Redistribution Layer Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
- Filing activity has cooled since its 2018 peak of 13 families, with the midpoint year 2022 down to 6 — a flat-to-declining trend rather than an accelerating one.
- 91% of the corpus sits in H01L, but a striking 55 records also carry the H10W code, showing packaging-specific classification has largely absorbed what used to be pure semiconductor-device filing.
- The United States receives the large majority of filings (75 of the tracked records), with Singapore, PCT, Europe, China and India each accounting for only a handful — filing strategy here is concentrated, not globally spread.
What the redistribution layer patent record shows
A redistribution layer (RDL) re-routes bond pads on a semiconductor die to new locations, letting fan-out and advanced packaging schemes fit more I/O into less space without shrinking the die itself. The claim space tracked here spans fine-line RDL, polymer dielectric RDL, high-density fan-out and redistribution wiring structures, filed under core packaging classifications including H01L23/538 and H01L21/48. With 91 total families across roughly a decade of filing, this is a mid-sized, mature corpus rather than an emerging one.
Filing volume rose through the late 2010s, peaked in 2018, and has since drifted down toward the level seen at the 2022 midpoint. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent year's near-zero count understates real activity, but the multi-year decline through the middle of the trend line is a genuine signal that the core claim territory around basic RDL structures is largely staked out.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those 91 families distribute across IPC classifications.
A peak, then a plateau
Filings ran from 8 in 2017 to a peak of 13 in 2018, settling near 6 by the 2022 midpoint and trailing toward zero in the most recent, still-incomplete year. Read the last one or two years as undercounted rather than as a real collapse in activity.
Packaging codes dominate, but overlap is heavy
Every record in the set carries an H01L semiconductor-device code, and 55 of the 91 also carry H10W, the packaging-specific classification — meaning most filers are describing packaging-level RDL structures, not device-level ones. The remaining subclasses (G06F, H10B, H10N, H01P, H05K, H10D) each carry only one or two records, marking narrow adjacent applications rather than distinct sub-fields.
Shares are the percentage of the 91 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Redistribution Layer Technology Landscape with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about redistribution layer technology landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited records and a representative filing
US20250279404A1 — Semiconductor package (Samsung Electronics)
The application claims a semiconductor package built from two stacked redistribution layers separated by a planarization layer: a first RDL carries a semiconductor chip and molding layer with a recessed upper surface, and a second RDL sits on the planarization layer above it. The structure targets flatness control across a multi-tier RDL stack rather than a single wiring plane.Filed 2025-09-04 — one of the more recent published records in the set.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US10062648B2 | Semiconductor package and method of forming the same | 75 |
| 2 | US20170250138A1 | Semiconductor package and method of forming the same | 54 |
| 3 | US9040316B1 | Semiconductor device and method of adaptive patterning for panelized packaging with dynamic via clipping | 48 |
| 4 | US9887103B2 | Semiconductor device and method of adaptive patterning for panelized packaging | 40 |
| 5 | US20190244907A1 | Semiconductor package structure and method for manufacturing the same | 34 |
| 6 | US20170358564A1 | Semiconductor package | 34 |
| 7 | US20170338204A1 | Device and Method for UBM/RDL Routing | 31 |
| 8 | US20170186737A1 | Thin fan-out multi-chip stacked packages and the method for manufacturing the same | 30 |
| 9 | US9196509B2 | Semiconductor device and method of adaptive patterning for panelized packaging | 29 |
| 10 | US20170263522A1 | Electronic component package and method of manufacturing the same | 24 |
Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings; treat them as a signal of prior-art density, not of current commercial importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for filing decisions
Three read-throughs from the trend and citation data that matter for anyone deciding where to file or design around existing claims.
The core structure claims are largely staked out
Volume peaked in 2018 and has fallen roughly in half by the 2022 midpoint. That pattern usually means the foundational RDL structure and process claims — basic fine-line routing, single-tier fan-out — are already occupied, pushing new filers toward narrower variations.
Packaging framing has overtaken device framing
Six in ten records carry the H10W packaging code alongside the baseline H01L code. New filings describing RDL purely as a device feature, without a packaging-level claim, are competing in a thinner slice of the space.
Two families anchor the prior-art landscape
The two most-cited records both describe adaptive-patterning and panelized packaging methods, and their citation counts (75 and 54) dwarf the rest of the set. Any new fan-out RDL filing should be checked against this pair first.
Filing strategy is US-centric with thin international spread
Singapore, PCT, Europe, China and India each carry only a handful of filings. A company defending or designing around this space needs to watch US filings closely; regional coverage elsewhere in the corpus is comparatively sparse.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to redistribution layer technology landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where momentum has gone quiet
Assignee activity in this corpus is dominated by large integrated device manufacturers and packaging specialists, and recent-year momentum has flattened across the board.
Leading assignees show no new publications in the latest tracked year
Samsung Electronics, TSMC, Samsung Electro-Mechanics, Deca Technologies, Powertech Technology and Intel all show zero filings in the most recent year, including a -100% YoY reading for Samsung Electronics. Given the 18-month publication lag, this reflects reporting delay as much as an actual pause.
A modest corpus with a defined set of repeat filers
At 91 total families, this is not a crowded field. Filing is concentrated among a set of established packaging and device manufacturers rather than spread across a long tail of single-filing entrants, which makes freedom-to-operate checks more tractable than in larger corpora.
Panelized packaging methods set the prior-art baseline
The two highest-cited record families both concern adaptive patterning for panelized packaging with dynamic via clipping — a method-level claim that later filers across the corpus have had to cite or design around.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) | 0 | — |
| Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Deca Technologies Inc. | 0 | — |
| Powertech Technology Inc. | 0 | — |
| Intel Corporation | 0 | — |
| Dialog Semiconductor (UK) Ltd. | 0 | — |
| NXP Semiconductors N.V. | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The trend and assignee data point to a mature, US-concentrated claim space with a handful of narrow gaps rather than open territory.
Check freedom to operate against the top-cited pair
Before filing in fan-out or panelized RDL packaging, run a claim-by-claim comparison against the two highest-cited families in this corpus, which anchor adaptive-patterning and via-clipping methods that later filings had to work around.
Explore prior art in EurekaModel the under-claimed branches
The waveguide, memory-device and PCB-overlap sub-areas show thin filing density relative to the core structure claims — map claim language there before assuming the space is open.
Run a white space analysis in EurekaTrack the next publication window
Recent-year momentum reads as flat because of the 18-month publication lag, not necessarily because filing has stopped. Re-check assignee activity once the next reporting window closes.
Set up monitoring in EurekaCommon questions about redistribution layer patents
An RDL is a patterned metal-and-dielectric structure built on top of a semiconductor die or package that reroutes bond pads to new locations, typically to spread I/O over a larger area for fan-out packaging or to align pads with a different substrate pitch. It is a packaging-level feature rather than a change to the underlying transistor structure. In this patent corpus, RDL claims are filed predominantly under H01L23/538 and H01L21/48, and most also carry the H10W packaging classification, reflecting how the industry now treats RDL as a packaging discipline rather than a purely device-level one.
The assignee ranking in this dataset is led by large integrated device manufacturers and specialist packaging houses, including Samsung Electronics, TSMC, Samsung Electro-Mechanics, Deca Technologies, Powertech Technology and Intel. All of these show zero filings in the most recent tracked year, which reflects both a genuine slowdown from the 2018 peak and the roughly 18-month lag between filing and publication that understates the latest year in any patent trend. A ranking that stays fairly concentrated, rather than long-tailed, suggests the field is dominated by a defined set of repeat filers rather than fragmented across many small entrants.
Activity has declined from its 2018 peak of 13 filed families to roughly half that by the 2022 midpoint, and the trend continues downward into the most recent years of the dataset. This does not mean innovation has stopped — publication lag means the newest filings are undercounted — but the decline through the middle years of the trend is real and suggests the foundational structure and process claims for basic RDL are largely occupied. New activity is more likely to concentrate in narrower variations, such as multi-tier RDL stacks or specific material systems, than in first-generation RDL structures.
US20250279404A1, assigned to Samsung Electronics, claims a semiconductor package with two stacked redistribution layers separated by a planarization layer, where the first RDL carries a chip under a molding layer with a recessed upper surface and the second RDL sits above the planarization layer. It is a multi-tier stacking and flatness-control claim rather than a claim over RDL wiring in general, so it is most relevant to designs that stack two or more RDL planes with an intervening planarization step. Anyone building a single-tier RDL structure, or a multi-tier stack without the specific molding-recess-plus-planarization arrangement, sits outside its narrowest claim scope, though a full claim chart is needed to confirm freedom to operate for any specific design.
The clearest gaps sit at the edges of the core H01L/H10W packaging classification: RDL structures that intersect waveguide or microwave routing (H01P), memory-device interconnect (H10B), and PCB-level redistribution assemblies (H05K) each show only one or two filings in this corpus, against 91 total families concentrated in core packaging claims. That thinness does not guarantee the space is legally open — it may simply be commercially unattractive — but it is a reasonable starting point for a novelty search before investing in a design in one of those adjacent branches. A dynamic via-clipping approach to panelized packaging, distinct from the heavily-cited existing method, is another area worth checking closely given how much prior art already cites the leading adaptive-patterning family.
Research Redistribution Layer Technology Landscape in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole redistribution layer technology landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.