Reactive Distillation Patents: Who Leads, Where Filings Cooled 2026
- Filing peaked in 2021 at 29 records and has since declined, with the 2022 midpoint at 10 — this is a maturing claim space, not a growing one.
- China leads receiving offices with 130 filings, ahead of the United States at 114 and the EPO at 77, reversing the jurisdiction pattern common in older process-chemistry landscapes.
- The most-cited record, US5599976A, carries 565 citations, more than double the next most-cited document — a strong signal that acetic-acid recovery chemistry set the template others built on.
Filing growth compares 2021 (29 records) with 2024 (7) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 538 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What the reactive distillation patent record shows
Reactive distillation combines a chemical reaction with simultaneous separation inside a single column, and the patent record tracked here spans 538 patent families published between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off. The search covers core process claims — equilibrium limitation, catalyst packing, column internals, residue curve mapping and esterification routes — filtered to IPC classes covering separation processes, catalytic reactors and acyclic organic compounds. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the 2026 count of 2 records understates actual recent filing activity rather than signalling a collapse.
The filing trend rose from 17 records in 2017 to a peak of 29 in 2021, then eased back toward 10 by 2022 — a pattern consistent with a technology where the dominant packing and column-internals architectures are already claimed and later filers are working narrower variations rather than new base chemistry.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 538-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.
A 2021 peak followed by a decline
Filings climbed from 17 in 2017 to 29 in 2021 before falling back to 10 by 2022, with only 2 records logged so far in 2026. Given the ~18-month publication lag, the true 2025-2026 filing rate is higher than shown, but the multi-year decline from the 2021 peak is a real signal that the core process claims are settling.
Concentrated in separation, catalysis and acyclic chemistry
C07C (acyclic and carbocyclic compounds) covers 435 of the 538 records, with B01D (separation processes) at 269 and B01J (catalytic processes) at 247 — the three classes overlap heavily, since most reactive distillation claims combine a reaction chemistry (C07C), a column or internals design (B01D) and a catalyst system (B01J) in the same family. Smaller counts in C10G (32), C07D (21) and C10L (19) mark adjacent refining and heterocyclic applications that remain comparatively thin.
Shares are the percentage of the 538 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Reactive Distillation Processes with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about reactive distillation processes and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe documents everyone in this space cites
US6297415B1 — Catalytic distillation process (BASF Aktiengesellschaft, 2001-10-02)
A catalyst packing which can be produced by vapor deposition and/or sputtering of at least one substance active as catalyst and/or promotor onto woven or knitted fabrics or sheets as support material is used in a process for catalytic distillation in which a heterogeneously catalyzed reaction is combined with a simultaneous distillation or rectification over the catalyst packing.The claim ties the catalytic effect to a specific manufacturing route for the packing — vapor deposition or sputtering onto woven or knitted support material — rather than to the reaction chemistry itself.
View full record| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5599976A | Recovery of acetic acid from dilute aqueous streams formed during a carbonylation process | 565 |
| 2 | US4232177A | Catalytic distillation process | 250 |
| 3 | US5266546A | Catalytic distillation machine | 216 |
| 4 | US4307254A | Catalytic distillation process | 190 |
| 5 | US4849569A | Alkylation of organic aromatic compounds | 161 |
| 6 | US4336407A | Catalytic distillation process | 139 |
| 7 | US4435595A | Reactive distillation process for the production of methyl acetate | 122 |
| 8 | US4950834A | Alkylation of organic aromatic compounds in a dual bed system | 100 |
| 9 | US5863419A | Sulfur removal by catalytic distillation | 98 |
| 10 | US4504687A | Method for etherifications | 92 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older records; treat these as markers of foundational influence rather than current state of the art.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three findings from the dataset that change where a new filing should be positioned.
The peak has passed
Filing volume rose steadily through the late 2010s, peaked at 29 records in 2021, then fell to 10 by 2022. That drop, well ahead of the publication-lag window, points to the core packing and internals architectures being claimed out rather than to a slowdown in the underlying chemistry.
China now leads receiving offices
China accounts for 130 filings against 114 for the United States and 77 for the EPO. For a field with this much overlapping claim density, a freedom-to-operate review that skips Chinese filings is reviewing an incomplete picture.
One acetic-acid recovery patent anchors the field
US5599976A carries 565 citations, more than double the next most-cited document at 250. Heavy reliance on a single foundational reference is common where later filers narrow claims around a settled base process rather than proposing new reaction routes.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to reactive distillation processes, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds the reactive distillation claim space
Filing activity concentrates among a small group of chemical majors and Chinese state-affiliated research institutes, with recent-year momentum flat across the leading names.
Sulzer and Wacker file jointly
The strongest co-assignee link in the dataset pairs Sulzer Chemtech with Wacker Chemie across 13 shared families, well ahead of the next-strongest pairs. That level of co-filing suggests a formal technology partnership around catalyst packing or column internals rather than incidental overlap.
Sinopec files through multiple internal institutes
Sinopec appears both directly and through at least three affiliated research institutes — its petrochemical science institute, its Dalian institute and its Shanghai institute — each filing separately and sometimes jointly with the parent. Any competitive-intelligence view of Sinopec's position needs to aggregate across these units.
No leading assignee is filing in the most recent year
Every major assignee tracked for recent-year momentum, including BASF, Sulzer, Celanese and Sinopec, shows zero filings in the latest year. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this is expected rather than alarming, but it also means recent competitive positioning cannot yet be read from the public record.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical Research & Licensing Company | 0 | — |
| CR&L / Catalytic Distillation Technologies LLC | 0 | — |
| BASF Aktiengesellschaft | 0 | — |
| China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (Sinopec) | 0 | — |
| Sulzer Chemtech Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Celanese International Corporation | 0 | — |
| Basell North America Inc. | 0 | — |
| Wacker Chemie AG | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to a maturing core process with specific open branches. The next steps depend on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, whitespace filing, or monitoring.
Run a freedom-to-operate check against the top-cited families
Start with the five most-cited records, especially US5599976A and the catalytic distillation process patents held by the earliest filers, since later families in this space tend to narrow claims around these foundational documents.
Explore prior art around these familiesDraft around the under-claimed IPC branches
C07D, C10L and C08G carry the thinnest record counts in this dataset relative to the core C07C, B01D and B01J classes, suggesting narrower prior art for heterocyclic, fuel-grade or condensation-polymer applications of reactive distillation.
Map the whitespace in detailTrack Sinopec's distributed filing structure
Because Sinopec files through multiple internal institutes as well as directly, a single-entity search will undercount its true position; a monitoring workflow should track the parent and its research institutes together.
Set up assignee monitoringCommon questions about reactive distillation patents
Reactive distillation combines a chemical reaction with product separation inside a single distillation column, which reduces equipment count and can shift equilibrium-limited reactions toward higher conversion. Because the reaction happens on or near the column packing itself, the physical design of that packing, including catalyst support materials and how the catalyst is deposited onto them, becomes a patentable feature distinct from the reaction chemistry. That is why column internals and catalyst packing show up as major claim categories in this dataset alongside the underlying esterification or alkylation reactions themselves.
The dataset shows filing concentrated among established chemical process companies including BASF, Sulzer Chemtech, Celanese and Wacker Chemie, alongside Sinopec and its affiliated research institutes in China. Sulzer and Wacker show the strongest co-filing relationship in the dataset, with 13 shared patent families, suggesting a sustained joint development effort around packing or column design. None of the leading assignees tracked show filings in the most recent year, which is consistent with the roughly 18-month lag between filing and publication rather than a sign these companies have stopped working in the field.
Filing volume rose from 17 records in 2017 to a peak of 29 in 2021, then fell to 10 by 2022 and further in subsequent years. A decline of this size, occurring well before the publication-lag window would explain it, typically indicates that the core architectures for catalyst packing, column internals and the main reaction routes are already well claimed, pushing new filers toward narrower or adjacent variations rather than foundational process patents. It does not necessarily mean commercial interest in reactive distillation has declined, only that the pace of new patentable process claims has slowed.
China leads with 130 filings in this dataset, ahead of the United States at 114, the European Patent Office at 77, WIPO/PCT filings at 41, Canada at 35 and India at 22. This distribution matters for freedom-to-operate work because a review focused only on US and European filings would miss the largest single jurisdiction by volume. The strong Chinese presence also correlates with Sinopec's multiple internal research institutes, which file both independently and jointly with the parent company.
The IPC composition data shows the core classes, C07C, B01D and B01J, carrying the bulk of the 538 records, while adjacent classes such as C07D (heterocyclic compounds), C10L (fuels) and C08G (condensation polymers) carry far fewer filings. That imbalance suggests thinner prior art for reactive distillation applied to heterocyclic intermediate production, fuel-grade product streams, or condensation polymer processes, though a formal novelty search against the specific claim language is still necessary before relying on that gap. Catalyst packing fabrication methods, such as sputtering or vapor deposition onto woven supports, also appear to be claimed by a narrower set of assignees than the broader reaction chemistry.
Research Reactive Distillation Processes in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole reactive distillation processes corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.