Remote Patient Monitoring Platform Patents: Filing Trends and Leading Filers
Filing nearly tripled from 2021 to 2024, up 145% from 31 to 76 records, before the two most recent years understate volume due to publication lag. Annual filings rose from 9 in 2017 to a recorded peak of 86 in 2025, with the 2021-to-2024 span alone showing a 145% increase (31 to 76 records). The 2025 and 2026 figures will keep revising upward as publication catches up to filing, so they should not be read as a plateau or decline.
- 1MAY PATENTS LTD12.8%
- 2SMART SPEAKER LLC8.2%
- 3HILL ROM SERVICES INC4.5%
- 4BRIGHT DATA LTD3.7%
- 5CAREPREDICT3.1%
See the full remote patient monitoring platforms analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Common questions about this landscape
Who holds the most patents in remote patient monitoring platforms?
One assignee leads the ranked field with 45 records, well ahead of the fifth-place holder at 11 and the tenth-place holder at 5. The top 5 assignees combined account for 32.4% of all 352 records in scope, and the top 10 account for 42.6%. Past that point the ranking of 100 assignees thins into a long tail of companies and research entities with only one or two filings each, so competitive risk is concentrated at the top rather than spread evenly.
Is remote patient monitoring patent filing growing or slowing down?
Filing grew substantially through the recent complete-data period, rising from 31 records in 2021 to 76 in 2024, a 145% increase. The recorded count reached 86 in 2025, but because patent publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete and will revise upward. There is no evidence in this dataset of an actual slowdown; the apparent flattening in the most recent years is a data-lag artifact, not a market signal.
What technology areas are most claimed in this space?
Healthcare informatics (IPC class G16H) appears in 55.4% of the 352 records, making it the dominant classification, followed by diagnosis and surgery methods (A61B) at 34.1% and digital data transmission (H04L) at 30.7%. AI-based computing (G06N), attendance/checking systems (G07C), vehicle propulsion (B60K) and traffic control (G08G) each sit between roughly 14% and 15%, indicating far less claim density around AI-driven triage logic and mobility-linked monitoring than around the core platform and connectivity layers.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Remote Patient Monitoring Platforms covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.