Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (834 records) with 2024 (830) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 10,762 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Satellite communications patenting spans everything from physical-layer transmission and channel estimation to orbital positioning and payload data handling. The scope here covers 10,762 published records filed or published between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off, drawn from a search combining satellite-link and space-communication terms with orbital position, attitude sensor, mission trajectory, channel estimation and traffic routing concepts. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent years in any trend chart are understated by construction, not because activity has actually dropped.
Reading the landscape by patent family rather than raw document count matters here: aggressive continuation practice and multi-jurisdiction refiling can inflate simple counts for large filers. The concentration and technology-composition figures below use the family-level ranking and the full record set respectively, and both are worth reading against who is filing where and on what claim scope.
Two views of the same 10,762-record dataset: the filing trend over time, and the IPC subclass breakdown that shows where claim activity concentrates.
Annual filings rose from 513 in 2017 to a peak of 834 in 2021, then held roughly level through 2024 at 830 records — a -0% change across that span. 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in as publications catch up with filing dates, and should not be read as a decline.
H04B (transmission, general) and H04L (digital information transmission) each appear on more than 40% of the 10,762 records in scope, with H04W (wireless communication networks) close behind at 37.7%. Because a single record can carry several IPC classes, these shares sum to well over 100% — the overlap itself indicates that most satellite communications filings combine transmission-layer and network-layer claims rather than treating them as separate inventions.
Shares are the percentage of the 10,762 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about satellite communications patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA LEO satellite determines its own orbital position using precise point positioning (PPP) correction data received separately from primary signalling, then uses inter-satellite communications to detect an error condition on another LEO navigation satellite in the constellation before broadcasting an alert.Filed by Xona Space Systems Inc., published 2024-04-18.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6452915B1 | IP-flow classification in a wireless point to multi-point (PTMP) transmission system | 1,216 |
| 2 | US20190349426A1 | The internet of things | 1,106 |
| 3 | US5481542A | Interactive information services control system | 979 |
| 4 | US20030093187A1 | PFN/TRAC systemTM FAA upgrades for accountable remote and robotics control to stop the unauthorized use of ai… | 977 |
| 5 | US20190339688A1 | Methods and systems for data collection, learning, and streaming of machine signals for analytics and mainten… | 974 |
| 6 | US20190364492A1 | Methods and devices for radio communications | 876 |
| 7 | US5991308A | Lower overhead method for data transmission using ATM and SCDMA over hybrid fiber coax cable plant | 867 |
| 8 | US6640248B1 | Application-aware, quality of service (QoS) sensitive, media access control (MAC) layer | 860 |
| 9 | US20100234071A1 | Vehicle integrated communications system | 858 |
| 10 | US6056237A | Sonotube compatible unmanned aerial vehicle and system | 795 |
Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had more time to be cited within this searched corpus; treat them as a signal of influence on the field, not as a ranking of current technical importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three findings from the dataset that matter more for a filing or freedom-to-operate decision than the raw counts alone.
The five leading assignees together hold 26.4% of all 10,762 records in scope, and the ranked ten hold 37.4%. That leaves close to two-thirds of the field spread across a long tail of the remaining ranked companies and unranked filers, which is a wider opening than the headline concentration figure suggests.
Filings peaked at 834 in 2021 and stood at 830 in 2024, a flat three-year span rather than a falling one. Several of the most active named assignees show sharp year-on-year drops in the most recent (partial) year, which is expected given publication lag and should not be read as retreat from the space.
H04B, H04L and H04W each sit above 37% of the 10,762 records, and because records can carry multiple IPC codes, most satellite communications filings combine transmission, digital-information and wireless-network claims in a single document rather than isolating one layer.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to satellite communications patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranked field runs 100 companies deep, from a single leader at 904 records down through a tail of much smaller filers. Reading momentum alongside raw counts shows where activity is cooling even among the largest holders.
The top-ranked assignee holds 904 records, well above the fifth-place figure of 347 and tenth-place figure of 167. That gap between first and fifth is the clearest sign of an entrenched incumbent position rather than a tightly bunched top tier.
Several of the assignees most active in recent years show steep year-on-year declines in the latest (partial) reporting year, with drops ranging from roughly -54% to -86%. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, this reads as incomplete data catching up rather than a genuine pullback.
Only ten co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest of them pair a corporate assignee with a named individual inventor rather than linking two companies. Cross-company joint filing is not a visible pattern in this field.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| DIGITAL GLOBAL SYSTEMS INC | 20 | -86% |
| Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | 14 | -63% |
| Qualcomm Inc. | 9 | -71% |
| NVIDIA Corp. | 6 | -54% |
| Viasat Inc. | 5 | -58% |
| Fraunhofer Gesellschaft zur Forderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. | 3 | -83% |
| LG Electronics Inc. | 3 | -91% |
| Intel Corp. | 1 | -83% |
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, whitespace filing, or tracking a competitor.
With 26.4% of records held by five assignees, a claim chart against the leading filer's portfolio is the fastest way to check whether a planned filing sits on occupied ground.
Run a claim comparison in EurekaSub-areas like inter-satellite link error handling and attitude-sensor fusion carry far fewer records than the H04B/H04L core, and are worth a closer prior-art pull before drafting.
Explore whitespace in EurekaYear-on-year drops among the most active filers may reflect publication lag rather than real retreat; a rolling watch catches the correction as later filings publish.
Set up assignee tracking in EurekaThe dataset's assignee ranking shows one company well ahead of the field with 904 records, compared with 347 at fifth place and 167 at tenth. That gap indicates an entrenched leader rather than a tightly bunched top tier. The ranking covers 100 companies in total, so it is not a top-50 or top-100 list in the informal sense — it is the full set the data endpoint returns, and most of those companies hold far fewer records than the leader.
Filing volume peaked at 834 records in 2021 and stood at 830 in 2024, a flat span rather than a growth trend, based on the -0% figure across those years. Later years (2025-2026) show lower counts, but that reflects the roughly 18-month lag between filing and publication rather than a genuine slowdown. The safest complete-year comparison is 2021 to 2024, and it shows a plateau, not a decline.
Transmission-layer claims under H04B appear on 43.4% of the 10,762 records in scope, digital information transmission under H04L on 41.4%, and wireless communication networks under H04W on 37.7%. Because a single patent can carry multiple IPC classes, these figures overlap heavily rather than summing to 100%, which shows that most filings in this field combine transmission and network-layer claims in one document. Narrower classes such as antennas (H01Q) and radar/positioning (G01S) sit in the single digits by comparison, marking them as smaller, more specialised pockets of the field.
Sub-areas adjacent to the dense transmission and networking core carry noticeably fewer records, including inter-satellite link error detection, payload data compression for LEO downlink, attitude-sensor fusion for constellation pointing, and antenna beam-steering for small satellites. These sit next to heavily claimed ground rather than being unrelated, which is what makes them worth a prior-art check before drafting rather than a reason to assume the space is empty. A first claim in one of these branches should focus on the specific sensor-fusion or signal-processing method rather than the broad system architecture, since broad architectural claims are more likely to run into the dense H04B/H04L/H04W prior art.
The top five assignees together hold 26.4% of all 10,762 records in scope, and the top ten hold 37.4%. That leaves close to two-thirds of the field distributed across the remaining ranked companies and unranked filers, so while there is real concentration at the top, it is not a closed field. Co-filing between companies is also rare — only ten co-assignee pairs appear in the data, and the strongest links pair a company with a named individual rather than two corporate filers.
Go past this page: query the whole satellite communications patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.