Robot Vision-Guided Manipulation Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026
- Filing peaked in 2019 at 15 families, then declined toward the midpoint year (2022 = 8), a pattern more consistent with a settled claim map than an expanding one.
- B25J dominates the IPC mix at 44 of 57 records, while G06T image-processing claims (16) and G05B control claims (8) sit as thinner, more contestable layers on top.
- No tracked assignee shows filings in the latest year, which is largely a publication-lag effect but also means the active-assignee list reflects 2019-2023 activity, not this year's filers.
Filing growth compares 2021 (1 records) with 2024 (3) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 57 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
Robot vision-guided manipulation sits at the intersection of camera-based perception and robotic motion control: a system observes a scene, estimates the pose of an object or tool, and uses that estimate to drive a manipulator through pick, place, assembly or path-following tasks. This dataset pulls 57 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine claim language on vision guided robot, robotic bin picking or visual servoing with technical detail on pose estimation, hand-eye calibration, cycle time, cluttered scene handling or grasp planning, filtered to the core IPC classes for manipulators and image processing.
The picture that emerges is a field with a well-established core — manipulator kinematics and control claims dominate the IPC mix — surrounded by thinner, more recent activity in perception and scene-understanding claims. Publication lag means the most recent one to two years understate real filing activity; treat the tail of the trend line as a floor, not a ceiling.
Filing trends and technology composition
Two views of the same 57-family dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and how those filings split across IPC subclasses.
A peak in 2019, then a decline
Filings rose from 2 in 2017 to a peak of 15 in 2019, then eased toward 8 at the 2022 midpoint. That shape reads as a field that filled its core claim space early rather than one still building momentum; 2026 shows zero, but that year is only partially reported.
Manipulator claims dominate, perception claims trail
B25J (manipulators and robots) accounts for 44 of 57 records, making it the base layer nearly every filing touches. G06T (image processing) and G06V (image/video recognition) together account for 24 records and represent the perception layer riding on top of that base, with G05B control claims (8) and H04N pictorial-communication claims (6) forming smaller adjacent groups. A04D harvesting applications (4) show the technology's spillover into agricultural robotics.
Shares are the percentage of the 57 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Robot Vision-Guided Manipulation with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about robot vision-guided manipulation and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe records shaping this space
Learning visual pose estimation for robotic operation (US20250262760A1, FANUC)
A method and system for robotic skill learning using visual pose estimation. A robot arm performing a task, such as an assembly or workpiece positioning operation, has a camera mounted thereon. The camera provides training images of an operation scene from a variety of positions and under a variety of lighting conditions. For each image, a relative pose of a tool center point with respect to a target pose is recorded. The images are used in a supervised learning process to train a neural network to minimize a difference between an inferred pose and the relative pose. Once trained, the neural network is used to compute a relative target position which is used in visual servoing control of the robot.Filed by FANUC, published 2025-08-21 — illustrates the current generation of learned, rather than geometrically modelled, pose estimation for visual servoing.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6330356B1 | Dynamic visual registration of a 3-D object with a graphical model | 275 |
| 2 | US20160243704A1 | Image-based trajectory robot programming planning approach | 145 |
| 3 | US20190389062A1 | System and method for robotic bin picking | 32 |
| 4 | US20190047145A1 | Vision guided robot path programming | 32 |
| 5 | CA2928645A1 | Image-based robot trajectory planning approach | 24 |
| 6 | WO2001024536A2 | Dynamic visual registration of a 3-d object with a graphical model | 21 |
| 7 | WO2015058297A1 | Image-based trajectory robot programming planning approach | 16 |
| 8 | US20220347853A1 | Machine Learning Enabled Visual Servoing with Dedicated Hardware Acceleration | 14 |
| 9 | US20210023710A1 | System and method for robotic bin picking using advanced scanning techniques | 10 |
| 10 | WO2022194883A2 | Improved visual servoing | 9 |
Citation counts accumulate over time and favour older filings; they signal historical influence on subsequent filers, not current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers indicate
Reading the filing trend, IPC split and citation pattern together points to a field with a settled core and a few active margins.
Growth has flattened since the 2019 peak
Filing activity nearly halved between the 2019 peak and the 2022 midpoint. Combined with a zero reading in the partial 2026 year, the honest read is a technology whose foundational claims were largely staked out by the early 2020s, with new filings now more incremental than expansive.
Manipulator control is the base layer everyone builds on
Nearly four in five records carry a B25J classification, meaning most filers are claiming some variant of arm or end-effector control alongside their vision method. Differentiation increasingly happens in the smaller G06T/G06V perception layer rather than in manipulator mechanics.
Foundational registration and trajectory-planning patents anchor the field
The most-cited record concerns 3-D visual registration against a graphical model, and the next tier covers image-based trajectory planning. Both predate the 2019 filing peak, consistent with citation counts rewarding early, broad claims rather than recent refinements.
Co-filing is rare and concentrated
Only three co-assignee pairings appear across 57 families, and the strongest link is an academic pairing rather than a corporate joint filing. That scarcity suggests most organisations in this space are filing independently rather than through joint development agreements.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to robot vision-guided manipulation, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is active, and where the gate sits
Recent-year momentum shows zero filings in the latest tracked year across every assignee listed, including established names like Siemens and Rockwell — a publication-lag artefact more than a sign of exit, but it means today's most-cited assignees are not necessarily today's most active filers.
Vakanski and Janabi-Sharifi
The strongest co-assignee link in the dataset is an academic pairing around image-based trajectory and robot path planning, rather than a corporate joint venture, pointing to university research as a continuing source of foundational filings in this space.
Siemens and Rockwell show historical, not current, activity
Both appear among the tracked assignees but register zero filings in the most recent year. Given the 18-month publication lag, this likely understates true recent activity rather than indicating withdrawal from the space.
Robovision among the newer entrants
Robovision appears in the tracked assignee list alongside larger industrial names, reflecting the entry of specialist vision-software vendors into a field historically dominated by manipulator and controls OEMs.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Teradyne | 0 | — |
| Siemens | 0 | — |
| VAKANSKI ALEKSANDAR | 0 | — |
| ROBOVISION | 0 | — |
| JANABI SHARIFI FARROKH | 0 | — |
| Rockwell Scientific | 0 | — |
| Innovative Technology Certification Corp | 0 | — |
| Intel Corporation | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, licensing or new filing strategy.
Check freedom-to-operate against the B25J core
With 44 of 57 records touching manipulator control claims, any new bin-picking or assembly system should be checked against this core before investing in the perception layer.
Run an FTO check in EurekaMap the perception-layer white space
G06T and G06V claims are thinner and more recent than the manipulator core, suggesting more room to differentiate through pose-estimation or scene-understanding methods.
Explore perception-layer claims in EurekaTrack assignee momentum past the publication lag
Every assignee in this dataset shows zero filings in the latest tracked year; verifying which are truly inactive versus simply unpublished requires monitoring beyond the current data cut-off.
Set up assignee monitoring in EurekaCommon questions on this landscape
The core classes are B25J for manipulators and robot arms, G06T for image data processing and generation, and G06V for image and video recognition, with G05B covering the control and regulating systems that link perception to motion. In this dataset B25J appears in 44 of 57 records, making it the dominant classification, while G06T and G06V together account for 24 records as the perception layer. Searches limited to a single class will miss the cross-disciplinary nature of most filings, since the majority combine a manipulator classification with at least one imaging classification.
The dataset shows filings rising from 2 in 2017 to a peak of 15 in 2019, then declining to 8 by the 2022 midpoint. This pattern is typical of a field where foundational claims around pose estimation, hand-eye calibration and grasp planning were staked out early, leaving later filers to refine rather than establish core methods. It is worth noting that publication lag of roughly 18 months means the most recent years in any such trend are always undercounted, so the apparent decline after 2019 should not be read as a definitive end to filing activity.
The tracked assignee list includes industrial automation names such as Siemens and Rockwell, specialist vision vendors such as Robovision, and academic filers including the Vakanski/Janabi-Sharifi pairing, which is the strongest co-assignee link in the dataset at five shared records. None of the tracked assignees show filings in the latest year, which reflects publication lag rather than a clean exit from the field. A representative recent filing from FANUC on learned visual pose estimation shows large manipulator OEMs are also active participants.
This FANUC filing, published 2025-08-21, claims a method of training a neural network on camera images captured from varying robot-arm positions and lighting conditions to infer a relative tool-center-point pose used in visual servoing control. It represents a learned, rather than purely geometric, approach to pose estimation. Anyone developing a similar supervised-learning pipeline for pose inference feeding a visual servoing loop should review its claim scope closely, since it sits squarely in the G06T/B25J overlap that this landscape identifies as the field's active perception layer.
Relative to the dense B25J manipulator core, sub-areas such as multi-camera pose fusion for occlusion handling, cluttered-scene grasp re-planning, and cycle-time optimization under variable lighting show thinner claim coverage in this dataset. These sit at the intersection of the smaller G06T, G06V and G05B classes rather than in the crowded manipulator-control layer. A first claim in these areas would likely need to specify a concrete technical mechanism, such as a fusion algorithm or re-planning trigger, rather than a generic vision-guided robot system, to clear the existing prior art.
Research Robot Vision-Guided Manipulation in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole robot vision-guided manipulation corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.