Book a demo

RFID Packaging Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026

RFID Packaging Patents: Top Companies & Filing Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/rfid-packaging-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Logistics, Material Handling & Packaging
RFID Packaging Patents: Who Leads and Where the Filing Is Concentrated

A patent landscape analysis of RFID packaging technology covering 232 records from 2015 to 2026, mapping leading assignees, filing trends, IPC composition and the most-cited patents shaping the field.

232
Published Records
29%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-50%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth = 2021 (12 records) → 2024 (6); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 232 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.

Check your own idea
Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the RFID packaging patent record shows

RFID packaging sits at the intersection of physical packaging engineering and data-carrying electronics, which is why the dataset spans both B65D/B65B container and wrapping classes and G06K/G06Q data-recognition and commerce classes. The 232 records in scope, filtered to the intersection of RFID packaging terminology and packaging IPC codes, run from 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, with the most recent years understated because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months. Filing activity peaked in 2017 and has since pulled back, though the field has not gone quiet: receiving offices spread across the United States, WIPO, Europe, Australia, Canada and India show this is being filed as an international problem rather than a single-jurisdiction one.

The composition of IPC classes is the clearest signal in this dataset: packaging structure classes dominate, while classes tied to computation and business-process logic are present but comparatively thin. That gap is where a first claim is more likely to find open ground, though it also means the physical packaging side of the problem is well covered by prior art.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1AVERY DENNISON RETAIL INFORMATION SERVICES LLC18
  2. 2POLY CLIP SYST16
  3. 3REEMTSMA CIGARETTENFABRIKEN GMBH12
  4. 4K61 BLAZER INVESTMENTS (PTY) LTD11
  5. 5BPREX HEALTHCARE PACKAGING INC10
  6. 6CLOSURE SYST INT INC7
  7. 7HEWLETT PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LP6
  8. 8COIN CONTROLS6
  9. 9WALMART APOLLO LLC6
  10. 10SONG KYEONG KEUN6
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on RFID Packaging Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

The two views below cover the same 232 records from different angles: one tracks when filings were made, the other shows which IPC subclasses those filings sit in, with a record able to carry more than one class.

Filing trend, 2015–2026

Filings peaked in 2017 at 24 records. The tracked 2021-to-2024 window fell from 12 to 6 records, a 50% decline; treat 2025 and 2026 as still filling in given typical publication lag, not as evidence of a continued drop.

Filing trend, 2015–2026061319252420172018201920202021202220232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.

IPC subclass composition

B65D (containers & packaging) covers 72.0% of the 232 records and B65B (packaging & wrapping) covers 34.1%, confirming this is filed primarily as a packaging-structure problem. Data and commerce classes — G06K at 30.2%, G06Q at 14.2%, G06F at 7.8% — are present but sit well below the packaging classes, and material-handling adjacent classes (B07C, B41J, B65G) each sit at 5.2%.

IPC subclass compositionB65D · Containers & packaging16772.0%B65B · Packaging & wrapping7934.1%G06K · Data recognition & presentation7030.2%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…3314.2%G06F · Electric digital data processi…187.8%B07C · Postal & object sorting125.2%B41J · Typewriters & printers125.2%B65G · Conveying & material handling125.2%Other18579.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 232 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on RFID Packaging Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on RFID Packaging Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about rfid packaging patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Representative filing and most-cited prior art

Representative record
US12049338B22024-07-30

US12049338B2 — Method for a packaging material (Tetra Laval Holdings & Finance, 2024-07-30)

TETRA LAVAL HOLDINGS & FINANCE S.A.

A method for providing a packaging material is provided. The method comprises feeding a web of packaging material through a packaging material processing unit; determining a target position of the packaging material; and controlling a printing unit to print an RFID antenna at the target position, wherein the material used for printing the RFID antenna is conductive substance. A packaging material is also provided.Filed by Tetra Laval Holdings & Finance and granted in 2024, this record sits at the leading edge of the dataset and claims an in-line, print-based method for placing an RFID antenna directly onto a packaging web rather than attaching a separately manufactured tag or inlay.

US12049338B2 — patent drawing 1US12049338B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in the RFID packaging field
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6557758B1Direct to package printing system with RFID write/read capability271
2US20050162277A1Secure product packaging system138
3WO2008000279A1Blister package integrating RFID based tags97
4US7034689B2Secure product packaging system97
5US20100320189A1Automated user-customized cooking appliance configuration94
6US20010054755A1Integrated package and RFID antenna88
7US20080149584A1Secure product packaging83
8US7748610B2Packaging device and container for sheet objects77
9US7712288B2Unified ingestion package and process for patient compliance with prescribed medication regimen72
10US20180189623A1RFID tags with shielding structure for incorporation into microwavable food packaging68

Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and skew toward older filings; use them as a signal of what other applicants had to design around, not as a measure of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on RFID Packaging Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Four figures from this dataset carry direct implications for where a new filing is likely to land clean and where it will collide with dense prior art.

Concentration
28.9%
of 232 records held by top 5 assignees

The top of the field is concentrated but not locked

The leading assignee holds 18 records and the top five combined account for 28.9% of all 232 records in scope. That leaves the majority of filings spread across a long tail, so freedom-to-operate analysis needs to look well past the leaderboard.

Top 5 combined, 232-record base
Filing trend
-50%
2021 to 2024 filing change

Activity has cooled from its 2017 peak

Filings peaked at 24 records in 2017 and the tracked 2021-to-2024 window shows a 50% decline from 12 to 6 records. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, 2025 and 2026 figures are not yet reliable evidence of a continued slowdown.

Peak year 2017, 24 records
Technology mix
72.0%
of records classed under B65D

Packaging structure claims dominate the class mix

B65D accounts for 72.0% of the 232 records and B65B for 34.1%, while data-processing classes like G06F sit at only 7.8%. Claim space around the physical packaging structure is the most crowded; the computational side of RFID packaging has more open ground.

Class shares sum above 100% because records carry multiple IPC codes
Filing geography
67
US-office filings, the largest single office

Filing is international but US-anchored

The United States leads with 67 filings, followed by WIPO (PCT) at 42 and the EPO at 38, with Australia, Canada and India each in double digits. That spread indicates applicants are pursuing multi-jurisdiction protection rather than treating this as a domestic-only technology.

Receiving office counts, not mutually exclusive with family counts
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to rfid packaging patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on RFID Packaging Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio strategy, or identifying a filing opportunity.

Map claim overlap against the leading assignees

With the top five assignees holding 28.9% of all 232 records, a claims-level comparison against those portfolios is the fastest way to see whether a planned filing crosses into occupied ground.

Explore assignee portfolios in Eureka

Probe the under-claimed computational classes

G06F and G06Q sit well below the packaging classes in share of records, suggesting the data-processing side of RFID packaging — rather than the physical structure side — is where a first claim is more likely to stand clean.

Run a white-space search in Eureka

Track the post-2024 filing signal as it fills in

The 2021-to-2024 window shows a real decline, but 2025 and 2026 are still incomplete due to publication lag; revisit the trend once those years mature before drawing conclusions about direction.

Set a filing alert in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on RFID Packaging Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on RFID Packaging Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research RFID Packaging Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole rfid packaging patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.