Fastest
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/satellite-user-terminal-antennas-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Antenna Technology · Patent LandscapeSatellite User Terminal Antennas: Patents Behind Flat-Panel and Steered-Beam Ground Terminals
- Filings peaked in 2020 at 32 records then growth reversed hard — the top assignee tracked in the hero data shows filings falling 64% from 2021 to 2024, the last year the dataset treats as complete.
- 62.8% of all 129 records sit with five companies and 79.1% sit with ten, so most of the claim space is already staked by a small, identifiable group rather than spread across a long tail.
- H01Q antenna claims cover 48.8% of records but power-supply, positioning and switching classes each sit under 7% — signalling where integration-level claims are still thin.
129
Published Records
63%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-64%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Filing growth compares 2021 (11 records) with 2024 (4) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 129 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview
What this landscape covers
Satellite user terminal antennas are the ground-side hardware that lets a fixed or mobile device track and communicate with a satellite — flat-panel arrays, electronically steered antennas and liquid-crystal aperture designs sit at the centre of this set. The search scope combines terminal-antenna hardware terms with the operational concerns that separate a working product from a lab demonstration: tracking of satellite, cross polarization, terminal power consumption, wide scan performance and regulatory mask compliance.
129 published records fall inside this scope between 2015 and the 2026-07-31 cut-off. Because publication trails filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent years in any trend chart understate real filing activity — a fact worth remembering before reading too much into 2025 or 2026 figures.
Filing activity, 2015–2026
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Satellite User Terminal Antennas covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 129 records: how filing volume moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.
A sharp 2020 peak, then a pullback
Filings rose from 2 in 2017 to a peak of 32 in 2020, then fell back. The tracked leader's filings alone dropped 64% from 2021 to 2024 — the last year with a complete publication picture — which is a genuine pullback in a maturing claim space, not a data artefact of the lag.
Antenna hardware dominates; the systems layer is thin
H01Q (antennas) appears in 48.8% of records and H04B (general transmission) in 37.2%, confirming this is primarily a hardware-claims field. Power supply (H02J, 6.2%), positioning (G01S, 5.4%) and switching (H04Q, 4.7%) each cover a small minority of records — these are the integration layers around the antenna, not the antenna itself, and they carry far less claim density.
Shares are the percentage of the 129 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Satellite User Terminal Antennas covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.
Go deeper on Satellite User Terminal Antennas with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about satellite user terminal antennas and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaFoundational Filings
The most-cited records in this space
Representative Filing
Flat panel antenna and manufacturing method (WO2020143903A1)
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.
The filing describes a radiating unit built from a power divider element feeding four elongated radiator elements, each rotated 45 degrees relative to its output port, arranged into an array that forms a flat panel antenna suited to injection-mould manufacturing.Filed by Huawei Technologies, published 2020-07-16 — illustrative of how manufacturing-method claims are now layered on top of core radiator geometry.
Highest-cited patents in scope
| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US8587492B2 | Dual-polarized multi-band, full duplex, interleaved waveguide antenna aperture | 292 |
| 2 | US6111542A | Rotating electronically steerable antenna system and method of operation thereof | 185 |
| 3 | US6317094B1 | Feed structures for tapered slot antennas | 171 |
| 4 | US7379707B2 | System for concurrent mobile two-way data communications and TV reception | 64 |
| 5 | US6285323B1 | Flat plate antenna arrays | 61 |
| 6 | US20100259346A1 | Dual-polarized multi-band, full duplex, interleaved waveguide antenna aperture | 59 |
| 7 | US20200025911A1 | System, method and computer-accessible medium for real time imaging using a portable device | 49 |
| 8 | US20060046648A1 | System for concurrent mobile two-way data communications and TV reception | 32 |
| 9 | US20070232228A1 | Wireless repeater with universal server base unit and modular donor antenna options | 26 |
| 10 | US20060284775A1 | Applications for low profile two way satellite antenna system | 23 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations inside the corpus — read them as a signal of influence on the field, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Satellite User Terminal Antennas covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Where to run it
For builders
MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Reading the Data
What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three patterns stand out once the ranking, the trend and the IPC split are read together.
Concentration
62.8% / 5 firms
share of 129 records
The claim space is already staked
Five companies hold 62.8% of the 129 records in scope, and ten hold 79.1%. A new entrant is not filing into open territory at the antenna-hardware level; it is filing around an already-crowded set of assignees.
Top 5 / Top 10 combined shares
Momentum
32 in 2020 → -64% by 2024
leader filings, 2021-2024
The peak has passed, the pullback is real
Filing volume peaked at 32 records in 2020. The tracked leader's own filings fell 64% between 2021 and 2024 — the last year the data treats as complete — which points to a field settling around established designs rather than one still expanding.
Peak year 2020; growth figure per hero card
Technology mix
48.8% H01Q vs 6.2% H02J
share of records, each class
Hardware claims dominate; systems claims are sparse
Antenna geometry and structure (H01Q) and general transmission (H04B) together cover most records, while power management, positioning and switching each sit in single-digit percentages. That gap is where integration-level claims still have room.
IPC subclass shares, all 129 records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to satellite user terminal antennas, with the prior art for and against each one.
Co-filing is rare in this field
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Viasat Inc. | RUNYON DONALD LAWSON | 2 |
| Elta Systems Ltd. | SAMSON CLAUDE | 2 |
| Elta Systems Ltd. | HABIB LAURENT | 2 |
| RaySat Antenna Systems LLC | SPIRTUS DANNY | 2 |
| RaySat Antenna Systems LLC | GAT YOEL | 2 |
| RaySat Antenna Systems LLC | GACHEV MARIO | 2 |
| RaySat Antenna Systems LLC | DIFONZO DANIEL F | 2 |
Only 7 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and the strongest pairs link a single company to a small number of named inventors rather than to another corporate assignee — this is a field of solo corporate filers, not joint ventures.
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Satellite User Terminal Antennas covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who's Filing
The assignee landscape
39 companies make up the full ranked list the dataset returns — not a top-50 or top-100 cut, the complete set. The leader holds 38 records; by fifth place that has fallen to 6, and by tenth place to 3, which is the shape of a field with one dominant filer and a long, thin tail behind it.
Leader
38 records
leading assignee
One filer well ahead of the field
The top-ranked assignee holds 38 of the 129 records in scope, well clear of second place — a gap large enough that any freedom-to-operate review should start with this filer's claim scope specifically.
Leader vs. fifth place: 38 vs 6
Mid-table
6 records
fifth-ranked assignee
A sharp drop after the leader
By fifth place, filing counts have fallen to 6 records, and by tenth to 3. The concentration is front-loaded: most of the 39 ranked companies hold only a handful of families each.
Fifth place 6; tenth place 3
Momentum
0 in the latest year
across several named leaders
Even top filers show no recent activity
Several of the most active historical assignees show zero filings in the latest tracked year — consistent with the post-2020 pullback and with publication lag, but worth confirming against each company's most recent public filings before assuming they have exited.
Recent-year momentum, ranked assignees
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Viasat Inc. | 0 | — |
| Elta Systems Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Farcast Corp. | 0 | — |
| CommScope Technologies LLC | 0 | — |
| MTI Wireless Edge | 0 | — |
| MTI TECH & ENG 1993 | 0 | — |
| RAYSAT ANTENNA SYST L L C | 0 | — |
| RaySat Antenna Systems LLC | 0 | — |
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Satellite User Terminal Antennas covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to a field with a dominant filer, a thin systems-integration layer, and a post-2020 slowdown. Turning that into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision means going deeper on the specific claims.
Map the leader's claim boundaries
With one assignee holding 38 of 129 records, understanding exactly where its claims start and stop is the first task before filing anything adjacent.
Explore assignee claims in EurekaCheck the under-claimed integration layers
Power management, positioning and switching each sit under 7% of records — worth a targeted search before assuming the space is open.
Run a white space search in EurekaWatch for the lag catching up
2025 and 2026 filings are still publishing; re-run this view in a few months to see whether the pullback since 2021 continues.
Track filing trends in EurekaSource: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Satellite User Terminal Antennas covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ
Common questions on this landscape
One assignee leads the ranked list with 38 of the 129 records in scope, well ahead of the rest of the field. The gap to fifth place, which holds 6 records, shows how front-loaded the concentration is. Anyone assessing freedom to operate in this space should start with the leader's specific claim scope before looking at the rest of the ranked assignees.
Filing volume peaked in 2020 at 32 records and has fallen since; the tracked leader's own filings dropped 64% between 2021 and 2024, the last year with a complete publication picture. Because publication lags filing by around 18 months, 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete and should not yet be read as a continuation of that decline. On the evidence available, the field looks like it is consolidating around established designs rather than expanding.
In this dataset the two terms describe overlapping but distinct claim approaches: flat panel antenna filings, like WO2020143903A1, focus on radiator geometry and manufacturable array structure, while electronically steered antenna filings focus on beam control without mechanical movement. Many records touch both concepts because a flat physical form factor is often paired with electronic steering to achieve satellite tracking. The IPC split shows H01Q (antenna structure) far ahead of narrower positioning-related classes like G01S, suggesting most claims still centre on the physical antenna rather than the steering algorithm.
The IPC composition points to the systems layer around the antenna: power supply and grid management (H02J) appears in only 6.2% of records, positioning (G01S) in 5.4%, and switching (H04Q) in 4.7%, all far below the 48.8% carried by core antenna structure claims (H01Q). Liquid crystal aperture tuning, terminal power consumption management, and regulatory mask compliance are named in the search scope but do not dominate any IPC bucket, suggesting they remain lightly claimed relative to core hardware. A first claim in these areas would likely pair a specific power or tracking mechanism with the antenna hardware, rather than claiming the antenna structure itself.
The United States receives the largest share of filings among the offices tracked, followed by the European Patent Office and WIPO PCT applications, with Canada and Israel also appearing as receiving offices. This spread reflects a field where applicants are pursuing both direct national protection and PCT routes rather than concentrating in a single jurisdiction. Anyone tracking competitive activity should watch the US and EPO dockets most closely given their volume.
Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Satellite User Terminal Antennas covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Research Satellite User Terminal Antennas in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole satellite user terminal antennas corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.