Book a demo

Rare Earth Permanent Magnet Patents: Who Leads, Where Gaps Are 2026

Rare Earth Permanent Magnet Patents: Who Leads, Where Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/rare-earth-permanent-magnets-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Metals & Alloys
Rare earth permanent magnet patents: mapping coercivity, grain boundary diffusion and heavy rare earth reduction claims
  • Filings have flattened, not grown. 2017 opened at 110 filings and the dataset peaks at 121 in 2020 before drifting back down — this is a mature, not expanding, claim space.
  • H01F absorbs nearly the entire corpus. 2,283 of 2,311 records sit in H01F, with B22F powder metallurgy and C22C alloy claims each covering under half the set — most of the differentiation is happening inside those two subclasses.
  • Several of the biggest historical filers show zero activity in the latest year. Shin-Etsu, TDK and Xiamen Tungsten all register 0 filings in the most recent year tracked, which reads as a pause in disclosure rather than a pause in R&D given the 18-month publication lag.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
2,311
Published Records
53%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-41%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (87 records) with 2024 (51) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 2,311 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this patent set covers

This landscape tracks 2,311 patent families filed against rare earth permanent magnet technology, built from a search string anchored on coercivity, grain boundary diffusion, heavy rare earth reduction, thermal stability and corrosion protection terms inside NdFeB and sintered magnet claims. The IPC gate spans H01F1 (magnet composition and structure), C22C38 (iron alloys) and B22F3 (powder metallurgy shaping and sintering), which is why the technology composition below concentrates so heavily in those three classes.

Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off, with the most recent year necessarily undercounted because publication lags filing by roughly eighteen months. Receiving-office data shows the United States, the European Patent Office and China each carrying a substantial share of filings, with Japan, WIPO/PCT and Taiwan behind them — a spread consistent with a technology where production, automotive demand and defense-adjacent supply chains sit in different jurisdictions.

Filing activity, 2017–2026
  1. 1SHIN ETSU CHEMICAL CO LTD478
  2. 2PROTERIAL LTD324
  3. 3TDK CORP188
  4. 4DAIDO STEEL CO LTD113
  5. 5INTER METALLICS KK113
  6. 6FUJIAN CHANGTING GOLDEN DRAGON RARE EARTH CO LTD79
  7. 7ULVAC INC65
  8. 8YANTAI ZHENGHAI MAGNETIC MATERIAL CO LTD62
  9. 9YANTAI DONGXING MAGNETIC MATERIALS INC55
  10. 10HITACHI LTD46
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Rare Earth Permanent Magnets covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 2,311-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those filings distribute across the IPC subclasses that make up the search gate.

A flat-to-declining filing curve

Filings opened at 110 in 2017, rose to a peak of 121 in 2020, sat at 109 by the 2022 midpoint, and had fallen to 6 by the most recent (partial) year. Read the tail end cautiously — publication lag means recent years will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be — but the shape from 2020 onward is a decline, not a plateau.

A flat-to-declining filing curve0387511315011020172018201912120202021202220232024202562026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

H01F dominates; B22F and C22C carry the differentiation

H01F (magnets, inductors and transformers) appears in 2,283 of 2,311 records, essentially the whole corpus, because it defines the search gate itself. Below that, B22F powder metallurgy (1,070) and C22C alloys (1,052) each cover under half the set, with C21D heat treatment, C23C coating, H02K motor integration, C04B ceramics and B05D coating processes trailing well behind — those smaller classes are where processing and application-specific claims are still being filed.

H01F dominates; B22F and C22C carry the differentiationH01F · Magnets, inductors & transform…2,28398.8%B22F · Powder metallurgy1,07046.3%C22C · Alloys1,05245.5%C21D · Heat treatment of metals1727.4%C23C · Coating & surface deposition1044.5%H02K · Electric motors & generators1024.4%C04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories833.6%B05D · Coating processes482.1%Other28512.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 2,311 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Rare Earth Permanent Magnets covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Rare Earth Permanent Magnets with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about rare earth permanent magnets and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Prior art

The patents setting the citation baseline

Representative recent filing
US11921174B12024-03-05

Method for identifying irreversible demagnetization of grain boundary diffusion NdFeB magnet (US11921174B1)

HANGZHOU MAGMAX TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.

The application describes a method for identifying irreversible demagnetization in a grain boundary diffusion NdFeB magnet by measuring magnetic field distribution: after applying a reverse magnetic field to a saturated magnet, an increase in the number of magnetic poles on the non-diffusion face indicates irreversible demagnetization has occurred.Filed by Hangzhou Magmax Technology Co., Ltd., published 2024-03-05 — a measurement and diagnostic method layered on top of grain boundary diffusion manufacturing, not a new diffusion process itself.

US11921174B1 — patent drawing 1US11921174B1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1WO2006043348A1Method for producing rare earth permanent magnet material600
2JP2007053351ARare earth permanent magnet, its manufacturing method, and permanent magnet rotary machine191
3JP2008263179ARare earth permanent magnet and method of manufacturing the same146
4US20080245442A1Preparation of Rare Earth Permanent Magnet Material126
5JP1987192566APermanent magnet material and its production115
6US20080286595A1R-Fe-B Rare Earth Sintered Magnet and Method for Producing Same101
7US6139766AOxide magnetic material, ferrite particles, sintered magnet, bonded magnet, magnetic recording medium, and mo…96
8US20060005898A1Anisotropic nanocomposite rare earth permanent magnets and method of making95
9CN1898757A稀土永磁材料的制备方法94
10JP2012248827ARare earth permanent magnet and method for producing the same93

Citation counts here reflect influence within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings, since a document needs years in circulation to accumulate citations. Treat the ranking as a map of foundational prior art, not of current commercial relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Rare Earth Permanent Magnets covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signals

What the filing pattern tells you

Three things stand out once the trend and IPC composition are read together: where claim density sits, what a flat filing curve implies, and what the citation baseline is built on.

Claim density
2,283 of 2,311
records touch H01F

Composition claims are the crowded ground

Nearly the entire corpus sits inside H01F, the magnet-composition and structure class. New filers competing on base alloy chemistry alone are filing into the densest part of the map; the more open room is in the powder metallurgy and alloy-processing classes underneath it.

Source: IPC subclass distribution
Filing momentum
121 → 6
peak year to latest year

A flat-to-declining curve, not a growth story

The 2020 peak of 121 filings has not been matched since, and the 2022 midpoint of 109 confirms the decline started before the most recent, publication-lag-affected years. This reads as a technology where the core patenting cycle has already run through several assignees.

Source: filing trend, 2017-2026
Historical anchor
600 citations
on the top-cited record

The prior-art baseline is old and heavily cited

The most-cited record in this set, a method for producing rare earth permanent magnet material, carries 600 citations — more than three times the next entry. Freedom-to-operate work in this space still has to clear a citation network built substantially on filings from the 2000s.

Source: most-cited records table
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to rare earth permanent magnets, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Rare Earth Permanent Magnets covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Assignees

Who is filing, and who has gone quiet

Ownership in this dataset is concentrated among a small group of Japanese and Chinese magnet producers, several of which show zero filings in the latest tracked year — a pattern worth separating from actual R&D pullback given the publication lag.

Momentum
0 filings
latest year, several major assignees

Historical leaders show a filing pause

Shin-Etsu Chemical, TDK, ULVAC and Xiamen Tungsten all register zero filings in the most recent year, with Shin-Etsu down -100% YoY. Given the 18-month publication lag, this is more likely a disclosure gap than a stop in development work.

Source: recent-year momentum by assignee
Collaboration
45 co-filings
strongest assignee pair

Co-assignee activity is concentrated in a few pairs

Of 10 identified co-assignee pairs, the strongest links Xiamen Tungsten with Fujian Jinlong Rare Earth at 45 shared records, with two further pairs at 23 and 13. Co-filing here tracks vertically integrated supply relationships between magnet producers and rare earth material suppliers.

Source: co-assignee pairs
Geography
651 filings
United States receiving office

US, EPO and China carry the bulk of filings

The United States (651), the European Patent Office (574) and China (437) account for most receiving-office activity, ahead of Japan (173), WIPO/PCT (85) and Taiwan (66). Filing strategy in this field is clearly multi-jurisdictional rather than concentrated in a single home market.

Source: receiving office breakdown
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth watching
Branches beneath the dense H01F composition layer where filing volume is thinner
Grain boundary diffusion diagnosticsHeavy rare earth reduction via dysprosium substitutionCorrosion protection coatings for sintered magnetsCeramic-bonded magnet processing (C04B)Motor-integration claims (H02K)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.0-100%
Baotou Beimai Lisheng Co., Ltd.0-100%
Intermetallics Co., Ltd.0
TDK Corporation0
ULVAC, Inc.0
Xiamen Tungsten Co., Ltd.0
Yantai Zhenghai Magnetic Material Co., Ltd.0
Fujian Jinlong Rare Earth Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Rare Earth Permanent Magnets covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next steps

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a mature, geographically distributed field with a dense composition layer and thinner processing and diagnostic branches. Two directions follow from that.

Check freedom to operate against the citation baseline

The most-cited records in this set, several from the 2000s, still anchor the prior-art network for coercivity and composition claims. Any new filing on base alloy chemistry should be checked against that baseline before drafting.

Run a freedom-to-operate search in Eureka

Track the assignees that went quiet

Several major historical filers show zero activity in the latest tracked year. Given the publication lag, it is worth monitoring whether that is a genuine slowdown or filings still working through the pipeline.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Rare Earth Permanent Magnets covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on rare earth permanent magnet patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Rare Earth Permanent Magnets covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Rare Earth Permanent Magnets in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole rare earth permanent magnets corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.