Resonant Converter Gate Driver Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
- Filing peaked in 2017 at 123 families and has not returned to that level since — 2022's midpoint sits at 110, pointing to a mature, flat-to-declining filing curve rather than an emerging one.
- H02M dominates the IPC mix with 1,086 records against just 55 in H01L, showing claims cluster around power-conversion topology rather than the semiconductor devices that implement the gate drive itself.
- Several major assignees show 0 filings in the latest year with -100% YoY drops recorded for multiple incumbents, consistent with publication lag rather than an actual pullback from the space.
Filing growth compares 2021 (80 records) with 2024 (65) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,507 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
Resonant converter gate driver patents cover the circuits and control schemes that switch the primary and secondary devices in LLC and other resonant DC-DC converters — isolated gate drive paths, adaptive dead-time control, and self-driven synchronous rectification. The dataset pulls 1,507 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 whose title, abstract or claims combine resonant/LLC converter language with gate driver, dead-time control or isolated gate drive terms.
Filing office data shows the United States and Europe carrying the bulk of activity, with a meaningful WIPO/PCT tail and secondary national filing in Germany, India and Austria — a pattern typical of a technology where the core IP is filed once and extended selectively into export or manufacturing markets rather than filed natively everywhere.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.
A peak in 2017, no clear recovery since
Filings hit 123 in 2017, the high point of the series. By the 2022 midpoint the count had settled at 110, and the run down to 2026 (2 records, a partial year) tracks a technology whose claim space was staked out early rather than one still accelerating.
Concentrated in power conversion, thin in semiconductor devices
H02M (power conversion) accounts for 1,086 of the records, more than four times the next largest subclass, H02J (power supply & grid systems) at 244. H05B (electric heating & lighting circuits) and H03K (pulse technique & logic circuits) each clear 150+, while H01L (semiconductor devices) trails at just 55 — the claims describe converter topology and drive timing far more often than the driver IC hardware itself.
Shares are the percentage of the 1,507 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Resonant Converter Gate Driver with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about resonant converter gate driver and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaKey patents and the most-cited prior art
Half-bridge LLC resonant converter with self-driven synchronous rectifiers
Filed by GlacialTech, this record discloses a half-bridge LLC resonant converter in which a primary IC controller and a gate driver drive secondary synchronous rectifiers. Where the primary controller only outputs ground-referenced gate drive voltages that cannot directly drive the primary switch transistors, the design adds a differential transformer, or a DC shifter plus DC restorer and differential transformer, to translate those voltages into a usable drive signal.Self-driven synchronous rectification is one of the more heavily claimed sub-branches in this dataset.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5293308A | Inductive power distribution system | 559 |
| 2 | US20090261778A1 | Non-Contact Charger Available Of Wireless Data and Power Transmission, Charging Battery-Pack and Mobile Devic… | 397 |
| 3 | WO1992017929A1 | Inductive power distribution system | 384 |
| 4 | US20090206791A1 | Non-Contact Power Charging System and Control Method Thereof | 321 |
| 5 | US6930893B2 | Factorized power architecture with point of load sine amplitude converters | 274 |
| 6 | US4685040A | Integrated circuit for controlling power converter by frequency modulation and pulse width modulation | 260 |
| 7 | US20090267558A1 | Wireless Power Charging System | 251 |
| 8 | US20030142513A1 | Factorized power architecture with point of load sine amplitude converters | 246 |
| 9 | US20030227280A1 | Factorized power architecture with point of load sine amplitude converters | 244 |
| 10 | US7948209B2 | Wireless charger system for battery pack solution and controlling method thereof | 227 |
Citation counts favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate references — read them as a signal of influence on the field, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the data indicates
Four read-outs from the filing, citation and jurisdiction data that matter for deciding where to file or where to look for an opening.
A technology past its filing peak
The 2017 high of 123 families has not been matched since, and the 2022 midpoint of 110 confirms a flat-to-declining trajectory rather than a temporary dip. New entrants should expect dense prior art on core LLC and dead-time control claims rather than open ground.
Topology claims outweigh device claims
H02M alone carries roughly 72% of the corpus, while H01L (semiconductor devices) holds only 55. Claim pressure sits on how the converter and its drive timing are structured, not on the physical gate driver silicon.
US-centred with a selective international tail
The United States leads with 708 records, ahead of Europe's 292 and a 172-record PCT tail; Germany, India and Austria each sit in the 49–64 range, consistent with core filings extended into a handful of manufacturing or export markets rather than filed natively everywhere.
Read the latest-year drop with caution
Multiple established assignees show zero filings and -100% YoY in the most recent year. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so this looks more like a reporting gap than an actual exit from the field.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to resonant converter gate driver, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds the claim space
Filing activity concentrates among a handful of established power-electronics and lighting-driver firms, with co-assignee links pointing to internal group structures more often than external partnerships.
Filings mostly stay in-house
The strongest co-assignee links — such as the pairing between Royal Philips and Philips Intellectual Property & Standards, and the pairing linking Texas Instruments with its Japanese subsidiary — reflect internal corporate structure rather than cross-company joint filing, so co-assignment data here signals group filing practice more than collaboration.
Incumbents show a latest-year gap, not an exit
Signify Holding, Infineon Technologies Austria, Power Integrations, Royal Philips, Texas Instruments and Huawei all show zero recorded filings in the latest year. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this reads as an incomplete latest year rather than a genuine pullback from the technology.
A long tail behind a concentrated top
With 1,507 families spread across the ranking, the field pairs a set of repeat filers in power semiconductors and lighting drivers with a large number of single- or few-filing entrants — typical of a mature niche where core positions are held but peripheral improvements keep arriving.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Signify Holding B.V. | 0 | -100% |
| Infineon Technologies Austria AG | 0 | -100% |
| Power Integrations, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| Koninklijke Philips N.V. (Royal Philips) | 0 | — |
| Texas Instruments Incorporated | 0 | -100% |
| Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| VLT, Inc. | 0 | — |
| JUNG CHUN KIL | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
This landscape identifies where claim density sits and where it thins out. Turning that into a filing or design-around decision means going deeper on specific claim sets and specific competitors.
Run a freedom-to-operate check on a specific sub-area
Filter the H02M cluster down to the exact dead-time control or synchronous rectification claims your design touches, rather than relying on subclass-level counts.
Explore in Patsnap EurekaTrack a specific assignee's filing behaviour over time
The latest-year drop to zero for several incumbents is likely a publication-lag artefact — verify against each assignee's historical filing cadence before drawing conclusions.
Explore in Patsnap EurekaCompare claim language across the most-cited prior art
The most-cited records in this corpus span both wireless power and resonant converter gate drive language — read the actual claims before assuming overlap.
Explore in Patsnap EurekaCommon questions about this landscape
In this dataset, it's a patent family whose title, abstract or claims combine resonant converter language — LLC converter, resonant DC-DC — with gate driver terms such as adaptive dead-time control or isolated gate drive. That combination captures both the power topology and the drive-circuit side of the design, which is why the IPC mix spans power conversion (H02M), pulse/logic circuits (H03K) and inductor/transformer classes (H01F) rather than sitting in one bucket. It excludes generic gate driver patents that don't specify a resonant or LLC topology.
The filing trend says no, at least not on raw counts: 2017 was the peak year at 123 families, and by the 2022 midpoint filings had settled at 110, a flat-to-declining pattern through to the present. The very low count in 2026 is a partial year and should not be read as a collapse — publication typically lags filing by around 18 months. Overall the shape looks like a mature technology with steady incremental filing rather than a fast-growing one.
Filing activity concentrates among established power-electronics, lighting-driver and semiconductor firms with long histories in switch-mode and resonant power supply design, alongside a long tail of smaller and single-filing entrants. Several of the largest holders show no recorded filings in the most recent year, which — given publication lag — is more likely an incomplete latest year than an actual exit. The co-assignee pairs in the data mostly link a parent company to its own subsidiary rather than pointing to cross-company collaboration.
The clearest gaps sit adjacent to the dense H02M topology cluster rather than inside it: gate driver ICs paired with wide-bandgap secondary rectifiers, isolated gate drive transformer design specifically for GaN half-bridges, and self-driven synchronous rectification pushed to higher switching frequencies all carry comparatively few records relative to core LLC dead-time control claims. H01L (semiconductor devices) is thin across the whole dataset at only 55 records, suggesting driver-IC-level claims are less crowded than converter-topology claims. Any of these still warrants a targeted freedom-to-operate search before assuming it's open.
H02M covers power conversion circuits generally, and this search combines resonant/LLC converter language with gate driver terms — so most matched records describe how the converter and its switching timing are structured, which falls under H02M. H01L covers semiconductor devices as physical components, and comparatively few of the 1,507 records claim the driver silicon itself rather than the circuit or control scheme around it. That gap is a reasonably reliable signal that claim pressure sits on topology and control, not on driver IC design.
Research Resonant Converter Gate Driver in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole resonant converter gate driver corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.