Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (21 records) with 2024 (14) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 749 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Resonant converter and inverter design covers circuits that use a resonant tank — an inductor-capacitor network — to enable soft switching in DC-DC conversion and in AC drive stages such as induction heating. The 749 families tracked here span filings from 2015 onward, and the search terms deliberately bridge resonant converter / LLC converter / resonant DC-DC work with resonant inverter, induction-heating inverter and class-E inverter work, because these share circuit topology even though they serve different end applications.
The classification spread shows a field centred on general power conversion (H02M) with meaningful secondary activity in electric heating circuits (H05B), power supply and grid systems (H02J), and smaller but present activity in EV propulsion, X-ray technique, transmission and discharge tubes — evidence that the same resonant-tank building block gets reused across a wide range of downstream products.
The filing trend and IPC composition below chart where resonant converter and inverter design activity has concentrated since 2015, and which adjacent technology classes it spills into.
Filings rose to a peak of 47 in 2017, fell toward a midpoint of 18 by 2022, and the most recent year shows 0 — consistent with the usual 18-month publication lag rather than a sudden stop, but the multi-year decline before that lag window is real.
H02M (power conversion) accounts for 488 of the 749 records, more than three times the next largest class, H05B (electric heating and lighting circuits) at 146. Power-supply and grid systems (H02J, 133), inductors and transformers (H01F, 53), EV propulsion (B60L, 49), X-ray technique (H05G, 29), general transmission (H04B, 26) and discharge tubes (H01J, 25) form a long tail of adjacent applications.
Shares are the percentage of the 749 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about resonant converter inverter design and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaAn LLC resonant converter includes a switching circuit for converting a DC voltage into a switching signal, a resonant tank coupled to the switching circuit to receive the switching signal and provide a primary current, and a transformer circuit coupled to the resonant tank. The transformer circuit includes multiple separated transformers, each with primary and secondary windings on the PCB, where each primary winding can be switched to couple in series or parallel with others to form a dynamically varied equivalent primary winding, maintaining the turns ratio to fine-tune the resonant tank.Filed by Zerova Technologies Taiwan Limited, published 2024-03-07.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6301128B1 | Contactless electrical energy transmission system | 634 |
| 2 | US6740079B1 | Electrosurgical generator | 597 |
| 3 | US5341083A | Contactless battery charging system | 450 |
| 4 | US5301096A | Submersible contactless power delivery system | 377 |
| 5 | US8674551B2 | Method and apparatus for contactless power transfer | 285 |
| 6 | US4504895A | Regulated dc-dc converter using a resonating transformer | 219 |
| 7 | WO2009149464A2 | Method and apparatus for contactless power transfer | 217 |
| 8 | US4864483A | Static power conversion method and apparatus having essentially zero switching losses and clamped voltage lev… | 207 |
| 9 | US6101102A | Fixed frequency regulation circuit employing a voltage variable dielectric capacitor | 205 |
| 10 | US5157319A | Contactless battery charging system | 197 |
Ranked by citation count within the searched corpus; older filings are structurally favoured because they have had more time to accumulate citations.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Citation concentration and co-assignee linkage reveal which claims carry the most weight in this corpus and which organisations file together.
US6301128B1 on contactless electrical energy transmission leads with 634 citations, ahead of US6740079B1's electrosurgical generator design at 597. Both predate most of the corpus and function as the baseline prior art that later resonant-converter filings are measured against.
Of 10 identified co-assignee pairs, the strongest links a pair of related entities across 16 shared families, well ahead of the next pairs at 4 each. This points to coordinated filing within a corporate group rather than broad industry collaboration.
All of the top assignees by volume register zero filings in the most recent year tracked. Combined with the pre-existing decline from the 2017 peak, this suggests the core topology space is treated as settled rather than actively contested by the largest players.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to resonant converter inverter design, with the prior art for and against each one.
Assignee ranking in this corpus is led by large industrial, lighting and medical-device organisations with related-entity co-filing patterns, alongside a long tail of single-filing entrants.
The strongest co-assignee pair in the dataset links two related entities across 16 shared families, roughly four times the next-strongest pairs. This pattern typically reflects a parent-subsidiary filing structure rather than open industry collaboration.
The United States leads with 275 filings, ahead of the EPO at 154 and WIPO/PCT at 91, with Germany, India and Austria trailing. The PCT volume indicates a meaningful share of applicants are pursuing multi-jurisdiction protection rather than filing domestically only.
Every top assignee tracked shows zero filings in the most recent year, consistent with the broader decline from the 2017 peak. This does not mean these organisations have exited the space — their older claims remain enforceable — but it does mean the visible frontier of new filing is not currently being set by the largest historical players.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Koninklijke Philips N.V. (Royal Philips) | 0 | — |
| General Electric Company | 0 | — |
| Signify Holding B.V. | 0 | — |
| Arcelik A.S. | 0 | — |
| Cindara Medical LLC | 0 | — |
| AT&T Corporation | 0 | — |
| WiTricity Advanced Vehicle Electrification Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Utah State University | 0 | — |
The filing and citation data point to a settled core topology and a thinner set of adjacent applications still open for narrower claims.
The reconfigurable series/parallel PCB-winding approach in the representative record is a narrow, specific claim direction rather than a topology block. A targeted FTO search on that mechanism, not on LLC topology broadly, is the efficient next step.
Search this claim space in EurekaThe densest citation and co-filing activity concentrates around a small related-entity group. Understanding which entity within that group actually holds enforceable claims matters more than the aggregate ranking.
Trace assignee relationships in EurekaThe apparent 2026 drop to zero filings is partly a lag artefact. Revisiting the filing trend in 12-18 months will separate genuine decline from unpublished pending applications.
Set a monitoring alert in EurekaIn this corpus, resonant converter filings (LLC converter, resonant DC-DC) are classified predominantly under H02M, power conversion circuitry, and describe DC-to-DC voltage transformation using a resonant tank to enable soft switching. Resonant inverter filings, including induction-heating inverters and class-E inverters, sit heavily in H05B, electric heating and lighting circuits, because they typically drive an AC load such as an induction coil rather than regulate a DC output. The two share circuit building blocks — switching stage, resonant tank, transformer — but patent examiners and applicants classify them by end function, which is why the IPC split in this dataset tracks application rather than pure topology.
The ranking in this dataset is led by a small group of large industrial and lighting companies with dense co-assignee relationships, most notably a Philips-related pairing linked across 16 shared families. Several other major assignees appear with related-entity filing patterns rather than single-inventor clusters, which is typical where a corporate group files jointly across regional subsidiaries. Recent-year momentum for these top assignees has dropped to zero, which reflects the general decline in new filings since the 2017 peak and the 18-month publication lag on the most recent applications, not necessarily reduced R&D activity.
The filing trend in this dataset rises to a peak of 47 in 2017, falls to a midpoint of 18 by 2022, and reaches 0 in the most recent year. Some of that recent-year drop is a publication-lag artefact — patents filed in the last 18 months typically have not published yet — but the multi-year decline visible well before the lag window suggests genuine cooling in new topology filing, consistent with a technology whose core circuit space (H02M) is already densely claimed. This pattern is common in mature power-electronics sub-fields where incremental refinement replaces foundational filing.
US20240079965A1, filed by Zerova Technologies Taiwan Limited and published 2024-03-07, claims an LLC resonant converter with transformer windings fabricated on a PCB, where primary-side windings across multiple transformers can be dynamically switched between series and parallel connection to retune the resonant tank's effective turns ratio. This is a specific implementation claim, not a claim over LLC topology generally, so it primarily constrains designs that combine PCB-fabricated windings with that particular reconfigurable coupling mechanism. Teams using PCB magnetics without the dynamic re-coupling feature, or reconfigurable windings built with conventional wound transformers, are less likely to fall within its scope, though a freedom-to-operate review of the granted claim language is the only way to confirm this for a specific design.
Relative to the 488-family H02M core, the smaller IPC clusters in this dataset — EV propulsion (B60L, 49 families), general transmission (H04B, 26) and electron/discharge tubes (H01J, 25) — show comparatively thin coverage, suggesting resonant converter and inverter designs purpose-built for those applications are less densely claimed than general power-conversion topology. PCB-integrated, reconfigurable magnetics is a concrete example of a narrower, still-open claim direction visible in the recent representative filing. Because publication lag understates the most recent 12-18 months, any white-space assessment should be paired with a fresh search rather than relying solely on the visible trend line.
Go past this page: query the whole resonant converter inverter design corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.