Rare Earth Permanent Magnet Patents: Who Leads, Where Gaps Are 2026
- Filings have flattened, not grown. 2017 opened at 110 filings and the dataset peaks at 121 in 2020 before drifting back down — this is a mature, not expanding, claim space.
- H01F absorbs nearly the entire corpus. 2,283 of 2,311 records sit in H01F, with B22F powder metallurgy and C22C alloy claims each covering under half the set — most of the differentiation is happening inside those two subclasses.
- Several of the biggest historical filers show zero activity in the latest year. Shin-Etsu, TDK and Xiamen Tungsten all register 0 filings in the most recent year tracked, which reads as a pause in disclosure rather than a pause in R&D given the 18-month publication lag.
Filing growth compares 2021 (87 records) with 2024 (51) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 2,311 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this patent set covers
This landscape tracks 2,311 patent families filed against rare earth permanent magnet technology, built from a search string anchored on coercivity, grain boundary diffusion, heavy rare earth reduction, thermal stability and corrosion protection terms inside NdFeB and sintered magnet claims. The IPC gate spans H01F1 (magnet composition and structure), C22C38 (iron alloys) and B22F3 (powder metallurgy shaping and sintering), which is why the technology composition below concentrates so heavily in those three classes.
Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off, with the most recent year necessarily undercounted because publication lags filing by roughly eighteen months. Receiving-office data shows the United States, the European Patent Office and China each carrying a substantial share of filings, with Japan, WIPO/PCT and Taiwan behind them — a spread consistent with a technology where production, automotive demand and defense-adjacent supply chains sit in different jurisdictions.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 2,311-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those filings distribute across the IPC subclasses that make up the search gate.
A flat-to-declining filing curve
Filings opened at 110 in 2017, rose to a peak of 121 in 2020, sat at 109 by the 2022 midpoint, and had fallen to 6 by the most recent (partial) year. Read the tail end cautiously — publication lag means recent years will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be — but the shape from 2020 onward is a decline, not a plateau.
H01F dominates; B22F and C22C carry the differentiation
H01F (magnets, inductors and transformers) appears in 2,283 of 2,311 records, essentially the whole corpus, because it defines the search gate itself. Below that, B22F powder metallurgy (1,070) and C22C alloys (1,052) each cover under half the set, with C21D heat treatment, C23C coating, H02K motor integration, C04B ceramics and B05D coating processes trailing well behind — those smaller classes are where processing and application-specific claims are still being filed.
Shares are the percentage of the 2,311 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Rare Earth Permanent Magnets with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about rare earth permanent magnets and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe patents setting the citation baseline
Method for identifying irreversible demagnetization of grain boundary diffusion NdFeB magnet (US11921174B1)
The application describes a method for identifying irreversible demagnetization in a grain boundary diffusion NdFeB magnet by measuring magnetic field distribution: after applying a reverse magnetic field to a saturated magnet, an increase in the number of magnetic poles on the non-diffusion face indicates irreversible demagnetization has occurred.Filed by Hangzhou Magmax Technology Co., Ltd., published 2024-03-05 — a measurement and diagnostic method layered on top of grain boundary diffusion manufacturing, not a new diffusion process itself.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WO2006043348A1 | Method for producing rare earth permanent magnet material | 600 |
| 2 | JP2007053351A | Rare earth permanent magnet, its manufacturing method, and permanent magnet rotary machine | 191 |
| 3 | JP2008263179A | Rare earth permanent magnet and method of manufacturing the same | 146 |
| 4 | US20080245442A1 | Preparation of Rare Earth Permanent Magnet Material | 126 |
| 5 | JP1987192566A | Permanent magnet material and its production | 115 |
| 6 | US20080286595A1 | R-Fe-B Rare Earth Sintered Magnet and Method for Producing Same | 101 |
| 7 | US6139766A | Oxide magnetic material, ferrite particles, sintered magnet, bonded magnet, magnetic recording medium, and mo… | 96 |
| 8 | US20060005898A1 | Anisotropic nanocomposite rare earth permanent magnets and method of making | 95 |
| 9 | CN1898757A | 稀土永磁材料的制备方法 | 94 |
| 10 | JP2012248827A | Rare earth permanent magnet and method for producing the same | 93 |
Citation counts here reflect influence within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings, since a document needs years in circulation to accumulate citations. Treat the ranking as a map of foundational prior art, not of current commercial relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the filing pattern tells you
Three things stand out once the trend and IPC composition are read together: where claim density sits, what a flat filing curve implies, and what the citation baseline is built on.
Composition claims are the crowded ground
Nearly the entire corpus sits inside H01F, the magnet-composition and structure class. New filers competing on base alloy chemistry alone are filing into the densest part of the map; the more open room is in the powder metallurgy and alloy-processing classes underneath it.
A flat-to-declining curve, not a growth story
The 2020 peak of 121 filings has not been matched since, and the 2022 midpoint of 109 confirms the decline started before the most recent, publication-lag-affected years. This reads as a technology where the core patenting cycle has already run through several assignees.
The prior-art baseline is old and heavily cited
The most-cited record in this set, a method for producing rare earth permanent magnet material, carries 600 citations — more than three times the next entry. Freedom-to-operate work in this space still has to clear a citation network built substantially on filings from the 2000s.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to rare earth permanent magnets, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and who has gone quiet
Ownership in this dataset is concentrated among a small group of Japanese and Chinese magnet producers, several of which show zero filings in the latest tracked year — a pattern worth separating from actual R&D pullback given the publication lag.
Historical leaders show a filing pause
Shin-Etsu Chemical, TDK, ULVAC and Xiamen Tungsten all register zero filings in the most recent year, with Shin-Etsu down -100% YoY. Given the 18-month publication lag, this is more likely a disclosure gap than a stop in development work.
Co-assignee activity is concentrated in a few pairs
Of 10 identified co-assignee pairs, the strongest links Xiamen Tungsten with Fujian Jinlong Rare Earth at 45 shared records, with two further pairs at 23 and 13. Co-filing here tracks vertically integrated supply relationships between magnet producers and rare earth material suppliers.
US, EPO and China carry the bulk of filings
The United States (651), the European Patent Office (574) and China (437) account for most receiving-office activity, ahead of Japan (173), WIPO/PCT (85) and Taiwan (66). Filing strategy in this field is clearly multi-jurisdictional rather than concentrated in a single home market.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| Baotou Beimai Lisheng Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| Intermetallics Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| TDK Corporation | 0 | — |
| ULVAC, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Xiamen Tungsten Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Yantai Zhenghai Magnetic Material Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Fujian Jinlong Rare Earth Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to a mature, geographically distributed field with a dense composition layer and thinner processing and diagnostic branches. Two directions follow from that.
Check freedom to operate against the citation baseline
The most-cited records in this set, several from the 2000s, still anchor the prior-art network for coercivity and composition claims. Any new filing on base alloy chemistry should be checked against that baseline before drafting.
Run a freedom-to-operate search in EurekaTrack the assignees that went quiet
Several major historical filers show zero activity in the latest tracked year. Given the publication lag, it is worth monitoring whether that is a genuine slowdown or filings still working through the pipeline.
Set up assignee monitoring in EurekaCommon questions on rare earth permanent magnet patents
Grain boundary diffusion is a processing technique that applies heavy rare earth elements like dysprosium or terbium only at the grain boundaries of a sintered NdFeB magnet, rather than throughout the bulk alloy. It raises coercivity and thermal stability while using far less of the expensive heavy rare earth material than bulk alloying would require. In this dataset it shows up both as a manufacturing process claim and, in newer filings such as US11921174B1, as the basis for diagnostic methods that measure whether the diffusion has caused irreversible demagnetization.
H01F covers magnets, inductors and transformers, and it was one of the three IPC classes used to build this search gate alongside C22C38 and B22F3. Because the search itself was anchored on magnet-specific terms like coercivity and sintered magnet, nearly every qualifying record naturally falls into H01F. The more informative comparison is what sits underneath it — B22F powder metallurgy and C22C alloy processing each cover under half the corpus, which is where distinct technical approaches are actually being differentiated.
Patent publication typically lags the actual filing date by around eighteen months, so the most recent year in any filing trend is structurally undercounted. Companies like Shin-Etsu Chemical, TDK and Xiamen Tungsten showing zero filings in the latest tracked year most likely reflects that lag rather than a genuine halt in R&D. It is worth revisiting the same assignees' filing counts a year or two after this data cut-off before concluding they have exited the space.
Not on the evidence here. Filings ran at 110 in 2017, peaked at 121 in 2020, and had already fallen to 109 by the 2022 midpoint before the recent-year figures dropped further under the publication lag. That trajectory looks like a filing cycle that has already peaked rather than one still building, though the composition layer around coercivity and heavy rare earth reduction remains heavily claimed.
The thinner IPC classes in this dataset point to it: C04B ceramics-adjacent processing, C23C and B05D coating routes for corrosion protection, and H02K motor-integration claims all carry far fewer records than the core H01F, B22F and C22C classes. Diagnostic and measurement methods layered on top of established manufacturing processes, similar in spirit to the grain boundary diffusion demagnetization test in US11921174B1, also sit in less crowded claim territory than the underlying alloy and sintering processes themselves.
Research Rare Earth Permanent Magnets in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole rare earth permanent magnets corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.