https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/resource-recovery-and-urban-mining-slag-metal-recovery-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Circular Economy & Waste Recycling
Slag metal recovery patents: who is filing, what they claim, and where the field is still open
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,351
Published Records
12%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+10%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (107 records) with 2024 (118) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,351 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Slag metal recovery sits at the intersection of pyrometallurgy and waste valorisation: extracting residual nickel, cobalt, iron and other metals from slag, ash and processing residues that would otherwise be discarded. The 1,351 records in scope span filings from 2017 through the current data cut-off, drawn from a search string that combines slag, metal and recovery terminology with resource-recovery and recycling context. Patent families, not raw document counts, are the fairer unit for judging real activity, and the assignee ranking here is built on family counts.

The dataset skews heavily toward Chinese applicants and the China national receiving office, with a much smaller volume reaching the USPTO, WIPO, EPO, Australia and Canada. That split matters for freedom-to-operate work: a filing that looks crowded in China may still be open in other jurisdictions.

Filing activity and technology mix, 2017–2026
  1. 1CENT SOUTH UNIV45
  2. 2KUNMING UNIV OF SCI & TECH35
  3. 3ASCEM BV33
  4. 4UMICORE(BE)28
  5. 5GUANGDONG BRUNP RECYCLING TECH CO LTD24
  6. 6METALLO BELGIUM23
  7. 7HUNAN BRUNP RECYCLING TECH CO LTD22
  8. 8UNIV OF SCI & TECH BEIJING18
  9. 9NORTHEASTERN UNIV CHINA14
  10. 10JINCHUAN GROUP CO LTD13
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Resource Recovery & Urban Mining: Slag Metal Recovery Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

The two views below cover the same 1,351 records from different angles: one tracks when applications were filed, the other tracks what they claim.

A decade of steady filing, with the most recent years still incomplete

Annual filings rose from 57 records in 2017 to a peak of 146 in 2025, with the 2021-to-2024 window showing 10% growth (107 to 118 records). 2026's count of 24 is a partial year and should not be read as a decline — publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the most recent one to two years always understate true filing activity.

A decade of steady filing, with the most recent years still incomplete0387511315057201720182019202020212022202320241462025242026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Metal extraction dominates, but seven other subclasses carry real volume

C22B (metal extraction and refining) appears in 59.6% of the 1,351 records, far ahead of the next-largest subclass, C21B (iron production via blast furnace) at 8.9%. Solid waste disposal (B09B), magnetic and electrostatic separation (B03C), and several inorganic-compound classes each sit in the 5-8% range. Because a single record can carry multiple IPC codes, these shares add up to well over 100% — they describe overlap in claim scope, not a partition of the field.

Metal extraction dominates, but seven other subclasses carry real volumeC22B · Metal extraction & refining80559.6%C21B · Iron production (blast furnace)1208.9%B09B · Solid waste disposal1077.9%B03C · Magnetic/electrostatic separat…886.5%C01G · Compounds of other metals805.9%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…745.5%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…725.3%C25C · Electrolytic metal production695.1%Other1,08280.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,351 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Resource Recovery & Urban Mining: Slag Metal Recovery Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Resource Recovery & Urban Mining: Slag Metal Recovery Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about resource recovery & urban mining: slag metal recovery patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

A representative filing and the most-cited prior art

Representative record
CA2863423A12013-10-17

Laterite-nickel ore processing method for efficient nickel resource recovery (CA2863423A1)

BEIJING SHENWU ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY TECHNOLOGY CORP

The filing describes a laterite-nickel ore processing route that classifies ore by particle size, feeds the coarser fraction directly into a rotary hearth furnace with reducing coal and flux, and presses the finer fraction into carbon-containing pellets before drying and further processing. The stated aim is to cut early pellet-processing cost while lifting nickel recovery rate.Filed by Beijing Shenwu Environment and Energy Technology Corp.

View full record →
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20160045841A1New and improved system for processing various chemicals and materials861
2WO2014153570A2New and improved system for processing various chemicals and materials219
3US5666891AARC plasma-melter electro conversion system for waste treatment and resource recovery170
4US5134944AProcesses and means for waste resources utilization166
5CN107653378A一种废旧镍钴锰锂离子电池中有价金属的回收方法141
6US3971639AFluid bed coal gasification127
7US5798497ATunable, self-powered integrated arc plasma-melter vitrification system for waste treatment and resource reco…119
8US6127645ATunable, self-powered arc plasma-melter electro conversion system for waste treatment and resource recovery65
9US5908564ATunable, self-powered arc plasma-melter electro conversion system for waste treatment and resource recovery62
10US4073644ASalt cake processing method and apparatus62

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations inside the searched corpus — treat this as a signal of influence on the field, not of current technical importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Resource Recovery & Urban Mining: Slag Metal Recovery Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Three patterns stand out once the ranking, the trend and the technology split are read together.

Concentration
12.2%
top 5 share of 1,351 records

A visible leader, but no lock on the field

The leading assignee holds 45 families, yet the top 5 combined account for only 12.2% of all 1,351 records in scope, and the top 10 for 18.9%. That leaves the large majority of filings spread across a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants, which is typical of a field still being worked out at the process-engineering level rather than one dominated by a handful of platform patents.

Based on the 100-company ranked assignee list.
Growth
+10%
2021 to 2024 filing growth

Steady, not explosive, expansion

Filings grew from 107 records in 2021 to 118 in 2024, a modest but real 10% increase over three years. 2025's count of 146 looks like a peak, but with publication lagging filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025-2026 figures are still filling in and should not be read as either an acceleration or a slowdown yet.

2024 is the most recent year treated as complete.
Technology mix
59.6%
records touching C22B

One subclass carries most of the claim density

C22B (metal extraction and refining) touches 805 of the 1,351 records. The next largest subclass, C21B (iron production), covers 8.9%, and five further subclasses each sit between 5% and 8%. That gap suggests the core extraction chemistry is where prior art is thickest, while separation and compound-recovery branches carry comparatively lighter claim coverage.

Shares overlap because records can carry multiple IPC codes.
Jurisdictions
888
China filings of 1,351 records

Filing activity is heavily China-weighted

China's national office received 888 of the applications in this dataset, dwarfing the United States (66), WIPO/PCT (56), Australia (49), EPO (42) and Canada (36). A clearance search limited to China alone would miss most of the international filing activity, but so would one that skips China.

Counts are receiving-office totals, not families.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to resource recovery & urban mining: slag metal recovery patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Resource Recovery & Urban Mining: Slag Metal Recovery Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The trend and composition data point to specific next steps depending on what a team needs to decide.

Map the white space in under-claimed branches

Separation processes (B01D), electrolytic production (C25C) and non-metallic compound recovery (C01B) each carry under 6% of records despite touching the same feedstocks as C22B. That gap is worth probing before assuming the whole space is occupied.

Explore white space in Eureka →

Track the long tail before it consolidates

With the top 10 assignees holding only 18.9% of records, a large share of activity sits with entrants that may not show up in a standard competitor watch list yet.

Build an assignee watchlist in Eureka →

Check freedom-to-operate jurisdiction by jurisdiction

The heavy skew toward China filings means clearance work outside China faces a materially different prior-art density than clearance work inside it.

Run a jurisdiction-specific search in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Resource Recovery & Urban Mining: Slag Metal Recovery Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on slag metal recovery patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Resource Recovery & Urban Mining: Slag Metal Recovery Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Resource Recovery & Urban Mining: Slag Metal Recovery Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole resource recovery & urban mining: slag metal recovery patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.