Book a demo

Road Maintenance Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Road Maintenance Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/road-maintenance-and-crack-sealing-equipment-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Road Construction Machinery
Road Maintenance and Crack Sealing Equipment Patents
  • A single leader holds 10 of the ranked records, while the remaining nine assignees each hold a handful — a long tail rather than a contested middle.
  • Filing peaked in 2023 at 6 records, with 2026 activity still partial and understated because of publication lag.
  • Aggregate spreading and pothole-sensing claims dominate citation counts, with the oldest spreader patent cited 100 times — a strong signal of how foundational that mechanical approach remains.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
21
Published Records
US
Leading Jurisdiction
10
Active Filers Ranked
2023
Peak Filing Year

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This review covers 21 published patent records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine crack sealing, pothole repair or chip sealing methods with control elements such as sealant melting temperature, crack routing, spray bar control, aggregate spreading or infrared heating. The scope spans mechanical spreading equipment, thermal sealant application, and the sensing and control systems increasingly layered on top of both.

Records concentrate heavily in road and pavement engineering, with a smaller but persistent presence in sensing, control and data-processing classes — a sign that mechanical spreading and thermal application remain the physical core of the field, while the newer claims are increasingly about detection and automated control layered onto that core.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1IDAHO ASPHALT SUPPLY INC10
  2. 2University of Maryland5
  3. 3TAYLOR BENJAMIN SHIELDS2
  4. 4PETROW WILLIAM2
  5. 5LIMOGE EDWARD JOSEPH2
  6. 6GARLAND STEPHEN DOUGLAS2
  7. 7CRONIN JOHN EDWARD2
  8. 8HILL FRANCIS K1
  9. 9HEATWURX1
  10. 10GOVIND BAJAJ1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Road Maintenance and Crack Sealing Equipment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 21-record set: the pace at which filings have arrived since 2017, and how those filings distribute across IPC subclasses.

Filing activity, 2017–2026

Filings rose from 3 in 2017 to a peak of 6 in 2023, before easing toward a partial 2026 count of 1. With fewer than four complete years available once publication lag is factored in, no reliable growth rate can be stated from this trend alone.

Filing activity, 2017–2026023563201720182019202020212022620232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

E01C (roads and pavements) covers 71.4% of the 21 records in scope, confirming this is fundamentally a mechanical and civil-engineering field. B01L and C12Q each reach 23.8%, reflecting a smaller cluster of records that pull in lab-apparatus and enzyme/DNA-testing classifications — likely incidental to broader multi-purpose filings rather than a distinct repair technology. G05D (non-electric control) at 19.0% and G06Q/G16B at 14.3% each point to a real but still modest layer of automated control and data-processing claims sitting on top of the mechanical base.

IPC subclass compositionE01C · Roads & pavements1571.4%B01L · Lab apparatus523.8%C12Q · Measuring & testing involving …523.8%G05D · Control of non-electric variab…419.0%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…314.3%G16B · Bioinformatics314.3%G06F · Electric digital data processi…29.5%A01C · Planting & sowing14.8%Other628.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 21 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Road Maintenance and Crack Sealing Equipment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Road Maintenance and Crack Sealing Equipment with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about road maintenance and crack sealing equipment and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited records in this field

Representative Filing
US6161986A2000-12-19

Aggregate spreading apparatus and methods (US6161986A)

GEFFS MANUFACTURING, INC., A CORP. OF IDAHO

An aggregate spreader for spreading a layer of loose aggregate onto a road surface includes a first hopper for receiving the loose aggregate, a plurality of gates or other suitable means associated with the first hopper for dispensing the loose aggregate onto the road surface, a plurality of sensors or other suitable means for sensing characteristics of the road surface, and an electronic controller or other means responsive to the sensors or sensing means and operably associated with the gates or dispensing means for controlling the placement of the layer of loose aggregate onto the road surface. In the preferred embodiment, each of the gates is independently controllable.Filed by Geffs Manufacturing, Inc., a corp. of Idaho; granted 2000-12-19.

US6161986A — patent drawing 1US6161986A — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-cited patents in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5234128AAggregate material spreader100
2US20140196529A1System and method for sensing and managing pothole location and pothole characteristics40
3US6161986AAggregate spreading apparatus and methods33
4US9416499B2System and method for sensing and managing pothole location and pothole characteristics30
5US20170297029A1Integrated thermoplastic chip for rapid PCR and hrma10
6US20200338562A1Integrated thermoplastic chip for rapid PCR and hrma2
7US10710083B2Integrated thermoplastic chip for rapid PCR and HRMA1
8WO2014113394A1Sensing and managing pothole location and characteristics1

Citation counts inside this corpus favour older filings; treat them as a measure of influence on later filers, not of current commercial relevance.

Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (8 of 8 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Road Maintenance and Crack Sealing Equipment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say

Three patterns stand out once the ranking, the trend line and the citation table are read together.

Concentration
10 vs 2
leader's records vs fifth-place count

One assignee dominates the ranked list

The leading assignee holds 10 of the records in the ranking, while fifth place holds only 2 and tenth place holds 1. That gap between first and everyone else is a long tail, not a competitive cluster — most other filers appear once or twice rather than building a sustained portfolio.

Assignee ranking, 10 companies
Momentum
6 in 2023
peak-year filings

Activity has already peaked and cooled

Filings climbed from 3 in 2017 to a peak of 6 in 2023, then eased. The 2026 figure of 1 is partial by definition — publication lag of roughly 18 months means recent activity is undercounted, not necessarily absent.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Citation weight
100 citations
on the oldest spreader patent

Mechanical spreading claims anchor the field

The most-cited record in scope, an aggregate material spreader, carries 100 citations — far ahead of the pothole-sensing records that follow it. That weight sits on older, foundational mechanical claims rather than on the newer sensing and control layer.

Most-cited records table
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to road maintenance and crack sealing equipment, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Co-filing pattern
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
TAYLOR BENJAMIN SHIELDSPETROW WILLIAM2
TAYLOR BENJAMIN SHIELDSLIMOGE EDWARD JOSEPH2
TAYLOR BENJAMIN SHIELDSGARLAND STEPHEN DOUGLAS2
TAYLOR BENJAMIN SHIELDSCRONIN JOHN EDWARD2
PETROW WILLIAMLIMOGE EDWARD JOSEPH2
PETROW WILLIAMGARLAND STEPHEN DOUGLAS2
PETROW WILLIAMCRONIN JOHN EDWARD2
LIMOGE EDWARD JOSEPHGARLAND STEPHEN DOUGLAS2

Ten co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, with the strongest links all centred on one individual inventor pairing with three separate collaborators twice each — a small, tightly linked inventor group rather than a broad industry consortium.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Road Maintenance and Crack Sealing Equipment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the claims

The ranking returned by this dataset covers 10 assignees, from a single leader with a double-digit count down to filers holding a single record. Read it as a map of who has staked mechanical ground versus who filed once and moved on.

Leader
10 records
of the ranked total

A single company sets the pace

One assignee holds 10 records in the ranking, well clear of the rest. Its recent-year momentum shows 1 filing in the latest year, down 50% year-on-year — still active, but slowing from an earlier pace.

Idaho Asphalt Supply Inc
Mid-tier
2 records
fifth-place count

A thin middle tier

Fifth place in the ranking holds only 2 records, and most of the tail sits at 1. This is a field where a handful of individual inventors and small entities filed once or twice rather than building sustained portfolios.

Ranked assignees, positions 5-10
Inventor cluster
10 pairs
co-assignee pairings

A tight inventor group drives co-filing

The strongest co-assignee links all run through one individual inventor, paired twice each with three separate collaborators. That points to a small, personally-connected filing group rather than corporate joint ventures.

Co-assignee pairs
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth watching
Sub-areas where filing density is thin relative to the core mechanical and thermal claims
automated spray bar rate controlinfrared sealant temperature feedback loopsreal-time crack-routing path planningpothole geolocation data integrationemulsion spray rate calibration sensors
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
IDAHO ASPHALT SUPPLY INC1-50%
University of Maryland0
TAYLOR BENJAMIN SHIELDS0
PETROW WILLIAM0
LIMOGE EDWARD JOSEPH0
GARLAND STEPHEN DOUGLAS0
CRONIN JOHN EDWARD0
HILL FRANCIS K0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Road Maintenance and Crack Sealing Equipment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The ranking and trend data point to specific next steps depending on whether you are filing, licensing or scoping a design-around.

Map the control-layer white space

G05D, G06Q and G16B classes together sit well under E01C's share, suggesting automated control and data-processing claims layered on spreading and sealing hardware remain comparatively open.

Explore white space in Eureka

Watch the leader's next move

The top assignee's filing pace has slowed year-on-year even while it holds the largest share of the ranking — worth tracking whether that reflects portfolio maturity or a shift toward trade secrecy.

Track assignee activity in Eureka

Check citation-anchored claims before filing

The two most-cited records concern aggregate spreading and pothole sensing; any new mechanical spreader or sensing claim should be checked against these first.

Run a citation check in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Road Maintenance and Crack Sealing Equipment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Road Maintenance and Crack Sealing Equipment covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Road Maintenance and Crack Sealing Equipment in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole road maintenance and crack sealing equipment corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.