Book a demo

Residual Stress Coatings Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026

Residual Stress Coatings Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/residual-stress-control-in-sprayed-coatings-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Coatings & Surface Treatment
Residual stress control in sprayed coatings: patents, leading filers and where filing has slowed
  • Filing has cooled since its 2018 peak. 141 records that year fell to 115 by 2022 and down to 26 in the still-partial 2026 count — a mature field, not a growth story.
  • Heat treatment, not coating deposition, carries the claim weight. C21D covers 20.2% of the 4,174 records in scope, more than twice the share held by C23C coating and deposition claims themselves.
  • No single company controls the field. The top five assignees combined hold just 12.1% of all 4,174 records in scope, leaving a long tail of single- and low-volume filers.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
4,174
Published Records
12%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-41%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
JP
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (138 records) with 2024 (82) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 4,174 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

A mature field concentrated around heat treatment and welding

Residual stress control in sprayed coatings sits at the intersection of coating deposition, post-process heat treatment, and welding-adjacent peening methods. Across 4,174 records published between 2015 and 2026, the largest share of filings claims heat treatment steps (C21D, 20.2%) rather than the coating deposition process itself, which points to compressive stress being engineered mostly after the coating or joint is formed rather than during it.

Filing activity peaked in 2018 and has eased since, and ownership of the field's claim space is moderately concentrated: the leading assignee holds 125 records, but the top five together account for only 12.1% of all records in scope, leaving substantial room for filers outside the established leaders.

Records by IPC subclass and filing year
  1. 1HITACHI LTD125
  2. 2SUMITOMO ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES LTD114
  3. 3NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION107
  4. 4KK TOSHIBA83
  5. 5IHI CORP74
  6. 6SURFACE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS LTD70
  7. 7JFE STEEL CORP65
  8. 8MITSUBISHI HEAVY IND LTD65
  9. 9KOBE STEEL LTD63
  10. 10NHK SPRING CO LTD61
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Residual Stress Control in Sprayed Coatings covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
Data & Trends

Filing trends and technology composition

Filing activity and IPC composition for the 4,174 records in scope show where residual stress control work concentrates and how filing volume has moved since 2017.

Filing trend: flat to declining since 2018

Filings rose from 113 in 2017 to a peak of 141 in 2018, then eased toward 115 by the 2022 midpoint and down to 26 in 2026 — a partial year. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the last one to two years understate true filing activity; the broader pattern is a mature field with no fresh growth surge.

Filing trend: flat to declining since 201803875113150113201714120182019202020212022202320242025262026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Heat treatment and welding dominate the claim space

C21D (heat treatment of metals) covers 20.2% of the 4,174 records in scope, more than any other subclass, with B23K (welding, soldering & brazing) second at 11.3%. Coating and deposition itself (C23C, 9.5%) sits behind both, suggesting more of the documented residual stress control work happens through post-process heat treatment and joining than through the coating deposition step itself. Records can carry several IPC classes, so these shares add up to more than 100%.

Heat treatment and welding dominate the claim spaceC21D · Heat treatment of metals84520.2%B23K · Welding, soldering & brazing47011.3%C23C · Coating & surface deposition3959.5%H01L · Semiconductor devices3348.0%B21D · Sheet-metal working3217.7%G01L · Force & pressure measurement2927.0%C22C · Alloys2766.6%B23P · Metal working (general)2556.1%Other4,472107.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 4,174 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Residual Stress Control in Sprayed Coatings covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Residual Stress Control in Sprayed Coatings with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about residual stress control in sprayed coatings and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative and most-cited filings

Representative filing
US20230207147A12023-06-29

Residual stress improvement method and residual stress improvement apparatus

KANADEVIA CORPORATION

A method of improving residual stress in a canister in which fuel assemblies are loaded includes, when the canister having a cylindrical canister shell and a canister lid welded to the upper opening of the canister shell is disposed in a cylindrical cask body, filling the space above and around an upper end portion of the canister in the cask body with fill water. Then, compressive stress is applied to a predetermined region of the upper end portion of the canister in the fill water. This makes it possible to readily apply compressive stress to the canister while shielding radioactive rays by the fill water.Published 2023-06-29 · Assigned to Kanadevia Corporation

US20230207147A1 — patent drawing 1US20230207147A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5875862APolycrystalline diamond cutter with integral carbide/diamond transition layer294
2JP2008277665AElectronic element, and method of manufacturing electronic element269
3US6338765B1Ultrasonic impact methods for treatment of welded structures219
4US6165616ASynthetic diamond coatings with intermediate bonding layers and methods of applying such coatings201
5US6174820B1Use of silicon oxynitride as a sacrificial material for microelectromechanical devices199
6US5826453ABurnishing method and apparatus for providing a layer of compressive residual stress in the surface of a work…175
7US20070190680A1MEMS device and manufacturing process thereof169
8US6516634B1Strengthening, crack arrest and multiple cracking in brittle materials using residual stresses167
9US5386724ALoad cells for sensing weight and torque on a drill bit while drilling a well bore159
10US6926970B2Apparatus and method for forming weld joints having compressive residual stress patterns156

Ranked by citation count within the searched corpus; older records accumulate more citations by nature of the corpus and should be read as foundational, not necessarily current.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Residual Stress Control in Sprayed Coatings covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the filing pattern signals for strategy

Reading filing concentration, IPC composition and citation data together points to where the field is settled and where a new filer still has room.

Concentration
12.1%
of 4,174 records held by top 5 assignees

Ownership is moderate, not dominant

The leading assignee holds 125 records and the tenth-ranked holds 61 — a gradual taper rather than a cliff. No single company's claim portfolio is broad enough to control the whole field, which matters for licensing negotiations and for assessing how much a single blocking patent actually forecloses.

Based on the 100-company assignee ranking
Technology mix
20.2%
of records classed under C21D heat treatment

Post-process treatment outweighs the coating step

Heat treatment claims outnumber coating and deposition claims (C23C, 9.5%) by more than two to one. Filers documenting residual stress control are more often protecting the treatment or joining step than the spray or deposition process itself.

IPC shares sum to more than 100% since records carry multiple classes
Filing trend
141 → 26
peak-year to latest-year record count

A field past its filing peak

Activity peaked in 2018 and has trended down since, with the 2022 midpoint at 115. Publication lag means the most recent one to two years will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be, but the multi-year direction is unambiguous.

2026 figure is a partial year
Influence
294 citations
on the most-cited record in the set

Foundational claims sit with older filings

The most-cited records date from earlier in the coverage window and cover diamond coating and ultrasonic impact treatment methods. High citation counts here reflect age and foundational status inside this corpus more than current commercial weight.

Citation counts favour older records in any searched corpus
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to residual stress control in sprayed coatings, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Co-filing clusters
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.Sumitomo Electric Hardmetal Corp.14
NHK Spring Co., Ltd.Shinko Metal Products Co., Ltd.14
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.Japan Atomic Power Company7
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.Shikoku Electric Power Company7
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.Hokkaido Electric Power Company7
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.Kansai Electric Power Co., Inc.7
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.Kyushu Electric Power Co., Inc.7
Hitachi, Ltd.Babcock-Hitachi K.K.6

Ten co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, with the strongest pairs linking a parent company to a specialised subsidiary — a pattern consistent with in-house materials or component divisions filing jointly with their parent.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Residual Stress Control in Sprayed Coatings covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the claim space, and where it is thinning

The assignee ranking shows a gradual taper rather than a small group controlling the field outright, while recent-year momentum suggests several established filers have slowed.

Leader
125 records
leading assignee

A modest lead, not a monopoly

The top-ranked assignee holds 125 of the 4,174 records in scope, a meaningful lead over the field but well short of dominance. Fifth place already falls to 74 records, and tenth place to 61 — the drop-off is steady rather than sharp.

From the 100-company assignee ranking
Concentration
19.8%
top 10 share of 4,174 records

A long tail beyond the leaders

The ten leading assignees combined account for 19.8% of all records in scope, meaning roughly four-fifths of filings sit with companies outside the ranked top ten. This is a field with many active but modest-volume filers rather than a small oligopoly.

Top 10 combined = 827 records
Momentum
-100% YoY
on one leading assignee's latest-year filings

Some established filers have gone quiet

Recent-year momentum data shows several previously active assignees filing zero or near-zero records in the latest year, including one major filer down 100% year-over-year. This does not necessarily mean exit from the field, given publication lag, but it does mark a shift worth tracking.

Momentum measured on latest full and partial year
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth watching
Based on IPC subclasses with lower record density relative to the field's dominant heat-treatment and welding classes.
Alloy-composition-linked stress targetingIn-process compressive stress verificationGeneral metal-forming stress controlSheet-metal working stress correlation
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Nippon Steel Corporation1
JFE Steel Corporation1-50%
Hitachi, Ltd.0
Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.0-100%
Toshiba Corporation0
IHI Corporation (formerly Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries)0
Kobe Steel, Ltd.0
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Residual Stress Control in Sprayed Coatings covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a field where the treatment step, not the coating step, carries most of the claim weight, and where filing momentum among established leaders has slowed.

Check freedom to operate against foundational claims

The most-cited records in this set date from earlier in the coverage window and cover diamond coating and impact treatment methods that later filings have had to work around rather than replace.

Search the full record set in Eureka

Track momentum shifts among the leading filers

Several established assignees show flat or declining recent-year filing, which changes how much weight to give their older, broader claims when planning new filings.

Monitor assignee activity in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Residual Stress Control in Sprayed Coatings covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Residual Stress Control in Sprayed Coatings covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Residual Stress Control in Sprayed Coatings in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole residual stress control in sprayed coatings corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.