Screw Compressor Noise & Vibration Patents: Who Leads 2026
- Filing has cooled since its 2017 peak of 7. the midpoint year 2022 sits at 4, and the trend through 2026 reads flat-to-declining rather than growing.
- China dominates the filing map. 28 of the tracked records route through the Chinese receiving office, more than Japan (19), EPO (11) and the US (8) combined against the rest of the field.
- Rotor tooth profile art is old and heavily cited. the most-cited records in this set date to 2010-2011 and concentrate on twin-screw rotor tooth form, a strong signal that this sub-area is densely occupied.
What this dataset covers
This landscape tracks 78 patent families filed or published against a search built around screw compressor construction combined with noise, vibration, pulsation and rotor whine reduction terms, restricted to IPC classes covering rotary-piston pumps and machines, positive-displacement hydraulic engines, refrigeration equipment, and vibration-isolation hardware. The core classification, F04C (rotary-piston pumps), accounts for every one of the 78 records, confirming the search is anchored correctly on the compressor mechanism itself rather than drifting into unrelated rotary machinery.
Coverage runs from 2015-01-01 through the 2026-07-31 cut-off. Because publication typically lags filing by roughly 18 months, the last one to two years in any trend chart will understate real filing activity and should be read as provisional rather than as a genuine falloff.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 78-family set: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how records distribute across the IPC subclasses that make up this search.
A peak in 2017, then a plateau
Filings peaked at 7 in 2017 and the midpoint year, 2022, sits at 4 — a pattern consistent with a mature sub-field where the core mechanical approaches to noise and vibration control were staked out early and subsequent filing has been incremental rather than expansionary.
Concentrated in one core classification
F04C (rotary-piston pumps) covers all 78 records, with much smaller counts spilling into F01C (rotary-piston machines, 9), F03C and F25B (2 each), and single-digit presence in F04B and F16C. The long tail into refrigeration and bearing/coupling classes suggests noise and vibration solutions here are usually claimed as compressor-integral features rather than as standalone damping or isolation hardware.
Shares are the percentage of the 78 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Screw Compressor Noise and Vibration with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about screw compressor noise and vibration and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe most-cited prior art in this space
EP3330543B1 — oil separation drum, screw compressor and air conditioning unit
Filed by Gree Electric Appliances, this granted European family addresses oil separation drum construction within a screw compressor and its integration into an air-conditioning unit, touching the mechanical path between rotor operation and downstream vibration and noise transfer.Grant date and full claim scope are rendered separately; summary reflects the title and assignee only.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CN102052322A | 一种双螺杆压缩机转子型线 | 23 |
| 2 | US20100209280A1 | Screw compressor pulsation damper | 17 |
| 3 | CN101550935A | 双螺杆压缩机螺杆转子齿形 | 15 |
| 4 | CN105041648A | 一种螺杆压缩机及其机体 | 11 |
| 5 | CN1811185A | 双螺杆压缩机螺杆转子齿形 | 11 |
| 6 | JP2009046983A | Screw compressor | 9 |
| 7 | JP1984037290A | Screw compressor | 8 |
| 8 | CN106050657A | 螺杆压缩机及其多级螺杆传动结构 | 7 |
| 9 | JP1987007901A | Balancing method for thrust of screw-type rotary machine | 7 |
| 10 | JP1989015482A | Contactless driving gear for screw compressor | 6 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations; treat this table as a map of influential prior art, not of current filing activity.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three read-outs from the trend, geography and citation data that matter more for strategy than the raw counts alone.
Growth has stalled, not accelerated
The 2017 peak of 7 filings has not been matched since, and the midpoint year 2022 sits at only 4. Read the final one to two years cautiously given publication lag, but the multi-year trajectory before that lag window is genuinely flat.
China is the primary filing venue
China accounts for more than a third of all tracked records, ahead of Japan (19), the EPO (11) and the US (8). Any freedom-to-operate check on new compressor noise-control hardware should start with Chinese-language prior art.
Rotor tooth-form claims sit on old, dense art
The most-cited documents in this set are twin-screw rotor tooth-profile patents dating to 2009-2011. New filings that touch rotor meshing geometry as a noise-reduction mechanism are filing into already-crowded claim space.
Solutions are compressor-integral, not standalone
Nearly all activity sits inside F04C itself, with only single-digit spillover into dedicated vibration-isolation or coupling classes. Noise and vibration control here is claimed mostly as a feature of the compressor mechanism, not as an add-on damping component.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to screw compressor noise and vibration, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is active, and where the field is open
Recent-year momentum across the tracked assignees reads as uniformly flat: every named player in the leaderboard shows zero filings in the latest tracked year, including a -100% YoY drop for one long-standing filer. That is consistent with a field in a filing lull rather than one with an emerging leader pulling ahead.
Collaboration is limited and mostly internal
The strongest co-assignee links are an intra-group pairing between two Gree entities and a compressor maker paired with a named inventor, rather than cross-company joint development. Co-filing is not a major feature of this landscape.
No assignee is currently accelerating
Every major filer in the recent-momentum ranking, including established Japanese and Chinese compressor manufacturers, shows zero filings in the latest tracked year. Given the ~18-month publication lag, this likely reflects reporting delay as much as an actual pause.
Filing strategy is regionally led, not global-by-default
China, Japan and Europe carry the bulk of the volume, with the US, PCT and India trailing well behind. A new entrant weighing where to file first should treat China and Japan as the offices where existing claim coverage is thickest.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Carrier Corporation | 0 | — |
| Gree Electric Appliances, Inc. of Zhuhai | 0 | — |
| Hitachi, Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Daikin Industries, Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| Kobe Steel, Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Kaishan Holding Group Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Bingshan Cold & Heat Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Zhao Yuji | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to a mature, geographically concentrated field with dense prior art around rotor form and thin coverage in a handful of adjacent mechanical branches.
Check freedom-to-operate against Chinese filings first
With 28 of 78 records routed through China, any new rotor-form or pulsation-control concept should be checked against Chinese-language prior art before other jurisdictions.
Run a freedom-to-operate searchMap the under-claimed branches against your own design
Standalone damper hardware and vibration-isolation mounts show materially thinner IPC coverage than rotor-integral solutions, which may leave room for a defensible first claim.
Explore white space in EurekaWatch for the publication-lag rebound
The apparent falloff after 2017 is partly a data artefact; filings from the last two years will continue to appear as they publish, so treat the current trend as a floor, not a ceiling.
Track filing trends over timeCommon questions about this landscape
The tracked leaderboard includes established compressor and HVAC manufacturers such as Gree, Hitachi, Daikin, Kobe Steel and Kaishan, alongside Carrier working jointly with a named inventor. None of these assignees shows filing activity in the latest tracked year, which reflects both a general slowdown after the 2017 peak and the roughly 18-month lag between filing and publication. No single assignee holds a dominant share of the 78 tracked families; the field reads as fragmented across several established compressor makers rather than led by one company.
The dataset shows filings peaking at 7 in 2017 before settling into a lower, roughly flat pattern, with the 2022 midpoint at 4. This is consistent with a sub-field where the core mechanical approaches — rotor tooth profile control, pulsation damping and vibration isolation — were substantially claimed in the years following that peak, leaving less open ground for new filings. The apparent decline after 2017 should be read alongside publication lag, since the most recent one to two years in any dataset are always understated at the time of capture.
Rotor whine reduction generally targets the tonal noise generated by meshing rotor teeth and gas pulsation at the compression chamber, often addressed through rotor tooth profile design — the subject of the most-cited records in this dataset. Pulsation attenuation instead targets pressure pulsations in the discharge gas stream, typically handled with damper chambers or muffler-type structures downstream of the compression stage, as seen in patents like the pulsation damper record in this set. Both mechanisms contribute to overall compressor noise, but they are addressed with different hardware and are often claimed separately.
This dataset anchors on F04C (rotary-piston pumps), which covers all 78 tracked records and is the primary classification for screw compressor mechanism patents. Supporting classes worth checking include F01C (rotary-piston machines generally), F03C (positive-displacement hydraulic engines), F25B (refrigeration and heat pumps, relevant when the compressor sits inside a refrigeration circuit), F04B (positive-displacement pumps) and F16C (shafts, bearings and couplings) for vibration transfer at the mechanical interface. A thorough freedom-to-operate search should not stop at F04C alone, since noise and vibration solutions sometimes get classified under the downstream application rather than the compressor mechanism itself.
The flat-to-declining filing trend since 2017 and the concentration of citations on decade-old rotor tooth-profile patents suggest the most obvious mechanical routes are already densely claimed, particularly around rotor form and integral pulsation damping. However, the thin IPC spillover into standalone vibration-isolation mounts, bearing-level vibration transfer, and hydraulic-drive variants suggests these adjacent branches carry lighter patent density. A practitioner considering a new filing should map a specific concept against these thinner branches rather than against the crowded rotor-profile core.
Research Screw Compressor Noise and Vibration in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole screw compressor noise and vibration corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.