Book a demo

RIS Hardware & Control Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

RIS Hardware & Control Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/reconfigurable-intelligent-surface-hardware-and-control-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Wireless Communications
Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface Hardware and Control Patents
  • 48.6% concentration. The top 5 of 100 ranked assignees hold 868 of the 1,787 records in scope — nearly half the field sits with a handful of filers.
  • Filing kept climbing through 2024. Annual filings rose from 307 in 2021 to 348 in 2024, a 13% increase, after peaking at 430 in 2022.
  • Transmission and networking dominate the claims. H04B and H04W together touch most of the corpus, while AI-based control (G06N, 2.2%) and power systems (H02J, 1.9%) remain thin.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,787
Published Records
49%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+13%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (307 records) with 2024 (348) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,787 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this dataset covers

This landscape tracks 1,787 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS), intelligent reflecting surface, or programmable metasurface terminology with claim language on element phase quantization, insertion loss, control signalling overhead, power consumption, deployment geometry, and passive versus active amplifying variants. The scope spans both passive reflect-only designs and the newer active-amplifying hardware branch, plus the control-plane signalling needed to steer them.

Because publication trails filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one or two years in any trend chart will understate real filing activity — treat 2025 and 2026 figures as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017–2026
  1. 1QUALCOMM INC621
  2. 2DELL PROD LP75
  3. 3HUAWEI TECH CO LTD62
  4. 4ZHANG YU60
  5. 5INTERDIGITAL PATENT HOLDINGS INC50
  6. 6TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)45
  7. 7SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD43
  8. 8LY HUNG DINH39
  9. 9ELSHAFIE AHMED34
  10. 10HUANG MIN29
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface Hardware and Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Annual filing counts and IPC subclass distribution across the 1,787 records in scope, drawn directly from the underlying dataset.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings were negligible before 2017, climbed to a peak of 430 in 2022, and held at 348 in 2024 — a 13% rise over the 2021 base of 307. 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in as later publications catch up.

Filing trend, 2017–202601252503755000201720182019202020214302022202320242025532026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

H04B (transmission, general) appears in 65.9% of records and H04W (wireless networks) in 44.2%, confirming that most filings are framed as communications-system claims rather than pure materials or antenna-structure claims. Records can carry multiple IPC codes, so these shares sum to more than 100%.

IPC subclass compositionH04B · Transmission (general)1,17865.9%H04W · Wireless communication networks78944.2%H04L · Digital information transmissi…36420.4%H01Q · Antennas21812.2%G01S · Radar, sonar & positioning18810.5%G06N · Computing based on AI models402.2%H02J · Power supply & grid systems341.9%G06F · Electric digital data processi…281.6%Other18210.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,787 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface Hardware and Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface Hardware and Control with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about reconfigurable intelligent surface hardware and control and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Representative Filing

Key patents and a representative recent filing

Representative Recent Filing
US20260106646A12026-04-16

Reconfigurable intelligent surface integrated on compact drones for wireless network survey (US20260106646A1)

DELL PRODUCTS L.P.

Filed by Dell Products L.P. and published 2026-04-16, this filing mounts a reconfigurable intelligent surface on a drone platform to survey candidate deployment locations before permanent installation. Passive beamforming is achieved by controllably tilting the surface as the drone moves between candidate heights and positions in a dense urban environment, with the surface also coupling user-equipment signal paths.Abstract condensed from the original filing for readability.

US20260106646A1 — patent drawing 1US20260106646A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20220014935A1Systems and methods using configurable surfaces for wireless communication197
2US20210288698A1Method for Intelligent Reflecting Surface Aided Terahertz Secure Communication System188
3WO2021207748A2Methods and apparatus for channel reconstruction in intelligent surface aided communications145
4US20210126359A1Data processing method and apparatus with wireless communication system including intelligent reflecting surf…121
5US20220052764A1Media-based reconfigurable intelligent surface-assisted modulation91
6US20220322321A1Reconfigurablle intelligent surface (RIS) information update68
7US20220077919A1Techniques to use reference signals for intelligent reflecting surface systems55
8US20220059943A1Multi-layer reconfigurable surface for an antenna52
9CN111865387A智能反射面辅助无线通信系统的波束成形设计方法49
10US20220321198A1Dynamic control of an unmanned aerial vehicle using a reconfigurable intelligent surface44

Citation counts favour older records that have had more time to accumulate citations within the searched corpus — read them as a signal of influence, not of current relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface Hardware and Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the filing pattern tells a claims strategist

Four read-outs from the concentration, composition and momentum data that matter for where to file next.

Concentration
48.6%
of 1,787 records held by top 5 assignees

The field's core claims are already staked

With 868 of 1,787 records concentrated among five assignees, foundational beamforming and phase-control claims in the busiest subclasses are likely to run into dense prior art. New entrants competing head-on in H04B/H04W claim space should expect crowded office actions.

Based on the assignee ranking of 100 companies.
Momentum
-81% YoY
leading assignee's latest-year filings vs prior year

Even the leader's pace has cooled from its peak

The top-ranked assignee filed 7 records in the latest year, down 81% year-on-year, consistent with the broader pattern of publication lag rather than a real pullback — 2022's peak of 430 filings across the field has not been repeated in complete-year data since.

Recent-year counts are partial due to the 2026-07-31 cut-off.
Composition
2.2%
of records touching G06N (AI-based control)

AI-driven control logic is a small slice of current claims

Only 40 of 1,787 records carry G06N codes and 34 carry H02J (power supply), even though control signalling overhead and power consumption are both named in the search scope. Claim language on adaptive or learned control policies for RIS elements remains comparatively open.

IPC shares sum above 100% because records carry multiple classes.
Geography
557
records filed at the United States receiving office

Filing is spread across major offices, not locked to one

The United States leads with 557 records, followed by China at 327, WIPO/PCT at 319 and the EPO at 312 — a genuinely multi-jurisdictional field rather than one dominated by a single national office.

India (223) and the UK (10) round out the receiving-office spread.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to reconfigurable intelligent surface hardware and control, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface Hardware and Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the claim space is still open

The ranked leaders account for a majority of filings, but the concentration curve flattens quickly after the top few, leaving a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants.

Top of the field
621
records from the leading assignee

One assignee sits well ahead of the rest

The leading assignee's 621 records dwarf the fifth-place figure of 50, meaning the drop-off after the top filer is steep rather than gradual. Firms entering this space should expect the leader's claim footprint to overlap most core RIS control and beamforming approaches.

Fifth place: 50 records; tenth place: 29 records.
Co-filing
60
shared records in the strongest co-assignee pair

Some filings are jointly held, not solely corporate

The strongest co-assignee pairing links a corporate filer with an individual inventor-assignee, appearing together on 60 records, with two more pairs at 39 each. This pattern suggests structured inventor arrangements around a small set of core patents rather than pure in-house R&D.

10 co-assignee pairs are recorded in total.
Long tail
29
records at the tenth-ranked position

Beyond the top ten, filings thin out fast

Tenth place holds 29 records against a leader at 621 — the ranked leaders combined (top 10) cover 59.2% of all 1,787 records, leaving the remaining 90 ranked companies to split the rest. That long tail is where narrower, defensible niche claims are more likely to survive examination.

Top 10 combined: 1,058 records, 59.2% of all records in scope.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches of the search scope with comparatively thin IPC coverage relative to the core transmission and networking claims.
Adaptive AI-based element control policiesActive-amplifying RIS power managementControl signalling overhead reduction schemesPassive-to-active hybrid element switchingDrone- or vehicle-mounted deployment surveying
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Qualcomm Inc.7-81%
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.1-67%
Dell Products L.P.0-100%
ZHANG YU0
InterDigital Patent Holdings, Inc.0-100%
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)0-100%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.0-100%
LY HUNG DINH0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface Hardware and Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The figures above establish the shape of the field. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision means drilling into specific claims and specific assignees.

Check freedom-to-operate against the leader's claim footprint

With one assignee holding 621 of 1,787 records, any new filing in core beamforming or phase-control claims should be checked against that portfolio first.

Run a claims comparison in Patsnap Eureka

Map the under-claimed control and power branches

G06N and H02J coverage sits below 3% of records each, well under the transmission and networking classes — worth a deeper subclass-level pull before drafting.

Explore white space in Patsnap Eureka

Track momentum, not just historical totals

Recent-year counts are still filling in due to publication lag; re-run the trend view periodically rather than treating 2025-2026 figures as final.

Set up monitoring in Patsnap Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface Hardware and Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on RIS hardware and control patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface Hardware and Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface Hardware and Control in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole reconfigurable intelligent surface hardware and control corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.