Book a demo

RIS Channel Coding Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026

RIS Channel Coding Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/reconfigurable-intelligent-surface-channel-coding-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Telecom & Wireless
Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface Channel Coding Patents
  • Filing peaked in 2023 at 11 families and has not returned to that level since — the field is past its first filing wave, not mid-climb.
  • H04B carries 33 of 38 records while H04L appears in 21, showing that most claims still sit inside transmission hardware rather than pure digital-signal-processing framing.
  • No assignee shows growth in the latest year every tracked filer, including Qualcomm and InterDigital, logged zero or a decline — a sign the leaders are consolidating rather than racing.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
38
Published Records
71%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+125%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
WO
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (4 records) with 2024 (9) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 38 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS) channel coding covers the estimation and signalling methods that let a wireless system learn the cascaded channel created when a passive or semi-passive reflecting surface sits between transmitter and receiver. Because the surface itself has no RF chain, conventional channel estimation does not apply directly — filings in this set cover reflection-coefficient estimation, cascaded channel state acquisition, and the feedback formats needed to report RIS-shaped channel state information back to the network. The search scope is narrow by design: 38 families across roughly a decade, concentrated in transmission and digital-signalling IPC classes.

Publication lags filing by around 18 months, so the 2025–2026 counts in the trend chart are undercounts of what has actually been filed; treat the most recent bar as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing activity by year
  1. 1INTERDIGITAL PATENT HOLDINGS INC15
  2. 2NOKIA SOLUTIONS & NETWORKS OY4
  3. 3QUALCOMM INC3
  4. 4TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)3
  5. 5ZHANG YU2
  6. 6ELSHAFIE AHMED2
  7. 7LY HUNG DINH1
  8. 8ABDELGHAFFAR MUHAMMAD SAYED KHAIRY1
  9. 9PENG CHENG LAB1
  10. 10SHANGHAI JIAOTONG UNIV1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface Channel Coding covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 38-family set: how filing has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.

A single filing wave, not sustained growth

Activity was at zero as recently as 2017, climbed to a peak of 11 families in 2023, and had already fallen back by the 2022 midpoint of 6 — the shape of a technology that had one concentrated filing push rather than a steadily compounding one. The partial 2026 count of 2 should be read against the publication lag, not as a collapse.

A single filing wave, not sustained growth03691202017201820192020202120221120232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Transmission hardware dominates over pure DSP framing

H04B (transmission, general) appears in 33 of 38 records and H04L (digital information transmission) in 21, meaning most families claim the RIS channel-estimation method as part of a transmission system rather than as a standalone signal-processing algorithm. The remaining classes — H04W, G02B, G06K, H01Q — each carry a single record, marking wireless-network integration, optical implementation, pattern-recognition-assisted estimation and antenna-level framing as minority approaches rather than established sub-fields.

Transmission hardware dominates over pure DSP framingH04B · Transmission (general)3386.8%H04L · Digital information transmissi…2155.3%H04W · Wireless communication networks25.3%G02B · Optical elements & systems12.6%G06K · Data recognition & presentation12.6%H01Q · Antennas12.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 38 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface Channel Coding covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface Channel Coding with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about reconfigurable intelligent surface channel coding and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Representative filing and most-cited records

Representative record
US20260197055A12026-07-09

Two-level reconfigurable intelligent surface channel state information

INTERDIGITAL PATENT HOLDINGS, INC.

Filed by InterDigital Patent Holdings and published 2026-07-09, this family describes a two-level RIS CSI scheme: a WTRU derives a first RIS CSI from a first symbol set using a uniform-phase quantization format, transmits it, then derives a second RIS CSI from a further symbol set and a second quantization format.Abstract trimmed for length — see full record for complete claim language.

US20260197055A1 — patent drawing 1US20260197055A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this set
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1CN112565121A用于智能反射面辅助的大规模MIMO系统的半盲信道估计方法20
2WO2022221976A1Configuration of reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS) selection10
3WO2023218079A1Channel estimation technique for reconfigurable intelligent surfaces7
4US20250167835A1Method for machine-learning-based uplink channel estimation in reflective intelligent systems6
5US20250323689A1Reconfigurable intelligent surface channel state information5
6US20250309943A1Radio frequency identification tags for a reconfigurable intelligent surface5
7CN117221052A毫米波RIS信道估计方法、装置、设备及存储介质4
8CN117614775A一种基于卡尔曼滤波的联合硬件损伤与RIS信道估计方法3
9CN114629751A一种毫米波通信系统的信道估计方法及系统3
10WO2024088542A1Reconfigurable intelligent surface and control thereof2

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to be cited; read them as a signal of influence on later work, not as a ranking of current importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface Channel Coding covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about where this field stands

Three signals worth weighing before deciding where to file or search for freedom to operate.

Filing shape
11 in 2023
peak year

One wave, already crested

The climb from zero in 2017 to 11 families in 2023, followed by a pullback, points to a single concentrated filing push rather than an accelerating field. New entrants now face a denser prior-art base than the raw family count suggests.

Based on the 2017–2026 filing trend
Claim framing
33 of 38
records in H04B

Hardware-first claiming

Most applicants anchor RIS channel estimation inside a transmission-system claim (H04B) rather than a standalone algorithm claim (H04L alone). That framing choice shapes where a freedom-to-operate search needs to start.

IPC subclass distribution
Filing venue
WIPO 10 · CN 8 · US 8
leading offices

No single jurisdiction dominates

PCT filings lead marginally, with China, the United States, Europe and India each carrying a meaningful share. A single-jurisdiction FTO search would miss most of the corpus.

Receiving office counts
Assignee momentum
0% growth
across tracked filers

Flat momentum at the top

Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum — including Qualcomm, Nokia and InterDigital — shows zero or negative year-on-year filing change. Read this alongside the publication lag: it may reflect reporting delay as much as a real pause.

Latest-year YoY by assignee
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to reconfigurable intelligent surface channel coding, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface Channel Coding covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the claim space still has room

The 38-family set has no runaway leader; filing is split across a handful of network-equipment vendors, research institutes and named inventors, with co-filing pairs pointing to specific collaboration lines.

Vendor cluster
10 co-assignee pairs
strongest at count 2

Qualcomm's named-inventor pairings

Qualcomm's strongest co-filing links are with individually named inventors (Zhang Yu, Elshafie Ahmed) rather than with other corporate assignees, suggesting these filings track specific engineering teams rather than a joint-venture structure.

Co-assignee pair analysis
Standards vendors
0 latest-year filings
InterDigital, Nokia, Ericsson, Qualcomm

Established filers, paused clocks

The named standards-adjacent vendors — InterDigital, Nokia Solutions and Networks, Qualcomm, Ericsson — each show zero filings in the latest tracked year. Their prior filings still anchor the most-cited table, so their claim positions remain live even without new activity.

Recent-year momentum table
Research institutes
38 families total
across all assignees

A mixed corporate/academic base

Alongside the vendor names, Chinese research entities and universities appear in the assignee set, indicating that RIS channel estimation is still drawing academic filing activity rather than being fully consolidated into commercial vendor portfolios.

Assignee ranking
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches with thin coverage relative to the core cascaded-channel-estimation claims
Optical-domain RIS channel sensing (G02B)Pattern-recognition-assisted reflection coefficient estimationAntenna-integrated RIS CSI feedback (H01Q)Wireless-network-layer RIS CSI signalling (H04W)Machine-learning uplink channel estimation for RIS
Rank all filers by momentum →
Latest-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
InterDigital Patent Holdings, Inc.0-100%
Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy0
Qualcomm Incorporated0
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson0
ZHANG YU0
ELSHAFIE AHMED0
Peng Cheng Laboratory0
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface Channel Coding covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The trend and assignee data point to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is filing, licensing or freedom-to-operate clearance.

Run a claim-level FTO check

Because 33 of 38 records sit in H04B, a subclass-only search will miss the H04L, H04W and optical-domain minority filings. A claim-level check across all six IPC subclasses in this set is the safer starting point.

Explore in Eureka →

Watch the standards-vendor cluster

InterDigital, Nokia, Ericsson and Qualcomm hold the most-cited positions but show no latest-year filings. Any new activity from this cluster would be an early signal of a renewed filing wave.

Track assignees in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface Channel Coding covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about RIS channel coding patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface Channel Coding covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface Channel Coding in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole reconfigurable intelligent surface channel coding corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.