Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
- Filing has cooled since a 2020 peak of 77. annual filings fell to single digits by the most recent (partial) year, a pattern of consolidation rather than continued expansion.
- One shaping subclass dominates the field. B29C (shaping of plastics) appears in 918 of 1,118 families, meaning most claim activity clusters around processing and forming, not material formulation.
- Co-filing is rare and concentrated. only 10 co-assignee pairs exist across the dataset, with the strongest link tying a French chemicals major to a plasturgy research cluster rather than to a rival manufacturer.
Filing growth compares 2021 (51 records) with 2024 (32) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,118 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What the patent record shows
Reinforced thermoplastic composites sit at the intersection of fiber engineering and polymer processing, and the patent record reflects that split. Filing activity concentrates heavily in shaping and consolidation methods — tape placement, impregnation, mandrel and tooling approaches — rather than in new resin or additive chemistries. The dataset covers 1,118 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026, drawn from a search targeting fiber-matrix adhesion, consolidation, tape placement, impregnation and recyclable composite claims.
Filings rose through the late 2010s, peaked in 2020, and have declined since, with the most recent year understated because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months. Receiving-office data shows the United States and Europe ahead of China and Korea, which points to an incumbent-heavy field rather than one where new entrants are racing to file first.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 1,118 families: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.
A field past its filing peak
Annual filings ran from 48 in 2017 to a peak of 77 in 2020, then eased toward 44 at the 2022 midpoint and down to 9 in the most recent, still-partial year. That trajectory reads as a maturing claim landscape rather than a growth market, though the final year or two will fill in somewhat as publications catch up.
Processing dominates over chemistry
B29C (shaping of plastics) covers 918 of the 1,118 records, with C08J (polymer processing) a distant second at 382. Materials-side subclasses — C08L polymer compositions and C08K additives — trail well behind, at 169 and 109 respectively, indicating that most of the intellectual property is staked out around how the composite is formed and consolidated, not what it is made from.
Shares are the percentage of the 1,118 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about reinforced thermoplastic composites and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe documents anchoring this field
Thermoplastic composite tubular structures and methods of fabricating the same
A method of fabricating a thermoplastic composite tubular structure provides a mandrel of a soluble, expandable material. The method overbraids the mandrel with a continuous fiber thermoplastic composite material to form an overbraided mandrel, installs it into a matched tooling assembly, heats the assembly at a specified profile to consolidate the material, and cools the result to form the finished tubular structure.Filed by The Boeing Company, published 2015-11-03. Anchors a family of tooling and consolidation claims around braided, mandrel-formed thermoplastic tubular parts.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US4678699A | Stampable polymeric composite containing an EMI/RFI shielding layer | 175 |
| 2 | US5275877A | Self reinforced thermoplastic composite laminate | 170 |
| 3 | US6017484A | Method for manufacture of minimum porosity, wrinkle free composite parts | 167 |
| 4 | US5529826A | Fabric-faced thermoplastic composite panel | 163 |
| 5 | US4469543A | Lamination of highly reinforced thermoplastic composites | 140 |
| 6 | EP2586585A1 | Thermoplastic composite material reinforced with synthetic fibres and manufacturing method | 125 |
| 7 | US9764520B2 | 3D thermoplastic composite pultrusion system and method | 118 |
| 8 | US9616623B2 | 3D thermoplastic composite pultrusion system and method | 116 |
| 9 | US10124546B2 | 3D thermoplastic composite pultrusion system and method | 115 |
| 10 | US9610737B2 | 3D thermoplastic composite pultrusion system and method | 115 |
Citation counts are drawn from within this searched corpus and favour older filings; treat them as a signal of influence on later filers, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the data means for filing strategy
The numbers point to a field where the processing side is crowded and the materials side is comparatively open.
Volume has cooled, not vanished
The drop from a 2020 peak of 77 to 9 filings in the most recent year looks steep, but publication lag of roughly 18 months means the last one to two years are undercounted. Read this as a plateau after a filing wave rather than an exit from the field.
Shaping methods are the crowded lane
With B29C present in the large majority of families, new tooling, tape-placement and consolidation claims face dense prior art. Differentiated process parameters or in-line inspection steps are more defensible than broad forming-method claims.
Co-filing is the exception
Only ten co-assignee pairs appear across 1,118 families, and the strongest links join industrial filers to university or plasturgy-cluster partners rather than to competing manufacturers. Most IP here is built and held independently.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to reinforced thermoplastic composites, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Arkema France | POLE DE PLASTURGIE DE EST | 12 |
| Arkema France | University of Lorraine | 6 |
| The Boeing Company | WILKERSON RANDALL D | 4 |
| The Boeing Company | RUBIN ALEXANDER M | 4 |
| The Boeing Company | FOX JAMES R | 4 |
| Arkema France | OLLOW | 2 |
| Cytec Industries | Solvay Specialty Polymers USA, LLC | 2 |
| Albany Engineered Composites | GORDON DEVELOPMENT LLC | 2 |
The strongest co-assignee pair links a French chemicals major with a plasturgy research cluster, and a second links the same filer to a university lab — a pattern of industry-academia pairing more than industry-industry alliance.
Who holds the ground
Recent-year momentum figures show flat-to-declining activity even among the most active historical filers, consistent with a field settling into maturity rather than one seeing an active filing race.
Boeing holds steady rather than expanding
Boeing's most recent-year filing count held flat year over year, and its representative patent on mandrel-formed, overbraided tubular structures remains one of the field's most cited documents. This suggests defending existing claim territory rather than pushing into new ground.
Several established filers went to zero
Multiple historically active assignees, including chemicals and aerospace-composite specialists, recorded zero filings in the latest year against a prior-year base — a sharp momentum drop that may reflect either portfolio consolidation or a lag in publication catching up with recent filings.
University partnerships anchor some chemical filers
The pairing between a major chemicals filer and a university research group is the second-strongest co-assignee link in the dataset, pointing to sponsored or joint academic research as a route into this field for materials-focused entrants.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| The Boeing Company | 1 | 0% |
| Arkema France | 0 | -100% |
| Cytec Industries | 0 | -100% |
| Daher Aerospace | 0 | -100% |
| Spirit AeroSystems, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| Toyobo Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Phillips Petroleum Company | 0 | — |
| Albany Engineered Composites | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The landscape points to a mature processing core and a thinner materials layer. The next steps depend on which side of that line you're working.
Map freedom-to-operate around tooling claims
With B29C claim density this high, a targeted search against the most-cited consolidation and tape-placement patents will clarify what a new tooling or forming process actually needs to design around.
Run a freedom-to-operate check in EurekaProbe the materials-side white space
C08K and C08L filing counts trail the processing subclasses by a wide margin, suggesting room for additive or resin-composition claims that don't collide with existing tooling patents.
Explore materials white space in EurekaTrack momentum shifts before they show up in headlines
Several historically active filers dropped to zero in the latest year; watching whether that reverses as publication catches up will show whether the field is truly cooling or just lagging.
Set up assignee monitoring in EurekaCommon questions on this landscape
Aerospace manufacturers and industrial chemicals companies hold the most cited and most active positions in this dataset, with Boeing's tubular-structure consolidation patents among the most-cited records. Materials suppliers such as Cytec-affiliated and Solvay-affiliated entities also appear repeatedly, particularly around resin and fiber-matrix formulations. However, recent-year momentum figures show even the historically active filers largely flat or declining, so leadership here is better read as accumulated portfolio strength than as an active filing race.
Filings rose from 48 in 2017 to a peak of 77 in 2020 before easing back toward single digits by the most recent year. Part of that decline is real consolidation as the core shaping and consolidation methods become well covered by existing prior art. Part of it is also a publication-lag artefact: patent applications typically publish around 18 months after filing, so the last one to two years in any trend chart will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be.
The bulk of the activity sits in B29C (shaping of plastics), which appears in 918 of the 1,118 families in this dataset, followed by C08J (polymer processing and solutions) at 382. Supporting subclasses include B29K and B29L, which index moulding materials and plastic product types, B32B for layered and laminate structures, and C08L and C08K on the materials side for polymer compositions and additives. The heavy weighting toward B29C confirms that most claims describe how the composite is formed and consolidated rather than what it's made from.
The clearest gaps sit on the materials side: C08K (additives) and C08L (polymer compositions) trail the processing subclasses by a wide margin, at 109 and 169 records respectively against 918 for B29C. Recyclable-matrix formulations, in-line consolidation quality sensing, and additive-modified fiber-matrix adhesion approaches all show thinner coverage than tooling and tape-placement methods. A first claim in these areas would need to tie a specific additive chemistry or sensing method to a measurable consolidation or recyclability outcome to stand apart from the crowded processing core.
US9174393B2 claims a method for fabricating thermoplastic composite tubular structures using a soluble, expandable mandrel overbraided with continuous fiber thermoplastic material, then consolidated in matched tooling under a specified heating and cooling profile. It is a process patent tied to mandrel-based, overbraided tube fabrication rather than a claim on the thermoplastic material itself. Anyone building a competing tubular-part process would need to review its specific tooling and thermal-profile claims closely, since those process steps — not the base material — are what the patent actually protects.
Research Reinforced Thermoplastic Composites in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole reinforced thermoplastic composites corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.