https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/rolling-element-bearing-technology-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Bearings & Rotating Machinery
Rolling element bearing patents: a mature claim space with declining new filings
  • 630 to 15. annual filings fell from a 2017 peak of 630 to just 15 in the most recent (partial) year — this is a field in claim-space consolidation, not expansion.
  • Nearly every tracked leader is pulling back. the largest assignees show sharp negative year-on-year momentum, several down to zero new filings in the latest year.
  • F16C dominates by a wide margin. 18,291 of 18,329 records sit in the core shafts-and-bearings subclass, with heat treatment, alloys and coatings trailing far behind as secondary claim territory.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
18.3K
Published Records
66%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-34%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
JP
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

A century-old mechanical category still being claimed on raceway and cage detail

Rolling element bearing patents in this dataset concentrate on raceway geometry, cage design, preload and fatigue life — the fine mechanical variables that separate a bearing rated for automotive wheel loads from one rated for wind-turbine main shafts. The search spans F16C19, F16C33 and F16C41, the IPC subclasses covering bearing construction, rolling elements and preload/lubrication respectively, filtered to documents that discuss contact stress or fatigue life in their title or claims.

Filing volume has fallen steadily since a 2017 peak, and publication lag means the most recent year understates true filing activity — but the multi-year decline through the dataset's midpoint is too large to be explained by lag alone.

Filing volume by year, 2017–2026
  1. 1NSK LTD4,155
  2. 2NTN CORP3,457
  3. 3JTEKT CORP2,412
  4. 4AB SKF SKF PATENT DEPARTMENT1,299
  5. 5SCHAEFFLER TECHNOLOGIES AG & CO KG760
  6. 6KOYO SEIKO CO LTD430
  7. 7THE TIMKEN CO(US)300
  8. 8MINEBEAMITSUMI INC223
  9. 9SKF GMBH176
  10. 10NIPPON THOMPSON122
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Rolling Element Bearing Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

18,329 patent families were pulled into this landscape, spanning receiving offices in Japan, the United States, Europe, China, the United Kingdom and WIPO.

A field past its filing peak

Filings ran at 630 in 2017 and sit at 465 by the 2022 midpoint, before falling further toward the present. Read the final one or two years as provisional — publication lag of roughly 18 months means recent filings are still arriving — but the multi-year downward slope predates that lag window.

A field past its filing peak0200400600800630201720182019202020212022202320242025152026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Concentrated in core bearing construction

F16C accounts for 18,291 of the 18,329 records — effectively the entire dataset. Secondary IPC exposure sits in gearing (F16H, 1,002), vehicle wheels (B60B, 986), heat treatment (C21D, 808), alloys (C22C, 688), coatings (C23C, 591), seals (F16J, 522) and velocity sensing (G01P, 416), showing that claim activity outside the core bearing mechanism is thin and scattered across adjacent disciplines rather than forming a second dense cluster.

Concentrated in core bearing constructionF16C · Shafts, bearings & couplings18,29199.8%F16H · Gearing & transmissions1,0025.5%B60B · Vehicle wheels & tyres9865.4%C21D · Heat treatment of metals8084.4%C22C · Alloys6883.8%C23C · Coating & surface deposition5913.2%F16J · Pistons, seals & gaskets5222.8%G01P · Velocity & acceleration4162.3%Other6,19133.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 18,329 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Rolling Element Bearing Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Rolling Element Bearing Technology with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about rolling element bearing technology and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The most-cited and most representative filings

Representative filing
US5902022A1999-05-11

US5902022A — Controlled contact stress roller bearing

KOYO BEARINGS NORTH AMERICA LLC

Rollers having a cylindrical configuration without substantial end relief are positioned between and exert a force against an outer raceway contact area and a cylindrical inner raceway contact area. The outer raceway has a crowned configuration such that a calculated maximum contact stress over the outer raceway contact area is controlled with respect to the maximum contact stress over the inner raceway contact area in order to make the outer raceway life substantially equal to the inner raceway life.Filed by Koyo Bearings North America, this filing ties a specific crowned-raceway geometry to a stated engineering target — equalising inner and outer raceway life — rather than claiming crowning in general.

US5902022A — patent drawing 1US5902022A — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20030030565A1Wireless sensor, rolling bearing with sensor, management apparatus and monitoring system273
2JP2004108388ARolling bearing device212
3JP1999129703ARolling bearing unit for wheel supporting212
4US5603574AFluid dampened support having variable stiffness and damping178
5US7034711B2Wireless sensor, rolling bearing with sensor, management apparatus and monitoring system172
6US9109630B2Rolling bearing unit162
7US6535135B1Bearing with wireless self-powered sensor unit159
8US5140849ARolling bearing with a sensor unit149
9JP1999101247ARolling bearing part121
10US3583511ARolling bearing118

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations within this searched corpus — treat this table as a map of historical influence, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Rolling Element Bearing Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about where this field stands

Three signals matter more than the raw filing count: the direction of the trend, the concentration of IPC exposure, and how consistently the largest assignees are pulling back.

Filing trajectory
630 → 15
peak year to latest year

Volume has fallen roughly back to a fraction of its 2017 peak

The 2022 midpoint of 465 sits well below the 2017 peak, and the slope continues downward from there. This is consistent with a mechanical category where the dominant geometric and material solutions were claimed early and the remaining filing activity is incremental refinement.

Filing trend, 2017–2026
Technology concentration
18,291 / 18,329
records in F16C

Almost the entire corpus sits inside one IPC subclass

Secondary exposure in gearing, wheels, heat treatment, alloys, coatings, seals and sensing is real but small by comparison, meaning most contested claim territory is still inside core bearing construction rather than in adjacent materials or sensing disciplines.

IPC composition
Assignee momentum
-78% to -100%
YoY change, tracked leaders

Every major assignee tracked is filing less, not more

Recent-year momentum for the largest historical filers is uniformly negative, with several dropping to zero new filings in the latest year. A field where the leaders are simultaneously retreating is a field where new entrants face less resistance on genuinely novel claims, but also less commercial pull for incremental ones.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Collaboration pattern
10 pairs
co-assignee pairings

Co-filing is limited and mostly intra-group

The strongest co-assignee pairings link a parent bearing manufacturer to an automotive partner or a legacy subsidiary, suggesting most joint filings reflect corporate structure rather than open cross-company R&D partnerships.

Co-assignee pairs
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to rolling element bearing technology, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Rolling Element Bearing Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who's filing

A retreating field of legacy bearing manufacturers

The assignee list is dominated by long-established bearing manufacturers and their automotive and industrial partners. Nearly all of them show declining or zero recent-year filing activity, which changes how a new entrant should read the competitive picture — the incumbents are defending existing claim territory more than they are extending it.

Momentum
-94% YoY
NTN, latest year

Even the most active recent filer is pulling back sharply

NTN still posted a filing in the latest year, but at a fraction of its historical rate, and several equally prominent bearing manufacturers recorded zero filings in the same period.

Recent-year momentum
Collaboration
37 co-filings
strongest pair

Joint filings cluster around automotive supply relationships

The strongest co-assignee pairing links a bearing manufacturer directly to an automotive OEM partner, pointing to application-specific co-development rather than broad industry collaboration.

Co-assignee pairs
Structure
18,329 families
total assignee ranking

A long tail sits beneath a small set of historical leaders

Filing history is concentrated among a handful of legacy bearing manufacturers, with a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants — typical of a mature mechanical category where most remaining activity is defensive or application-specific.

Assignee ranking
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
Claim density inside core F16C is high; these adjacent zones show comparatively thin coverage in this dataset.
sensor-integrated raceway monitoringcoating-based fatigue life extensioncage material for high-speed EV motor bearingspreload self-adjustment mechanismshybrid ceramic-steel contact interfaces
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Schaeffler Technologies AG & Co. KG2-78%
NTN Corporation1-94%
NSK Ltd.0-100%
JTEKT Corporation0
SKF0-100%
Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd.0
The Timken Company0
Minebea Mitsumi Inc.0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Rolling Element Bearing Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a mature core with narrow but real openings at its edges. The next step is checking any specific claim idea against the exact families holding raceway, cage and preload territory.

Map a specific claim against the crowded core

Before drafting on raceway geometry, preload or cage design, check freedom-to-operate against the dense cluster of F16C33 and F16C41 filings rather than assuming novelty from general market knowledge.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka

Track the retreating leaders for renewed activity

Several of the largest historical assignees are at or near zero recent filings; a resumption in any one of them is a meaningful signal worth monitoring rather than a routine data point.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka

Probe the under-claimed sub-areas directly

Sensor-integrated monitoring and coating-based fatigue extension show thinner coverage than core raceway claims — worth a targeted search before committing R&D budget.

Explore white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Rolling Element Bearing Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on rolling element bearing patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Rolling Element Bearing Technology covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Rolling Element Bearing Technology in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole rolling element bearing technology corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.