https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/resonant-converter-inverter-design-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Power Electronics · Patent Landscape
Resonant converter and inverter design patents: where filing activity has concentrated and stalled
  • 488 of 749 families sit in H02M power conversion, more than three times the next-largest class, meaning most claim space is occupied by DC-DC and switching-circuit topology rather than novel physics.
  • Filings peaked at 47 in 2017 and fell to 18 by 2022, a multi-year decline that predates the normal 18-month publication lag on the most recent filings.
  • The most-cited record, US6301128B1, holds 634 citations, far ahead of the rest of the corpus, making it the default prior-art reference examiners reach for in this space.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
749
Published Records
23%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-33%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (21 records) with 2024 (14) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 749 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

A field anchored in power conversion, spilling into heating and grid systems

Resonant converter and inverter design covers circuits that use a resonant tank — an inductor-capacitor network — to enable soft switching in DC-DC conversion and in AC drive stages such as induction heating. The 749 families tracked here span filings from 2015 onward, and the search terms deliberately bridge resonant converter / LLC converter / resonant DC-DC work with resonant inverter, induction-heating inverter and class-E inverter work, because these share circuit topology even though they serve different end applications.

The classification spread shows a field centred on general power conversion (H02M) with meaningful secondary activity in electric heating circuits (H05B), power supply and grid systems (H02J), and smaller but present activity in EV propulsion, X-ray technique, transmission and discharge tubes — evidence that the same resonant-tank building block gets reused across a wide range of downstream products.

Filing volume and IPC composition, 2015 to the 2026 cut-off
  1. 1KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV47
  2. 2GENERAL ELECTRIC CO40
  3. 3SIGNIFY HOLDING BV33
  4. 4ARCELIK AS29
  5. 5AT&T CORP21
  6. 6WIRELESS ADVANCED VEHICLE ELECTRIFICATION INC19
  7. 7MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP18
  8. 8UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY18
  9. 9SHIRATRONICS INC18
  10. 10PHILIPS INTPROP & STANDARDS GMBH15
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Resonant Converter Inverter Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Filing Data

Filing trends and technology composition

The filing trend and IPC composition below chart where resonant converter and inverter design activity has concentrated since 2015, and which adjacent technology classes it spills into.

Filings peaked in 2017 and have not returned since

Filings rose to a peak of 47 in 2017, fell toward a midpoint of 18 by 2022, and the most recent year shows 0 — consistent with the usual 18-month publication lag rather than a sudden stop, but the multi-year decline before that lag window is real.

Filings peaked in 2017 and have not returned since0132538504720172018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Power conversion circuitry dominates the classification spread

H02M (power conversion) accounts for 488 of the 749 records, more than three times the next largest class, H05B (electric heating and lighting circuits) at 146. Power-supply and grid systems (H02J, 133), inductors and transformers (H01F, 53), EV propulsion (B60L, 49), X-ray technique (H05G, 29), general transmission (H04B, 26) and discharge tubes (H01J, 25) form a long tail of adjacent applications.

Power conversion circuitry dominates the classification spreadH02M · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)48865.2%H05B · Electric heating & lighting ci…14619.5%H02J · Power supply & grid systems13317.8%H01F · Magnets, inductors & transform…537.1%B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion496.5%H05G · X-ray technique293.9%H04B · Transmission (general)263.5%H01J · Electron & discharge tubes253.3%Other20427.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 749 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Resonant Converter Inverter Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Resonant Converter Inverter Design with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about resonant converter inverter design and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

A representative recent filing

Representative Recent Filing
US20240079965A12024-03-07

LLC Resonant Converter with Windings Fabricated on PCB

ZEROVA TECHNOLOGIES TAIWAN LIMITED

An LLC resonant converter includes a switching circuit for converting a DC voltage into a switching signal, a resonant tank coupled to the switching circuit to receive the switching signal and provide a primary current, and a transformer circuit coupled to the resonant tank. The transformer circuit includes multiple separated transformers, each with primary and secondary windings on the PCB, where each primary winding can be switched to couple in series or parallel with others to form a dynamically varied equivalent primary winding, maintaining the turns ratio to fine-tune the resonant tank.Filed by Zerova Technologies Taiwan Limited, published 2024-03-07.

US20240079965A1 — patent drawing 1US20240079965A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record in Eureka
Most-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6301128B1Contactless electrical energy transmission system634
2US6740079B1Electrosurgical generator597
3US5341083AContactless battery charging system450
4US5301096ASubmersible contactless power delivery system377
5US8674551B2Method and apparatus for contactless power transfer285
6US4504895ARegulated dc-dc converter using a resonating transformer219
7WO2009149464A2Method and apparatus for contactless power transfer217
8US4864483AStatic power conversion method and apparatus having essentially zero switching losses and clamped voltage lev…207
9US6101102AFixed frequency regulation circuit employing a voltage variable dielectric capacitor205
10US5157319AContactless battery charging system197

Ranked by citation count within the searched corpus; older filings are structurally favoured because they have had more time to accumulate citations.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Resonant Converter Inverter Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signals

What the citation and co-filing data show

Citation concentration and co-assignee linkage reveal which claims carry the most weight in this corpus and which organisations file together.

Citation Concentration
634 citations
top-cited record

Older contactless-power patents anchor the field

US6301128B1 on contactless electrical energy transmission leads with 634 citations, ahead of US6740079B1's electrosurgical generator design at 597. Both predate most of the corpus and function as the baseline prior art that later resonant-converter filings are measured against.

Citation counts favour older records; treat this as influence, not current relevance.
Co-filing Pattern
16 shared families
strongest co-assignee pair

Joint filing concentrates around a small set of related entities

Of 10 identified co-assignee pairs, the strongest links a pair of related entities across 16 shared families, well ahead of the next pairs at 4 each. This points to coordinated filing within a corporate group rather than broad industry collaboration.

Only 10 co-assignee pairs exist across 749 families — most filings are single-assignee.
Filing Momentum
0 in latest year
top assignees, most recent year

Every leading assignee shows zero recent filings

All of the top assignees by volume register zero filings in the most recent year tracked. Combined with the pre-existing decline from the 2017 peak, this suggests the core topology space is treated as settled rather than actively contested by the largest players.

Recency figures understate true activity because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to resonant converter inverter design, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Resonant Converter Inverter Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the claim space, and where it thins out

Assignee ranking in this corpus is led by large industrial, lighting and medical-device organisations with related-entity co-filing patterns, alongside a long tail of single-filing entrants.

Corporate Group Filing
16 shared families
strongest co-assignee pair

Coordinated filing across related entities

The strongest co-assignee pair in the dataset links two related entities across 16 shared families, roughly four times the next-strongest pairs. This pattern typically reflects a parent-subsidiary filing structure rather than open industry collaboration.

10 co-assignee pairs total across 749 families.
Receiving Office Spread
275 US filings
leading receiving office

US and EPO dominate, PCT signals cross-border intent

The United States leads with 275 filings, ahead of the EPO at 154 and WIPO/PCT at 91, with Germany, India and Austria trailing. The PCT volume indicates a meaningful share of applicants are pursuing multi-jurisdiction protection rather than filing domestically only.

Receiving-office counts reflect where protection was sought, not where invention occurred.
Filing Momentum
0 in latest year
across top assignees

Largest assignees show no recent activity

Every top assignee tracked shows zero filings in the most recent year, consistent with the broader decline from the 2017 peak. This does not mean these organisations have exited the space — their older claims remain enforceable — but it does mean the visible frontier of new filing is not currently being set by the largest historical players.

Recent-year counts are understated by the roughly 18-month publication lag.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
These pockets show comparatively thin coverage relative to the 488-family H02M core, based on IPC composition alone — a full freedom-to-operate check is still required.
PCB-embedded reconfigurable transformer windingsEV traction-integrated resonant converters (B60L overlap)Discharge-tube excitation inverters (H01J overlap)Induction-heating inverter grid integration (H02J overlap)Class-E inverter wireless-transmission designs (H04B overlap)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Koninklijke Philips N.V. (Royal Philips)0
General Electric Company0
Signify Holding B.V.0
Arcelik A.S.0
Cindara Medical LLC0
AT&T Corporation0
WiTricity Advanced Vehicle Electrification Ltd.0
Utah State University0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Resonant Converter Inverter Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The filing and citation data point to a settled core topology and a thinner set of adjacent applications still open for narrower claims.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on PCB-integrated magnetics

The reconfigurable series/parallel PCB-winding approach in the representative record is a narrow, specific claim direction rather than a topology block. A targeted FTO search on that mechanism, not on LLC topology broadly, is the efficient next step.

Search this claim space in Eureka

Track the co-assignee cluster before designing around it

The densest citation and co-filing activity concentrates around a small related-entity group. Understanding which entity within that group actually holds enforceable claims matters more than the aggregate ranking.

Trace assignee relationships in Eureka

Re-run the trend after the publication-lag window closes

The apparent 2026 drop to zero filings is partly a lag artefact. Revisiting the filing trend in 12-18 months will separate genuine decline from unpublished pending applications.

Set a monitoring alert in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Resonant Converter Inverter Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on resonant converter and inverter patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Resonant Converter Inverter Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Resonant Converter Inverter Design in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole resonant converter inverter design corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.