Book a demo

Redistribution Layer Materials Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026

Redistribution Layer Materials Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/redistribution-layer-advanced-materials-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Semiconductors & Microelectronics
Redistribution Layer Advanced Materials Patents: Who Holds the Claims
  • Filing peaked in 2023 at 9 families and has not been matched since — the dataset shows a technology whose claim activity has already cooled from its high point rather than one still accelerating.
  • 39 families concentrate almost entirely in the US 36 of the receiving-office filings are US, with only single filings at China, the EPO and via PCT — a signal of where enforcement actually matters.
  • Momentum has stalled across every tracked assignee the leading filers each show zero filings in the latest tracked year, consistent with the broader flat-to-declining trend rather than one firm pulling back alone.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
39
Published Records
79%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-40%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Redistribution layer (RDL) advanced materials sit at the intersection of packaging and materials chemistry: photosensitive dielectrics, low-CTE polymers and seed layer formulations that let a fan-out or fan-in package route signals from a small die to a larger ball-grid footprint. The search underlying this page combines RDL-specific title/abstract language with IPC classes covering semiconductor device structure (H01L23/538), polyimide-type polymer chemistry (C08G73) and semiconductor manufacturing processes (H01L21/48), so it captures both the material composition claims and the structural packaging claims that depend on them.

The corpus is small and US-centric: 39 patent families total, concentrated overwhelmingly under H01L with a large secondary cluster in H10W, and only a handful of records touching printed circuit assemblies, memory manufacture or antenna structures. That composition suggests a niche but well-defined claim space rather than a sprawling one, and it means individual assignees can hold outsized influence with only a few filings each.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017–2026
  1. 1SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD10
  2. 2UNIMICRON TECH CORP8
  3. 3INTEL CORP7
  4. 4TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD4
  5. 5PARABELLUM STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITIES FUND LLC2
  6. 6AT & S AUSTRIA TECHNOLOGIE & SYSTEMTECHNIK AG2
  7. 7PHOENIX PIONEER TECH2
  8. 8POWERTECH TECHNOLOGY INC1
  9. 9MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC1
  10. 10GLOBALFOUNDRIES INC1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Redistribution Layer Advanced Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology mix

Two views of the same 39-family dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and how those filings distribute across IPC subclasses.

A flat-to-declining filing curve

Filings rose from 2 in 2017 to a peak of 9 in 2023, passing through 3 at the 2022 midpoint. With no year since 2023 matching that peak, and the most recent year necessarily undercounted because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the honest read is a technology whose patent activity plateaued rather than one in a sustained upswing.

A flat-to-declining filing curve0358102201720182019202020212022920232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

H01L dominates, H10W is a strong second

Every one of the 39 families sits under H01L (semiconductor devices), with 24 also tagged to H10W. Beyond that, coverage thins fast: H05K (printed circuits) at 4, H10B (memory manufacture) at 3, H01Q (antennas) at 2 and H10P at 1 — a long tail of adjacent applications rather than a second core cluster.

H01L dominates, H10W is a strong secondH01L · Semiconductor devices39100.0%H10W2461.5%H05K · Printed circuits & assemblies410.3%H10B · Memory device manufacture37.7%H01Q · Antennas25.1%H10P12.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 39 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Redistribution Layer Advanced Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Redistribution Layer Advanced Materials with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about redistribution layer advanced materials and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Representative filing and most-cited prior art

Representative record
US10177058B12019-01-08

Encapsulating composition, semiconductor package and manufacturing method thereof

POWERTECH TECHNOLOGY INC.

Filed by Powertech Technology, this family claims an encapsulating composition combining a photosensitive dielectric material with a polarizable compound suspended within it. Under an external stimulus, the polarizable compound aligns uniformly through the thickness of the material to form a conductive path through the photosensitive dielectric — effectively building conductivity into the encapsulant itself rather than relying solely on a separate metal seed layer.Granted 2019-01-08 · US10177058B1

US10177058B1 — patent drawing 1US10177058B1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20200168550A1Semiconductor package70
2US7268012B2Methods for fabrication of thin semiconductor assemblies including redistribution layers and packages and ass…50
3US20200126923A1Chip package and method of forming the same34
4US20200118989A1Light emitting device package structure and manufacturing method thereof26
5US20180166356A1Fan-out circuit packaging with integrated lid23
6US20180005931A1Circuit redistribution structure unit and method for manufacturing circuit redistribution structure12
7US20190312016A1Fan out packaging pop mechanical attach method10
8US11322450B2Chip package and method of forming the same8
9US11244904B2Semiconductor package including interposer5
10US20240258277A1Semiconductor packages and method for fabricating the same4

Citation counts reward older filings that have had more time to accumulate references within the searched corpus; read them as a measure of influence on subsequent filers, not as a ranking of current technical relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Redistribution Layer Advanced Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-outs from the trend and citation data, framed for someone deciding where to file or where to challenge.

Filing momentum
Peak 2023 at 9, 2022 at 3
families per year

Activity has already crested

The climb from a 2022 midpoint of 3 families to a 2023 peak of 9 looked like acceleration, but no later year has matched it. Combined with the 18-month publication lag understating the newest year, the safer assumption is that core claim territory here is largely staked out rather than still being contested.

Trend data, 2017–2026
Jurisdiction
36 of 39 filings at the US
receiving office split

This is a US enforcement story

With only single filings at China, the EPO and via PCT, freedom-to-operate analysis and licensing leverage in this space are overwhelmingly a US question. An assignee optimising for global coverage on RDL materials specifically would be filing well outside the pattern this corpus shows.

Receiving office data
Prior art influence
Top citation count: 70
cites for US20200168550A1

Influential filings are structural, not just material

The most-cited record in the corpus, US20200168550A1, is claimed as a semiconductor package rather than a bare material composition, and the next most-cited, US7268012B2, covers thin-assembly fabrication methods. Heavily cited prior art in this field tends to bundle material choice with structural or process claims rather than isolating the material alone.

Citation ranking, top 5 records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to redistribution layer advanced materials, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Redistribution Layer Advanced Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the field is open

The assignee ranking is dominated by a small group of device and OSAT manufacturers, each showing zero filings in the latest tracked year — a pattern consistent with the flat overall trend rather than a single company's retreat.

Filing concentration
39 families, one dominant IPC pairing
H01L + H10W

A narrow, well-defended core

Nearly every family in this dataset carries both the H01L and H10W classifications, indicating that the field's core claim territory — RDL structure paired with the underlying material — is already covered by the leading filers rather than open ground.

IPC composition
Momentum
0 filings in latest year across leading assignees
recent-year momentum

Every tracked leader has paused

The assignees with the deepest filing history in this corpus, including major device manufacturers and OSAT houses, all show zero filings in the most recent tracked year. That is a field-wide pause, not a competitive opening created by one firm stepping back.

Recent-year momentum
Geography
3 of 39 outside the US
non-US receiving offices

Thin coverage outside the US

Single filings at China, the EPO and via PCT mean that companies building freedom-to-operate positions outside the United States face a much sparser prior-art landscape here — thinner protection, but also thinner precedent to build on.

Receiving office data
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches with visible activity but no dense claim cluster around them yet.
Low-CTE polymer/seed-layer interface adhesionRDL materials for antenna-integrated packagesPhotosensitive dielectric formulations for memory packagingFine-pitch seed layer deposition for fan-out RDL
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.0-100%
Unimicron Technology Corp.0
Intel Corporation0-100%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC)0
Intel IP Corporation0
HengJing Technology Co., Ltd.0
AT&S Austria Technologie & Systemtechnik AG0
Micron Technology, Inc.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Redistribution Layer Advanced Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The trend and assignee data point to a field with a defined core and a thin periphery. Two directions follow from that.

Test freedom-to-operate against the top-cited records

Because the most influential prior art bundles structural packaging claims with material composition, a freedom-to-operate check on a new RDL material should not stop at the material claims — it needs to trace how those materials are claimed alongside package structure in the highest-cited families.

Explore prior art in Eureka

Map the under-claimed branches before filing

The gap between the dense H01L/H10W core and the thin H05K, H10B and H01Q counts suggests specific packaging contexts — antenna-integrated and memory packaging among them — where a well-drafted material claim would face less crowded prior art.

Run a white space search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Redistribution Layer Advanced Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on RDL advanced materials patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Redistribution Layer Advanced Materials covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Redistribution Layer Advanced Materials in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole redistribution layer advanced materials corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.