Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Rolling element bearing patents in this dataset concentrate on raceway geometry, cage design, preload and fatigue life — the fine mechanical variables that separate a bearing rated for automotive wheel loads from one rated for wind-turbine main shafts. The search spans F16C19, F16C33 and F16C41, the IPC subclasses covering bearing construction, rolling elements and preload/lubrication respectively, filtered to documents that discuss contact stress or fatigue life in their title or claims.
Filing volume has fallen steadily since a 2017 peak, and publication lag means the most recent year understates true filing activity — but the multi-year decline through the dataset's midpoint is too large to be explained by lag alone.
18,329 patent families were pulled into this landscape, spanning receiving offices in Japan, the United States, Europe, China, the United Kingdom and WIPO.
Filings ran at 630 in 2017 and sit at 465 by the 2022 midpoint, before falling further toward the present. Read the final one or two years as provisional — publication lag of roughly 18 months means recent filings are still arriving — but the multi-year downward slope predates that lag window.
F16C accounts for 18,291 of the 18,329 records — effectively the entire dataset. Secondary IPC exposure sits in gearing (F16H, 1,002), vehicle wheels (B60B, 986), heat treatment (C21D, 808), alloys (C22C, 688), coatings (C23C, 591), seals (F16J, 522) and velocity sensing (G01P, 416), showing that claim activity outside the core bearing mechanism is thin and scattered across adjacent disciplines rather than forming a second dense cluster.
Shares are the percentage of the 18,329 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about rolling element bearing technology and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaRollers having a cylindrical configuration without substantial end relief are positioned between and exert a force against an outer raceway contact area and a cylindrical inner raceway contact area. The outer raceway has a crowned configuration such that a calculated maximum contact stress over the outer raceway contact area is controlled with respect to the maximum contact stress over the inner raceway contact area in order to make the outer raceway life substantially equal to the inner raceway life.Filed by Koyo Bearings North America, this filing ties a specific crowned-raceway geometry to a stated engineering target — equalising inner and outer raceway life — rather than claiming crowning in general.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20030030565A1 | Wireless sensor, rolling bearing with sensor, management apparatus and monitoring system | 273 |
| 2 | JP2004108388A | Rolling bearing device | 212 |
| 3 | JP1999129703A | Rolling bearing unit for wheel supporting | 212 |
| 4 | US5603574A | Fluid dampened support having variable stiffness and damping | 178 |
| 5 | US7034711B2 | Wireless sensor, rolling bearing with sensor, management apparatus and monitoring system | 172 |
| 6 | US9109630B2 | Rolling bearing unit | 162 |
| 7 | US6535135B1 | Bearing with wireless self-powered sensor unit | 159 |
| 8 | US5140849A | Rolling bearing with a sensor unit | 149 |
| 9 | JP1999101247A | Rolling bearing part | 121 |
| 10 | US3583511A | Rolling bearing | 118 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations within this searched corpus — treat this table as a map of historical influence, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three signals matter more than the raw filing count: the direction of the trend, the concentration of IPC exposure, and how consistently the largest assignees are pulling back.
The 2022 midpoint of 465 sits well below the 2017 peak, and the slope continues downward from there. This is consistent with a mechanical category where the dominant geometric and material solutions were claimed early and the remaining filing activity is incremental refinement.
Secondary exposure in gearing, wheels, heat treatment, alloys, coatings, seals and sensing is real but small by comparison, meaning most contested claim territory is still inside core bearing construction rather than in adjacent materials or sensing disciplines.
Recent-year momentum for the largest historical filers is uniformly negative, with several dropping to zero new filings in the latest year. A field where the leaders are simultaneously retreating is a field where new entrants face less resistance on genuinely novel claims, but also less commercial pull for incremental ones.
The strongest co-assignee pairings link a parent bearing manufacturer to an automotive partner or a legacy subsidiary, suggesting most joint filings reflect corporate structure rather than open cross-company R&D partnerships.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to rolling element bearing technology, with the prior art for and against each one.
The assignee list is dominated by long-established bearing manufacturers and their automotive and industrial partners. Nearly all of them show declining or zero recent-year filing activity, which changes how a new entrant should read the competitive picture — the incumbents are defending existing claim territory more than they are extending it.
NTN still posted a filing in the latest year, but at a fraction of its historical rate, and several equally prominent bearing manufacturers recorded zero filings in the same period.
The strongest co-assignee pairing links a bearing manufacturer directly to an automotive OEM partner, pointing to application-specific co-development rather than broad industry collaboration.
Filing history is concentrated among a handful of legacy bearing manufacturers, with a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants — typical of a mature mechanical category where most remaining activity is defensive or application-specific.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Schaeffler Technologies AG & Co. KG | 2 | -78% |
| NTN Corporation | 1 | -94% |
| NSK Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| JTEKT Corporation | 0 | — |
| SKF | 0 | -100% |
| Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| The Timken Company | 0 | — |
| Minebea Mitsumi Inc. | 0 | -100% |
The dataset points to a mature core with narrow but real openings at its edges. The next step is checking any specific claim idea against the exact families holding raceway, cage and preload territory.
Before drafting on raceway geometry, preload or cage design, check freedom-to-operate against the dense cluster of F16C33 and F16C41 filings rather than assuming novelty from general market knowledge.
Run a freedom-to-operate check in EurekaSeveral of the largest historical assignees are at or near zero recent filings; a resumption in any one of them is a meaningful signal worth monitoring rather than a routine data point.
Set up assignee monitoring in EurekaSensor-integrated monitoring and coating-based fatigue extension show thinner coverage than core raceway claims — worth a targeted search before committing R&D budget.
Explore white space in EurekaFiling volume in this dataset dropped from a 2017 peak of 630 to a small fraction of that by the most recent year, with the 2022 midpoint already down to 465. This pattern is typical of a mature mechanical category: the core geometric and material solutions for raceway, cage and preload design were claimed heavily in the 2010s, and remaining activity is now mostly incremental refinement rather than foundational invention. Publication lag of roughly 18 months means the final year or two of any trend is always undercounted, but the multi-year decline visible before that lag window is too large to attribute to lag alone.
The assignee ranking is led by a small group of long-established bearing manufacturers, historically the heaviest filers in raceway, cage and preload claims. Nearly all of these leaders show sharply negative year-on-year filing momentum in the latest data, with several recording zero new filings — meaning current leadership reflects historical filing volume more than active recent output. A new entrant should treat the ranking as a map of who defends existing claim territory, not who is currently expanding it.
Raceway refers to the surface inside a bearing that rolling elements travel along, and its geometry — crowning, curvature, surface treatment — directly affects contact stress distribution and fatigue life, as seen in filings like the controlled-contact-stress roller bearing example in this landscape. Cage design covers the structure that spaces and retains the rolling elements, affecting friction, speed rating and lubrication flow. Both are core claim territory inside the F16C33 and F16C41 IPC subclasses that make up the vast majority of this dataset.
Based on this dataset, core raceway and cage claims inside F16C are dense, but adjacent zones such as sensor-integrated raceway monitoring, coating-based fatigue life extension, and cage materials suited to high-speed EV motor applications show comparatively thin coverage. These sit at the intersection of bearing mechanics and other disciplines — sensing, coatings, alloys — where secondary IPC exposure in this dataset is present but far smaller than the core F16C volume. That gap is a starting point for a novelty search, not a guarantee of open claim space.
US5902022A claims a specific combination — cylindrical rollers without substantial end relief paired with a crowned outer raceway calculated to equalise inner and outer raceway fatigue life. It does not block crowned raceways in general or roller bearings broadly; a design using a different crowning calculation method, a different roller end geometry, or a different life-equalisation target would likely sit outside its literal claim scope. Any team designing near this territory should still have counsel compare the specific claim language against their own geometry and stated engineering objective.
Go past this page: query the whole rolling element bearing technology corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.