Rotor Balancing Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
- Filings peaked in 2019 at 13 records and have since flattened to a single record at the 2022 midpoint, with none yet recorded by the 2026 cut-off.
- Testing and balance claims dominate the mix G01M appears in 32 of 37 records, with turbine-linked F01D and damper-linked F16F forming the next largest clusters.
- The most-cited record dates to 1989 United Technologies' squeeze film damper patent still carries 81 citations, a sign the core damper claim space remains a live reference point.
A mature, narrowly claimed field centred on turbomachinery
Rotor balancing and vibration control patents in this dataset sit almost entirely inside testing and balance methods (G01M) and their application to turbines (F01D) and vibration dampers (F16F). The 37 families span filings through the United States, European, Canadian, PCT, UK and Russian offices, with the earliest influential claims dating to the 1980s and still drawing citations decades later.
Filing activity is not accelerating. It rose to a peak in 2019, fell back sharply by the 2022 midpoint, and shows nothing yet for 2026 — a pattern consistent with a claim space where the foundational squeeze film damper and active-control approaches were staked out early and have not been meaningfully displaced since.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trends and technology composition
Thirty-seven patent families make up this dataset, filed mainly through the United States, European, Canadian, PCT, UK and Russian offices, with testing-and-balance claims dominating the IPC mix.
A 2019 peak followed by a flat tail
Filings rose to a peak of 13 records in 2019, fell back toward the 2022 midpoint of a single record, and show no new filings by the 2026 cut-off. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent years understate real activity, but the multi-year decline from the 2019 peak is a genuine signal rather than a reporting artifact.
Testing and balance claims dominate the IPC mix
G01M (testing machine and structure balance) appears in 32 of 37 records, with F01D (turbines) in 16 and F16F (springs and vibration dampers) in 11 — together pointing to turbomachinery balancing as the corpus's centre of gravity. H02K, G01B and G01N each carry only a handful of records, marking the thinner branches of the field.
Shares are the percentage of the 37 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Rotor Balancing and Vibration Control with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about rotor balancing and vibration control and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe records shaping this claim space
Variable stiffness oil film damper
The critical speed of a bearing-supported rotating shaft is changed or controlled by dimensioning the oil squeeze film damper so the volume of oil is selected to produce a spring rate that, when added to the mechanical spring rate, attains the overall spring rate of the system. The spring rate of the oil becomes effective when the volume reaches a predetermined level higher than previously known oil squeeze film dampers.Filed by United Technologies Corporation; still the second most-cited record in this corpus.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5544073A | Rotor balancing calculator | 127 |
| 2 | US4643592A | Vibration limiting of rotating machinery through active control means | 124 |
| 3 | US4867655A | Variable stiffness oil film damper | 81 |
| 4 | CN107219076A | 一种气体轴承‑转子系统动力学特性研究的实验系统 | 16 |
| 5 | CN113758697A | 一种挤压油膜阻尼器动力学系数的识别方法 | 11 |
| 6 | GB2216609A | Variable stiffness oil film damper | 8 |
| 7 | RU2163008C2 | Process of rotor balancing | 6 |
| 8 | EP3241987A1 | Rotor balancing | 5 |
| 9 | US20210156757A1 | Rotor balancing method and apparatus | 4 |
| 10 | US20170254715A1 | Rotor balancing | 3 |
Ranked by forward citation count within the searched corpus; older records are structurally favoured, so treat this as a map of influence rather than of current filing activity.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the filing data actually tells you
Three findings stand out once the raw counts are read against filing dates and citation patterns rather than taken at face value.
A cooling filing trend, not a growing one
The corpus peaked at 13 records in 2019 and had fallen to a single record by the 2022 midpoint, with nothing yet recorded for 2026. Publication lag means the last year or two always understates activity, but the multi-year decline predates that window and looks structural.
Testing and balance claims crowd the centre
G01M coverage across 32 of 37 records shows most inventive effort has gone into measurement and balance methods rather than into new mechanical damper structures, which sit further down the IPC list.
Old patents still set the reference frame
The two most-cited records in the set date to the 1980s and remain the benchmark that later squeeze film damper and active-control filings had to cite or design around, despite decades of subsequent filing.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to rotor balancing and vibration control, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds the claims, and who is still filing
Recent-year momentum across the tracked assignees is flat: every one of the leading filers, including long-standing turbine and power-equipment manufacturers, shows no new filings in the latest tracked year. That points to a settled ownership structure rather than an active filing race.
No active filer is currently accelerating
Every leading assignee in the recent-momentum data shows zero filings in the latest tracked year, several with sharp year-on-year drops. This suggests the leading claim positions were established earlier and are now being held rather than extended.
Filing activity concentrates in the US and Europe
The United States and European Patent Office together account for the largest share of receiving-office filings, with Canada, WIPO, the UK and Russia forming a smaller but consistent secondary tier.
Turbomachinery is the dominant application
Sixteen of 37 records also carry an F01D turbine classification, confirming that most rotor balancing patent activity in this corpus is driven by turbine and power-generation applications rather than general industrial rotating equipment.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Siemens Gas and Power GmbH & Co. KG | 0 | — |
| Rolls-Royce plc | 0 | — |
| United Technologies Corporation | 0 | — |
| Siemens Energy Global GmbH & Co. KG | 0 | — |
| Eicher Motors Limited | 0 | -100% |
| Power Reactor and Nuclear Fuel Development Corporation | 0 | — |
| Siemens AG | 0 | — |
| Schenck RoTec GmbH | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis next
The filing and citation patterns above point to specific next questions for an R&D or IP team working in this space.
Run a freedom-to-operate check on the squeeze film damper claims
The two most-cited records in this corpus define the spring-rate and active-control approaches that later filings had to work around. Any new damper or control design should be checked against their specific functional ranges before committing to a build.
Check claim scope in EurekaMap the motor-integration white space in detail
H02K, G01B and G01N each carry only a handful of records against G01M's 32, suggesting motor-integrated sensing and correction is under-claimed. A deeper subclass-level pull would confirm whether that gap holds across adjacent technology areas too.
Explore adjacent IPC classes in EurekaTrack whether dormant assignees resume filing
Every leading assignee shows zero filings in the latest tracked year. Monitoring whether any resume activity would signal renewed competitive interest in this claim space.
Set up assignee monitoring in EurekaFrequently asked questions
It covers methods and devices for measuring and correcting mass unbalance in rotating shafts, and for damping the vibration that unbalance and gyroscopic effects produce, especially near critical speeds. In this dataset the claims cluster around IPC G01M (testing machine and structure balance), F01D (turbines) and F16F (springs and vibration dampers), which shows the field is anchored in turbomachinery applications rather than generic rotating equipment. Typical claim elements include field balancing calculators, squeeze film dampers, mode shape analysis and active control loops that respond to unbalance response measurements.
The assignee list is led by a small group of turbine and power-equipment manufacturers with long-standing filings, though recent-year momentum data shows none of the tracked assignees adding new filings in the latest tracked year. That flat momentum does not mean the underlying patents have lapsed or lost value — several of the most-cited records in the corpus, including the foundational squeeze film damper and active-control filings, remain live reference points that later filers had to design around. Anyone assessing freedom to operate should treat citation count as a signal of influence on the field, not as a measure of an assignee's current filing pace.
The filing trend in this dataset rose to a peak of 13 records in 2019, then fell toward a single record at the 2022 midpoint with no new filings recorded by the 2026 cut-off. Part of that apparent drop is a reporting effect: publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the most recent one to two years are always undercounted at the time of any given data pull. Even allowing for that lag, the multi-year decline from the 2019 peak suggests the core squeeze film damper and field balancing claim space is largely occupied, which tends to slow new filing activity rather than accelerate it.
US4867655A, assigned to United Technologies Corporation, claims a method of controlling a rotor's critical speed by sizing the oil volume in a squeeze film damper so the resulting oil spring rate, combined with the mechanical spring rate, reaches a target overall spring rate above previously known levels. That is a functional claim over the oil-film physics rather than a fixed damper shape, which is why it has drawn 81 forward citations in this corpus. A new damper design that falls inside the same oil-volume-to-spring-rate relationship is likely to run into this claim regardless of its housing geometry, so the practical design-around path is to work outside that specific spring-rate range or shift toward a different damping mechanism such as active electromagnetic control.
The thinnest branches by IPC exposure are H02K (electric motors and generators), G01B (dimensional measurement) and G01N (material analysis), each carrying only one to three records against G01M's 32. That imbalance suggests integration of real-time dimensional sensing and unbalance correction directly into electric-motor rotor assemblies is comparatively open ground, since neither subclass alone is densely claimed and the combination sits outside the corpus's turbine-dominated centre of gravity. A first claim there would need to tie a sensor-driven correction loop specifically to a motor rotor assembly to distinguish it from the existing turbine-focused prior art.
Research Rotor Balancing and Vibration Control in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole rotor balancing and vibration control corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.