Book a demo

Redistribution Layer Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026

Redistribution Layer Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/redistribution-layer-technology-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Semiconductors & Microelectronics
Redistribution Layer Patents: Who Leads Fan-Out RDL Packaging
  • Filing activity has cooled since its 2018 peak of 13 families, with the midpoint year 2022 down to 6 — a flat-to-declining trend rather than an accelerating one.
  • 91% of the corpus sits in H01L, but a striking 55 records also carry the H10W code, showing packaging-specific classification has largely absorbed what used to be pure semiconductor-device filing.
  • The United States receives the large majority of filings (75 of the tracked records), with Singapore, PCT, Europe, China and India each accounting for only a handful — filing strategy here is concentrated, not globally spread.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
91
Published Records
63%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+75%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the redistribution layer patent record shows

A redistribution layer (RDL) re-routes bond pads on a semiconductor die to new locations, letting fan-out and advanced packaging schemes fit more I/O into less space without shrinking the die itself. The claim space tracked here spans fine-line RDL, polymer dielectric RDL, high-density fan-out and redistribution wiring structures, filed under core packaging classifications including H01L23/538 and H01L21/48. With 91 total families across roughly a decade of filing, this is a mid-sized, mature corpus rather than an emerging one.

Filing volume rose through the late 2010s, peaked in 2018, and has since drifted down toward the level seen at the 2022 midpoint. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent year's near-zero count understates real activity, but the multi-year decline through the middle of the trend line is a genuine signal that the core claim territory around basic RDL structures is largely staked out.

Filing activity, 2017–2026
  1. 1SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD26
  2. 2TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD13
  3. 3DECA TECH USA INC8
  4. 4POWERTECH TECHNOLOGY INC6
  5. 5NXP BV4
  6. 6INTEL CORP4
  7. 7DIALOG SEMICONDUCTOR (UK) LTD4
  8. 8SOCIONEXT INC4
  9. 9ADVANCED SEMICON ENG INC2
  10. 10ARKA ENERGY INC2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Redistribution Layer Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same corpus: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how those 91 families distribute across IPC classifications.

A peak, then a plateau

Filings ran from 8 in 2017 to a peak of 13 in 2018, settling near 6 by the 2022 midpoint and trailing toward zero in the most recent, still-incomplete year. Read the last one or two years as undercounted rather than as a real collapse in activity.

A peak, then a plateau048111582017132018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Packaging codes dominate, but overlap is heavy

Every record in the set carries an H01L semiconductor-device code, and 55 of the 91 also carry H10W, the packaging-specific classification — meaning most filers are describing packaging-level RDL structures, not device-level ones. The remaining subclasses (G06F, H10B, H10N, H01P, H05K, H10D) each carry only one or two records, marking narrow adjacent applications rather than distinct sub-fields.

Packaging codes dominate, but overlap is heavyH01L · Semiconductor devices91100.0%H10W5560.4%G06F · Electric digital data processi…22.2%H10B · Memory device manufacture22.2%H10N · Other electric solid-state dev…22.2%H01P · Waveguides & microwave elements11.1%H05K · Printed circuits & assemblies11.1%H10D · Semiconductor devices (general)11.1%Other11.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 91 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Redistribution Layer Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Redistribution Layer Technology Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about redistribution layer technology landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The most-cited records and a representative filing

Representative filing
US20250279404A12025-09-04

US20250279404A1 — Semiconductor package (Samsung Electronics)

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.

The application claims a semiconductor package built from two stacked redistribution layers separated by a planarization layer: a first RDL carries a semiconductor chip and molding layer with a recessed upper surface, and a second RDL sits on the planarization layer above it. The structure targets flatness control across a multi-tier RDL stack rather than a single wiring plane.Filed 2025-09-04 — one of the more recent published records in the set.

US20250279404A1 — patent drawing 1US20250279404A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited patents in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US10062648B2Semiconductor package and method of forming the same75
2US20170250138A1Semiconductor package and method of forming the same54
3US9040316B1Semiconductor device and method of adaptive patterning for panelized packaging with dynamic via clipping48
4US9887103B2Semiconductor device and method of adaptive patterning for panelized packaging40
5US20190244907A1Semiconductor package structure and method for manufacturing the same34
6US20170358564A1Semiconductor package34
7US20170338204A1Device and Method for UBM/RDL Routing31
8US20170186737A1Thin fan-out multi-chip stacked packages and the method for manufacturing the same30
9US9196509B2Semiconductor device and method of adaptive patterning for panelized packaging29
10US20170263522A1Electronic component package and method of manufacturing the same24

Citation counts reflect influence within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings; treat them as a signal of prior-art density, not of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Redistribution Layer Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing decisions

Three read-throughs from the trend and citation data that matter for anyone deciding where to file or design around existing claims.

Filing trend
13 in 2018 → 6 by 2022
peak to midpoint

The core structure claims are largely staked out

Volume peaked in 2018 and has fallen roughly in half by the 2022 midpoint. That pattern usually means the foundational RDL structure and process claims — basic fine-line routing, single-tier fan-out — are already occupied, pushing new filers toward narrower variations.

Trend data, 2017–2026
Classification overlap
55 of 91 records carry H10W
packaging code overlap

Packaging framing has overtaken device framing

Six in ten records carry the H10W packaging code alongside the baseline H01L code. New filings describing RDL purely as a device feature, without a packaging-level claim, are competing in a thinner slice of the space.

IPC composition
Citation concentration
Top record cited 75 times
highest-cited filing

Two families anchor the prior-art landscape

The two most-cited records both describe adaptive-patterning and panelized packaging methods, and their citation counts (75 and 54) dwarf the rest of the set. Any new fan-out RDL filing should be checked against this pair first.

Citation ranking
Filing geography
75 of ~91 records via US receiving office
US filing share

Filing strategy is US-centric with thin international spread

Singapore, PCT, Europe, China and India each carry only a handful of filings. A company defending or designing around this space needs to watch US filings closely; regional coverage elsewhere in the corpus is comparatively sparse.

Receiving office data
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to redistribution layer technology landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Redistribution Layer Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where momentum has gone quiet

Assignee activity in this corpus is dominated by large integrated device manufacturers and packaging specialists, and recent-year momentum has flattened across the board.

Momentum
0 in latest year across leading assignees
recent-year filings

Leading assignees show no new publications in the latest tracked year

Samsung Electronics, TSMC, Samsung Electro-Mechanics, Deca Technologies, Powertech Technology and Intel all show zero filings in the most recent year, including a -100% YoY reading for Samsung Electronics. Given the 18-month publication lag, this reflects reporting delay as much as an actual pause.

Momentum data
Concentration
91 families total, ranked assignee list
corpus size

A modest corpus with a defined set of repeat filers

At 91 total families, this is not a crowded field. Filing is concentrated among a set of established packaging and device manufacturers rather than spread across a long tail of single-filing entrants, which makes freedom-to-operate checks more tractable than in larger corpora.

Assignee ranking
Citation leadership
Adaptive-patterning families cited 75 and 48 times
top-cited filings

Panelized packaging methods set the prior-art baseline

The two highest-cited record families both concern adaptive patterning for panelized packaging with dynamic via clipping — a method-level claim that later filers across the corpus have had to cite or design around.

Citation data
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These branches show thin coverage relative to the core RDL structure claims — worth a freedom-to-operate check before assuming open space.
Multi-tier RDL planarization stacksRDL-integrated waveguide/microwave routing (H01P overlap)Memory-device RDL interconnect (H10B overlap)Dynamic via-clipping for panelized packagingPCB-level redistribution wiring assemblies (H05K overlap)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.0-100%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC)0
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd.0
Deca Technologies Inc.0
Powertech Technology Inc.0
Intel Corporation0
Dialog Semiconductor (UK) Ltd.0
NXP Semiconductors N.V.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Redistribution Layer Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The trend and assignee data point to a mature, US-concentrated claim space with a handful of narrow gaps rather than open territory.

Check freedom to operate against the top-cited pair

Before filing in fan-out or panelized RDL packaging, run a claim-by-claim comparison against the two highest-cited families in this corpus, which anchor adaptive-patterning and via-clipping methods that later filings had to work around.

Explore prior art in Eureka

Model the under-claimed branches

The waveguide, memory-device and PCB-overlap sub-areas show thin filing density relative to the core structure claims — map claim language there before assuming the space is open.

Run a white space analysis in Eureka

Track the next publication window

Recent-year momentum reads as flat because of the 18-month publication lag, not necessarily because filing has stopped. Re-check assignee activity once the next reporting window closes.

Set up monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Redistribution Layer Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about redistribution layer patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Redistribution Layer Technology Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Redistribution Layer Technology Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole redistribution layer technology landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.