7. 7BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC13
  8. 8MALLINCKRODT LLC6
  9. 9THE BRIGHAM & WOMEN S HOSPITAL INC6
  10. 10RGT UNIV OF CALIFORNIA6
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Radiopharmaceutical Manufacturing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 165-record set: how filing activity has moved year on year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

Filing activity climbed sharply into 2024

Annual filings peaked at 27 in 2017, cooled, then rebuilt: 2021's count of 2 records grew to 11 by 2024, a +450% rise over that three-year span. 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete due to publication lag and should not be read against the peak.

Filing activity climbed sharply into 2024081523302720172018201920202021202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Composition claims dominate; hardware claims are thinner

A61K (medicinal preparations) appears on 57.6% of the 165 records and A61P (therapeutic activity) on 29.7%, showing the corpus skews toward what is being dispensed rather than the equipment dispensing it. G21F (radiation protection and shielding) and G21G (nuclear conversion) each sit near 11-12%, and B01F (mixing and stirring) and A61J (medicine containers) hover in the low teens — the physical hot-cell and dispensing-hardware side of the field is comparatively under-filed relative to the pharmaceutical composition side.

Composition claims dominate; hardware claims are thinnerA61K · Medicinal preparations9557.6%A61P · Therapeutic activity of compou…4929.7%C07D · Heterocyclic compounds3018.2%A61M · Devices for body fluids2313.9%B01F · Mixing & stirring2213.3%G21F · Radiation protection & shieldi…2012.1%A61J · Containers for medicine1810.9%G21G · Conversion of nuclei1810.9%Other10060.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 165 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Radiopharmaceutical Manufacturing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Radiopharmaceutical Manufacturing with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about radiopharmaceutical manufacturing and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The records shaping this space

Representative Recent Filing
US20260151517A12026-06-04

Somatostatin receptor-targeting radiopharmaceuticals and uses thereof

NUCLIDIUM AG

Pharmaceutical compositions comprising [61Cu]Cu-NODAGA-LM3 or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt, for imaging subjects suspected of having or diagnosed with an SST2-expressing tumor by administering the composition and generating radiographic images.Filed 2026-06-04 by Nuclidium AG — illustrates the current push toward copper-61 targeted imaging agents built on defined chelator-peptide constructs.

US20260151517A1 — patent drawing 1US20260151517A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20110178359A1Systems For Integrated Radiopharmaceutical Generation, Preparation, Transportation and Administration282
2WO2008083313A2Methods and systems for integrated radiopharmaceutical generation, preparation, transportation, and administr…120
3US20110209764A1Apparatus and Methods for Delivery of Fluid Injection Boluses to Patients and Handling Harmful Fluids89
4WO2009149367A1Apparatus and methods for delivery of fluid injection boluses to patients and handling harmful fluids58
5WO1997036578A1Spray-dried microparticles as therapeutic vehicles for use in gene therapy49
6US9056200B2Apparatus and methods for delivery of fluid injection boluses to patients and handling harmful fluids41
7US9750953B2Apparatus and methods for delivery of fluid injection boluses to patients and handling harmful fluids38
8US9326742B2Systems for integrated radiopharmaceutical generation, preparation, transportation and administration37
9WO2003034444A1Radiopharmaceutical capsule dispensing system35
10US20140046295A1Apparatus and Methods for Delivery of Fluid Injection Boluses to Patients and Handling Harmful Fluids33

Citation counts reward older filings that have had years to accumulate references — treat them as a signal of influence within this corpus, not as a ranking of current technical importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Radiopharmaceutical Manufacturing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-throughs from the trend, class and citation data that matter more than the raw counts themselves.

Filing Momentum
+450%
2021 → 2024 filings

Activity is rebuilding, not winding down

After a 2017 peak of 27 records, annual filings fell before recovering: 2021's 2 records grew to 11 by 2024. That three-year swing is the strongest recent signal in the dataset and argues against treating this as a mature, settled field.

Peak year: 2017 (27 records)
Claim Concentration
32 vs 23
leader vs fifth place

One filer sits well ahead of the pack

The leading assignee holds 32 records against 23 for fifth place, then the field thins quickly to single digits by tenth. That gap suggests the leader has staked broad early claims that later entrants have had to file around rather than through.

Ranking spans 59 companies
Composition vs Hardware
57.6% vs 12.1%
A61K vs G21F share of 165 records

Pharmaceutical claims outweigh shielding claims

Medicinal-preparation claims (A61K) touch more than half the record set; radiation-shielding claims (G21F) sit near one in eight. Hot-cell and transport-shielding hardware looks comparatively open relative to the composition side.

Shares sum above 100% because records carry multiple IPC classes
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to radiopharmaceutical manufacturing, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Radiopharmaceutical Manufacturing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the room still opens up

The ranking spans 59 companies drawn from academic medical centres, imaging majors and specialist radiopharma manufacturers — not a top-50 or top-100 cut, but the full ranked field the dataset returns.

Leader
32
records

A clear lead with academic and specialist company presence

The top assignee's 32 records put it well ahead of a fifth-place count of 23, and momentum data shows several leading names posting flat or declining latest-year counts — consistent with early leaders defending established ground rather than expanding it.

Gap to fifth place: 9 records
Co-filing
10 pairs
co-assignee pairs identified

Collaboration is concentrated around one strong pairing

Of the ten co-assignee pairs found, one pairing between a specialist radiopharma manufacturer and its parent group accounts for the strongest link at 23 shared records — most other co-filing relationships in the set are much thinner.

Strongest pair: 23 shared records
Long Tail
59
ranked assignees

A long tail below the top ten

Filing drops from 32 at the top to 6 by tenth place, and continues thinning across the remaining ranked field. That shape points to a market with one or two entrenched filers and many single- or few-record entrants testing narrow claims.

Tenth place: 6 records
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
Branches where the IPC composition and citation data suggest room still exists.
Automated hot-cell dose dispensingTransport shielding for short half-life isotopesDecay-correction software integrationAseptic fill-finish for theranostic agentsSite-licensing workflow automation
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Johns Hopkins University10%
The Regents of the University of California1
RadioMedix Inc.0
GE Healthcare Ltd.0-100%
Scinogy Products Pty Ltd.0-100%
ORANO MED0
Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research0
Medrad Inc.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Radiopharmaceutical Manufacturing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this next

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio strategy or technical scouting.

Check freedom-to-operate on hot-cell hardware

With G21F and B01F claim density well below A61K, a hardware-focused search on shielding and mixing mechanisms is likely to surface fewer blocking claims than a composition search would.

Run a freedom-to-operate search

Track the leader's recent filing behaviour

The top assignee's flat latest-year momentum is worth monitoring against its 32-record base — a resumed filing pace there would signal renewed investment in this exact claim space.

Set up assignee monitoring

Map the co-filing network in detail

Ten identified co-assignee pairs, with one dominant pairing, suggest a small set of manufacturing partnerships shapes much of this field's IP strategy.

Explore collaboration mapping
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Radiopharmaceutical Manufacturing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on radiopharmaceutical manufacturing patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Radiopharmaceutical Manufacturing covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Radiopharmaceutical Manufacturing in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole radiopharmaceutical manufacturing corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.