Book a demo

RO Membrane Chlorine & Fouling Durability Patent Landscape

RO Membrane Chlorine & Fouling Durability Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape
RO Membrane Chlorine & Fouling Durability Patent Landscape in 2026

The RO membrane chlorine and fouling durability space comprises 142 patent families, led by Toray Industries with the largest single-applicant position; the field reached a peak in 2021 and annual volume has since eased, though several new entrants indicate that selective technical niches remain actively contested.

142
Patent families in scope
24%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-20%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Toray leads a moderately concentrated field with a visible Japanese–Chinese competitive split

Toray Industries holds the top position among the hundred largest filers, followed closely by Teijin and Kurita Water Industries. The top five filers account for 24% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, signalling moderate rather than extreme concentration.

A clear two-tier structure exists: Toray and Teijin sit noticeably ahead of the mid-pack, while a dense cluster from Kurita down to LG Chem holds positions three through ten with counts ranging from 18 to 10 patent records. Below that, the field disperses across a long tail of universities and smaller specialists.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Toray Industries Inc27
2Teijin Limited22
3Kurita Water Industries Ltd18
4Toyobo Co Ltd14
5BEIJING RES INST OF CHEM IND CHINA PETROLEUM & CHE…14
6CHINA PETROLEUM & CHEMICAL CORP14
7Nitto Denko Corporation13
8Wanhua Chemical Group Co Ltd12
9Hunan Keensen Technology Co Ltd11
10LG Chem Ltd10
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Shinshu University10
12Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology9
13AGC Inc8
14ROHM & HAAS CO8
15The Dow Chemical Company8
16The Research Foundation of State University of New York7
17FilmTec Corporation7
18Hydranautics6
19Nanjing Shuibeizi Different Quantity Pipeline Water Co Ltd6
20Midwest Research Institute6
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leaders’ positions reflect deep investment in membrane polymer chemistry and fabrication processes. Japanese incumbents (Toray, Teijin, Toyobo, Nitto Denko) collectively anchor the high end, while Chinese applicants—Sinopec’s Beijing Research Institute, Wanhua Chemical, and Hunan Keensen—signal an accelerating domestic effort to close the gap.

Filings from approximately 2024 onward are subject to publication lag and likely understate true recent activity; the 2026 count of zero reflects this lag rather than a cessation of R&D. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

A 2021 filing peak, a dominant separation-science core, and sparse adjacent branches

Annual filing volume and the IPC branch breakdown together reveal both the pace of the field and the technical areas attracting primary versus secondary investment.

Annual filing trend

Activity climbed from 7 filings in 2017 to a clear peak of 25 in 2021, then moderated to the lower teens by 2022–2023. The 2025 count of 23 appears elevated but should be read cautiously given publication lag on very recent applications; the 2026 figure of zero reflects that lag entirely.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 25 in 2021.720172020181320191320202520212020229202312202423202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B01D (separation processes, including membrane fabrication and filtration) is overwhelmingly dominant, reflecting the core membrane-engineering focus. C02F (water and wastewater treatment) is the principal secondary branch, capturing system-level applications. Polymer chemistry branches—C08G and C08J—account for meaningful but smaller shares, pointing to materials-innovation work that underpins membrane durability improvements.

Technology compositionB01D · Separation processes (filtration etc.) leads with 388; C02F · Water & wastewater treatment 113.B01D · Separation proces…388C02F · Water & wastewate…113C08G · Condensation poly…53C08J · Polymer processin…36C11D · Detergents & clea…11B05D · Coating processes9C22B · Metal extraction …8C08F · Addition polymers…6↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
AU2023266319B2Published 2025-09-25

PREPARATION METHOD OF FLUORINE-FREE Ti3C2Tx MXene-…

Research Institute Of Chemical DEFENSE, Pla Academy Of Military Sciences

The present disclosure belongs to the technical field of composite membrane preparation, and discloses a preparation method of a fluorine-free Ti3C2Tx MXene-modified polyamide (PA) reverse osmosis (RO) membrane. The preparation method comprises: preparing a fluorine-free Ti3C2Tx MXene nanosheet material through etching with tetramethylammonium hydroxide… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Interfacially synthesized reverse osmosis membrane1,163
2Reverse osmosis membrane237
3Interfacially synthesized reverse osmosis membrane173
4Semipermeable composite membrane159
5Semipermeable composite membrane122
6Method for preparation of semipermeable composite …116
7High flux high efficiency nanofiber membranes and …96
8Permselective membrane67

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

Four structural dimensions—maturity, concentration, collaboration, and geography—together shape where entry barriers are high and where genuine white space persists.

Decline

Field is past its 2021 peak; consolidation phase underway

The lifecycle evidence places this field in decline, with annual filings easing back from the 2021 peak. Core polyamide thin-film composite chemistry is highly developed, so marginal incremental filings are harder to distinguish from background noise. R&D differentiation now likely requires addressing specific failure modes—chlorine-induced hydrolysis mechanisms or biofouling at the molecular level—rather than broad platform patents.

Lifecycle: Decline
Concentration

Moderate concentration leaves room for focused challengers

With the top five filers holding 24% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, no single entity has locked up the space. The mid-tier cluster from rank 3 to 10 is tightly packed, meaning a well-targeted filing program in an underserved branch could move a challenger into the visible leadership tier. The long tail of university applicants also signals that academic IP may be available for licensing or partnership.

Moderate concentration
Collaboration

Co-filing is rare and concentrated within the Sinopec group

The most active co-filing pair is China Petroleum & Chemical Corp’s Beijing Chemical Research Institute filing jointly with its parent Sinopec entity, with 14 co-filed records—effectively an intra-group coordination rather than an arm’s-length partnership. Wanhua Chemical Group and its Ningbo subsidiary account for 2 co-filed records. Outside these two corporate families, cross-organization collaboration is not evidenced in the data, suggesting that IP alliances between independent parties remain largely untapped.

Limited cross-org IP alliances
Geography

China is the primary prosecution venue; US, Europe, and Japan remain significant

China accounts for the largest share of patent records among all prosecution jurisdictions, reflecting both a growing domestic industry and a strategic push to secure rights in the world’s largest membrane-manufacturing base. The United States, Europe (EPO), and Japan each represent substantial secondary jurisdictions. South Korea and PCT filings round out a globe-spanning prosecution footprint, indicating that leading applicants treat this as a multi-market commercial asset.

China-led multi-jurisdictional
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Sinopec Beijing Research Institute of Chemical IndustryChina Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (Sinopec)14
Wanhua Chemical Group Co LtdWanhua Chemical (Ningbo) Co Ltd2

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Jurisdiction counts are at the patent-record level; a single family prosecuted in multiple offices contributes a count in each.Explore insights →
Leaders

Toray anchors the field; Teijin and Kurita mount the strongest challenges

The two top-ranked applicants differ in their technology emphasis and trajectory, with Kurita emerging as a notable new entrant in recent periods.

Leader · Toray Industries

Toray Industries

Toray holds the top position with 27 patent records and concentrates its work firmly in B01D membrane separation sub-classes—specifically B01D71 (membrane materials), B01D69 (membrane structures), and B01D61 (membrane processes). This breadth across fabrication, structure, and application sub-classes reflects a platform-level strategy rather than a single product niche. Momentum data does not flag Toray as a new entrant, consistent with a long-established and sustained filing program.

patent records: 27
Challenger · Kurita Water Industries

Kurita Water Industries

Kurita ranks third with 18 patent records and is flagged as a new entrant in recent filings, with 6 recent records. Its technical emphasis leans toward B01D65 (membrane maintenance and cleaning) alongside the broader B01D71 and B01D61 sub-classes, suggesting a differentiated focus on operational durability and membrane-system management rather than pure polymer synthesis. This operational angle may reflect Kurita’s water-treatment services background and could position it to capture IP in cleaning chemistry and fouling-mitigation protocols.

patent records: 18
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access rank 4–100 with technology-route breakdowns and momentum scores for every filer.
Toyobo Co LtdNitto Denko Corp+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Kurita Water Industries Ltd6▲ new entrant
Nitto Denko Corporation1▲ new entrant
Wanhua Chemical Group Co Ltd6▲ new entrant
Hunan Keensen Technology Co Ltd5▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player patent record counts are drawn from the applicant ranking within the landscape corpus.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served IPC branches adjacent to the dominant separation-science core

Several IPC branches appear in the corpus at low frequency relative to the dominant B01D class, representing areas where patent density is thin. Each is noted as an observation of relative sparsity; technical and commercial merit should be assessed independently.

C11D · Detergents & cleaning compositions

With only 11 patent records and a 2% share among the hundred largest filers’ activity, C11D is sparsely covered despite the direct relevance of cleaning-chemistry formulations to fouling removal and membrane restoration cycles. Applicants active in membrane operation (such as Kurita, with its maintenance-oriented B01D65 focus) are plausible entry points, and the branch sits adjacent to existing water-treatment expertise. The sparse coverage may reflect that cleaning chemistries are developed by detergent companies outside the core membrane IP community, leaving a gap for membrane specialists to claim.

Search this in Eureka →

B05D · Coating processes

B05D accounts for only 9 patent records and a 1% share, suggesting that surface-coating methods applied to membranes for chlorine resistance or anti-biofouling purposes are not yet heavily patented within this corpus. Given that thin protective coatings are a known strategy for extending membrane life against oxidant exposure, the sparse filing count indicates that coating-process IP may be underdeveloped relative to its technical importance. Applicants with polymer-chemistry capabilities (active in C08G or C08J) would have a plausible path into this branch.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
Explore all adjacent IPC branches with filing density, applicant overlap, and entry-barrier scores.
C08G · Condensation polymersC08J · Polymer processing & solutions+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch share figures reflect each branch’s patent records as a proportion of the top-100 filers’ combined total within this corpus.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ by IPC technology route

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerB01D 71 · Separation processes (filtration etc.)B01D 69 · Separation processes (filtration etc.)B01D 67 · Separation processes (filtration etc.)B01D 61 · Separation processes (filtration etc.)C02F 1 · Water & wastewater treatment
Toray Industries IncStrong · 23Strong · 16AbsentStrong · 14Moderate · 6
China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (Sinopec)Strong · 14Strong · 11Strong · 14Moderate · 6Strong · 10
Sinopec Beijing Research Institute of Chemical IndustryStrong · 14Strong · 11Strong · 14Moderate · 6Strong · 10
Wanhua Chemical Group Co LtdStrong · 10AbsentStrong · 11Strong · 8Strong · 11
Teijin LimitedStrong · 22Strong · 15AbsentAbsentAbsent
Kurita Water Industries LtdStrong · 14AbsentAbsentStrong · 12Moderate · 6
Nitto Denko CorporationStrong · 13Strong · 9Strong · 9AbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Generate your own RO membrane durability patent landscape

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.