Book a demo

Rotor Balancing Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Rotor Balancing Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/rotor-balancing-and-vibration-control-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Bearings & Rotating Machinery
Rotor Balancing and Vibration Control Patents
  • Filings peaked in 2019 at 13 records and have since flattened to a single record at the 2022 midpoint, with none yet recorded by the 2026 cut-off.
  • Testing and balance claims dominate the mix G01M appears in 32 of 37 records, with turbine-linked F01D and damper-linked F16F forming the next largest clusters.
  • The most-cited record dates to 1989 United Technologies' squeeze film damper patent still carries 81 citations, a sign the core damper claim space remains a live reference point.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
37
Published Records
68%
Top-5 Share of All Records
0%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Landscape Overview

A mature, narrowly claimed field centred on turbomachinery

Rotor balancing and vibration control patents in this dataset sit almost entirely inside testing and balance methods (G01M) and their application to turbines (F01D) and vibration dampers (F16F). The 37 families span filings through the United States, European, Canadian, PCT, UK and Russian offices, with the earliest influential claims dating to the 1980s and still drawing citations decades later.

Filing activity is not accelerating. It rose to a peak in 2019, fell back sharply by the 2022 midpoint, and shows nothing yet for 2026 — a pattern consistent with a claim space where the foundational squeeze film damper and active-control approaches were staked out early and have not been meaningfully displaced since.

Filings by year, 2017–2026
  1. 1SIEMENS ENERGY GLOBAL GMBH & CO KG9
  2. 2ROLLS ROYCE PLC6
  3. 3UNITED TECH CORP4
  4. 4JAPAN NUCLEAR CYCLE DEV INST3
  5. 5EICHER MOTORS3
  6. 6SIEMENS GAS & POWER GMBH & CO KG2
  7. 7SCHENCK ROTEC GMBH2
  8. 8MOORE JAMES W1
  9. 9КУРКОВ АЛЕКСАНДР ЕВГЕНЬЕВИЧ1
  10. 10CSI TECHNOLOGIES LLC1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Rotor Balancing and Vibration Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
Filing Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Thirty-seven patent families make up this dataset, filed mainly through the United States, European, Canadian, PCT, UK and Russian offices, with testing-and-balance claims dominating the IPC mix.

A 2019 peak followed by a flat tail

Filings rose to a peak of 13 records in 2019, fell back toward the 2022 midpoint of a single record, and show no new filings by the 2026 cut-off. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent years understate real activity, but the multi-year decline from the 2019 peak is a genuine signal rather than a reporting artifact.

A 2019 peak followed by a flat tail048111572017201813201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Testing and balance claims dominate the IPC mix

G01M (testing machine and structure balance) appears in 32 of 37 records, with F01D (turbines) in 16 and F16F (springs and vibration dampers) in 11 — together pointing to turbomachinery balancing as the corpus's centre of gravity. H02K, G01B and G01N each carry only a handful of records, marking the thinner branches of the field.

Testing and balance claims dominate the IPC mixG01M · Testing machine & structure ba…3286.5%F01D · Turbines & non-positive engines1643.2%F16F · Springs & vibration dampers1129.7%F16C · Shafts, bearings & couplings513.5%G01H · Measuring vibrations & sound38.1%H02K · Electric motors & generators38.1%G01B · Measuring length & dimensions12.7%G01N · Material analysis & testing12.7%Other25.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 37 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Rotor Balancing and Vibration Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Rotor Balancing and Vibration Control with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about rotor balancing and vibration control and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Prior Art

The records shaping this claim space

Representative Record
US4867655A1989-09-19

Variable stiffness oil film damper

UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, . A CORP. OF DE.

The critical speed of a bearing-supported rotating shaft is changed or controlled by dimensioning the oil squeeze film damper so the volume of oil is selected to produce a spring rate that, when added to the mechanical spring rate, attains the overall spring rate of the system. The spring rate of the oil becomes effective when the volume reaches a predetermined level higher than previously known oil squeeze film dampers.Filed by United Technologies Corporation; still the second most-cited record in this corpus.

US4867655A — patent drawing 1US4867655A — patent drawing 2
View full record in Eureka
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5544073ARotor balancing calculator127
2US4643592AVibration limiting of rotating machinery through active control means124
3US4867655AVariable stiffness oil film damper81
4CN107219076A一种气体轴承‑转子系统动力学特性研究的实验系统16
5CN113758697A一种挤压油膜阻尼器动力学系数的识别方法11
6GB2216609AVariable stiffness oil film damper8
7RU2163008C2Process of rotor balancing6
8EP3241987A1Rotor balancing5
9US20210156757A1Rotor balancing method and apparatus4
10US20170254715A1Rotor balancing3

Ranked by forward citation count within the searched corpus; older records are structurally favoured, so treat this as a map of influence rather than of current filing activity.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Rotor Balancing and Vibration Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signal Check

What the filing data actually tells you

Three findings stand out once the raw counts are read against filing dates and citation patterns rather than taken at face value.

Filing Momentum
13 → 1
records, 2019 peak to 2022 midpoint

A cooling filing trend, not a growing one

The corpus peaked at 13 records in 2019 and had fallen to a single record by the 2022 midpoint, with nothing yet recorded for 2026. Publication lag means the last year or two always understates activity, but the multi-year decline predates that window and looks structural.

Source: filing-year counts in this dataset
Claim Concentration
32/37
records touch G01M

Testing and balance claims crowd the centre

G01M coverage across 32 of 37 records shows most inventive effort has gone into measurement and balance methods rather than into new mechanical damper structures, which sit further down the IPC list.

Source: IPC subclass composition
Citation Influence
124 & 81
citations on the two oldest top records

Old patents still set the reference frame

The two most-cited records in the set date to the 1980s and remain the benchmark that later squeeze film damper and active-control filings had to cite or design around, despite decades of subsequent filing.

Source: forward citation counts
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to rotor balancing and vibration control, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Rotor Balancing and Vibration Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Assignee Landscape

Who holds the claims, and who is still filing

Recent-year momentum across the tracked assignees is flat: every one of the leading filers, including long-standing turbine and power-equipment manufacturers, shows no new filings in the latest tracked year. That points to a settled ownership structure rather than an active filing race.

Filing Pattern
0 in latest year
across all tracked leading assignees

No active filer is currently accelerating

Every leading assignee in the recent-momentum data shows zero filings in the latest tracked year, several with sharp year-on-year drops. This suggests the leading claim positions were established earlier and are now being held rather than extended.

Source: recent-year assignee momentum
Geographic Spread
US 9 · EPO 8
leading receiving offices

Filing activity concentrates in the US and Europe

The United States and European Patent Office together account for the largest share of receiving-office filings, with Canada, WIPO, the UK and Russia forming a smaller but consistent secondary tier.

Source: receiving-office counts
Technology Focus
16 F01D records
turbine-linked filings

Turbomachinery is the dominant application

Sixteen of 37 records also carry an F01D turbine classification, confirming that most rotor balancing patent activity in this corpus is driven by turbine and power-generation applications rather than general industrial rotating equipment.

Source: IPC subclass composition
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These branches carry the lowest IPC record counts in the dataset and warrant a freedom-to-operate check rather than an assumption of open space.
Motor-integrated unbalance sensingDimensional-measurement feedback loopsActive electromagnetic damping alternativesMaterial-analysis-linked balance diagnostics
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Siemens Gas and Power GmbH & Co. KG0
Rolls-Royce plc0
United Technologies Corporation0
Siemens Energy Global GmbH & Co. KG0
Eicher Motors Limited0-100%
Power Reactor and Nuclear Fuel Development Corporation0
Siemens AG0
Schenck RoTec GmbH0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Rotor Balancing and Vibration Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis next

The filing and citation patterns above point to specific next questions for an R&D or IP team working in this space.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on the squeeze film damper claims

The two most-cited records in this corpus define the spring-rate and active-control approaches that later filings had to work around. Any new damper or control design should be checked against their specific functional ranges before committing to a build.

Check claim scope in Eureka

Map the motor-integration white space in detail

H02K, G01B and G01N each carry only a handful of records against G01M's 32, suggesting motor-integrated sensing and correction is under-claimed. A deeper subclass-level pull would confirm whether that gap holds across adjacent technology areas too.

Explore adjacent IPC classes in Eureka

Track whether dormant assignees resume filing

Every leading assignee shows zero filings in the latest tracked year. Monitoring whether any resume activity would signal renewed competitive interest in this claim space.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Rotor Balancing and Vibration Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Questions

Frequently asked questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Rotor Balancing and Vibration Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Rotor Balancing and Vibration Control in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole rotor balancing and vibration control corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.