Book a demo

Scramjet Thermal Barrier Coating Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Scramjet Thermal Barrier Coating Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/scramjet-thermal-barrier-coating-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Aerospace & Propulsion · Patent Landscape
Scramjet Thermal Barrier Coating Patents: Who Holds the Core Claims
  • Only 32 families total. a narrow, specialised corpus where the core structural-cooling and ceramic-matrix claims were staked out early.
  • Filing peaked in 2020 at 5 records. and has flattened since, with no assignee showing activity in the latest tracked year.
  • F02C and C04B account for 19 of the records. while joining methods, powder metallurgy and fuel-supply branches sit at just 3 to 4 records each.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
32
Published Records
US
Leading Jurisdiction
11
Active Filers Ranked
2020
Peak Filing Year
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

A narrow, structurally-concentrated field

Scramjet thermal barrier coating patents form a small corpus of 32 published families filed between 2015 and mid-2026, concentrated overwhelmingly at the United States receiving office. The field combines two distinct engineering problems under one search: coating a substrate against extreme heat, and actively cooling the structure the coating sits on. Filing activity has been driven less by a steady stream of new entrants than by a small group of gas-turbine and ceramics specialists refining a structural-cooling approach that was substantially claimed before 2015.

The technology composition confirms this: gas-turbine plant design and ceramic or refractory chemistry account for well over half of the dataset, while additive manufacturing, powder metallurgy and joining methods remain minor branches. Filing peaked in 2020 and has since flattened, a pattern worth reading alongside the roughly 18-month lag between filing and publication that always understates the most recent years.

Filing trend and IPC composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1HRL LAB11
  2. 2GENERAL ELECTRIC CO8
  3. 3ROLLS ROYCE NORTH AMERICAN TECHNOLOGIES INC6
  4. 4ROLLS ROYCE CORP4
  5. 5PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP4
  6. 6RTX CORP2
  7. 7CAMARDA CHARLES J1
  8. 8NAIK SUBHASH K1
  9. 9GLASS DAVID E1
  10. 10MERRIGAN MICHAEL A1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Scramjet Thermal Barrier Coating covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Filing Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Thirty-two published families since 2015 show a narrow, structurally-concentrated field rather than a broad emerging one. The trend and the IPC spread both point to a technology where the core claim space was staked out early and has not been substantially reopened.

Filing activity has flattened since its 2020 peak

Filings rose from a single record in 2017 to a peak of 5 in 2020, then held around the 2022 midpoint of 3 without a clear recovery. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the final one to two years of this window will read lower than actual filing activity turns out to be.

Filing activity has flattened since its 2020 peak013451201720182019520202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Gas-turbine and ceramics classes dominate the IPC spread

F02C (gas-turbine plants) and C04B (ceramics, cement & refractories) together account for 19 of the underlying records, with F01D (turbines) close behind. Additive manufacturing (B33Y), powder metallurgy (B22F) and joining methods (B23K) each register only 3 to 5 records, marking them as thinner, less-contested branches.

Gas-turbine and ceramics classes dominate the IPC spreadF02C · Gas-turbine plants1031.3%C04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories928.1%F01D · Turbines & non-positive engines721.9%B33Y · Additive manufacturing (3D pri…515.6%F02M · Fuel supply & carburettors412.5%F28D · Heat-exchange apparatus412.5%B22F · Powder metallurgy39.4%B23K · Welding, soldering & brazing39.4%Other1959.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 32 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Scramjet Thermal Barrier Coating covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Scramjet Thermal Barrier Coating with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about scramjet thermal barrier coating and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative and most-cited filings

Representative filing
US20170015600A12017-01-19

Thermal and environmental barrier coating for ceramic substrates (US20170015600A1)

HRL LABORATORIES, LLC

A thermal and environmental barrier coating composed of ceramic hollow microspheres sintered together. In one embodiment the microspheres are sintered together with a powder of another material that acts as a binder, or with a powder of a material that may be the same as the material of the hollow microspheres, forming a matrix in which the hollow microspheres are embedded. The hollow microspheres may be composed of a material with a high temperature capability, and with a low coefficient of thermal expansion.Filed by HRL Laboratories, LLC, published 2017-01-19; the second most-cited record in this dataset at 21 citations.

US20170015600A1 — patent drawing 1US20170015600A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5720339ARefractory-composite/heat-pipe-cooled leading edge and method for fabrication80
2US20170015600A1Thermal and environmental barrier coating for ceramic substrates21
3US11535360B1Hypersonic leading-edge heat pipe with porous wick, and methods of making and using the same20
4US20090158748A1Direct induction combustor/generator15
5US20210277796A1Method and system for fuel nozzle cleaning during engine operation14
6US20210156339A1Cooling system for an engine assembly12
7US20100162725A1Gas turbine engine device9
8US20120195744A1Engine hot section component and method for making the same8
9US8146371B2Direct induction combustor/generator8
10WO2016153543A2Thermal and environmental barrier coating for ceramic substrates7

Ranked by citation count within the searched corpus; older records accumulate more citations by nature of time in force, so treat this as a measure of influence rather than current relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Scramjet Thermal Barrier Coating covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signals

What the filing data signals

Three patterns stand out once the 32 families are broken down by technology class, citation weight and co-filing behaviour: a concentrated core, a flattened trend, and a small set of tightly linked inventors holding the structural-cooling claims.

Concentration
19 of 32
records in F02C + C04B

The core claim space sits in two IPC classes

Gas-turbine plant design and ceramic/refractory chemistry between them cover the majority of this dataset. That density means a new filer targeting a ceramic barrier coating on a gas-turbine-style hot section is filing into occupied ground, not open space.

Source: IPC subclass breakdown
Momentum
5 in 2020
peak filing year

Filing activity has not recovered since its 2020 high

The midpoint year of 2022 sits at 3 records, below the 2020 peak, and no assignee in the recent-momentum data shows filings in the latest tracked year. Given the roughly 18-month publication lag, the most recent one to two years likely understate true activity.

Source: annual filing trend, 2017-2026
Influence
80 citations
on the top-cited record

One 1997 structural patent still anchors the field

The refractory-composite, heat-pipe-cooled leading edge patent is cited far more than any other record in this set, including the second-ranked HRL Laboratories coating patent at 21 citations. High citation counts in an older record reflect influence within this corpus, not that the approach is still the newest option.

Source: citation ranking, most-cited records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to scramjet thermal barrier coating, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Scramjet Thermal Barrier Coating covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the core claims

Corporate assignees and a tightly linked group of named inventors share this space. The recent-year momentum data shows no assignee filing in the latest tracked year, consistent with the broader flattening trend rather than pointing to any single company's exit.

Corporate anchor
21 citations
on its lead filing

HRL Laboratories holds the second most-cited coating patent

HRL Laboratories' sintered hollow-microsphere barrier coating sits inside the dense C04B ceramics cluster and is the highest-cited coating-chemistry record behind the much older 1997 structural leading-edge patent.

Source: citation ranking
Inventor cluster
3 co-filings
Teague + Naik pair

A small inventor group co-files across structural-cooling claims

Teague, Naik and Loebig appear together across several of the strongest co-assignee pairs in this dataset, indicating a concentrated body of related filings around structural cooling and joining rather than one filed by a single large company alone.

Source: co-assignee pair analysis
Engine OEMs
0 in latest year
across tracked assignees

Established propulsion OEMs show no recent-year filing

General Electric, Pratt & Whitney Canada, United Technologies and Rolls-Royce entities all register zero filings in the latest tracked year in this dataset, matching the overall flattened trend since the 2020 peak.

Source: recent-year momentum by assignee
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
These sub-areas carry the thinnest IPC coverage in the dataset relative to the dominant gas-turbine and ceramics clusters.
ceramic-to-substrate braze bondinghollow-microsphere alternative pore structuresfuel-cooled nozzle coating durabilityadditive-manufactured graded lattice coatingspowder-metallurgy joining interfaces
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
HRL Laboratories, LLC0
General Electric Company0
Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp.0
TEAGUE CHARLES J0
NAIK SUBHASH K0
United Technologies Corporation0
Rolls-Royce plc0
Rolls-Royce North American Technologies, Inc.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Scramjet Thermal Barrier Coating covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next Steps

Where to take this analysis next

The filing and citation data point to specific follow-up work depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, white-space filing, or tracking a small group of active inventors.

Run a claim-chart comparison against the top-cited records

The 1997 structural leading-edge patent and the HRL Laboratories coating patent between them anchor most of the citation weight in this dataset. A detailed claim chart against both is the starting point for any freedom-to-operate check in this space.

Compare claims in Eureka

Test a first claim in the thinner IPC branches

Joining methods, powder metallurgy and fuel-supply-adjacent durability all show only 3 to 4 records apiece. Drafting and stress-testing a claim in one of these branches is a faster route to open ground than filing into the dominant gas-turbine or ceramics clusters.

Draft and test a claim in Eureka

Track the named-inventor cluster for new assignments

Teague, Naik and Loebig co-file repeatedly across the structural-cooling and joining claims in this dataset. Watching for new assignments or continuations tied to this group is a practical way to catch the next filing before it is widely cited.

Set up inventor tracking in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Scramjet Thermal Barrier Coating covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Scramjet Thermal Barrier Coating covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Scramjet Thermal Barrier Coating in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole scramjet thermal barrier coating corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.