https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/reusable-launch-vehicles-grid-fin-control-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Space & Satellite Systems · Patent Landscape
Grid Fin Control Patents for Reusable Launch Vehicles
Get a prior-art report on your approach
42.4K
Published Records
22%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-22%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (1,564 records) with 2024 (1,221) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 42,392 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the grid fin control record set actually covers

Grid fins are the deployable aerodynamic control surfaces that stabilise and steer a returning booster through descent, and the patent activity captured under this search string spans the control logic, actuation hardware and structural mounting that make that steering work. The set is broad by design: it pulls in 42,392 published records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026, tracking everything from fin deployment mechanics to the digital control loops that command them. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent years in any trend here are undercounts, not a real slowdown.

Because a single fin-control system can generate several continuation filings and cross multiple jurisdictions, raw document counts overstate how much genuinely distinct engineering exists. Patent families are the fairer unit for judging real technical breadth, and the concentration figures below are read that way.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1INTEL CORP4,002
  2. 2NVIDIA CORP2,724
  3. 3SEMICON ENERGY LAB CO LTD1,091
  4. 4TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD728
  5. 5LG ELECTRONICS INC716
  6. 6SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD406
  7. 7STRONG FORCE IOT PORTFOLIO 2016 LLC350
  8. 8CILAG GMBH INTERNATIONAL323
  9. 9ETHICON ENDO SURGERY INC315
  10. 10RESMED PTY LTD307
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Reusable Launch Vehicles: Grid Fin Control Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 42,392-record set: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

A decade of filing, with a 2022 peak

Annual filings rose from 838 in 2017 to a peak of 1,710 in 2022. Using only complete-year data, 2021's 1,564 fell to 1,221 by 2024, a -22% move over that three-year span. Treat 2025 and 2026 figures as still filling in rather than evidence of a genuine drop-off.

A decade of filing, with a 2022 peak05001,0001,5002,000838201720182019202020211,71020222023202420251182026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Semiconductor and control-electronics classes dominate the mix

H01L (semiconductor devices) touches 11.1% of all records, well ahead of H10D at 5.4% and G06F at 4.1%. Because records can carry multiple IPC codes, these shares sum to more than 100% and should be read as claim density per class, not a partition of the field.

Semiconductor and control-electronics classes dominate the mixH01L · Semiconductor devices4,69811.1%H10D · Semiconductor devices (general)2,2955.4%G06F · Electric digital data processi…1,7564.1%H10W1,1062.6%H10B · Memory device manufacture1,0412.5%G06N · Computing based on AI models1,0132.4%H04W · Wireless communication networks8522.0%H05K · Printed circuits & assemblies7531.8%Other21,56850.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 42,392 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Reusable Launch Vehicles: Grid Fin Control Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Reusable Launch Vehicles: Grid Fin Control Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about reusable launch vehicles: grid fin control patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The anchor filing and the most-cited prior art

Representative filing
US20090045286A12009-02-19

US20090045286A1 — Grid fin control system for a fluid-borne object

KAZAK COMPOSITES, INCORPORATED

A grid fin control system for a fluid-borne body includes a nozzle extension, an optional stabilization device, and a plurality of grid fins. The grid fins are stowable folded against the nozzle extension and deployable to extend radially outwardly.Filed by Kazak Composites, Incorporated and published 2009-02-19, this record predates the modern reusable-booster wave and sits as foundational prior art for stow/deploy grid fin architectures.

US20090045286A1 — patent drawing 1US20090045286A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this set
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20080120129A1Consistent set of interfaces derived from a business object model2,470
2US8978954B2Staple cartridge comprising an adjustable distal portion1,797
3US20100149073A1Near to Eye Display System and Appliance1,790
4US20130201316A1System and method for server based control1,727
5US9332984B2Fastener cartridge assemblies1,515
6US9358005B2End effector layer including holding features1,398
7US9795384B2Fastener cartridge comprising a tissue thickness compensator and a gap setting element1,218
8US20090137887A1Analyte sensor1,130
9US20180140299A1Fastener cartridge comprising a tissue thickness compensator and a gap setting element1,033
10US20090143659A1Analyte sensor1,030

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to be cited; read them as a signal of influence within this corpus, not as a ranking of current technical importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Reusable Launch Vehicles: Grid Fin Control Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Three read-throughs from the concentration, trend and citation data, aimed at where a new filer or licensor should actually look.

Concentration
21.8%
of all 42,392 records

The top of the field is thin, not dominant

The five most active assignees together account for 21.8% of all records in scope, and the top ten only reach 25.9%. That leaves roughly three-quarters of the filing activity spread across a long tail, which is unusual for a hardware-control niche this specific and suggests the core deployment mechanics are not yet owned by any single player.

Ranked leaders, 100 companies covered
Momentum
-22%
2021 to 2024 complete-year filings

Growth has plateaued from a 2022 high, not collapsed

Filing rose steadily through 2022's peak of 1,710 before easing to 1,221 by 2024. That -22% move over the three complete years available is a cooling from an unusually strong peak, not a structural decline, and the 2025-2026 figures are too fresh to read either way.

Peak year 2022, 1,710 records
Jurisdiction
12,328
US receiving-office records

Enforcement exposure is heavily US-weighted

The United States receives far more filings than any other office, well ahead of EPO's 2,529 and WIPO/PCT's 2,050. A design freedom review that only checks EPO and PCT filings is checking the smaller share of the exposure.

UK 1,023, Canada 835, Australia 803
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to reusable launch vehicles: grid fin control patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Reusable Launch Vehicles: Grid Fin Control Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, licensing, or new filing strategy.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on US filings first

Given that 12,328 records entered via the United States against 2,529 at the EPO, any clearance review that leads with Europe is checking the smaller share of the exposure.

Explore in Eureka

Watch the long tail, not just the leader

With the top ten holding only 25.9% of all records, most of the technical variation in grid fin control sits outside the ranked leaders and is worth monitoring for emerging approaches.

Explore in Eureka

Revisit claim scope once 2025-2026 data fills in

Because publication lags filing by about 18 months, any conclusion about the field slowing down should be re-tested once the most recent two years are complete.

Explore in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Reusable Launch Vehicles: Grid Fin Control Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Questions practitioners ask about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Reusable Launch Vehicles: Grid Fin Control Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Reusable Launch Vehicles: Grid Fin Control Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole reusable launch vehicles: grid fin control patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.