Book a demo

Resonant Converter Efficiency Patents: Top Filers & Trends 2026

Resonant Converter Efficiency Patents: Top Filers & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/resonant-converter-efficiency-enhancement-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Power Electronics · Patent Landscape
Resonant Converter Efficiency Patents: Where Filing Has Concentrated and Cooled
  • Filing has cooled since its 2019 peak. 135 records in 2019 fell to 11 in the most recent, partial year — a decline that outpaces the usual 18-month publication lag alone.
  • H02M holds four times the volume of any other subclass. 1,575 of 1,916 records sit in power conversion, while control, protection and pulse-logic subclasses remain in the low tens to hundreds.
  • The most-cited patents date to the 1980s and 1990s. US6301128B1, US5027264A and US4720668A still anchor citation counts above 300, showing how much current design still routes through decades-old switching techniques.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,916
Published Records
15%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-37%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (121 records) with 2024 (76) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,916 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks 1,916 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine resonant converter or LLC converter claims with soft-switching efficiency, zero-voltage switching or loss-reduction language. The corpus spans core power conversion circuitry alongside adjacent grid, transformer, EV propulsion, and control-and-protection classifications, giving a view of where resonant efficiency claims sit relative to the broader power electronics field.

Filing volume peaked in 2019 and has since declined, and classification is heavily weighted toward one IPC subclass, both of which shape how the sections below should be read: as a mature core with narrowing but still-open adjacent branches, rather than an expanding frontier.

Filings by year and IPC subclass
  1. 1DELTA ELECTRONICS INC(CN)82
  2. 2INFINEON TECH AUSTRIA AG59
  3. 3WIRELESS ADVANCED VEHICLE ELECTRIFICATION INC56
  4. 4HUAWEI DIGITAL POWER TECH CO LTD52
  5. 5KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV41
  6. 6ENPHASE ENERGY INC40
  7. 7R2 SEMICONDUCTOR INC40
  8. 8SIGNIFY HOLDING BV34
  9. 9MURATA MFG CO LTD28
  10. 10SEMICON COMPONENTS IND LLC28
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Resonant Converter Efficiency Enhancement covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
Filing Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Annual filing counts and IPC classification show where resonant converter efficiency work concentrates and how filing activity has moved since 2017.

Filing activity, 2017-2026

Filings rose from 90 in 2017 to a peak of 135 in 2019, held near the midpoint at 107 in 2022, and have declined toward the most recent year. The final year is partial because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2026's count of 11 understates actual filing activity for that year.

Filing activity, 2017-20260387511315090201720181352019202020212022202320242025112026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass distribution

H02M (power conversion) dominates with 1,575 of 1,916 records, roughly four times the next largest subclass, H02J (power supply and grid systems) at 309. Transformer and inductor hardware (H01F, 160), heating and lighting circuit applications (H05B, 140), and EV propulsion (B60L, 81) form a secondary tier, while control, protection and pulse-logic subclasses (G05F, H02H, H03K) remain comparatively thin.

IPC subclass distributionH02M · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)1,57582.2%H02J · Power supply & grid systems30916.1%H01F · Magnets, inductors & transform…1608.4%H05B · Electric heating & lighting ci…1407.3%B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion814.2%H03K · Pulse technique & logic circui…633.3%H02H · Protective circuit arrangements583.0%G05F · Electric/magnetic variable con…452.3%Other40321.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,916 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Resonant Converter Efficiency Enhancement covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Resonant Converter Efficiency Enhancement with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about resonant converter efficiency enhancement and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative and most-cited filings

Representative Recent Filing
US20240079965A12024-03-07

LLC Resonant Converter with Windings Fabricated on PCB

ZEROVA TECHNOLOGIES TAIWAN LIMITED

An LLC resonant converter includes a switching circuit for converting a DC voltage into a switching signal, a resonant tank coupled to the switching circuit to receive the switching signal and provide a primary current, and a transformer circuit coupled to the resonant tank. The transformer circuit uses multiple separated transformers, each with primary and secondary windings fabricated on the PCB, where the primary windings can be selected to couple in series or parallel with each other to form a dynamically varied equivalent primary winding, holding the turns ratio while fine-tuning the resonant tank.Filed by Zerova Technologies Taiwan Limited, published 2024-03-07.

US20240079965A1 — patent drawing 1US20240079965A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6301128B1Contactless electrical energy transmission system634
2US5027264APower conversion apparatus for DC/DC conversion using dual active bridges430
3US4720668AZero-voltage switching quasi-resonant converters354
4US5986895AAdaptive pulse width modulated resonant Class-D converter309
5US4992919AParallel resonant converter with zero voltage switching307
6US8674551B2Method and apparatus for contactless power transfer285
7US6344979B1LLC series resonant DC-to-DC converter275
8US4855888AConstant frequency resonant power converter with zero voltage switching265
9US4953068AFull bridge power converter with multiple zero voltage resonant transition switching264
10US6400579B2Lossless switching DC to DC converter with DC transformer248

Citation counts are drawn from the searched corpus and favour older filings; treat them as a measure of downstream influence rather than current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Resonant Converter Efficiency Enhancement covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Analysis

What the filing pattern signals

Reading filing volume, classification and citation depth together points to a technology field where the core switching mechanism is settled and remaining activity is narrowing toward implementation detail.

Filing trajectory
90 → 135 → 11
2017 → 2019 peak → 2026

Volume has declined from its 2019 high

Filings rose to a peak of 135 in 2019, held near 107 at the 2022 midpoint, then declined toward 11 in the most recent, partial year. Some of that final drop reflects the normal 18-month lag between filing and publication, but the multi-year decline from peak predates that effect.

Treat the last 1-2 years as directionally incomplete.
Classification concentration
1,575 of 1,916
H02M share of records

Power conversion claims dominate the corpus

H02M outweighs the next subclass, H02J, by roughly five to one, and dwarfs protection (H02H), pulse-logic (H03K) and variable-control (G05F) subclasses. That concentration means basic resonant conversion circuit claims are heavily occupied ground.

Adjacent control and protection subclasses remain comparatively open.
Citation depth
634 citations
US6301128B1, top-cited record

Foundational patents still anchor the field

The most-cited records date from the late 1980s through the 1990s, and their citation counts well exceed 300. That reflects influence on downstream filing rather than current enforceability, since citation counts inside any searched corpus naturally favour older records.

Use citation rank as an influence signal, not a currency-of-technology signal.
Assignee activity
0 in latest year
YoY change for several tracked assignees

Momentum has flattened across major filers

Several previously active assignees show zero filings in the most recent year, consistent with the corpus-wide decline from the 2019 peak. Co-assignee pairs such as Philips with its IP and standards affiliate suggest some of the historical volume reflects corporate structure rather than distinct invention.

Recency, not cumulative count, separates active filers from historical ones.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to resonant converter efficiency enhancement, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Resonant Converter Efficiency Enhancement covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Competitive Landscape

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

Assignee activity has cooled broadly rather than consolidating around one clear leader, and the co-assignee pairs in the data point to corporate structure as much as to active collaboration.

Concentration
10 co-assignee pairs
across the corpus

Collaboration is limited and often structural

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset. The strongest, Philips paired with its own IP and standards affiliate, reflects internal corporate structure rather than external collaboration; Murata Manufacturing with Murata Power Solutions follows the same pattern.

Cross-company joint filing is rare in this field.
Recent momentum
0 in latest year
for multiple tracked assignees

Several major historical filers show no recent activity

Assignees including Delta Electronics and Infineon Technologies Austria show zero filings and a -100% year-on-year change in the latest tracked year, consistent with the corpus-wide decline from its 2019 peak rather than isolated pullbacks.

Check live filing status before assuming continued activity.
Geographic filing
894 US receiving-office records
largest single office

Filing skews toward the US and EPO

The United States receives the largest share of filings at 894, followed by the EPO at 307 and WIPO/PCT at 177. China (95) and Germany (69) trail well behind, indicating this field's patent activity has historically concentrated in US and European filing strategy.

Track this filer in Eureka
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking first
These branches carry far fewer records than the H02M core, based on IPC subclass counts in this dataset.
Adaptive fault-protection circuits for resonant tanksPulse-logic control loops for variable switching frequencyReconfigurable transformer winding structuresEV-specific resonant converter integrationVariable-control methods for turns-ratio tuning
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Delta Electronics, Inc.0-100%
Infineon Technologies Austria AG0-100%
Wireless Advanced Vehicle Electrification, Inc.0
Koninklijke Philips N.V. (Royal Philips)0
Huawei Digital Power Technologies Co., Ltd.0
R2 SEMICONDUCTOR INC0
Enphase Energy, Inc.0-100%
Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Resonant Converter Efficiency Enhancement covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis next

The dataset points to specific follow-up work depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, competitive tracking, or identifying open claim space.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on PCB-winding transformer designs

If a design uses reconfigurable multi-transformer windings on a PCB, review the full claim set of US20240079965A1 and adjacent H01F-classified filings before finalising the transformer architecture.

Check claim scope in Eureka

Track assignee filing recency, not cumulative count

Several historically active filers show zero filings in the latest tracked year. Build a live-updated view of who is still filing before treating any assignee as a current competitive threat.

Monitor assignee activity in Eureka

Scope claims around control and protection, not the core tank

G05F, H02H and H03K subclasses carry far fewer records than H02M. A claim built around adaptive protection or control-loop integration is more likely to clear prior art than one on the resonant tank itself.

Explore white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Resonant Converter Efficiency Enhancement covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on resonant converter efficiency patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Resonant Converter Efficiency Enhancement covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Resonant Converter Efficiency Enhancement in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole resonant converter efficiency enhancement corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.