Book a demo

Screw Compressor Noise & Vibration Patents: Who Leads 2026

Screw Compressor Noise & Vibration Patents: Who Leads 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/screw-compressor-noise-and-vibration-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Mechanical Engineering & Machinery
Screw compressor noise and vibration patents: where filings concentrate and where they don't
  • Filing has cooled since its 2017 peak of 7. the midpoint year 2022 sits at 4, and the trend through 2026 reads flat-to-declining rather than growing.
  • China dominates the filing map. 28 of the tracked records route through the Chinese receiving office, more than Japan (19), EPO (11) and the US (8) combined against the rest of the field.
  • Rotor tooth profile art is old and heavily cited. the most-cited records in this set date to 2010-2011 and concentrate on twin-screw rotor tooth form, a strong signal that this sub-area is densely occupied.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
78
Published Records
62%
Top-5 Share of All Records
0%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
CN
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this dataset covers

This landscape tracks 78 patent families filed or published against a search built around screw compressor construction combined with noise, vibration, pulsation and rotor whine reduction terms, restricted to IPC classes covering rotary-piston pumps and machines, positive-displacement hydraulic engines, refrigeration equipment, and vibration-isolation hardware. The core classification, F04C (rotary-piston pumps), accounts for every one of the 78 records, confirming the search is anchored correctly on the compressor mechanism itself rather than drifting into unrelated rotary machinery.

Coverage runs from 2015-01-01 through the 2026-07-31 cut-off. Because publication typically lags filing by roughly 18 months, the last one to two years in any trend chart will understate real filing activity and should be read as provisional rather than as a genuine falloff.

Filing activity, 2015-2026
  1. 1CARRIER CORP16
  2. 2GREE ELECTRIC APPLIANCE INC OF ZHUHAI13
  3. 3HITACHI LTD7
  4. 4DAIKIN INDUSTRIES LTD7
  5. 5浙江开山凯文螺杆机械有限公司5
  6. 6KOBE STEEL LTD5
  7. 7DALIAN REFRIGERATOR3
  8. 8Zhao Yuji2
  9. 9南通永力液压设备有限公司2
  10. 10MITSUBISHI HEAVY IND LTD2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Screw Compressor Noise and Vibration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 78-family set: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how records distribute across the IPC subclasses that make up this search.

A peak in 2017, then a plateau

Filings peaked at 7 in 2017 and the midpoint year, 2022, sits at 4 — a pattern consistent with a mature sub-field where the core mechanical approaches to noise and vibration control were staked out early and subsequent filing has been incremental rather than expansionary.

A peak in 2017, then a plateau02468720172018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Concentrated in one core classification

F04C (rotary-piston pumps) covers all 78 records, with much smaller counts spilling into F01C (rotary-piston machines, 9), F03C and F25B (2 each), and single-digit presence in F04B and F16C. The long tail into refrigeration and bearing/coupling classes suggests noise and vibration solutions here are usually claimed as compressor-integral features rather than as standalone damping or isolation hardware.

Concentrated in one core classificationF04C · Rotary-piston pumps78100.0%F01C · Rotary-piston machines911.5%F03C · Positive-displacement hydrauli…22.6%F25B · Refrigeration & heat pumps22.6%F04B · Positive-displacement pumps11.3%F16C · Shafts, bearings & couplings11.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 78 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Screw Compressor Noise and Vibration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Screw Compressor Noise and Vibration with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about screw compressor noise and vibration and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The most-cited prior art in this space

Representative filing
EP3330543B12021-09-08

EP3330543B1 — oil separation drum, screw compressor and air conditioning unit

GREE ELECTRIC APPLIANCES, INC. OF ZHUHAI

Filed by Gree Electric Appliances, this granted European family addresses oil separation drum construction within a screw compressor and its integration into an air-conditioning unit, touching the mechanical path between rotor operation and downstream vibration and noise transfer.Grant date and full claim scope are rendered separately; summary reflects the title and assignee only.

EP3330543B1 — patent drawing 1EP3330543B1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-cited records in the dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1CN102052322A一种双螺杆压缩机转子型线23
2US20100209280A1Screw compressor pulsation damper17
3CN101550935A双螺杆压缩机螺杆转子齿形15
4CN105041648A一种螺杆压缩机及其机体11
5CN1811185A双螺杆压缩机螺杆转子齿形11
6JP2009046983AScrew compressor9
7JP1984037290AScrew compressor8
8CN106050657A螺杆压缩机及其多级螺杆传动结构7
9JP1987007901ABalancing method for thrust of screw-type rotary machine7
10JP1989015482AContactless driving gear for screw compressor6

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations; treat this table as a map of influential prior art, not of current filing activity.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Screw Compressor Noise and Vibration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-outs from the trend, geography and citation data that matter more for strategy than the raw counts alone.

Filing momentum
7 → 0
peak (2017) to latest tracked year

Growth has stalled, not accelerated

The 2017 peak of 7 filings has not been matched since, and the midpoint year 2022 sits at only 4. Read the final one to two years cautiously given publication lag, but the multi-year trajectory before that lag window is genuinely flat.

Filing trend, 2015-2026
Geographic concentration
28 of 78
records via the Chinese receiving office

China is the primary filing venue

China accounts for more than a third of all tracked records, ahead of Japan (19), the EPO (11) and the US (8). Any freedom-to-operate check on new compressor noise-control hardware should start with Chinese-language prior art.

Receiving office distribution
Prior-art density
23 citations
top-cited record, rotor profile

Rotor tooth-form claims sit on old, dense art

The most-cited documents in this set are twin-screw rotor tooth-profile patents dating to 2009-2011. New filings that touch rotor meshing geometry as a noise-reduction mechanism are filing into already-crowded claim space.

Citation ranking
Classification spread
6 IPC subclasses
F04C, F01C, F03C, F25B, F04B, F16C

Solutions are compressor-integral, not standalone

Nearly all activity sits inside F04C itself, with only single-digit spillover into dedicated vibration-isolation or coupling classes. Noise and vibration control here is claimed mostly as a feature of the compressor mechanism, not as an add-on damping component.

IPC composition
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to screw compressor noise and vibration, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Screw Compressor Noise and Vibration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is active, and where the field is open

Recent-year momentum across the tracked assignees reads as uniformly flat: every named player in the leaderboard shows zero filings in the latest tracked year, including a -100% YoY drop for one long-standing filer. That is consistent with a field in a filing lull rather than one with an emerging leader pulling ahead.

Co-filing pattern
5 pairs
co-assignee relationships identified

Collaboration is limited and mostly internal

The strongest co-assignee links are an intra-group pairing between two Gree entities and a compressor maker paired with a named inventor, rather than cross-company joint development. Co-filing is not a major feature of this landscape.

Co-assignee analysis
Recent activity
0 in latest year
across every tracked assignee

No assignee is currently accelerating

Every major filer in the recent-momentum ranking, including established Japanese and Chinese compressor manufacturers, shows zero filings in the latest tracked year. Given the ~18-month publication lag, this likely reflects reporting delay as much as an actual pause.

Recent-year momentum
Geographic reach
6 receiving offices
CN, JP, EP, US, WO, IN

Filing strategy is regionally led, not global-by-default

China, Japan and Europe carry the bulk of the volume, with the US, PCT and India trailing well behind. A new entrant weighing where to file first should treat China and Japan as the offices where existing claim coverage is thickest.

Receiving office distribution
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
Sub-areas where the IPC spillover is thin relative to the core F04C volume
standalone pulsation dampers (separate from rotor form)vibration isolation mounts for compressor housingsrefrigeration-integrated noise damping (F25B overlap)bearing/coupling-level vibration transfer (F16C overlap)hydraulic-drive screw compressor noise control (F03C overlap)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Carrier Corporation0
Gree Electric Appliances, Inc. of Zhuhai0
Hitachi, Ltd.0
Daikin Industries, Ltd.0-100%
Kobe Steel, Ltd.0
Kaishan Holding Group Co., Ltd.0
Bingshan Cold & Heat Technology Co., Ltd.0
Zhao Yuji0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Screw Compressor Noise and Vibration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a mature, geographically concentrated field with dense prior art around rotor form and thin coverage in a handful of adjacent mechanical branches.

Check freedom-to-operate against Chinese filings first

With 28 of 78 records routed through China, any new rotor-form or pulsation-control concept should be checked against Chinese-language prior art before other jurisdictions.

Run a freedom-to-operate search

Map the under-claimed branches against your own design

Standalone damper hardware and vibration-isolation mounts show materially thinner IPC coverage than rotor-integral solutions, which may leave room for a defensible first claim.

Explore white space in Eureka

Watch for the publication-lag rebound

The apparent falloff after 2017 is partly a data artefact; filings from the last two years will continue to appear as they publish, so treat the current trend as a floor, not a ceiling.

Track filing trends over time
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Screw Compressor Noise and Vibration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Screw Compressor Noise and Vibration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Screw Compressor Noise and Vibration in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole screw compressor noise and vibration corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.