Book a demo

Reactive Distillation Patents: Who Leads, Where Filings Cooled 2026

Reactive Distillation Patents: Who Leads, Where Filings Cooled 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/reactive-distillation-processes-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Reactive Distillation Processes
Reactive distillation patents: mapping who holds the catalyst-packing claims and where filing has slowed
  • Filing peaked in 2021 at 29 records and has since declined, with the 2022 midpoint at 10 — this is a maturing claim space, not a growing one.
  • China leads receiving offices with 130 filings, ahead of the United States at 114 and the EPO at 77, reversing the jurisdiction pattern common in older process-chemistry landscapes.
  • The most-cited record, US5599976A, carries 565 citations, more than double the next most-cited document — a strong signal that acetic-acid recovery chemistry set the template others built on.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
538
Published Records
26%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-76%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (29 records) with 2024 (7) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 538 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the reactive distillation patent record shows

Reactive distillation combines a chemical reaction with simultaneous separation inside a single column, and the patent record tracked here spans 538 patent families published between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off. The search covers core process claims — equilibrium limitation, catalyst packing, column internals, residue curve mapping and esterification routes — filtered to IPC classes covering separation processes, catalytic reactors and acyclic organic compounds. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the 2026 count of 2 records understates actual recent filing activity rather than signalling a collapse.

The filing trend rose from 17 records in 2017 to a peak of 29 in 2021, then eased back toward 10 by 2022 — a pattern consistent with a technology where the dominant packing and column-internals architectures are already claimed and later filers are working narrower variations rather than new base chemistry.

Filing activity by year, 2017-2026
  1. 1CHEMICAL RESEARCH & LICENSING CO36
  2. 2BASF SE30
  3. 3CATALYTIC DISTILLATION TECHNOLOGIES28
  4. 4CELANESE INTERNATIONAL CORP24
  5. 5CHINA PETROLEUM & CHEMICAL CORP24
  6. 6SULZER CHEMTECH AG22
  7. 7GREENYUG LLC20
  8. 8SASOL NORTH AMERICA INC16
  9. 9WACKER CHEMIE AG15
  10. 10ENERKEM INC13
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Reactive Distillation Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 538-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

A 2021 peak followed by a decline

Filings climbed from 17 in 2017 to 29 in 2021 before falling back to 10 by 2022, with only 2 records logged so far in 2026. Given the ~18-month publication lag, the true 2025-2026 filing rate is higher than shown, but the multi-year decline from the 2021 peak is a real signal that the core process claims are settling.

A 2021 peak followed by a decline08152330172017201820192020292021202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Concentrated in separation, catalysis and acyclic chemistry

C07C (acyclic and carbocyclic compounds) covers 435 of the 538 records, with B01D (separation processes) at 269 and B01J (catalytic processes) at 247 — the three classes overlap heavily, since most reactive distillation claims combine a reaction chemistry (C07C), a column or internals design (B01D) and a catalyst system (B01J) in the same family. Smaller counts in C10G (32), C07D (21) and C10L (19) mark adjacent refining and heterocyclic applications that remain comparatively thin.

Concentrated in separation, catalysis and acyclic chemistryC07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds43580.9%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…26950.0%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …24745.9%C07B · General organic chemistry meth…6211.5%C10G · Hydrocarbon oils & refining325.9%C07D · Heterocyclic compounds213.9%C10L · Fuels & firelighters193.5%C08G · Condensation polymers91.7%Other5710.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 538 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Reactive Distillation Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Reactive Distillation Processes with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about reactive distillation processes and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The documents everyone in this space cites

Representative filing
US6297415B12001-10-02

US6297415B1 — Catalytic distillation process (BASF Aktiengesellschaft, 2001-10-02)

BASF AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

A catalyst packing which can be produced by vapor deposition and/or sputtering of at least one substance active as catalyst and/or promotor onto woven or knitted fabrics or sheets as support material is used in a process for catalytic distillation in which a heterogeneously catalyzed reaction is combined with a simultaneous distillation or rectification over the catalyst packing.The claim ties the catalytic effect to a specific manufacturing route for the packing — vapor deposition or sputtering onto woven or knitted support material — rather than to the reaction chemistry itself.

View full record
Most-cited records in the dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5599976ARecovery of acetic acid from dilute aqueous streams formed during a carbonylation process565
2US4232177ACatalytic distillation process250
3US5266546ACatalytic distillation machine216
4US4307254ACatalytic distillation process190
5US4849569AAlkylation of organic aromatic compounds161
6US4336407ACatalytic distillation process139
7US4435595AReactive distillation process for the production of methyl acetate122
8US4950834AAlkylation of organic aromatic compounds in a dual bed system100
9US5863419ASulfur removal by catalytic distillation98
10US4504687AMethod for etherifications92

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older records; treat these as markers of foundational influence rather than current state of the art.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Reactive Distillation Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three findings from the dataset that change where a new filing should be positioned.

Filing momentum
29 → 10
records, 2021 → 2022

The peak has passed

Filing volume rose steadily through the late 2010s, peaked at 29 records in 2021, then fell to 10 by 2022. That drop, well ahead of the publication-lag window, points to the core packing and internals architectures being claimed out rather than to a slowdown in the underlying chemistry.

Trend data, 2017-2026
Jurisdiction mix
130 vs 114
China vs. United States filings

China now leads receiving offices

China accounts for 130 filings against 114 for the United States and 77 for the EPO. For a field with this much overlapping claim density, a freedom-to-operate review that skips Chinese filings is reviewing an incomplete picture.

Receiving office counts
Citation concentration
565 citations
US5599976A, the top-cited record

One acetic-acid recovery patent anchors the field

US5599976A carries 565 citations, more than double the next most-cited document at 250. Heavy reliance on a single foundational reference is common where later filers narrow claims around a settled base process rather than proposing new reaction routes.

Citation counts across most-cited records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to reactive distillation processes, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Reactive Distillation Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the reactive distillation claim space

Filing activity concentrates among a small group of chemical majors and Chinese state-affiliated research institutes, with recent-year momentum flat across the leading names.

Co-filing pattern
13 shared families
strongest co-assignee pair

Sulzer and Wacker file jointly

The strongest co-assignee link in the dataset pairs Sulzer Chemtech with Wacker Chemie across 13 shared families, well ahead of the next-strongest pairs. That level of co-filing suggests a formal technology partnership around catalyst packing or column internals rather than incidental overlap.

Co-assignee pairs, 10 total
Institutional depth
3 internal research units
under one parent group

Sinopec files through multiple internal institutes

Sinopec appears both directly and through at least three affiliated research institutes — its petrochemical science institute, its Dalian institute and its Shanghai institute — each filing separately and sometimes jointly with the parent. Any competitive-intelligence view of Sinopec's position needs to aggregate across these units.

Co-assignee pairs involving Sinopec entities
Recent-year activity
0 in latest year
for every leading assignee tracked

No leading assignee is filing in the most recent year

Every major assignee tracked for recent-year momentum, including BASF, Sulzer, Celanese and Sinopec, shows zero filings in the latest year. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this is expected rather than alarming, but it also means recent competitive positioning cannot yet be read from the public record.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
Sub-areas with thinner representation in the IPC composition data, where a well-drafted claim faces less crowded prior art.
Residue curve map optimisation for multi-component systemsCatalyst packing fabrication via sputtering/vapor depositionReactive distillation for heterocyclic intermediates (C07D)Column internals for fuel-grade product streams (C10L)Condensation polymer integration (C08G)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Chemical Research & Licensing Company0
CR&L / Catalytic Distillation Technologies LLC0
BASF Aktiengesellschaft0
China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (Sinopec)0
Sulzer Chemtech Ltd.0
Celanese International Corporation0
Basell North America Inc.0
Wacker Chemie AG0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Reactive Distillation Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a maturing core process with specific open branches. The next steps depend on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, whitespace filing, or monitoring.

Run a freedom-to-operate check against the top-cited families

Start with the five most-cited records, especially US5599976A and the catalytic distillation process patents held by the earliest filers, since later families in this space tend to narrow claims around these foundational documents.

Explore prior art around these families

Draft around the under-claimed IPC branches

C07D, C10L and C08G carry the thinnest record counts in this dataset relative to the core C07C, B01D and B01J classes, suggesting narrower prior art for heterocyclic, fuel-grade or condensation-polymer applications of reactive distillation.

Map the whitespace in detail

Track Sinopec's distributed filing structure

Because Sinopec files through multiple internal institutes as well as directly, a single-entity search will undercount its true position; a monitoring workflow should track the parent and its research institutes together.

Set up assignee monitoring
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Reactive Distillation Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about reactive distillation patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Reactive Distillation Processes covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Reactive Distillation Processes in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole reactive distillation processes corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.