Residual Stress Coatings Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026
- Filing has cooled since its 2018 peak. 141 records that year fell to 115 by 2022 and down to 26 in the still-partial 2026 count — a mature field, not a growth story.
- Heat treatment, not coating deposition, carries the claim weight. C21D covers 20.2% of the 4,174 records in scope, more than twice the share held by C23C coating and deposition claims themselves.
- No single company controls the field. The top five assignees combined hold just 12.1% of all 4,174 records in scope, leaving a long tail of single- and low-volume filers.
Filing growth compares 2021 (138 records) with 2024 (82) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 4,174 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
A mature field concentrated around heat treatment and welding
Residual stress control in sprayed coatings sits at the intersection of coating deposition, post-process heat treatment, and welding-adjacent peening methods. Across 4,174 records published between 2015 and 2026, the largest share of filings claims heat treatment steps (C21D, 20.2%) rather than the coating deposition process itself, which points to compressive stress being engineered mostly after the coating or joint is formed rather than during it.
Filing activity peaked in 2018 and has eased since, and ownership of the field's claim space is moderately concentrated: the leading assignee holds 125 records, but the top five together account for only 12.1% of all records in scope, leaving substantial room for filers outside the established leaders.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trends and technology composition
Filing activity and IPC composition for the 4,174 records in scope show where residual stress control work concentrates and how filing volume has moved since 2017.
Filing trend: flat to declining since 2018
Filings rose from 113 in 2017 to a peak of 141 in 2018, then eased toward 115 by the 2022 midpoint and down to 26 in 2026 — a partial year. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the last one to two years understate true filing activity; the broader pattern is a mature field with no fresh growth surge.
Heat treatment and welding dominate the claim space
C21D (heat treatment of metals) covers 20.2% of the 4,174 records in scope, more than any other subclass, with B23K (welding, soldering & brazing) second at 11.3%. Coating and deposition itself (C23C, 9.5%) sits behind both, suggesting more of the documented residual stress control work happens through post-process heat treatment and joining than through the coating deposition step itself. Records can carry several IPC classes, so these shares add up to more than 100%.
Shares are the percentage of the 4,174 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Residual Stress Control in Sprayed Coatings with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about residual stress control in sprayed coatings and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaRepresentative and most-cited filings
Residual stress improvement method and residual stress improvement apparatus
A method of improving residual stress in a canister in which fuel assemblies are loaded includes, when the canister having a cylindrical canister shell and a canister lid welded to the upper opening of the canister shell is disposed in a cylindrical cask body, filling the space above and around an upper end portion of the canister in the cask body with fill water. Then, compressive stress is applied to a predetermined region of the upper end portion of the canister in the fill water. This makes it possible to readily apply compressive stress to the canister while shielding radioactive rays by the fill water.Published 2023-06-29 · Assigned to Kanadevia Corporation


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5875862A | Polycrystalline diamond cutter with integral carbide/diamond transition layer | 294 |
| 2 | JP2008277665A | Electronic element, and method of manufacturing electronic element | 269 |
| 3 | US6338765B1 | Ultrasonic impact methods for treatment of welded structures | 219 |
| 4 | US6165616A | Synthetic diamond coatings with intermediate bonding layers and methods of applying such coatings | 201 |
| 5 | US6174820B1 | Use of silicon oxynitride as a sacrificial material for microelectromechanical devices | 199 |
| 6 | US5826453A | Burnishing method and apparatus for providing a layer of compressive residual stress in the surface of a work… | 175 |
| 7 | US20070190680A1 | MEMS device and manufacturing process thereof | 169 |
| 8 | US6516634B1 | Strengthening, crack arrest and multiple cracking in brittle materials using residual stresses | 167 |
| 9 | US5386724A | Load cells for sensing weight and torque on a drill bit while drilling a well bore | 159 |
| 10 | US6926970B2 | Apparatus and method for forming weld joints having compressive residual stress patterns | 156 |
Ranked by citation count within the searched corpus; older records accumulate more citations by nature of the corpus and should be read as foundational, not necessarily current.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the filing pattern signals for strategy
Reading filing concentration, IPC composition and citation data together points to where the field is settled and where a new filer still has room.
Ownership is moderate, not dominant
The leading assignee holds 125 records and the tenth-ranked holds 61 — a gradual taper rather than a cliff. No single company's claim portfolio is broad enough to control the whole field, which matters for licensing negotiations and for assessing how much a single blocking patent actually forecloses.
Post-process treatment outweighs the coating step
Heat treatment claims outnumber coating and deposition claims (C23C, 9.5%) by more than two to one. Filers documenting residual stress control are more often protecting the treatment or joining step than the spray or deposition process itself.
A field past its filing peak
Activity peaked in 2018 and has trended down since, with the 2022 midpoint at 115. Publication lag means the most recent one to two years will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be, but the multi-year direction is unambiguous.
Foundational claims sit with older filings
The most-cited records date from earlier in the coverage window and cover diamond coating and ultrasonic impact treatment methods. High citation counts here reflect age and foundational status inside this corpus more than current commercial weight.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to residual stress control in sprayed coatings, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. | Sumitomo Electric Hardmetal Corp. | 14 |
| NHK Spring Co., Ltd. | Shinko Metal Products Co., Ltd. | 14 |
| Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. | Japan Atomic Power Company | 7 |
| Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. | Shikoku Electric Power Company | 7 |
| Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. | Hokkaido Electric Power Company | 7 |
| Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. | Kansai Electric Power Co., Inc. | 7 |
| Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. | Kyushu Electric Power Co., Inc. | 7 |
| Hitachi, Ltd. | Babcock-Hitachi K.K. | 6 |
Ten co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, with the strongest pairs linking a parent company to a specialised subsidiary — a pattern consistent with in-house materials or component divisions filing jointly with their parent.
Who holds the claim space, and where it is thinning
The assignee ranking shows a gradual taper rather than a small group controlling the field outright, while recent-year momentum suggests several established filers have slowed.
A modest lead, not a monopoly
The top-ranked assignee holds 125 of the 4,174 records in scope, a meaningful lead over the field but well short of dominance. Fifth place already falls to 74 records, and tenth place to 61 — the drop-off is steady rather than sharp.
A long tail beyond the leaders
The ten leading assignees combined account for 19.8% of all records in scope, meaning roughly four-fifths of filings sit with companies outside the ranked top ten. This is a field with many active but modest-volume filers rather than a small oligopoly.
Some established filers have gone quiet
Recent-year momentum data shows several previously active assignees filing zero or near-zero records in the latest year, including one major filer down 100% year-over-year. This does not necessarily mean exit from the field, given publication lag, but it does mark a shift worth tracking.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Nippon Steel Corporation | 1 | — |
| JFE Steel Corporation | 1 | -50% |
| Hitachi, Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| Toshiba Corporation | 0 | — |
| IHI Corporation (formerly Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries) | 0 | — |
| Kobe Steel, Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to a field where the treatment step, not the coating step, carries most of the claim weight, and where filing momentum among established leaders has slowed.
Check freedom to operate against foundational claims
The most-cited records in this set date from earlier in the coverage window and cover diamond coating and impact treatment methods that later filings have had to work around rather than replace.
Search the full record set in EurekaTrack momentum shifts among the leading filers
Several established assignees show flat or declining recent-year filing, which changes how much weight to give their older, broader claims when planning new filings.
Monitor assignee activity in EurekaCommon questions on this landscape
The evidence shows three overlapping clusters: heat-treatment-based methods (C21D, 20.2% of the 4,174 records in scope) are the largest, followed by welding and peening-related methods (B23K, 11.3%) and coating deposition itself (C23C, 9.5%). Measurement and verification methods (G01L, 7.0%) support both of the larger routes but are rarely claimed alone. In practice this means most patented residual stress control happens through a post-deposition or joining step rather than through the spray process itself, so freedom-to-operate work should check heat-treatment and welding claims even when the underlying question is about a coating.
The ranked leaders include major Japanese industrial and steel manufacturers among the top filers, with the leading assignee holding 125 records and the fifth-ranked holding 74. The top five combined account for 12.1% of the 4,174 records in scope, and the top ten combined account for 19.8% — a moderate concentration rather than dominance by one or two firms. This is a ranking of the 100 companies the data endpoint returns, not a definitive top-100 or top-50 list, and a long tail of smaller filers holds the remaining share.
Filing activity peaked in 2018 at 141 records and has generally declined since, sitting at 115 by the 2022 midpoint and falling further toward the most recent, still-partial year. This pattern points to a mature field rather than one attracting a fresh wave of entrants. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the last one or two years in any dataset understate real activity, but the multi-year trend before that lag window is consistently flat-to-declining, not growing.
US20230207147A1, assigned to Kanadevia Corporation and published 2023-06-29, claims a method of applying compressive stress to a canister holding fuel assemblies while it sits submerged in fill water inside a cask body, using the water to shield radioactive rays during the stress treatment. Its scope is specific to nuclear fuel canister handling and the fill-water shielding combination, not to compressive stress application generally. Work outside spent-fuel canister or radioactive-environment pressure vessels is unlikely to be blocked by this particular claim, though the general compressive-stress concept sits inside a densely populated prior art field that predates it.
The thinnest claim density relative to volume sits in general metal-working (B23P, 6.1% of the 4,174 records in scope) and alloy composition (C22C, 6.6%), both well behind the dominant heat-treatment and welding classes. A first claim combining a specific alloy composition with an in-process compressive stress target during a named forming step would sit outside the densest existing claim clusters. Recent-year momentum data also shows several established filers slowing or stopping activity, which is a further signal that adjacent branches are not being actively defended.
Research Residual Stress Control in Sprayed Coatings in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole residual stress control in sprayed coatings corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.