Book a demo

Robot Interoperability Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Robot Interoperability Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/robot-interoperability-and-fleet-interface-standards-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Material Handling & Warehousing
Robot Fleet Interoperability and Interface Standard Patents
  • Filings peaked in 2017 at 158 and have declined since, with 2022 sitting at the 95-record midpoint — this is a maturing claim space, not a growing one.
  • Elevator and door integration dominates the IPC mix, with B66B (lifts & escalators) present in 25.9% of the 1,906 records, well ahead of any digital-control class.
  • No single filer controls the field, the top 5 assignees combined hold just 7.0% of all 1,906 records, and the leader alone accounts for 32 of them.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,906
Published Records
7%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-21%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
CN
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (96 records) with 2024 (76) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,906 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks patent activity at the boundary between mobile robot fleets and the fixed infrastructure they must interoperate with — elevators, doors, master control layers, coordinate frame alignment, and fault reporting. The search combines vendor-agnostic interface language with concrete integration points like elevator calls and door handshakes, rather than robotics broadly. That framing pulls in a large share of building-automation assignees alongside robotics and telecom players, which explains why lift and escalator control shows up as the single largest technology class in the set.

The 1,906 records span 2015 through the 2026 cutoff, with China, the United States and the EPO as the largest receiving offices. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one or two years in any trend understate real filing activity.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015–2026
  1. 1XJ SCHINDLER XUCHANG ELEVATOR32
  2. 2ZTE CORP29
  3. 3INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS INC27
  4. 4NAT OILWELL VARCO NORMAY AS26
  5. 5TAE TECHNOLOGIES INC20
  6. 6GUANGZHOU GUANGRI ELEVATOR IND17
  7. 7AUTOSTORE TECH AS17
  8. 8TEXACO DEV CORP16
  9. 9HITACHI BUILDING TECH GUANGZHOU CO LTD15
  10. 10GROTE IND INC14
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Robot Interoperability and Fleet Interface Standards covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,906 records: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Filings peaked in 2017 at 158 records and have trended down through the 2022 midpoint of 95, reaching 12 in the partial 2026 year. Read the tail end cautiously — publication lag means 2025 and 2026 will fill in further as more families publish.

Filing trend, 2017–2026050100150200158201720182019202020212022202320242025122026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

B66B (lifts & escalators) leads at 25.9% of the 1,906 records, roughly double the next tier of G06F (10.9%) and H04L (10.0%). Control-layer classes G05B and G05D, and connectivity classes H04N, H04W and H02J, sit in the 3–7% range each — a record can carry several classes, so these shares add to more than 100%.

IPC subclass compositionB66B · Lifts & escalators49425.9%G06F · Electric digital data processi…20710.9%H04L · Digital information transmissi…19010.0%G05B · Control & regulating systems1357.1%H04N · Pictorial communication (video…1125.9%H04W · Wireless communication networks1075.6%H02J · Power supply & grid systems764.0%G05D · Control of non-electric variab…643.4%Other1,56682.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,906 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Robot Interoperability and Fleet Interface Standards covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Robot Interoperability and Fleet Interface Standards with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about robot interoperability and fleet interface standards and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative filing and most-cited prior art

Representative Record
US20220317671A12022-10-06

On-board diagnostics device and system, and detection method and readable storage medium

ZTE CORPORATION

The filing describes a master control module that governs a controller, a selection module and multiple protocol transceivers, routing diagnostic data transceiving through whichever protocol transceiver the selection module activates. It frames diagnostics as a switchable, protocol-agnostic layer sitting above heterogeneous hardware interfaces rather than a fixed single-protocol stack.Filed by ZTE Corporation, published 2022-10-06 as US20220317671A1.

US20220317671A1 — patent drawing 1US20220317671A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6364888B1Alignment of master and slave in a minimally invasive surgical apparatus3,471
2US5761320AAudio distribution system having programmable zoning features1,650
3US5440644AAudio distribution system having programmable zoning features1,629
4US6418478B1Pipelined high speed data transfer mechanism1,356
5US5905442AMethod and apparatus for controlling and determining the status of electrical devices from remote locations1,283
6US6493608B1Aspects of a control system of a minimally invasive surgical apparatus882
7US6459175B1Universal power supply767
8US7907166B2Stereo telestration for robotic surgery721
9US5193110AIntegrated services platform for telephone communication system693
10US20030085621A1Power supply methods and configurations634

Citation counts favour older filings in any searched corpus; treat them as a signal of influence on subsequent filers, not as a ranking of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Robot Interoperability and Fleet Interface Standards covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about this field

Three patterns stand out once filing volume, technology mix and citation weight are laid side by side.

Filing momentum
158 → 12
2017 peak vs. latest partial year

The field has already crested

Filing volume peaked in 2017 and has fallen through the 2022 midpoint of 95 to a partial 12 in the most recent year. This reads as a maturing, well-explored problem space rather than an emerging one — new entrants are filing into territory that has already been substantially claimed.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Class concentration
25.9%
of records carry B66B

Elevator integration is the centre of gravity

Lifts and escalators (B66B) appear in over a quarter of the 1,906 records, roughly double the share of the next largest class. Anyone filing on robot-to-building handover claims is filing into the densest part of this landscape by default.

IPC subclass composition
Ownership spread
7.0%
top 5 assignees' combined share

No dominant gatekeeper

The five largest assignees hold only 7.0% of all 1,906 records between them, and the top 10 combined reach 11.2%. That is a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants rather than a market controlled by a handful of blocking portfolios.

Concentration, top 5 & top 10
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to robot interoperability and fleet interface standards, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Robot Interoperability and Fleet Interface Standards covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the room to move sits

The ranked leaders come from elevator manufacturing, telecom infrastructure and surgical robotics — a mix that reflects the search scope's overlap of building integration and vendor-agnostic control claims, not a single converged industry.

Leader
32
records

A modest single-digit-percent leader

The top-ranked assignee holds 32 of the 1,906 records — enough to lead the ranking but far short of the volume needed to foreclose the space. Recent-year momentum data shows several of the largest historical filers, including this one, recording zero filings in the latest year.

Assignee ranking, 100 companies
Mid-table
20 / 14
fifth- and tenth-place counts

A shallow drop-off past the leader

Fifth place holds 20 records and tenth place 14 — a gentle slope rather than a cliff. That shape favours new entrants: displacing any single mid-table assignee does not require matching a large blocking portfolio.

Assignee ranking, fifth and tenth place
Filing geography
1,020
China-origin records

China is the dominant receiving office

China accounts for 1,020 of the records in scope, more than three times the United States figure of 310. Europe (EPO), WIPO/PCT, the UK and India follow at smaller volumes, which matters for where freedom-to-operate searches should start.

Receiving offices
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas to watch
Branches adjacent to the dense elevator and control-layer core that carry comparatively little filing density in this dataset.
Coordinate frame alignment across heterogeneous fleetsUniform fault-reporting schemas for mixed-vendor robotsNon-elevator door handover protocolsCross-vendor common message set standardisationDiagnostics protocol switching layers
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
XJ Schindler Xuchang Elevator Co., Ltd.0
ZTE Corporation0
AutoStore Technology AS0
Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.0
TAE Technologies, Inc.0
AutoStore Technology AS0-100%
Guangzhou Guangri Elevator Industry Co., Ltd.0
Texaco Development Corporation0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Robot Interoperability and Fleet Interface Standards covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this next

The landscape points to a field with settled elevator-integration claims and comparatively open interoperability-layer claims.

Map freedom-to-operate against the B66B core

Any robot-to-elevator or robot-to-door handover claim should be checked against the dense B66B cluster first, since it carries the highest claim density in the dataset by a wide margin.

Explore the IPC breakdown in Eureka

Watch the flat-to-declining filing trend

With 2017's peak of 158 filings unmatched since and 2026 running at a partial 12, new filing strategy should account for a field that is being consolidated rather than expanded.

Track filing trends in Eureka

Test claims in the under-claimed branches

Coordinate frame alignment and uniform fault-reporting sit outside the dense elevator core and show thinner coverage in this dataset, making them worth a dedicated novelty search.

Run a white space search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Robot Interoperability and Fleet Interface Standards covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Robot Interoperability and Fleet Interface Standards covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Robot Interoperability and Fleet Interface Standards in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole robot interoperability and fleet interface standards corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.