Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (107 records) with 2024 (118) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,351 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Slag metal recovery sits at the intersection of pyrometallurgy and waste valorisation: extracting residual nickel, cobalt, iron and other metals from slag, ash and processing residues that would otherwise be discarded. The 1,351 records in scope span filings from 2017 through the current data cut-off, drawn from a search string that combines slag, metal and recovery terminology with resource-recovery and recycling context. Patent families, not raw document counts, are the fairer unit for judging real activity, and the assignee ranking here is built on family counts.
The dataset skews heavily toward Chinese applicants and the China national receiving office, with a much smaller volume reaching the USPTO, WIPO, EPO, Australia and Canada. That split matters for freedom-to-operate work: a filing that looks crowded in China may still be open in other jurisdictions.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
The two views below cover the same 1,351 records from different angles: one tracks when applications were filed, the other tracks what they claim.
Annual filings rose from 57 records in 2017 to a peak of 146 in 2025, with the 2021-to-2024 window showing 10% growth (107 to 118 records). 2026's count of 24 is a partial year and should not be read as a decline — publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the most recent one to two years always understate true filing activity.
C22B (metal extraction and refining) appears in 59.6% of the 1,351 records, far ahead of the next-largest subclass, C21B (iron production via blast furnace) at 8.9%. Solid waste disposal (B09B), magnetic and electrostatic separation (B03C), and several inorganic-compound classes each sit in the 5-8% range. Because a single record can carry multiple IPC codes, these shares add up to well over 100% — they describe overlap in claim scope, not a partition of the field.
Shares are the percentage of the 1,351 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about resource recovery & urban mining: slag metal recovery patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe filing describes a laterite-nickel ore processing route that classifies ore by particle size, feeds the coarser fraction directly into a rotary hearth furnace with reducing coal and flux, and presses the finer fraction into carbon-containing pellets before drying and further processing. The stated aim is to cut early pellet-processing cost while lifting nickel recovery rate.Filed by Beijing Shenwu Environment and Energy Technology Corp.
View full record →| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20160045841A1 | New and improved system for processing various chemicals and materials | 861 |
| 2 | WO2014153570A2 | New and improved system for processing various chemicals and materials | 219 |
| 3 | US5666891A | ARC plasma-melter electro conversion system for waste treatment and resource recovery | 170 |
| 4 | US5134944A | Processes and means for waste resources utilization | 166 |
| 5 | CN107653378A | 一种废旧镍钴锰锂离子电池中有价金属的回收方法 | 141 |
| 6 | US3971639A | Fluid bed coal gasification | 127 |
| 7 | US5798497A | Tunable, self-powered integrated arc plasma-melter vitrification system for waste treatment and resource reco… | 119 |
| 8 | US6127645A | Tunable, self-powered arc plasma-melter electro conversion system for waste treatment and resource recovery | 65 |
| 9 | US5908564A | Tunable, self-powered arc plasma-melter electro conversion system for waste treatment and resource recovery | 62 |
| 10 | US4073644A | Salt cake processing method and apparatus | 62 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations inside the searched corpus — treat this as a signal of influence on the field, not of current technical importance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns stand out once the ranking, the trend and the technology split are read together.
The leading assignee holds 45 families, yet the top 5 combined account for only 12.2% of all 1,351 records in scope, and the top 10 for 18.9%. That leaves the large majority of filings spread across a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants, which is typical of a field still being worked out at the process-engineering level rather than one dominated by a handful of platform patents.
Filings grew from 107 records in 2021 to 118 in 2024, a modest but real 10% increase over three years. 2025's count of 146 looks like a peak, but with publication lagging filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025-2026 figures are still filling in and should not be read as either an acceleration or a slowdown yet.
C22B (metal extraction and refining) touches 805 of the 1,351 records. The next largest subclass, C21B (iron production), covers 8.9%, and five further subclasses each sit between 5% and 8%. That gap suggests the core extraction chemistry is where prior art is thickest, while separation and compound-recovery branches carry comparatively lighter claim coverage.
China's national office received 888 of the applications in this dataset, dwarfing the United States (66), WIPO/PCT (56), Australia (49), EPO (42) and Canada (36). A clearance search limited to China alone would miss most of the international filing activity, but so would one that skips China.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to resource recovery & urban mining: slag metal recovery patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
The trend and composition data point to specific next steps depending on what a team needs to decide.
Separation processes (B01D), electrolytic production (C25C) and non-metallic compound recovery (C01B) each carry under 6% of records despite touching the same feedstocks as C22B. That gap is worth probing before assuming the whole space is occupied.
Explore white space in Eureka →With the top 10 assignees holding only 18.9% of records, a large share of activity sits with entrants that may not show up in a standard competitor watch list yet.
Build an assignee watchlist in Eureka →The heavy skew toward China filings means clearance work outside China faces a materially different prior-art density than clearance work inside it.
Run a jurisdiction-specific search in Eureka →The ranked assignee list is led by a single company holding 45 families, but the field is not dominated by a small group: the top 5 assignees combined account for only 12.2% of the 1,351 records in scope, and the top 10 for 18.9%. Several of the most active filers are Chinese battery-recycling and metallurgical research groups, alongside established metals refiners. The remainder of the ranking is a long tail of companies with far fewer filings each, which points to a technology still being worked out at the process level rather than locked up by a few platform patents.
Filings grew from 107 records in 2021 to 118 in 2024, a real but modest 10% increase over that three-year window. The dataset shows a peak of 146 records in 2025, but that figure and the 24 recorded so far in 2026 should be read with caution: patent publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the most recent one to two years always look lower than the eventual final count. There is no evidence in this dataset of a genuine slowdown once that lag is accounted for.
Metal extraction and refining, IPC subclass C22B, appears in 59.6% of the 1,351 records in scope, making it by far the largest single category. Iron production via blast furnace (C21B) is a distant second at 8.9%, followed by solid waste disposal, magnetic and electrostatic separation, and several inorganic-compound classes each in the 5-8% range. Because a record can carry more than one IPC code, these percentages overlap rather than summing to 100%, reflecting how often extraction claims are paired with separation or compound-recovery steps.
China's national patent office received 888 of the applications in this dataset, far ahead of any other jurisdiction. The United States follows with 66, then WIPO/PCT filings at 56, Australia at 49, the European Patent Office at 42, and Canada at 36. Anyone running a freedom-to-operate check should treat China as the primary jurisdiction to clear, but should not skip the smaller markets, since they carry a meaningfully different mix of applicants.
CA2863423A1 describes a laterite-nickel ore processing method filed by Beijing Shenwu Environment and Energy Technology Corp, which classifies ore by particle size before routing the coarser fraction into a rotary hearth furnace and pressing the finer fraction into carbon-containing pellets. It is included here as a representative record because it illustrates a common pattern in this dataset: process-engineering claims around ore preparation and furnace feed, aimed at improving recovery rate and cutting processing cost, rather than a novel chemistry. Anyone designing a similar pre-treatment step should review its specific claim boundaries before assuming an alternative particle-size cutoff or furnace type is clear.
Go past this page: query the whole resource recovery & urban mining: slag metal recovery patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.