Book a demo

Robot Condition Monitoring Patent Snapshot 2026

Robot Condition Monitoring Patent Snapshot 2026
Evidence Snapshot
Robot Condition Monitoring Patent Snapshot in 2026

The robot condition monitoring patent space is heavily concentrated, with ABB-affiliated entities holding the majority of the top-ranked positions and Europe (EPO) as the primary filing jurisdiction. Annual volume peaked in 2021 and has since eased, signalling a maturing field with selective new entrants beginning to emerge.

36
Patent families in scope
62%
Top visible applicants share
-33%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
Europe (EPO)
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

ABB commands the field; concentration among the top five filers is pronounced

ABB Research Ltd leads the applicant ranking with 7 patent families, followed closely by ABB (Schweiz) AG with 6 and Lam Research Corporation with 5. The top three filers are all either ABB entities or adjacent industrial automation players, establishing a clear first tier.

The top five filers account for 62% of the combined total across the ranked applicants visible in this query, indicating a strongly consolidated visible assignee structure. The gap between the first tier and the remaining applicants — each holding only one or two patent families — is substantial, leaving limited mid-tier competition.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1ABB Research Ltd7
2ABB (Schweiz) AG6
3Lam Research Corporation5
4ABB AG (Germany)3
5Yonsei University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation2
6Nanyang Technological University1
7SCHAEFFLER TECHNOLOGIES AG & CO KG1
8Tianjin Saiwei Industrial Technology Co Ltd1
9Seiko Epson Corporation1
10Chongqing Vocational College of Transportation1
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11GUANGDONG MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL COLLEGE1
12NOIDA INST OF ENG & TECH1
13Panasonic Holdings Corporation1
14LS Electric Co Ltd1
15RNS Institute of Technology1
16Central South University1
17Chongqing Yujiao Automation Technology Co Ltd1
18Prasanna Kumar Mallappa1
19Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

ABB’s multi-entity presence (ABB Research Ltd, ABB (Schweiz) AG, and ABB AG Germany) suggests coordinated portfolio building across group subsidiaries, effectively reinforcing the lead position. For new entrants or challengers, competing head-on with ABB’s established base would require differentiated technical positioning rather than volume alone.

The most recent 18–24 months of filing data are subject to publication lag and likely under-represent true activity levels; the apparent dip after 2021 should be interpreted with this in mind. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

A 2021 filing spike subsides; manipulator technology dominates the IPC mix

The annual filing trend reveals a sharp 2021 peak followed by reduced activity, while the technology composition is dominated by manipulator and control-systems classes with AI-related branches occupying a smaller but growing share.

Annual filing trend

Filings were negligible before 2018, ramped through 2019–2021, and hit a clear peak of 12 families in 2021 before easing. Years 2024–2025 show partial counts attributable to publication lag and should not be read as confirming a continued decline.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 12 in 2021.020172201842019220201220214202222023620244202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B25J (Manipulators and robots) overwhelmingly is visible in the IPC composition, followed by G05B (Control and regulating systems) and G06N (AI-based computing). The long tail of single-record branches — spanning measurement, materials testing, power systems, and communications — signals exploratory work at the technology frontier but has not yet consolidated into significant filing clusters.

Technology compositionB25J · Manipulators & robots leads with 47; G05B · Control & regulating systems 12.B25J · Manipulators & ro…47G05B · Control & regulat…12G06N · Computing based o…7G06F · Electric digital …3G06Q · Business, commerc…2B23K · Welding, solderin…1G01B · Measuring length …1G01D · Measuring (genera…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
EP1607192B1Published 2012-10-10

Verfahren und System zur Verschleissabschätzung vo…

Abb AG

Die Erfindung betrifft ein Verfahren zur Verschleißermittlung von Achsen eines Roboterarmes eines Industrieroboters, wobei ein Drehmomentenverlauf (54, 56, 58) an wenigstens einer Achse während wenigstens eines Arbeitszyklus des Industrieroboters zur Abschätzung herangezogen wird. Der Drehmomentenverlauf (54, 56, 58) wird auf Drehmomentenverlaufsabschnitte… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Verfahren und System zur Verschleissabschätzung vo… — patent drawingVerfahren und System zur Verschleissabschätzung vo… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1A robot system for anomaly detection24
2工业机器人预测性维护管理方法及系统17
3A robot controller with integrated logic functiona…14
4A robot system and a method for monitoring a robot…14
5Obtaining the gear stiffness of a robot joint gear…14
6Obtaining the gear stiffness of a robot joint gear…13
7Collaborative robot system on a mobile cart with a…11
8Condition monitoring of an industrial robot10

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · ABB Research Ltd

ABB Research Ltd

ABB Research Ltd holds 7 patent families — the largest single-applicant count in scope — focused primarily on B25J (Manipulators and robots). When combined with the 6 families held by ABB (Schweiz) AG and 3 by ABB AG Germany, the ABB group’s aggregate position is commanding. ABB (Schweiz) AG carries a new-entrant momentum signal in the recent period, indicating the group’s filing activity is shifting toward the Swiss entity. The collaboration evidence further identifies ABB (Schweiz) AG as the hub of the most active co-inventor relationships.

patent families: 7
Challenger · Lam Research Corporation

Lam Research Corporation

Lam Research Corporation holds 5 patent families and carries a new-entrant momentum trend, meaning it had no prior-period filings in this corpus before its recent activity. Its technical focus spans three B25J sub-classes — B25J 11, B25J 5, and B25J 9 — covering specialized and mobile manipulator configurations, which differ from ABB’s more diagnostics-oriented positioning. This breadth across manipulator sub-types, combined with new-entrant status, marks Lam as the most technically distinct challenger in the current ranking.

patent families: 5
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Schaeffler Technologies AG & Co KGYonsei University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.