Book a demo

RO Membrane Surface Engineering Patent Landscape

RO Membrane Surface Engineering Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape
RO Membrane Surface Engineering Patent Landscape in 2026

RO membrane surface engineering is an active, growing field anchored by a small group of established membrane manufacturers — Nitto Denko, LG Chem, and their affiliated entities — holding a commanding combined share of the top-ranked filers. Filing activity is still rising on a multi-year basis, with China the dominant jurisdiction for prosecution and separation-process chemistry (B01D) accounting for the vast majority of technical activity.

627
Patent families in scope
24%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+10%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Nitto Denko and LG Chem lead a moderately concentrated field

Nitto Denko Corp holds the top-ranked position among the hundred largest filers, followed closely by LG Chem. The top five filers together account for 24% of the combined patent records of the hundred largest filers, signaling moderate concentration with meaningful room for challengers.

The tier gap between the top two applicants (78 and 76 patent records respectively) and the third and fourth (55 each) is relatively narrow, indicating competitive parity across the leading group rather than a single dominant incumbent. Beyond the top ten, activity fragments across Chinese universities and domestic manufacturers.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Nitto Denko Corporation78
2LG Chem Ltd76
3NanoH2O Inc55
4Toray Advanced Materials Korea Inc55
5EI DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO54
6Hydranautics46
7Saehan Industries Co Ltd46
8NanoH2O Co Ltd46
9Dow Global Technologies LLC43
10LG NanoH2O Inc43
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11The Dow Chemical Company40
12Zhejiang University of Technology35
13Vontron Technology Co Ltd27
14FilmTec Corporation26
15Wanhua Chemical Group Co Ltd22
16Tianjin Polytechnic University19
17Hunan Keensen Technology Co Ltd19
18Tianjin University19
19BL Technology Inc18
20Zhejiang University16
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leaders’ positions reflect deep, sustained programs in polyamide thin-film composite membrane chemistry. Their breadth across B01D subclasses — membrane materials, configurations, and process operations — suggests they have built interlocking portfolios that create meaningful freedom-to-operate barriers for late entrants targeting mainstream polyamide chemistry.

Filing counts for 2025 and 2026 are materially understated due to the 18–24 month patent publication lag and should not be read as a slowdown. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Annual filings are rising and separation-process chemistry dominates the mix

The trend chart captures yearly filing volume from 2017 through 2026, while the technology-composition chart shows how activity is distributed across IPC classes. Together they reveal a field with rising output concentrated almost entirely in filtration and polymer chemistry.

Annual filing trend

Filings held in the 61–65 range from 2017 to 2019, dipped in 2020, then recovered through 2021–2024 and reached 81 records in 2024. The 2025 figure (98 records) and the 2026 figure (15 records) are heavily understated by publication lag and should be treated as floors, not peaks. On a multi-year basis the field is still expanding, consistent with a 10% recent growth rate.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 98 in 2025.612017612018652019452020772021632022612023812024982025152026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B01D (separation processes including filtration) overwhelmingly dominates the IPC mix, followed distantly by C02F (water and wastewater treatment) and C08G (condensation polymers). The long tail of lower-share classes — B05D (coating processes), B01J (chemical and physical processes), C07C (acyclic compounds) — represents adjacent technical territory with comparatively sparse coverage, pointing to potential areas where differentiated approaches could find room.

Technology compositionB01D · Separation processes (filtration etc.) leads with 1,565; C02F · Water & wastewater treatment 481.B01D · Separation proces…1,565C02F · Water & wastewate…481C08G · Condensation poly…146C08J · Polymer processin…102C07C · Acyclic & carbocy…45B05D · Coating processes33B01J · Chemical/physical…23C07B · General organic c…20↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US12157092B1Published 2024-12-03

Seawater desalination reverse osmosis membrane wit…

China Agricultural University

A method for creating a seawater desalination reverse osmosis membrane that excels in both water flux and boron removal. The method utilizes the abundant and reactive amino groups of carbon nitride in an interfacial polymerization reaction to enhance the membrane’s structure. The unique pore and interlayer structure of carbon nitride is employed to modify… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Interfacially synthesized reverse osmosis membrane1,162
2Composite membrane and method for making the same324
3Composite membrane and method for making the same279
4Reverse osmosis membrane237
5Novel polyamide reverse osmosis membranes233
6Highly permeable composite reverse osmosis membran…221
7Interfacially synthesized reverse osmosis membrane…219
8Polyamide membranes useful for water softening219

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

Four structural dimensions — lifecycle stage, concentration, collaboration patterns, and geographic reach — frame how new entrants and existing players should position their RO membrane surface engineering programs.

Growth

Growth stage with rising annual volume

The lifecycle evidence classifies this field as Growth, with annual filings still rising and the most recent years understated by publication lag. A 10% recent growth rate confirms the field has not yet entered a consolidation or maturity plateau. R&D investment can still establish meaningful positions, though core polyamide chemistry is heavily covered by the leading incumbents.

Lifecycle: Growth
Concentration

Moderate concentration with a competitive top tier

The top five filers hold 24% of combined patent records among the hundred largest filers, and the gap between the first and fifth ranked applicants is modest. This structure means no single player has locked up the field, but the leading cluster — Nitto Denko, LG Chem, NanoH2O, Toray Advanced Materials Korea, and DuPont — has deep, overlapping coverage of mainstream membrane separation subclasses. Differentiation through adjacent chemistry or novel surface modification routes is a more viable entry path than direct competition on core polyamide formulations.

Moderate concentration
Collaboration

LG Chem–LG NanoH2O and Nitto–Hydranautics are the most active co-filer pairs

The strongest co-filing relationship in the evidence is between LG Chem and LG NanoH2O, with 21 jointly filed patent records, reflecting the integration of NanoH2O’s nanocomposite membrane technology into LG Chem’s portfolio. Nitto Denko and Hydranautics follow with 15 co-filed records, and Dow Chemical and FilmTec account for 10, again reflecting corporate family ties. LG Chem and Korea University Research and Business Foundation have 6 co-filed records, the only significant industry–academic pairing in the evidence.

Corporate ecosystem
Geography

China is the primary prosecution jurisdiction; the US and EPO provide broad international coverage

China accounts for the largest number of patent records in the dataset, followed by the United States and EPO. South Korea and WIPO (PCT) also carry significant volumes, reflecting the Korean origins of several leading applicants. Japan, Canada, and Australia round out meaningful secondary markets. Emerging-market jurisdictions such as India, Israel, and Singapore have modest but non-trivial coverage, suggesting selective international filing strategies focused on key desalination and water-treatment markets.

China-led, global spread
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
LG Chem LtdLG NanoH2O Inc21
Nitto Denko CorporationHydranautics15
The Dow Chemical CompanyFilmTec Corporation10
LG Chem LtdKorea University Research and Business Foundation6

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Jurisdiction counts are at the patent-record level and reflect prosecution footprint across the top filers.Explore insights →
Leaders

Nitto Denko and LG Chem lead through deep B01D coverage and affiliated-entity portfolios

Both top-ranked applicants concentrate their technology focus entirely within B01D separation-process subclasses — membrane materials (B01D71), membrane configurations (B01D69), and membrane operations (B01D61/B01D67) — making them direct strategic competitors across the full surface engineering workflow.

Leader · Nitto Denko Corporation

Nitto Denko Corporation

Nitto Denko holds the top-ranked position with 78 patent records. Its technology focus spans membrane configurations (B01D69, 65 records), membrane materials (B01D71, 58 records), and membrane manufacturing processes (B01D67, 38 records), indicating full-stack coverage from polymer selection through fabrication. Its affiliated entity Hydranautics contributes an additional 46 patent records with a parallel B01D focus and 15 co-filed records, substantially amplifying Nitto’s effective portfolio footprint. Momentum data flags Nitto Denko as a new entrant in the most recent period — likely reflecting a reorganization or entity reclassification rather than a genuinely new market presence.

78 patent records
Challenger · LG Chem Ltd

LG Chem Ltd

LG Chem ranks second with 76 patent records and holds the heaviest weighting in B01D71 (membrane materials, 106 records across its own filings), followed by B01D69 (96 records) and B01D61 (84 records). When its affiliated entities LG NanoH2O (43 records) and the historical NanoH2O Inc (55 records) and NanoH2O Co Ltd (46 records) are considered alongside its 21 co-filed records with LG NanoH2O, LG Chem’s combined ecosystem represents the field’s largest coordinated portfolio. Its nanocomposite membrane lineage — acquired through NanoH2O — gives it a distinct technical identity within the mainstream polyamide surface engineering space.

76 patent records
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all 100 applicants, including Chinese universities, specialty material companies, and new entrants.
Vontron Technology Co LtdWanhua Chemical Group Co Ltd+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Nitto Denko Corporation1▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Patent record counts are drawn from the top-100 applicant ranking; affiliated-entity counts are independent figures from the same ranking.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches in polymer processing and coating technology

Several IPC classes sit adjacent to the dominant B01D core but carry comparatively sparse patent coverage. These branches are observations of relative sparsity; only those with plausible technical value and a realistic entry path are framed as potential opportunities.

B05D · Coating processes

With only 33 patent records against more than 1,500 in B01D, coating process methodology is notably sparse relative to the volume of surface modification claimed in the dominant class. Surface grafting, layer-by-layer deposition, and atmospheric plasma coating for fouling resistance are established laboratory techniques with commercial relevance, yet the patent record in B05D for RO membrane contexts is thin. An entrant with process-equipment or surface-chemistry expertise could establish differentiated positions in controlled thin-film deposition routes without directly colliding with the incumbent polyamide formulation portfolios.

Search this in Eureka →

C08J · Polymer processing and solutions

C08J carries 102 patent records — a secondary volume relative to B01D but modest for a class directly relevant to membrane casting, crosslinking control, and solvent-exchange processing. As fabrication precision becomes a performance differentiator, the chemistry of polymer solution preparation and post-treatment processing represents an under-documented technical axis. Academic filers such as Zhejiang University of Technology and Tianjin University are active in polymer membrane formulation, suggesting that industry players willing to collaborate with academic groups could accelerate position-building in this branch.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See relative coverage density across all IPC branches, with entry-path analysis and competitor overlap scores.
C07C · Acyclic and carbocyclic compounds (monomer chemistry)B01J · Chemical and physical processes and catalysis+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch counts are patent-record-level observations of relative filing density within the top-100 applicant corpus.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ across B01D membrane subclasses

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerB01D 71 · Separation processes (filtration etc.)B01D 69 · Separation processes (filtration etc.)B01D 67 · Separation processes (filtration etc.)B01D 61 · Separation processes (filtration etc.)C02F 1 · Water & wastewater treatment
LG Chem LtdStrong · 106Strong · 96Moderate · 46Strong · 84Moderate · 36
Nitto Denko CorporationStrong · 58Strong · 65Strong · 38Strong · 34Moderate · 17
NanoH2O IncStrong · 52Strong · 37Moderate · 20Strong · 34Absent
Saehan Industries Co LtdStrong · 48Strong · 45Moderate · 21Moderate · 15Moderate · 12
Zhejiang University of TechnologyStrong · 32Strong · 30Strong · 34Strong · 30Moderate · 15
E I du Pont de Nemours and CompanyStrong · 49Strong · 42AbsentModerate · 24Absent
HydranauticsStrong · 41Strong · 37Moderate · 17AbsentModerate · 15
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own RO membrane surface engineering landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.