Book a demo

Robot Vision-Guided Manipulation Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026

Robot Vision-Guided Manipulation Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/robot-vision-guided-manipulation-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Robotics
Robot vision-guided manipulation patents: who filed, where filings peaked, and what remains open
  • Filing peaked in 2019 at 15 families, then declined toward the midpoint year (2022 = 8), a pattern more consistent with a settled claim map than an expanding one.
  • B25J dominates the IPC mix at 44 of 57 records, while G06T image-processing claims (16) and G05B control claims (8) sit as thinner, more contestable layers on top.
  • No tracked assignee shows filings in the latest year, which is largely a publication-lag effect but also means the active-assignee list reflects 2019-2023 activity, not this year's filers.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
57
Published Records
68%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+200%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (1 records) with 2024 (3) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 57 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Robot vision-guided manipulation sits at the intersection of camera-based perception and robotic motion control: a system observes a scene, estimates the pose of an object or tool, and uses that estimate to drive a manipulator through pick, place, assembly or path-following tasks. This dataset pulls 57 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine claim language on vision guided robot, robotic bin picking or visual servoing with technical detail on pose estimation, hand-eye calibration, cycle time, cluttered scene handling or grasp planning, filtered to the core IPC classes for manipulators and image processing.

The picture that emerges is a field with a well-established core — manipulator kinematics and control claims dominate the IPC mix — surrounded by thinner, more recent activity in perception and scene-understanding claims. Publication lag means the most recent one to two years understate real filing activity; treat the tail of the trend line as a floor, not a ceiling.

Filing activity, 2017-2026
  1. 1SIEMENS AG13
  2. 2TERADYNE INC11
  3. 3VAKANSKI ALEKSANDAR5
  4. 4ROBOVISION5
  5. 5JANABI SHARIFI FARROKH5
  6. 6UNIVERSAL ROBOTS USA INC4
  7. 7ROCKWELL SCI CENT INC3
  8. 8INTEL CORP3
  9. 9BRACHIUM3
  10. 10TELEDYNE LICENSING2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Robot Vision-Guided Manipulation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 57-family dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and how those filings split across IPC subclasses.

A peak in 2019, then a decline

Filings rose from 2 in 2017 to a peak of 15 in 2019, then eased toward 8 at the 2022 midpoint. That shape reads as a field that filled its core claim space early rather than one still building momentum; 2026 shows zero, but that year is only partially reported.

A peak in 2019, then a decline048111522017201815201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Manipulator claims dominate, perception claims trail

B25J (manipulators and robots) accounts for 44 of 57 records, making it the base layer nearly every filing touches. G06T (image processing) and G06V (image/video recognition) together account for 24 records and represent the perception layer riding on top of that base, with G05B control claims (8) and H04N pictorial-communication claims (6) forming smaller adjacent groups. A04D harvesting applications (4) show the technology's spillover into agricultural robotics.

Manipulator claims dominate, perception claims trailB25J · Manipulators & robots4477.2%G06T · Image data processing & genera…1628.1%G05B · Control & regulating systems814.0%G06V · Image/video recognition814.0%H04N · Pictorial communication (video…610.5%A01D · Harvesting & mowing47.0%G06F · Electric digital data processi…47.0%A61B · Diagnosis & surgery11.8%Other58.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 57 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Robot Vision-Guided Manipulation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Robot Vision-Guided Manipulation with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about robot vision-guided manipulation and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The records shaping this space

Representative Recent Filing
US20250262760A12025-08-21

Learning visual pose estimation for robotic operation (US20250262760A1, FANUC)

FANUC CORPORATION

A method and system for robotic skill learning using visual pose estimation. A robot arm performing a task, such as an assembly or workpiece positioning operation, has a camera mounted thereon. The camera provides training images of an operation scene from a variety of positions and under a variety of lighting conditions. For each image, a relative pose of a tool center point with respect to a target pose is recorded. The images are used in a supervised learning process to train a neural network to minimize a difference between an inferred pose and the relative pose. Once trained, the neural network is used to compute a relative target position which is used in visual servoing control of the robot.Filed by FANUC, published 2025-08-21 — illustrates the current generation of learned, rather than geometrically modelled, pose estimation for visual servoing.

US20250262760A1 — patent drawing 1US20250262760A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in the dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6330356B1Dynamic visual registration of a 3-D object with a graphical model275
2US20160243704A1Image-based trajectory robot programming planning approach145
3US20190389062A1System and method for robotic bin picking32
4US20190047145A1Vision guided robot path programming32
5CA2928645A1Image-based robot trajectory planning approach24
6WO2001024536A2Dynamic visual registration of a 3-d object with a graphical model21
7WO2015058297A1Image-based trajectory robot programming planning approach16
8US20220347853A1Machine Learning Enabled Visual Servoing with Dedicated Hardware Acceleration14
9US20210023710A1System and method for robotic bin picking using advanced scanning techniques10
10WO2022194883A2Improved visual servoing9

Citation counts accumulate over time and favour older filings; they signal historical influence on subsequent filers, not current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Robot Vision-Guided Manipulation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers indicate

Reading the filing trend, IPC split and citation pattern together points to a field with a settled core and a few active margins.

Filing Trajectory
15 → 8
peak (2019) vs. midpoint (2022)

Growth has flattened since the 2019 peak

Filing activity nearly halved between the 2019 peak and the 2022 midpoint. Combined with a zero reading in the partial 2026 year, the honest read is a technology whose foundational claims were largely staked out by the early 2020s, with new filings now more incremental than expansive.

Trend basis: 2017-2026 dataset
Claim Concentration
44 of 57
records touch B25J

Manipulator control is the base layer everyone builds on

Nearly four in five records carry a B25J classification, meaning most filers are claiming some variant of arm or end-effector control alongside their vision method. Differentiation increasingly happens in the smaller G06T/G06V perception layer rather than in manipulator mechanics.

IPC composition, 57 records
Citation Pattern
275 citations
top-cited record

Foundational registration and trajectory-planning patents anchor the field

The most-cited record concerns 3-D visual registration against a graphical model, and the next tier covers image-based trajectory planning. Both predate the 2019 filing peak, consistent with citation counts rewarding early, broad claims rather than recent refinements.

Top 5 most-cited records
Collaboration Signal
3 co-assignee pairs
across the dataset

Co-filing is rare and concentrated

Only three co-assignee pairings appear across 57 families, and the strongest link is an academic pairing rather than a corporate joint filing. That scarcity suggests most organisations in this space are filing independently rather than through joint development agreements.

Co-assignee pair analysis
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to robot vision-guided manipulation, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Robot Vision-Guided Manipulation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is active, and where the gate sits

Recent-year momentum shows zero filings in the latest tracked year across every assignee listed, including established names like Siemens and Rockwell — a publication-lag artefact more than a sign of exit, but it means today's most-cited assignees are not necessarily today's most active filers.

Academic / Individual
5 co-filed records
strongest co-assignee pair

Vakanski and Janabi-Sharifi

The strongest co-assignee link in the dataset is an academic pairing around image-based trajectory and robot path planning, rather than a corporate joint venture, pointing to university research as a continuing source of foundational filings in this space.

Co-assignee pair strength: 5
Industrial Automation
0 in latest year
recent-year momentum

Siemens and Rockwell show historical, not current, activity

Both appear among the tracked assignees but register zero filings in the most recent year. Given the 18-month publication lag, this likely understates true recent activity rather than indicating withdrawal from the space.

Recent-year momentum tracking
Specialist Vendor
Named assignee
bin-picking / vision specialist

Robovision among the newer entrants

Robovision appears in the tracked assignee list alongside larger industrial names, reflecting the entry of specialist vision-software vendors into a field historically dominated by manipulator and controls OEMs.

Assignee ranking, 57 families
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These branches show thin representation relative to the B25J core and may offer more open claim space.
cluttered-scene grasp re-planninghand-eye calibration drift correctionmulti-camera pose fusion for occlusioncycle-time optimization under lighting variancelearned visual servoing for non-rigid parts
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Teradyne0
Siemens0
VAKANSKI ALEKSANDAR0
ROBOVISION0
JANABI SHARIFI FARROKH0
Rockwell Scientific0
Innovative Technology Certification Corp0
Intel Corporation0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Robot Vision-Guided Manipulation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, licensing or new filing strategy.

Check freedom-to-operate against the B25J core

With 44 of 57 records touching manipulator control claims, any new bin-picking or assembly system should be checked against this core before investing in the perception layer.

Run an FTO check in Eureka

Map the perception-layer white space

G06T and G06V claims are thinner and more recent than the manipulator core, suggesting more room to differentiate through pose-estimation or scene-understanding methods.

Explore perception-layer claims in Eureka

Track assignee momentum past the publication lag

Every assignee in this dataset shows zero filings in the latest tracked year; verifying which are truly inactive versus simply unpublished requires monitoring beyond the current data cut-off.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Robot Vision-Guided Manipulation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Robot Vision-Guided Manipulation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Robot Vision-Guided Manipulation in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole robot vision-guided manipulation corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.