https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/recirculating-aquaculture-systems-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Aquaculture
Recirculating Aquaculture System Patents: Who Holds the Water Quality Claims
  • Filing has plateaued, not grown. the peak year so far is 2022 at 23 filings, and 2026 volumes sit well below that — this is a mature filing curve, not an emerging one.
  • China dominates the filing count. 91 of the tracked records were filed at the China receiving office, more than triple the United States total of 30.
  • Ownership is fragmented outside a small cluster. only 9 co-assignee pairs exist across 171 families, and the strongest links trace back to a single named inventor group rather than a corporate lab.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
171
Published Records
24%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+40%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
CN
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the patent record shows about RAS technology

Recirculating aquaculture systems combine mechanical filtration, biofiltration, oxygenation and water chemistry control into a closed-loop production environment. The patent record tracked here spans 171 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026, filtered to documents that specifically address biofilter performance, water quality control, off-flavor management, oxygenation or energy consumption within RAS or land-based fish farming contexts. Filing activity is concentrated in animal husbandry and fishing classifications, with water and wastewater treatment as the dominant secondary category.

Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the 2026 figure in any trend chart understates real filing activity for that year. Read the most recent one or two years as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing activity, 2017-2026
  1. 1PENTAIR WATER POOL & SPA INC17
  2. 2YISSUM RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY OF THE HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM LTD7
  3. 3JIMEI UNIV6
  4. 4ATLANTIC SAPPHIRE IP LLC6
  5. 5THREE-SIXTY AQUACULTURE LTD5
  6. 6SHENZHEN JINGYU TECHNOLOGY CO LTD5
  7. 7YELLOW SEA FISHERIES RES INST CHINESE ACAD OF FISHERIES SCI4
  8. 8ZHEJIANG UNIV4
  9. 9TONGWEI AGRI DEV CO LTD3
  10. 10FLORIDA STATE UNIV RES FOUND INC3
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Recirculating Aquaculture Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 171-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those filings distribute across IPC subclasses.

A flat-to-declining curve after a 2022 peak

Filings rose from 8 in 2017 to a peak of 23 in 2022, then eased off. With the midpoint year already at peak volume, this reads as a technology whose claim space filled early rather than one still accelerating.

A flat-to-declining curve after a 2022 peak0613192582017201820192020202123202220232024202562026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Animal husbandry and water treatment dominate

A01K (animal husbandry and fishing) appears in 158 of 171 records and C02F (water and wastewater treatment) in 76, confirming that most claims sit at the intersection of livestock-style tank/system design and water treatment chemistry. Separation processes, mixing equipment, microorganism-related claims and horticulture crossovers each account for single-digit shares — these are the smaller, more specialized branches.

Animal husbandry and water treatment dominateA01K · Animal husbandry & fishing15892.4%C02F · Water & wastewater treatment7644.4%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…74.1%B01F · Mixing & stirring74.1%C12N · Microorganisms & genetic engin…74.1%A01G · Horticulture & forestry63.5%C12Q · Measuring & testing involving …31.8%A22C · Meat & fish processing21.2%Other2011.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 171 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Recirculating Aquaculture Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Recirculating Aquaculture Systems with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about recirculating aquaculture systems and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited and most recent filings

Representative recent filing
US20240057567A12024-02-22

US20240057567A1 — Recirculating aquaculture system and method

SUPERIOR FRESH LLC

A recirculating aquaculture system for producing aquatic species suitable for human consumption includes a culture tank and a set of communicating subsystems: solids control, recirculating pump, aeration/stripping for carbon dioxide removal, pH control, and oxygenation, all configured to treat and recirculate water within a closed system.Filed by Superior Fresh LLC, published 2024-02-22.

US20240057567A1 — patent drawing 1US20240057567A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US10219491B2Dissolved oxygen control system for aquaculture250
2US20030070624A1Process for culturing crabs in recirculating marine aquaculture systems65
3US20180125041A1Systems and Methods of Intensive Recirculating Aquaculture46
4US6584935B2Process for culturing crabs in recirculating marine aquaculture systems46
5CN101595855A一种工厂化循环水养殖系统的排水排污装置44
6US20140311416A1Dissolved Oxygen Control System for Aquaculture34
7CN103734066A一种海水循环水养殖系统31
8US20140261213A1Carbon Dioxide Control System for Aquaculture27
9US20090152192A1Novel Arrangement of Denitrification Reactors in a Recirculating Aquaculture System22
10US10034461B2Systems and methods of intensive recirculating aquaculture21

Citation counts favor older filings inside any searched corpus — treat them as a measure of influence on later filings, not as a signal of current commercial importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Recirculating Aquaculture Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once the raw counts are put in context: where claim density sits, who filed together, and how citation influence is distributed.

Filing geography
91 vs 30
China vs US receiving-office filings

China is the primary filing venue by a wide margin

China accounts for 91 of the tracked filings against 30 for the United States and 17 for WIPO/PCT routes. A freedom-to-operate check limited to US or EPO prior art will miss the majority of the documented activity in this field.

Receiving office data
Technology mix
158 / 171
records classed under A01K

Tank and husbandry claims outnumber pure water-treatment claims

A01K covers 158 of 171 families versus 76 for C02F water treatment, meaning most patents frame their core claims around the animal-holding system rather than the treatment chemistry alone, even when biofiltration or oxygenation is the technical hook.

IPC composition
Collaboration pattern
9 pairs
co-assignee pairs across 171 families

Co-filing is rare and clustered around one inventor group

Only 9 co-assignee pairs exist in the dataset. The strongest links — Losordo Thomas with Delong Dennis P, and each of them with Stiles Jr Robert W — point to a single collaborating group rather than a broader industry pattern of joint filing.

Co-assignee network
Citation influence
250 citations
top-cited record, dissolved oxygen control

Oxygenation control is the most-referenced technical anchor

The most-cited record in this dataset addresses dissolved oxygen control, cited 250 times — well ahead of the next entries. That concentration suggests oxygenation control claims are a frequently-cited reference point for later filings in adjacent water-quality subsystems.

Citation ranking
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to recirculating aquaculture systems, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Recirculating Aquaculture Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The assignee list is long-tailed: a handful of named inventors and companies with repeat filings, and a large number of single-filing entrants, many of them Chinese aquaculture equipment and farming companies filing utility-model-style protection on tank and pipework designs.

Momentum
0% YoY
latest-year filings, top-ranked assignee

No assignee shows strong recent-year acceleration

Every assignee in the recent-year momentum data shows either a single filing or zero filings in the latest year, including the top-ranked entity. This is consistent with the plateaued 2022-peak filing curve rather than any one player pulling ahead.

Recent-year filings
Named inventors
9 links
co-assignee pairs, 3 involve one trio

A small inventor cluster anchors the strongest links

Losordo Thomas, Delong Dennis P and Stiles Jr Robert W account for the three strongest co-assignee pairs in the dataset, suggesting a long-running collaborative filing relationship rather than corporate-lab co-ownership.

Co-assignee pairs
Geographic spread
6 offices
receiving offices with tracked filings

Filing activity spans six receiving offices unevenly

China, the United States, WIPO, Europe, India and Australia all show tracked filings, but volume drops off sharply after the top two, meaning most competitive filing decisions should weigh China and US prior art first.

Receiving office split
🔍
Under-claimed technical branches
Sub-areas with thin coverage relative to the core tank and biofilter claims — worth checking before assuming the space is occupied.
Off-flavor compound removal mediaEnzyme/DNA-based water quality monitoringMicrobial community engineering for biofiltersEnergy-recovery pumping subsystemsHorticulture/aquaponics crossover claims
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences10%
Pentair Pool and Spa0
LOSORDO THOMAS0
DELONG DENNIS P0
Yissum Research Development Company of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem0
STILES JR ROBERT W0
Jimei University0
University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Recirculating Aquaculture Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a few concrete next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, licensing, or identifying a filing gap.

Check China filings before clearing a design

With 91 of 171 tracked families filed in China, a freedom-to-operate review anchored only on US or EPO prior art is incomplete for tank, pipework and biofilter hardware claims.

Search China filings in Eureka

Map the oxygenation citation cluster

The most-cited record in this space concerns dissolved oxygen control. Tracing what cites it and what it cites surfaces the surrounding claim boundaries before drafting new oxygenation claims.

Trace citations in Eureka

Test the under-claimed branches

Off-flavor compound removal, enzyme/DNA-based monitoring and microbial community engineering all show thin coverage relative to core tank claims — each is a candidate for a narrower, defensible first filing.

Explore white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Recirculating Aquaculture Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about RAS patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Recirculating Aquaculture Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Recirculating Aquaculture Systems in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole recirculating aquaculture systems corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.