Robot Interoperability Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
- Filings peaked in 2017 at 158 and have declined since, with 2022 sitting at the 95-record midpoint — this is a maturing claim space, not a growing one.
- Elevator and door integration dominates the IPC mix, with B66B (lifts & escalators) present in 25.9% of the 1,906 records, well ahead of any digital-control class.
- No single filer controls the field, the top 5 assignees combined hold just 7.0% of all 1,906 records, and the leader alone accounts for 32 of them.
Filing growth compares 2021 (96 records) with 2024 (76) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,906 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This dataset tracks patent activity at the boundary between mobile robot fleets and the fixed infrastructure they must interoperate with — elevators, doors, master control layers, coordinate frame alignment, and fault reporting. The search combines vendor-agnostic interface language with concrete integration points like elevator calls and door handshakes, rather than robotics broadly. That framing pulls in a large share of building-automation assignees alongside robotics and telecom players, which explains why lift and escalator control shows up as the single largest technology class in the set.
The 1,906 records span 2015 through the 2026 cutoff, with China, the United States and the EPO as the largest receiving offices. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one or two years in any trend understate real filing activity.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 1,906 records: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.
Filing trend, 2017–2026
Filings peaked in 2017 at 158 records and have trended down through the 2022 midpoint of 95, reaching 12 in the partial 2026 year. Read the tail end cautiously — publication lag means 2025 and 2026 will fill in further as more families publish.
IPC subclass composition
B66B (lifts & escalators) leads at 25.9% of the 1,906 records, roughly double the next tier of G06F (10.9%) and H04L (10.0%). Control-layer classes G05B and G05D, and connectivity classes H04N, H04W and H02J, sit in the 3–7% range each — a record can carry several classes, so these shares add to more than 100%.
Shares are the percentage of the 1,906 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Robot Interoperability and Fleet Interface Standards with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about robot interoperability and fleet interface standards and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaRepresentative filing and most-cited prior art
On-board diagnostics device and system, and detection method and readable storage medium
The filing describes a master control module that governs a controller, a selection module and multiple protocol transceivers, routing diagnostic data transceiving through whichever protocol transceiver the selection module activates. It frames diagnostics as a switchable, protocol-agnostic layer sitting above heterogeneous hardware interfaces rather than a fixed single-protocol stack.Filed by ZTE Corporation, published 2022-10-06 as US20220317671A1.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6364888B1 | Alignment of master and slave in a minimally invasive surgical apparatus | 3,471 |
| 2 | US5761320A | Audio distribution system having programmable zoning features | 1,650 |
| 3 | US5440644A | Audio distribution system having programmable zoning features | 1,629 |
| 4 | US6418478B1 | Pipelined high speed data transfer mechanism | 1,356 |
| 5 | US5905442A | Method and apparatus for controlling and determining the status of electrical devices from remote locations | 1,283 |
| 6 | US6493608B1 | Aspects of a control system of a minimally invasive surgical apparatus | 882 |
| 7 | US6459175B1 | Universal power supply | 767 |
| 8 | US7907166B2 | Stereo telestration for robotic surgery | 721 |
| 9 | US5193110A | Integrated services platform for telephone communication system | 693 |
| 10 | US20030085621A1 | Power supply methods and configurations | 634 |
Citation counts favour older filings in any searched corpus; treat them as a signal of influence on subsequent filers, not as a ranking of current commercial importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers say about this field
Three patterns stand out once filing volume, technology mix and citation weight are laid side by side.
The field has already crested
Filing volume peaked in 2017 and has fallen through the 2022 midpoint of 95 to a partial 12 in the most recent year. This reads as a maturing, well-explored problem space rather than an emerging one — new entrants are filing into territory that has already been substantially claimed.
Elevator integration is the centre of gravity
Lifts and escalators (B66B) appear in over a quarter of the 1,906 records, roughly double the share of the next largest class. Anyone filing on robot-to-building handover claims is filing into the densest part of this landscape by default.
No dominant gatekeeper
The five largest assignees hold only 7.0% of all 1,906 records between them, and the top 10 combined reach 11.2%. That is a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants rather than a market controlled by a handful of blocking portfolios.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to robot interoperability and fleet interface standards, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the room to move sits
The ranked leaders come from elevator manufacturing, telecom infrastructure and surgical robotics — a mix that reflects the search scope's overlap of building integration and vendor-agnostic control claims, not a single converged industry.
A modest single-digit-percent leader
The top-ranked assignee holds 32 of the 1,906 records — enough to lead the ranking but far short of the volume needed to foreclose the space. Recent-year momentum data shows several of the largest historical filers, including this one, recording zero filings in the latest year.
A shallow drop-off past the leader
Fifth place holds 20 records and tenth place 14 — a gentle slope rather than a cliff. That shape favours new entrants: displacing any single mid-table assignee does not require matching a large blocking portfolio.
China is the dominant receiving office
China accounts for 1,020 of the records in scope, more than three times the United States figure of 310. Europe (EPO), WIPO/PCT, the UK and India follow at smaller volumes, which matters for where freedom-to-operate searches should start.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| XJ Schindler Xuchang Elevator Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| ZTE Corporation | 0 | — |
| AutoStore Technology AS | 0 | — |
| Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | 0 | — |
| TAE Technologies, Inc. | 0 | — |
| AutoStore Technology AS | 0 | -100% |
| Guangzhou Guangri Elevator Industry Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Texaco Development Corporation | 0 | — |
Where to take this next
The landscape points to a field with settled elevator-integration claims and comparatively open interoperability-layer claims.
Map freedom-to-operate against the B66B core
Any robot-to-elevator or robot-to-door handover claim should be checked against the dense B66B cluster first, since it carries the highest claim density in the dataset by a wide margin.
Explore the IPC breakdown in EurekaWatch the flat-to-declining filing trend
With 2017's peak of 158 filings unmatched since and 2026 running at a partial 12, new filing strategy should account for a field that is being consolidated rather than expanded.
Track filing trends in EurekaTest claims in the under-claimed branches
Coordinate frame alignment and uniform fault-reporting sit outside the dense elevator core and show thinner coverage in this dataset, making them worth a dedicated novelty search.
Run a white space search in EurekaCommon questions on this landscape
In this dataset it means filings that address how mobile robots interface with shared infrastructure or with each other in a vendor-agnostic way — common message sets, master control layers, elevator and door integration, coordinate frame alignment, handover, and uniform diagnostics or fault reporting. It is narrower than robotics patents generally: a robot's own locomotion or gripper design would not qualify unless it touches one of these interface points. The 1,906 records in scope were selected specifically for this interface-layer focus rather than robotics as a whole.
B66B, the lifts-and-escalators IPC subclass, appears in 25.9% of the 1,906 records, making it by far the largest single class in this landscape. This happens because the search terms include elevator and door integration as concrete, well-defined interface points, and elevator manufacturers have a long history of filing detailed mechanical and control patents in this space. It signals dense prior art around robot-to-elevator handover claims specifically, not that elevators are central to robotics generally.
No. The top 5 assignees combined hold only 7.0% of all 1,906 records, and the top 10 combined reach 11.2%, with the single leader at 32 records out of a 100-company ranked list. That is a long tail rather than a concentrated portfolio structure, which generally means freedom-to-operate risk is spread across many smaller holders rather than concentrated in one or two blocking patents. New entrants should still check the leader's claims closely, but no single portfolio appears to control the field.
The trend data shows 158 filings in 2017, falling to a midpoint of 95 in 2022 and 12 in the most recent partial year. This pattern is consistent with a technology area where the core interface problems — elevator calls, door handshakes, basic diagnostics protocols — were substantially claimed in the mid-2010s, leaving less open ground for new filings. Readers should treat the final one to two years of any trend cautiously, since publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so recent-year counts will rise somewhat as more families publish.
The chip-level analysis in this landscape points to coordinate frame alignment across heterogeneous fleets, uniform fault-reporting schemas for mixed-vendor robots, and non-elevator door handover protocols as comparatively under-claimed relative to the dense B66B elevator core. These sit adjacent to the busiest classes rather than being disconnected from them, which is often where a first, well-drafted claim can still find clean ground. A targeted novelty search against the existing 1,906 records is the right first step before drafting in any of these branches.
Research Robot Interoperability and Fleet Interface Standards in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole robot interoperability and fleet interface standards corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.