Book a demo

Reverse Osmosis Desalination Patent Landscape 2026

Reverse Osmosis Desalination Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

Reverse Osmosis Desalination Patent Landscape in 2026

The reverse osmosis desalination patent field spans 275 patent families and is moderately concentrated, with a mix of specialist technology firms, academic institutions, and industrial players sharing the top ranks. Activity has plateaued near its 2017 peak on a multi-year basis, signalling a mature field where incremental differentiation—particularly in energy recovery, membrane chemistry, and alternative pumping—remains the primary avenue for new filings.

275
Patent families in scope
22%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-8%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Desalitech leads a fragmented field with no single dominant bloc

Desalitech holds the top position among ranked applicants with 31 patent records, followed by Tianjin Normal University at 21 and Sulzer Management AG at 16. The field includes a diverse mix of corporate technology developers, university research groups, and national research institutes across multiple geographies.

The top five filers account for 22% of the combined total among the hundred largest filers, indicating moderate concentration. The gap between the leader and the second-ranked applicant is meaningful but not insurmountable, and the tier below the top five features several players clustered between 9 and 13 patent records, suggesting a competitive mid-tier.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Desalitech31
2Tianjin Normal University21
3Sulzer Management AG16
4Sulzer Chemtech AG13
5Purdue Research Foundation12
6IDE Technologies Ltd11
7Oceanwell Co.11
8Hangzhou Water Treatment Technology Development Center10
9Nagare Membranes LLC10
10Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research9
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Changzhou University9
12NanoASIS Technologies Inc.8
13BAOSHAN IRON & STEEL CO LTD7
14University of Florida Research Foundation Inc.7
15Tritech Water Technologies Pte. Ltd.7
16TIANJIN SEA WATER DESALINATION & COMPLEX UTILIZATI…7
17Krosys6
18Honeywell International Inc.6
19Tianjin Ronglu Zhongle Technology Co., Ltd.6
20Garfield International Investments Ltd.6
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Desalitech’s position implies a system-level approach to closed-circuit and continuous RO optimization, while Sulzer’s dual-entity presence (Sulzer Management AG and Sulzer Chemtech AG) points to integrated process engineering coverage. Academic filers such as Tianjin Normal University signal that membrane materials research remains an active frontier not fully commercialized.

Filings from approximately the last 18–24 months will be under-represented due to standard patent publication lag and should not be read as a structural decline. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Filing volumes have plateaued since 2017; water treatment and separation dominate the technology mix

The annual trend chart reveals how filing activity has evolved over the study window, while the technology composition chart identifies which IPC classes anchor the field and which remain peripheral.

Annual filing trend

Annual filings peaked in 2017 and have oscillated at lower levels since, consistent with a maturing field. The 2024–2026 bars should be treated as incomplete due to publication lag; no structural further decline can be inferred from those years alone.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 50 in 2017.50201738201825201945202019202128202230202324202415202512026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

C02F (water and wastewater treatment) and B01D (separation processes including filtration) together account for the large majority of classified patent records, confirming that membrane-based water treatment is the technical core. Secondary clusters around pumping machinery (F04F, F04B), hydraulic machines (F03B), and condensation polymers (C08G) reflect energy recovery systems and membrane material chemistry as the next most active branches.

Technology compositionC02F · Water & wastewater treatment leads with 600; B01D · Separation processes (filtration etc.) 382.C02F · Water & wastewate…600B01D · Separation proces…382F04F · Pumping by other …29F04B · Positive-displace…27C08G · Condensation poly…22F03B · Hydraulic machine…22F03D · Wind motors (wind…14F03G · Spring/weight & m…14↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
EP2377817A1Published 2011-10-19

UMKEHROSMOSE-ENTSALZUNGSANLAGE UND MODUL DAVON

FOMIN, Vladimir Fjodorovich

The inventive reverse osmosis desalination plant comprises reverse osmosis desalination modules which are used together and each of which consists of the following three in-series jointed blocks: a diaphragm pump unit (14), a hydraulic interconnection unit (9) and a diaphragm element unit (3), wherein the hydraulic interconnection unit (9) is provided with… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

UMKEHROSMOSE-ENTSALZUNGSANLAGE UND MODUL DAVON — patent drawingUMKEHROSMOSE-ENTSALZUNGSANLAGE UND MODUL DAVON — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Wave energy conversion device for desalination, ETC128
2Reverse osmosis desalination apparatus and method120
3Wave energy conversion device for desalination, ETC116
4Wave-powered desalination of seawater101
5Method of and apparatus for producing power and de…87
6Permeation separation element76
7Recovery of oil68
8A pressure exchanger64

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the patent structure means for R&D investment decisions

Four structural dimensions—lifecycle stage, competitive concentration, collaborative activity, and geographic distribution—shape where new entrants and incumbents can most productively deploy R&D resources.

Maturity

A mature field with selective innovation windows

The lifecycle evidence indicates a Maturity stage: annual filings have plateaued near their 2017 peak. The field is not in decline, but the era of broad foundational filing has passed. R&D investment is most defensible in well-differentiated sub-areas such as energy recovery coupling, novel membrane chemistries, and integrated renewable-powered systems rather than core RO process patents already well covered.

Lifecycle: Maturity
Concentration

Moderate concentration with a competitive mid-tier

The top five filers hold 22% of the combined total among the hundred largest filers, meaning roughly 78% is distributed across the remaining large filers. The mid-tier cluster between 9 and 13 patent records suggests multiple players are capable of credible IP challenges. New entrants can build meaningful positions without needing to match the leader’s portfolio depth immediately, particularly in adjacent technology branches.

Moderate fragmentation
Collaboration

Co-filing activity is limited and concentrated in entity pairs

The most active co-filing relationship is between Sulzer Chemtech AG and Sulzer Management AG, which have co-filed 4 patent records together, reflecting coordinated IP strategy within the Sulzer group. Changzhou University and Jiangsu Tohope Pharma have co-filed 3 records, and IDE Technologies entities have collaborated on 2. Overall co-filing activity is sparse, suggesting that cross-organization R&D partnerships have not yet consolidated into major joint IP programs in this field.

Low co-filing density
Geography

China leads filings; US and PCT routes confirm international reach

China is the leading filing jurisdiction by a wide margin, followed by the United States and WIPO PCT filings, with Europe (EPO), Australia, and the UK forming a secondary tier. The presence of filings in Israel, Singapore, South Korea, India, and Spain reflects the global distribution of both manufacturing interest and water-stressed markets. Applicants seeking broad commercial protection should prioritize PCT and EPO routes given the multi-jurisdiction spread already observed.

China-led, globally spread
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Sulzer Chemtech AGSulzer Management AG4
Changzhou UniversityJiangsu Tohope Pharma Co., Ltd.3
IDE Technologies LtdIDE Water Technologies Ltd2
Natural Ocean Well Co.Oceanwell Co.2

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights are derived from lifecycle, collaboration, concentration, and jurisdiction evidence in the corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

Desalitech and Sulzer anchor the field; new academic and start-up entrants are emerging

The top two tiers differ in strategic profile: Desalitech represents a focused RO systems specialist, while Sulzer’s combined entities reflect broad process-engineering coverage. Below them, academic and start-up filers are growing from small bases.

Leader · Desalitech

Desalitech

Desalitech holds the top position with 31 patent records. Its technical emphasis is concentrated in C02F 1 (water and wastewater treatment) and B01D 61 (separation/filtration processes), consistent with closed-circuit and continuous-flow RO system IP. Momentum data for Desalitech is not separately broken out in the recent-entrant trend evidence, indicating an established rather than newly surging position.

families: 31
Challenger · Sulzer (combined entities)

Sulzer Management AG / Sulzer Chemtech AG

Sulzer Management AG (16 patent records) and Sulzer Chemtech AG (13 patent records) together represent the second-largest bloc in the ranking. Sulzer Chemtech’s focus spans C02F 1, B01D 61, and C02F 103, reflecting integrated treatment-process engineering. The two entities co-file jointly (4 co-filed records), suggesting coordinated portfolio management. Their combined position makes Sulzer the most significant industrial-process-engineering presence in the field.

families: 29 combined
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked data for all top filers including IDE Technologies, Purdue Research Foundation, NanoASIS, and Nagare Membranes.
IDE Technologies LtdPurdue Research Foundation+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Changzhou University2▲ new entrant
Natural Ocean Well Co.4▲ new entrant
Purdue Research Foundation4▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player profiles are based on patent record counts and IPC focus data from the applicant ranking.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches in pumping, hydraulics, polymer chemistry, and wind-coupled systems

Several IPC branches adjacent to the dominant C02F and B01D core have low patent record counts relative to the field’s overall volume, representing areas where the prior-art density is thin. These are observations of relative sparsity; entry value depends on technical fit and commercial deployment context.

F04B / F04F · Positive-displacement and alternative pumping

Positive-displacement pumps (F04B, 27 records) and pumping by other means (F04F, 29 records) each represent only about 2% of the classified corpus. Energy recovery through advanced pumping architectures is a known efficiency lever in RO systems, yet the patent density here is low relative to the membrane and treatment branches. Entrants with novel pump-rotor or pressure-exchanger designs could build defensible positions without encountering dense prior art. Realistic entry paths include pressure exchanger improvements and isobaric energy recovery devices.

Search this in Eureka →

C08G · Condensation polymers for membrane substrates

Condensation polymers (C08G, 22 records, ~2% share) sit adjacent to the dominant membrane separation branch. Polyamide and polysulfone chemistries underpin most commercial RO membranes, yet this IPC class is sparsely covered in the corpus, suggesting that fundamental polymer synthesis IP has not been heavily filed within this specific desalination context. Academic groups already active in membrane science (e.g., Tianjin Normal University with its B01D 71 focus) are positioned to extend into C08G, and new entrants targeting next-generation membrane materials—such as aquaporin-embedded or mixed-matrix polymer systems—would encounter a relatively open prior-art landscape.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See the complete adjacent-branch analysis including F03B hydraulic machines, F03D wind-coupled systems, and H02J grid-integration branches.
F03B · Hydraulic machines & enginesF03D · Wind motors coupled to desalination+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branch analysis is based on IPC classification counts relative to the dominant branches in the corpus.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ by technology route emphasis

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerC02F 1 · Water & wastewater treatmentB01D 61 · Separation processes (filtration etc.)C02F 103 · Water & wastewater treatmentC02F 9 · Water & wastewater treatmentB01D 65 · Separation processes (filtration etc.)
Sulzer Chemtech AGStrong · 24Moderate · 12Moderate · 10AbsentAbsent
Natural Ocean Well Co.Strong · 13Strong · 13Strong · 9AbsentStrong · 11
IDE Technologies LtdStrong · 14Strong · 14Strong · 11AbsentAbsent
Tianjin Sea Water Desalination & Complex Utilization Technology Co., Ltd.Strong · 14Moderate · 7Moderate · 7AbsentAbsent
Kuwait Institute for Scientific ResearchStrong · 8Strong · 8Strong · 5Strong · 5Absent
Purdue Research FoundationStrong · 12Strong · 7Moderate · 5AbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Map your own reverse osmosis desalination patent landscape

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.