Resonant Converter Efficiency Patents: Top Filers & Trends 2026
- Filing has cooled since its 2019 peak. 135 records in 2019 fell to 11 in the most recent, partial year — a decline that outpaces the usual 18-month publication lag alone.
- H02M holds four times the volume of any other subclass. 1,575 of 1,916 records sit in power conversion, while control, protection and pulse-logic subclasses remain in the low tens to hundreds.
- The most-cited patents date to the 1980s and 1990s. US6301128B1, US5027264A and US4720668A still anchor citation counts above 300, showing how much current design still routes through decades-old switching techniques.
Filing growth compares 2021 (121 records) with 2024 (76) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,916 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This landscape tracks 1,916 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine resonant converter or LLC converter claims with soft-switching efficiency, zero-voltage switching or loss-reduction language. The corpus spans core power conversion circuitry alongside adjacent grid, transformer, EV propulsion, and control-and-protection classifications, giving a view of where resonant efficiency claims sit relative to the broader power electronics field.
Filing volume peaked in 2019 and has since declined, and classification is heavily weighted toward one IPC subclass, both of which shape how the sections below should be read: as a mature core with narrowing but still-open adjacent branches, rather than an expanding frontier.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trends and technology composition
Annual filing counts and IPC classification show where resonant converter efficiency work concentrates and how filing activity has moved since 2017.
Filing activity, 2017-2026
Filings rose from 90 in 2017 to a peak of 135 in 2019, held near the midpoint at 107 in 2022, and have declined toward the most recent year. The final year is partial because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2026's count of 11 understates actual filing activity for that year.
IPC subclass distribution
H02M (power conversion) dominates with 1,575 of 1,916 records, roughly four times the next largest subclass, H02J (power supply and grid systems) at 309. Transformer and inductor hardware (H01F, 160), heating and lighting circuit applications (H05B, 140), and EV propulsion (B60L, 81) form a secondary tier, while control, protection and pulse-logic subclasses (G05F, H02H, H03K) remain comparatively thin.
Shares are the percentage of the 1,916 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Resonant Converter Efficiency Enhancement with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about resonant converter efficiency enhancement and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaRepresentative and most-cited filings
LLC Resonant Converter with Windings Fabricated on PCB
An LLC resonant converter includes a switching circuit for converting a DC voltage into a switching signal, a resonant tank coupled to the switching circuit to receive the switching signal and provide a primary current, and a transformer circuit coupled to the resonant tank. The transformer circuit uses multiple separated transformers, each with primary and secondary windings fabricated on the PCB, where the primary windings can be selected to couple in series or parallel with each other to form a dynamically varied equivalent primary winding, holding the turns ratio while fine-tuning the resonant tank.Filed by Zerova Technologies Taiwan Limited, published 2024-03-07.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6301128B1 | Contactless electrical energy transmission system | 634 |
| 2 | US5027264A | Power conversion apparatus for DC/DC conversion using dual active bridges | 430 |
| 3 | US4720668A | Zero-voltage switching quasi-resonant converters | 354 |
| 4 | US5986895A | Adaptive pulse width modulated resonant Class-D converter | 309 |
| 5 | US4992919A | Parallel resonant converter with zero voltage switching | 307 |
| 6 | US8674551B2 | Method and apparatus for contactless power transfer | 285 |
| 7 | US6344979B1 | LLC series resonant DC-to-DC converter | 275 |
| 8 | US4855888A | Constant frequency resonant power converter with zero voltage switching | 265 |
| 9 | US4953068A | Full bridge power converter with multiple zero voltage resonant transition switching | 264 |
| 10 | US6400579B2 | Lossless switching DC to DC converter with DC transformer | 248 |
Citation counts are drawn from the searched corpus and favour older filings; treat them as a measure of downstream influence rather than current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the filing pattern signals
Reading filing volume, classification and citation depth together points to a technology field where the core switching mechanism is settled and remaining activity is narrowing toward implementation detail.
Volume has declined from its 2019 high
Filings rose to a peak of 135 in 2019, held near 107 at the 2022 midpoint, then declined toward 11 in the most recent, partial year. Some of that final drop reflects the normal 18-month lag between filing and publication, but the multi-year decline from peak predates that effect.
Power conversion claims dominate the corpus
H02M outweighs the next subclass, H02J, by roughly five to one, and dwarfs protection (H02H), pulse-logic (H03K) and variable-control (G05F) subclasses. That concentration means basic resonant conversion circuit claims are heavily occupied ground.
Foundational patents still anchor the field
The most-cited records date from the late 1980s through the 1990s, and their citation counts well exceed 300. That reflects influence on downstream filing rather than current enforceability, since citation counts inside any searched corpus naturally favour older records.
Momentum has flattened across major filers
Several previously active assignees show zero filings in the most recent year, consistent with the corpus-wide decline from the 2019 peak. Co-assignee pairs such as Philips with its IP and standards affiliate suggest some of the historical volume reflects corporate structure rather than distinct invention.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to resonant converter efficiency enhancement, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the gaps sit
Assignee activity has cooled broadly rather than consolidating around one clear leader, and the co-assignee pairs in the data point to corporate structure as much as to active collaboration.
Collaboration is limited and often structural
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset. The strongest, Philips paired with its own IP and standards affiliate, reflects internal corporate structure rather than external collaboration; Murata Manufacturing with Murata Power Solutions follows the same pattern.
Several major historical filers show no recent activity
Assignees including Delta Electronics and Infineon Technologies Austria show zero filings and a -100% year-on-year change in the latest tracked year, consistent with the corpus-wide decline from its 2019 peak rather than isolated pullbacks.
Filing skews toward the US and EPO
The United States receives the largest share of filings at 894, followed by the EPO at 307 and WIPO/PCT at 177. China (95) and Germany (69) trail well behind, indicating this field's patent activity has historically concentrated in US and European filing strategy.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Delta Electronics, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| Infineon Technologies Austria AG | 0 | -100% |
| Wireless Advanced Vehicle Electrification, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Koninklijke Philips N.V. (Royal Philips) | 0 | — |
| Huawei Digital Power Technologies Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| R2 SEMICONDUCTOR INC | 0 | — |
| Enphase Energy, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis next
The dataset points to specific follow-up work depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, competitive tracking, or identifying open claim space.
Run a freedom-to-operate check on PCB-winding transformer designs
If a design uses reconfigurable multi-transformer windings on a PCB, review the full claim set of US20240079965A1 and adjacent H01F-classified filings before finalising the transformer architecture.
Check claim scope in EurekaTrack assignee filing recency, not cumulative count
Several historically active filers show zero filings in the latest tracked year. Build a live-updated view of who is still filing before treating any assignee as a current competitive threat.
Monitor assignee activity in EurekaScope claims around control and protection, not the core tank
G05F, H02H and H03K subclasses carry far fewer records than H02M. A claim built around adaptive protection or control-loop integration is more likely to clear prior art than one on the resonant tank itself.
Explore white space in EurekaCommon questions on resonant converter efficiency patents
An LLC resonant converter uses a resonant tank of inductors and a capacitor to shape the switching waveform so that transistors switch at or near zero voltage, reducing switching losses compared to a hard-switched DC-DC converter. Patent claims in this space typically cover the specific tank topology, the transformer or winding structure, or the control method that achieves zero-voltage switching, rather than the general concept of resonant conversion. Because foundational zero-voltage-switching patents such as US4720668A and US4992919A date back decades, most current filing activity narrows in on specific implementation details like PCB-integrated windings, adaptive frequency control, or multi-transformer configurations rather than the base topology.
Filing activity in this dataset is spread across a mix of established power electronics manufacturers and semiconductor firms, with several assignees showing recent-year momentum dropping to zero, which is consistent with the overall decline in filing volume since the 2019 peak. No single assignee dominates the 1,916-family dataset outright, and the presence of co-assignee pairs such as Philips with Philips Intellectual Property & Standards, and Murata Manufacturing with Murata Power Solutions, indicates that some filings result from internal corporate restructuring rather than independent invention. Reviewing the assignee ranking table alongside filing recency is more informative than relying on cumulative counts alone, since older large filers may no longer be active.
Filing volume peaked at 135 records in 2019, held roughly steady at 107 by the 2022 midpoint, and has since declined toward 11 in the most recent, partial year. Part of that decline reflects the normal 18-month lag between filing and publication, which always understates the most recent year or two of activity. The broader pattern, though, suggests that core resonant topology and zero-voltage-switching claim space has become dense enough that fewer applicants see room for a defensible new composition claim, pushing remaining innovation toward narrower implementation details such as winding structure or control-loop integration.
The thinnest IPC branches relative to the 1,575-record H02M core are G05F (electric and magnetic variable control, 45 records), H02H (protective circuit arrangements, 58) and H03K (pulse technique and logic circuits, 63). These figures indicate that protection circuitry, adaptive control loops and pulse-logic integration layered onto a resonant converter are comparatively under-claimed next to the core switching topology. B60L (electric vehicle propulsion, 81 records) is also relatively light, suggesting vehicle-specific integration claims have not been as heavily filed as general power-conversion claims.
No. US20240079965A1 covers a specific implementation: an LLC resonant converter with multiple separated transformers whose PCB-fabricated primary windings can be reconfigured in series or parallel to hold the turns ratio while tuning the resonant tank. It does not claim the general concept of an LLC resonant converter, zero-voltage switching, or conventional wire-wound transformer designs. A design using a fixed winding configuration, a single monolithic transformer, or a different turns-ratio adjustment mechanism would generally sit outside this specific claim scope, though a freedom-to-operate review of the full claim set is the only reliable way to confirm that for a given design.
Research Resonant Converter Efficiency Enhancement in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole resonant converter efficiency enhancement corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.