Book a demo

Robot In-Process Sensing Patent Landscape 2026

Robot In-Process Sensing Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
Robot In-Process Sensing Patent Landscape in 2026

The robot in-process sensing field is in a confirmed growth stage, with a 42% rise in recent filings driven by medical robotics and industrial manipulator applications. KB Medical SA holds the leading position, but the field is fragmented across medical, semiconductor, and manufacturing domains, leaving meaningful room for differentiated entry.

97
Patent families in scope
31%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+42%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

KB Medical SA leads a fragmented, cross-domain field

KB Medical SA occupies the top position with 16 patent records, followed by Veebot Systems Inc at 13 and a cluster of applicants — Machina Labs Inc, ABB (Switzerland) AG, and Veebot LLC — each holding 6 records. The top five filers collectively account for 31% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, indicating moderate concentration for a field of this size.

A clear two-tier structure is visible: KB Medical SA and Veebot Systems Inc form a leading pair with a noticeable gap over the next tier, which is itself tightly bunched. Below the top six, patent records drop rapidly to single digits, suggesting that most participants are early-stage or opportunistic filers rather than sustained investors.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1KB Medical SA16
2Veebot Systems Inc13
3Machina Labs Inc6
4ABB (Switzerland) AG6
5Veebot LLC6
6Applied Materials Inc4
7Changsha Yihuang Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.3
8Chengdu Genchi Technology Co., Ltd.3
9Hunan Yikong Education Technology Co., Ltd.3
10Institute of Machinery Manufacturing Technology, China Academy of Engineering Physics2
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11LIUZHOU VOCATIONAL & TECHN COLLEGE2
12Zhuhai Xinke Automation Equipment Co., Ltd.2
13Hefei Xinyihua Intelligent Machine Co., Ltd.2
14Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (TSMC)2
15POHANG IRON & STEEL CO LTD2
16Sichuan University2
17Maanshan Yuanrong Robot Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd.1
18Hangzhou Zhiku Yunze Network Technology Co., Ltd.1
19SAVEETHA INST OF MEDICAL & TECH SCI1
20Chuzhou University1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leaders’ positions reflect divergent strategic bets — KB Medical SA and the Veebot entities focus almost exclusively on surgical and diagnostic guidance, while Machina Labs Inc and ABB (Switzerland) AG are oriented toward industrial manipulator sensing. This domain split means the apparent market leader in one application vertical does not dominate another.

The most recent 18–24 months of filing data are subject to publication lag and will undercount actual activity; growth signals from 20242025 should be interpreted with that in mind. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Filing volume is rising and technology coverage spans surgical, industrial, and AI branches

Two charts together show that annual filing volume has grown steadily since 2017 and that the technology base spans a broad but uneven set of IPC classes. Reading them together helps identify where momentum and coverage are aligned versus where a branch is large but filing activity is thin.

Annual filing trend

Annual filings grew from 5 records in 2017 to a visible run-rate increase through 2024–2025. The 2025 figure of 20 records is the highest in the dataset but should be read as a floor given publication lag. The growth phase is well-established across the multi-year window, with no evidence of a structural plateau in earlier completed years.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 20 in 2025.5201792018520198202013202111202211202315202420202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B25J (Manipulators and Robots) and A61B (Diagnosis and Surgery) together account for the two largest branches, reflecting the dual industrial-and-medical character of in-process sensing. G05B (Control and Regulating Systems), G06N (AI Models), and A61M (Devices for Body Fluids) each hold meaningful shares but remain relatively underserved relative to the leading pair, marking them as adjacencies worth monitoring.

Technology compositionB25J · Manipulators & robots leads with 46; A61B · Diagnosis & surgery 40.B25J · Manipulators & ro…46A61B · Diagnosis & surgery40G05B · Control & regulat…14A61M · Devices for body …12G06N · Computing based o…12G06F · Electric digital …11H01L · Semiconductor dev…5G06Q · Business, commerc…4↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US5737500APublished 1998-04-07

Mobile dexterous seven degree of freedom robot arm…

California Institute Of Technology

The present invention is a mobile redundant dexterous manipulator with a seven-degree-of-freedom robot arm mounted on a 1 degree-of-freedom mobile platform with a six-degree-of freedom end effector including a real-time control system with multiple modes of operation. The manipulator-plus-platform system has two degrees-of-redundancy for the task of hand… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Mobile dexterous seven degree of freedom robot arm… — patent drawingMobile dexterous seven degree of freedom robot arm… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Mobile dexterous seven degree of freedom robot arm…588
2Apparatus, systems, and methods for precise guidan…442
3Systems and methods for autonomous intravenous nee…413
4Systems and methods for autonomous intravenous nee…184
5Apparatus and systems for precise guidance of surg…175
6Apparatus, systems, and methods for precise guidan…154
7Systems and methods for autonomous intravenous nee…82
8Apparatus, systems, and methods for precise guidan…77

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

Four lenses — maturity, concentration, collaboration, and geography — together characterize where the field is heading and where entry or differentiation is most tractable. Each card draws directly from filing and structural evidence.

Growth

Growth stage with rising annual volume

The lifecycle evidence classifies robot in-process sensing as a Growth-stage field, with annual filings still rising and the most recent years understated by publication lag. The 42% recent growth figure confirms that this is not a mature, saturated domain. Teams entering now can still establish foundational positions in sub-domains that have not yet attracted concentrated filers.

Growth Stage
Concentration

Moderate top-tier concentration, thin mid-field

The top five filers hold 31% of the hundred largest filers’ combined patent records, a moderate concentration level. The rapid drop-off below the top six applicants indicates that the mid-field is thin — most secondary filers hold only one or two records. This structure makes it relatively straightforward for a committed entrant to claim a top-ten position within a single product cycle.

Moderate Concentration
Collaboration

One documented co-filing pair; ecosystem activity is nascent

The only confirmed co-applicant relationship in evidence is between Changsha Yihuang Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. and Hunan Yikong Education Technology Co., Ltd., which jointly filed 3 patent records. Both are Chinese education-technology entities, suggesting their collaboration targets training and demonstration robotics rather than core in-process sensing. No cross-sector or cross-border co-filing pairs appear in the evidence, indicating that ecosystem collaboration remains nascent.

Nascent Collaboration
Geography

China dominates filings; the US is the primary secondary jurisdiction

China accounts for 61 patent records, establishing it as the primary filing jurisdiction by a wide margin. The United States follows at 35 records, and Europe (EPO) trails at 12. WIPO PCT and India each register 6 records, with South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and a handful of others showing minimal presence. Teams seeking cross-border protection should prioritize a China-plus-US foundation, with EPO as a natural third pillar.

China-Led Geography
Patsnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Changsha Yihuang Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.Hunan Yikong Education Technology Co., Ltd.3

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Card data derived from lifecycle, concentration, collaboration, and jurisdiction evidence in the landscaped corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

KB Medical SA and Machina Labs Inc represent divergent sensing strategies

The leading filers split clearly between medical-robotics guidance and industrial-manipulator sensing, making direct head-to-head competition less relevant than their respective sub-domain depths. Momentum data highlights which players entered the landscape most recently.

Leader · KB Medical SA

KB Medical SA

KB Medical SA holds 16 patent records, the largest position in the corpus. Its technology emphasis is tightly concentrated in A61B 34 (surgical robotics guidance, 11 records) and A61B 90 (surgical instruments with sensing, 10 records), with a smaller A61B 17 footprint (3 records). This depth in surgical navigation and intraoperative sensing makes KB Medical SA the dominant filer in the medical sub-domain. No momentum shift is recorded in the recent window — its position reflects an established, sustained filing program rather than a new-entrant surge.

patent records: 16
Challenger · Machina Labs Inc

Machina Labs Inc

Machina Labs Inc holds 6 patent records and is flagged as a new entrant in the momentum data, meaning its entire recorded position was established in the recent filing window. Its focus is squarely industrial: B25J 11 (specialized manipulators, 6 records), B25J 13 (manipulator control by sensing, 4 records), and B25J 9 (manipulator arms, 4 records). This profile — recent, concentrated, and in an underserved industrial branch — positions Machina Labs as the most watch-worthy challenger for teams working on manufacturing-side in-process sensing.

patent records: 6
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles, technology emphasis, and momentum signals for all applicants in the landscaped corpus.
ABB (Switzerland) AGApplied Materials Inc+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Veebot Systems Inc2▲ new entrant
Machina Labs Inc6▲ new entrant
Applied Materials Inc4▲ new entrant
Changsha Yihuang Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.3▲ new entrant
Hunan Yikong Education Technology Co., Ltd.3▲ new entrant
POSCO (Pohang Iron and Steel Co., Ltd.)2▲ new entrant
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Ranking and technology emphasis are drawn from the top-100 applicant list and IPC focus data in the evidence.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Control systems, AI models, and semiconductor sensing are under-served adjacencies

Several IPC branches appear in the corpus at counts that are small relative to the dominant B25J and A61B classes, yet they represent technically plausible extensions of in-process sensing. These are observations of relative sparsity; whether they constitute investable opportunities depends on a team’s existing capability base.

G06N · AI-Driven Sensing Models

G06N (Computing Based on AI Models) registers 12 patent records — just 6% of the branch-level count — despite AI inference being increasingly central to in-process sensing decisions such as anomaly detection, adaptive control, and sensor fusion. Applied Materials Inc is the only top-ten filer with a documented AI-model focus (G06N 20, 4 records), and it entered as a new entrant. For teams with existing ML-for-robotics capability, this branch offers a plausible entry path: filing positions are sparse, the technical value of closing the loop between sensing and AI inference is well-established, and no incumbent has yet consolidated coverage.

Search this in Eureka →

G05B · Real-Time Control and Regulating Systems

G05B (Control and Regulating Systems) holds 14 patent records, representing 7% of branch-level activity, despite control-loop integration being a foundational requirement for in-process sensing to influence robot behavior. The branch’s relative sparsity suggests that most current filers treat sensing and control as separate inventive steps rather than integrated systems. A team that can claim tightly coupled sensing-to-actuation architectures — particularly for closed-loop feedback in surgical or precision-manufacturing contexts — faces limited incumbent coverage in this branch and would address a technically grounded gap.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See branch-level filing density, representative patents, and entry-path analysis for all adjacencies identified in the corpus.
H01L · Semiconductor in-process sensingA61M · Fluid delivery with robotic sensing+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Branch counts are at the patent-record level and reflect relative filing density within the landscaped corpus, not absolute market size.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading filers differ by technology route

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerB25J 9 · Manipulators & robotsA61B 34 · Diagnosis & surgeryA61B 90 · Diagnosis & surgeryA61B 5 · Diagnosis & surgeryB25J 19 · Manipulators & robots
Veebot Systems IncAbsentStrong · 11Strong · 7Strong · 11Absent
KB Medical SAAbsentStrong · 11Strong · 10AbsentAbsent
Veebot LLCAbsentModerate · 2AbsentStrong · 5Absent
ABB (Switzerland) AGStrong · 6AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
Machina Labs IncStrong · 4AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
Institute of Machinery Manufacturing Technology, China Academy of Engineering PhysicsStrong · 2AbsentAbsentAbsentStrong · 2
Nanjing Yusheng Robot Technology Co., Ltd.Strong · 2AbsentAbsentAbsentStrong · 2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.